Explore the vast range of titles available.

To assess the national uptake of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes from 2016 to 2018 and the effect of infection prevention and control (IPC) hours on the implementation of the core elements. Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis. US nursing homes. We used the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Long-Term Care Facility Component annual surveys from 2016 to 2018 to assess nursing home characteristics and percent implementation of the core elements. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all 7 core elements while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. We included 7,506 surveys from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported implementation of all 7 core elements, a 28% increase from 2016. The greatest increases in implementation from 2016 to 2018 were in education (19%), reporting (18%), and drug expertise (15%). In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. Nursing homes that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% (95% confidence interval, 7%-20%) more likely to implement all 7 core elements when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation. Nursing homes reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016 to 2018. Improvements in access to drug expertise, education, and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and resource use among nursing home providers under new regulatory requirements. Nursing home stewardship programs may benefit from increased IPC staff hours.

Estimate changes in antibiotic prescribing among advanced practice clinicians (APCs)-nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)-compared to physicians in 2022 versus 2011 to inform antibiotic stewardship efforts. Retrospective descriptive analysis of antibiotic prescription rates for 2011 and 2022 using county-level prescription dispensing data by provider type from IQVIA Xponent® (numerator) and population census estimates (denominator). Prescribing rates among physicians and APCs (NPs and PAs) nationally, by state, and by rurality of county are reported. Overall outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates in 2022 declined by 19.2% compared to 2011, from 877 to 709 prescriptions per 1000 population. The physician rate declined by 45% (628 to 345 per 1000 population), whereas the rate for APCs rose by 104% (124 to 253 per 1000 population), particularly for NPs (148% increase from 65 to 161 per 1000 population). The increase in NP prescribing rates was distinctly higher in seven contiguous Southeastern states (163 to 393 per 1000 population from 2011 to 2022, respectively), where rates were higher within rural counties (range, 385 to 651 per 1000 population by state in 2022). APCs accounted for 1 in 3 outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in 2022, more than doubling their rate per capita over the past decade. This increase was especially prominent for NPs, particularly within the Southeast region, likely reflecting their growing role as rural primary care clinicians. Integration of APCs for outpatient antibiotic stewardship efforts is essential.

In 2022, uptake of all seven Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship were reported by 83% of US long-term care facilities. Though 98% of facilities reported access to an electronic health record, less than one-third utilized it for tracking antibiotic use, suggesting opportunities to leverage electronic data for automated reporting.

Long-term care pharmacy dispensing data from 2013 to 2021 were used to characterize antibiotic prescribing data in U.S. long-term care facilities. Overall antibiotic prescribing rates decreased from 2013 to 2021, mostly due to decreases in fluoroquinolones and macrolides. Tracking antibiotic use in long-term care settings can help identify opportunities for optimizing prescribing practices.

The 2007–2018 National Health Interview Survey data linked with Medicare claims were used to examine older adults’ characteristics and assess their associations with receiving an antibiotic prescription. This analysis shows variation in antibiotic prescribing among adults enrolled in Medicare Part D by race and ethnicity, sex, geography, and health status.

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use impacts patient safety and antimicrobial resistance patterns. In 2013, general dentists in the U.S. prescribed nearly 10% of all outpatient oral antibiotics (24.5 million prescriptions). The American Dental Association (ADA) published guidelines in 2019 recommending limited antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of dental pain and swelling. We characterized dental prescribing during 2018–2022 to assess whether antibiotic use decreased after the guideline’s release. In addition, we examined access to dental care. Methods: All antibiotic prescriptions dispensed during 2018–2022 were extracted from the IQVIA Xponent database, which captured ≥92% of all U.S. outpatient prescriptions and projected to 100% coverage. Prescriptions by general dentists were compared to total outpatient oral antibiotic prescriptions and summarized by patient sex, patient age, and prescriber geographic region. Census denominators were used to calculate prescribing rates per 1,000 persons. IQVIA general dentist counts were used to calculate dentists per 100,000 persons. Results: General dentists prescribed 24.7 million antibiotic prescriptions in 2018 (75 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) compared with 25.2 million (76 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) in 2022. During 2020–2022, general dentists prescribed >10% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions (range 10.7%–12.1%). In each year, prescription rates were higher for females, patients > 65 years, and among prescribers in the Northeast. In 2022, there were 58 general dentists per 100,000 persons in the United States. The highest general dentist rate was in District of Columbia (100 per 100,000 persons) and the lowest rate was in Delaware (41 per 100,000 persons). Conclusions: Despite the ADA’s 2019 guidelines, prescribing by general dentists remained stable during 2018–2022. Because the total number of antibiotic prescriptions overall decreased, general dentists’ share of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions increased to >10% in recent years. Rate variation by patient characteristics and prescriber region may reflect differences in dental disease burden or may represent unnecessary antibiotic use. Dental antibiotic stewardship is needed, including dissemination and implementation of current prescribing guidelines. Further evaluation of prescribing indications and access to dental care is needed to inform dental stewardship priorities.

Background: The number of advanced practice providers (APPs)—nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)—continues to expand across the United States. Several studies suggest differences in antibiotic prescribing rates and appropriateness by APPs compared to physicians. The objective of this analysis is to characterize population- and provider-specific outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates among physicians and APPs nationally, by state, and within urban versus rural counties. Methods: We estimated outpatient oral antibiotic prescription rates for 2011 and 2022 using county-level prescription dispensing data from IQVIA Xponent® (numerator) and population census estimates (denominator). Provider specialty denominators were provided by IQVIA, based on data from the American Medical Association. Counties were classified as urban or rural per the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics classification. National and state-level prescription volume, rates per 1000 population, and average number of prescriptions per provider were calculated for physicians, NPs, and PAs. We assessed the degree to which provider-specific rates explained the variance of the overall rate by state, using the coefficient of determination (r2) from Pearson’s correlation. Results: Between 2011 and 2022, overall U.S. antibiotic prescribing declined from 877 to 709 per 1000 population, a 19.2% relative reduction. The provider-specific proportion of the overall prescribing rate relatively decreased by 32% for physicians but increased by 157% for APPs (NPs 229%, PAs 86%; Figure 1). State-level antibiotic prescribing rates varied by provider type for both years, shifting towards proportionally greater APP prescribing in 2022 (Figure 2). For 2011 and 2022, physician prescribing rate strongly correlated with the overall state rate (r2 = 0.83 in 2011 versus 0.80 in 2022), whereas the correlation of the NP prescribing rate increased (r2 = 0.20 in 2011 versus 0.76 in 2022). A total of 60,327 (7.2%) physicians practiced in rural settings in contrast to 42,876 (12%) NPs and 14,495 (9.4%) PAs in 2022. Providers in rural counties prescribed more antibiotics per provider on average compared to urban counties; rural physicians prescribed 57% more antibiotics per provider (207 vs 132 antibiotics per provider), rural NPs prescribed 115% more (284 vs 132), and rural PAs prescribed 53% more (289 vs 189). Conclusions: The relative contribution of APPs to outpatient antibiotic prescriptions more than doubled over the past decade, accounting for 1 in 3 prescriptions in 2022. This contribution was especially prominent among NPs in rural counties. Further evaluation of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness among APPs and integration of APPs into antibiotic stewardship efforts in various settings.

We updated a descriptive analysis of national outpatient antibiotic prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prescribing volume was lower during 2020 and January–June in 2021 and 2022 compared to corresponding baseline months in 2019. Prescribing approached or exceeded baseline during July–December of 2021 and 2022 for all antibiotics, especially for azithromycin.

The distributions of antibiotic prescriptions by geography, antibiotic class, and prescriber specialty are similar in the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D Prescriber Public Use Files and IQVIA Xponent dataset. Public health organizations and healthcare systems can use these data to track antibiotic use and guide antibiotic stewardship interventions for older adults.

Background: Antibiotic use (AU) data are needed to improve prescribing in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). CMS requires AU tracking in LTCFs (effective 2017). Although most LTCFs have limited resources for AU tracking, LTCFs contract with LTCF pharmacies to dispense, monitor, and review medications. The objective of our analysis was to report LTCF antibiotic prescribing and characterize temporal changes from 2013 to 2021. Methods: We estimated annual systemic AU rates using prescription dispenses and resident census data from PharMerica, a LTCF-pharmacy services provider that covers ~20% of LTCFs nationwide, although the number of LTCFs and residents serviced by PharMerica varied over time (Fig. 1). We included LTCFs with ≥4 months of antibiotic dispensing and 12 months of census data. We identified courses by collapsing the same drug dispensed to the same resident within 3 days of the preceding end date. Course duration was calculated as the difference between the end and dispense dates. We reported yearly AU rates as courses per 1,000 residents and days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 resident days from 2013 to 2021. We compared AU rates (percentage change) and antibiotic courses by class and agent (absolute percent difference) between 2013 and 2021. Results: From 2013 to 2021, AU course rates reported as antibiotic courses per 1,000 residents decreased (percentage change, −28%), with a notable increase in 2020 (Fig. 1). However, the median course duration remained the same (Table 1). The AU decline was mostly driven by decreases in fluoroquinolone courses (absolute difference, −10%, most commonly levofloxacin) and macrolide courses (−2%, most commonly azithromycin) (Figs. 2 and 3). Increases in cephalosporin courses (absolute difference, +7%, most commonly cephalexin) and tetracycline courses (+5%, most commonly doxycycline) were also observed (Figs. 2 and 3). During this period, AU DOT rates reported as DOT per 1,000 resident days decreased (percentage change, −13%) (Table 1). Conclusions: The LTCF AU rates, especially for fluoroquinolones, have decreased in recent years with associated shifts in the distribution of antibiotic classes. This finding may be due to CMS stewardship requirements and increased awareness of adverse events, including the FDA fluoroquinolone warnings. The observed increase in 2020 could be secondary to changes in prescribing practices and resident population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Opportunities to improve prescribing in LTCFs include optimizing treatment duration and leveraging LTCF-pharmacy resources to provide stewardship expertise and support AU tracking and reporting. Disclosures: None