Explore the vast range of titles available.

\"This book explores leadership and management in social sector organizations, which include, NGOs, non-profits, social enterprises, social businesses, and cross-sector collaborations focusing on advancing human dignity and social justice. It provides social sector leaders with an overview of current trends, issues, and challenges in the field as well as best practices to foster effective programs, sustain organizations and meet the growing demands of the sector. The enclosed chapters cover topics such as cross-sector organizational design, innovation for client services, gender management dynamics, policy advocacy, and the growing social entrepreneurship movement.\"--Publisher's website.

We investigated the social relations shaping the reproductive health care experiences of women with female genital cutting (FGC) in Toronto, Canada. Using Institutional Ethnography, we interviewed eight women with FGC and seven obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYN). We found a disjuncture between women’s needs during appointments that extended beyond the reproductive body and range of care that doctors were able to provide. Women engaged in emotional healthwork during appointments by explaining FGC to doctors, reading doctors’ body language, and getting through vulvar/vaginal examinations. Women reported that if they had emotional reactions during appointments, they were often referred to a mental health specialist, a referral on which they did not act. OB/GYNs described their specialty as “surgical”—training centered around treating reproductive abnormalities and not mental health issues. Therefore, the disjuncture between women’s needs and OB/GYNs’ institutional training highlights the difficulties inherent when bodies of “difference” encounter the reproductive health care system.

“Undetectable equals Untransmittable”, or U=U, is a public health message designed to reduce HIV stigma and help communicate the scientific consensus that HIV cannot be sexually transmitted when a person living with HIV has an undetectable viral load. Between October 2020-February 2021 we conducted 11 in-depth interviews and 3 focus groups with diverse HIV/STI service providers (nurses, public health workers, physicians, frontline providers, and sexual health educators) in Ontario, Canada (n = 18). Our objective was to understand how U=U was communicated to sexual health service users in healthcare interactions. Interview questions were embedded in a larger study focused on improving access to HIV/STI testing. Transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analysed following grounded theory. Most providers emphasized the significance of U=U as a biomedical advancement in HIV prevention but had some challenges communicating U=U in everyday practice. We discovered four interrelated barriers when communicating the U=U message: (1) provider-perceived challenges with “zero risk” messaging (e.g., wanting to “leave a margin” of HIV risk); (2) service users not interested in receiving sexual health information (e.g., in order to provide “client centered care” some providers do not share U=U messages if service users are only interested in HIV/STI testing or if other discussions must be prioritized); (3) skepticism and HIV stigma from service users (e.g., providers explained how the hesitancy of some service users accepting the U=U message was shaped by a legacy of HIV prevention messages and persistent HIV stigma); and (4) need for more culturally appropriate resources (e.g., communities other than sexual and gender minority men; non-English speaking service users; that account for broader legal context). We discuss ways to overcome barriers to communicating the U=U message as well as the limitations and potential unintended consequences of U=U framings in the context of unequal access to HIV prevention and treatment.

Trans masculine, two-spirit, and non-binary people who are gay, bisexual or otherwise have sex with men (TGBM) are under-tested for sexually transmitted infections (STI) and may face complex, intersectional barriers that prevent them from accessing STI testing. As part of a study on gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men’s (GBM) experiences of current STI testing systems in Ontario, Canada, this paper reports on the findings from TGBM participants’ experiences with in-person STI testing in a range of venues (i.e. Family doctors, walk-in clinics, and community-based organizations) to explore testing barriers specific to TGBM. Using a community-based research approach, between June 2020 and December 2021 peer researchers who identified as GBM conducted focus groups and interviews with 38 cis and trans GBM, 13 of whom identified as TGBM. Data were analyzed following grounded theory. When questioned about past experiences with testing, TGBM participants reported several barriers to STI testing within current testing models in Ontario due to cisnormativity and heteronormativity. Cisnormativity is the assumption that everyone identifies as the gender they were assigned at birth, and those who do not are considered “abnormal”, while heteronormativity is when it is assumed that everyone is heterosexual. From our research we identified three overarching themes concerning testing barriers among TGBM participants: (1) non-inclusive clinic environments, (2) lack of provider knowledge and competency, and (3) legal documentation. Inherent cis and heteronormativity in healthcare institutions appear to be factors shaping the historical under-testing for STI in the TGBM population. These findings suggest the relevance of implementing trans-specific clinical practices that reduce the stigma and barriers faced by TGBM in STI testing contexts, including: hosting all-gender testing hours, opening more LGBTQ+ clinics, offering training in transgender health to testing providers, and conducting a review of how gender markers on health documents can be more inclusive of trans, two-spirit, and non-binary communities.

Dating apps are virtual sociosexual networking platforms that facilitate varying social and sexual relationships and have considerably changed the way that many queer individuals form social, sexual, and romantic connections. Despite evidence that social media use can be associated with either diminished or improved mental health, few studies have explored the association between dating apps and mental health among queer adults. Using reparative theory and a transformative paradigm, this research sought to critically explore the association between dating apps and mental health among queer adults in Canada.. We used a convergent mixed methods design comprising an online survey (N=250) and one-on-one interviews (subsample of n=22) among queer adults from across Canada. Participants were recruited using Grindr advertisements and selected for diverse identities. The survey and interview collected information on dating app use and mental health. A structural equation model assessed the association between dating app use and mental health symptoms and the mediating role of discrimination and community connectedness. Hybrid reflexive thematic analysis of interviews elucidated how power and marginalization are negotiated, resisted, and refused in everyday app use. Participants used an average of 3.22 (SD 1.78) dating apps, most commonly for casual sex (208/249, 83.5%). Dating app use was associated with increased life satisfaction (β=0.31, 95% CI 0.32-1.12; P<.001) and self-esteem (β=0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.38; P=.02) but not with depression (β=-0.16, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.02; P=.07) or anxiety (β=-0.11, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.10; P=.20). Discrimination and seeking social approval were associated with adverse mental health. Although seeking friendship was the least commonly reported motivation (98/249, 39.4%), interviewees described making friends unintentionally through intimate experiences. Increased community connection was associated with heightened life satisfaction (β=0.18, 95% CI 0.14-0.82; P=.01) and self-esteem (β=0.13, 95% CI 0.004-0.28; P=.04). Interviewees described managing negative impacts of use by adjusting expectations, using technological features to avoid unwanted interactions, and welcoming unexpected interactions in addition to their desired connections from use. Participant accounts of the inconsistent and evolving ways to use dating apps revealed the complex relationship between app use and well-being. Queer peoples use dating apps conscientiously, leveraging hope and serendipity to stumble upon novel and welcomed connections. Queer peoples use strategies to promote their well-being while navigating this threatening internet-based sociosexual space. The mixed methods approach provides nuance to the relationship between dating app use and well-being, underscoring the context-dependent and temporally dynamic association between them.

Background Birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) remain essential components of maternal survival strategies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Suboptimal antenatal education contributes significantly to delayed recognition of obstetric danger signs and late care-seeking. Delays in recognising obstetric danger signs and seeking care contribute to high maternal mortality in LMICs. Culturally tailored antenatal education packages have been increasingly used to improve BPCR; however, evidence across LMICs has not been systematically synthesised. Objective To synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of culturally appropriate antenatal education interventions on BPCR outcomes among pregnant women in LMICs. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA 2020 and JBI guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, AJOL, and Google Scholar (January 2015–July 2025) for English-language studies on antenatal education interventions reporting BPCR outcomes in LMICs. Two reviewers screened titles/abstracts, assessed full texts, appraised quality (JBI checklists), and extracted data for narrative synthesis due to heterogeneity. Results Eleven studies ( n  = 5,802; quasi-experimental n  = 4, cross-sectional n  = 4, cohort n  = 2, community-based n  = 1) from Ethiopia (3), Nigeria (3), Tanzania (2), Cameroon (1), Kenya (1), Bangladesh (1) showed consistent improvements: danger sign knowledge up to 85% (mobile SMS, Tanzania), BPCR practices 25–95% (e.g., goal-oriented education, Nigeria: 65.5% to 95.3%), institutional delivery 53.5% to 93.5%. Predictors include early ANC, partner involvement and local languages. Quality: low-moderate risk of bias. Conclusions Culturally matched antenatal classes help pregnant women in low-income countries better prepare for childbirth and emergencies, improving knowledge by up to 85% and care-seeking behaviour by 25–95%. This review of 11 studies supports the use of local languages, family involvement, and phone messages in routine prenatal care to save lives. More high-quality trials are needed.

Background Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 in Canada, the availability of sexual health services including sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection (STBBI) testing has been negatively impacted in the province of Ontario due to their designation as “non-essential” health services. As a result, many individuals wanting to access sexual healthcare continued to have unmet sexual health needs throughout the pandemic. In response to this, sexual health service providers have adopted alternative models of testing, such as virtual interventions and self-sampling/testing. Our objective was to investigate service providers’ experiences of disruptions to STBBI testing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada, and their acceptability of alternative testing services. Methods Between October 2020-February 2021, we conducted semi-structured virtual focus groups (3) and in-depth interviews (11) with a diverse group of sexual health service providers ( n  = 18) including frontline workers, public health workers, sexual health nurses, physicians, and sexual health educators across Ontario. As part of a larger community-based research study, data collection and analysis were led by three Peer Researchers and a Community Advisory Board was consulted throughout the research process. Transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo software following grounded theory. Results Service providers identified the reallocation of public health resources and staff toward COVID-19 management, and closures, reduced hours, and lower in-person capacities at sexual health clinics as the causes for a sharp decline in access to sexual health testing services. Virtual and self-sampling interventions for STBBI testing were adopted to increase service capacity while reducing risks of COVID-19 transmission. Participants suggested that alternative models of testing were more convenient, accessible, safe, comfortable, cost-effective, and less onerous compared to traditional clinic-based models, and that they helped fill the gaps in testing caused by the pandemic. Conclusions Acceptability of virtual and self-sampling interventions for STBBI testing was high among service providers, and their lived experiences of implementing such services demonstrated their feasibility in the context of Ontario. There is a need to approach sexual health services as an essential part of healthcare and to sustain sexual health services that meet the needs of diverse individuals.

Digital sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection (STBBIs) testing services are used to improve testing access, but might replicate existing social inequities. Previous research has shown that the digital STBBI testing service GetCheckedOnline has improved access to testing in British Columbia (BC), Canada. As part of the program's continuous evaluation, we examined awareness and use of the service in 5 urban, suburban, and rural communities where the program has expanded. This study aimed to determine if social location is associated with differences in awareness and use of the service in 5 communities outside Vancouver, BC. From July to September 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey recruiting (in-person and online) sexually active people aged 16 years or older in 5 urban, suburban, and rural communities where GetCheckedOnline had sample collection sites available at the time. We examined differences in awareness and use by age, gender identity, sexual identity, race/ethnicity, education, and income using logistic regression models informed by the Health Equity Measurement Framework. Of the 1658 participants (n=1058, 63.8% in-person and n=600, 36.2% online), 35.3% (586/1658) were aware of GetCheckedOnline and 19.5% (324/1658) had used it. Awareness and use were lower in the first and last age quartiles compared to the second quartile (>38 years: awareness odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% CI 0.17-0.32; use OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.12-0.28; <25 years: awareness OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.53; use OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.41). Awareness and use were also lower in the lowest income group compared to the highest (awareness OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.65; use OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.65). Awareness and use were higher among genderfluid, genderqueer, and nonbinary participants compared to men (awareness OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.63-3.18; use OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.36-2.84), transgender compared to cisgender participants (awareness OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.54-3.06; use OR 2.15, 95% CI 0.46-3.13), and nonheterosexual compared to heterosexual participants (awareness OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.89-2.97; use OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.91-3.38). People of color had higher awareness and use vs White participants (awareness OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.34-2.26; use OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.72). Indigenous participants had higher awareness than White participants (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.19-2.20) but no difference in use. Women had similar awareness but lower use compared to men (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92). GetCheckedOnline is an equitable means of access to STBBI testing for some but not all equity-owed groups in BC. Further adaptations should consider factors such as differences in material circumstances to improve its accessibility for all.

Digital technologies are reshaping health care, making digital health literacy (DHL) a critical competency for navigating online health information. Although widely conceived and measured as a unidimensional measure of DHL, the literature increasingly supports a multidimensional framing of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS). Studies propose alternative factor structures that can better inform population-level interventions, but these studies have not accounted for the ordinal nature of eHEALS response data. This study aimed to identify and validate an alternate multidimensional structure of eHEALS accounting for its ordinal response scale. Data were drawn from the 2022 GetCheckedOnline community survey of consenting English-speaking British Columbia residents aged ≥16 years who reported sexual activity in the past 12 months. Participants were recruited through geo-targeted digital advertisements, community outreach, and in-person recruitment at public events, and community locations. DHL was measured using eHEALS, with responses collected on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics summarized eHEALS responses using means, medians, and IQRs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess the scale's structure using polychoric correlations and standard model fit indices. Reliability and validity were evaluated using polychoric ordinal alpha, average variance extracted, and composite reliability, with missing data addressed via multiple imputation. Overall, 1657 participants met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 33.0 (SD 11.77, 95% CI 32.4-33.6) years. Among these 47.3% (95% CI 44.9%-49.7%) identified as women, 30.4% (95% CI 28.1%-32.6%) identified as racialized minorities, 80.5% (95% CI 78.5%-82.3%) reported easy internet access, and 32.2% (95% CI 30.0%-34.5%) had a bachelor's degree or higher. Across eHEALS items, median scores were 4.0 (IQR 1.0-2.0) with excellent internal consistency (polychoric ordinal α=.92). Exploratory factor analysis supported a 3-factor solution explaining 65.7% of the variance, demonstrated through confirmatory factor analysis (χ² =71.7, P<.001, root-mean-square error of approximation=0.059, standardized root-mean-square residual=0.026, comparative fit index=0.969, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.948). The final model included Information Navigation (standardized loadings=0.765-0.917), Resource Appraisal (0.825-0.892), and Confidence in Use (0.803 for both items), with composite reliability (0.784-0.900), and average variance extracted (0.503-0.738) supporting construct validity. This study confirms a multidimensional structure of eHEALS, identifying Information Navigation, Resource Appraisal, and Confidence in Use as key dimensions of DHL. This revised model enhances measurement precision, enabling more accurate identification of populations with limited DHL and informing the development of targeted, equity-oriented interventions. Future research should aim to confirm this multidimensional structure in more diverse populations and explore how distinct DHL domains influence access to digital health services in various contexts. Additionally, ongoing scale development must adapt to account for the role of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and social media algorithms in health care.

Previous research has established that gender and sexual minority (2SLGBTQ+) youth experience worse mental health and substance use outcomes than their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. Research suggests that mental health and substance use concerns have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study used self-reported online survey responses from 1404 Canadian 2SLGBTQ+ youth which included, but were not limited to, questions regarding previous mental health experiences, diagnoses, and substance use. Additional questions assessed whether participants had expressed a need for mental health and/or substance use resources since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) and whether they had experienced barriers when accessing this care. Bivariate and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between variables and expressing a need for resources as well as experiencing barriers to accessing these resources. Bivariate analyses revealed multiple sociodemographic, mental health, and substance use variables significantly associated with both expressing a need for and experiencing barriers to care. Multinomial regression analysis revealed gender identity, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and level of educational attainment to be significantly correlated with both cases. This study supports growing research on the mental health-related harms that have been experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and could be used to inform tailored intervention plans for the 2SLGBTQ+ youth population.