Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
568 result(s) for "Graham, Daniel W"
Sort by:
Explaining the cosmos
Explaining the Cosmos is a major reinterpretation of Greek scientific thought before Socrates. Focusing on the scientific tradition of philosophy, Daniel Graham argues that Presocratic philosophy is not a mere patchwork of different schools and styles of thought. Rather, there is a discernible and unified Ionian tradition that dominates Presocratic debates. Graham rejects the common interpretation of the early Ionians as \"material monists\" and also the view of the later Ionians as desperately trying to save scientific philosophy from Parmenides' criticisms. In Graham's view, Parmenides plays a constructive role in shaping the scientific debates of the fifth century BC. Accordingly, the history of Presocratic philosophy can be seen not as a series of dialectical failures, but rather as a series of theoretical advances that led to empirical discoveries. Indeed, the Ionian tradition can be seen as the origin of the scientific conception of the world that we still hold today.
Early Greek Philosophy, Volume I: Introductory and Reference Materials trans. and ed. by André Laks and Glenn W. Most (review)
Furthermore, \"Pre-Socratics\" such as Democritus were contemporaries of Socrates, and indeed some of the tribe of Pre-Socratics lived in the mid- and late-fourth century, long after Socrates' death. Because of such considerations, Laks and Most avoid the term \"Pre-Socratic\" as much as possible (1: 6–7), thinking of their subjects as Pre-Platonic, and (as we shall see) including Socrates within their purview. In general, Laks and Most's Early Greek Philosophy provides an expansive and rich collection of texts covering the sources of early Greek philosophy. Besides the expected Greek and Latin sources, Laks and Most also provide a number of texts from Arabic, Syriac, and Armenian sources, translated by other scholars. According to B12, \"It is always different waters that flow toward those who step into the same rivers.\" [...]the Greek, ποταμοῖσι τοῖσιν αὐτοῖσιν ἐμβαίνουσιν ἕτερα καὶ ἕτερα ὕδατα ἐπιρρεῖ, locates the phrase \"the same\" between the noun before it and the participle after it in such a way that it could modify either, as Charles Kahn has pointed out. [...]a secondary meaning of the sentence is, \"On the same people entering the rivers different waters flow.\"
SOCRATES AS A DEONTOLOGIST
[...]there is no strict characterization of teleology or consequentialism that all modem interpreters adhere to.II There is one Socratic dialogue of Plato's that shows Socrates making a selfconscious moral deliberation about his own future action under trying circumstances: the Crito.Because of its narrow focus on one situation, this dialogue provides the best place to observe Socratic moral theory in action.[...]it is not the work of justice to harm people, even enemies who are bad.13 This argument could focus on the issue of introducing more bad than good into the world.[...]I suggest we reject psychological egoism for a view I shall call psychological agathism, namely, that people act to bring about the good simpliciter.
On the Date of Chaerephon's Visit to Delphi
According to Socrates' narration of events in the Apology, (a) his old friend Chaerephon took it upon himself to inquire of the oracle at Delphi if anyone was wiser than Socrates. In the Peace of Nicias that ended the Archidamian War, the very first article, significandy, ensured safe passage \"by land and by sea to all who wish to sacrifice, travel, consult an oracle, or watch athletic competitions\" to the \"common sanctuaries,\" and the second article promised independent governance to Delphi (Thuc. 5.18.1-2).45 Evidendy access to the oracle was one of the main demands of the Athenians after a long interdiction. [...]any solution to the dating of the oracle will need to take into account the problem of access to the oracle during times of war. According to one reading of the inscription LSCG 78, which details the Amphictionic Law of 388 b.c.e., the Pythian games customarily lasted a full calendar year.50 If this were the case, the duration of this truce exceeded that of the other Panhellenic festivals.51 Regardless of the precise length of time allocated, at the occasion of the Delphic games, travelers were guaranteed a safe journey to and from Delphi. There is one possible practical problem for this account. Since the oracle was available for consultation only one day per month, and Delphi was crowded with pilgrims and sports fans around the time of the Pythian games, it would be difficult to get into the queue for the oracle.
On the Date of Chaerephon's Visit to Delphi
When did the oracle at Delphi tell Chaerephon that no one was wiser than Socrates (if at all)? Scholars have defended dates of 431 B.C.E. or earlier, and 421 or later, but these dates do not accord well with events of Socrates' life. We propose a date of 426, during the sacred truce for the Pythian games.
Does Nature Love to Hide? Heraclitus B123 DK
  The three-word fragment of Heraclitus is regularly translated in a straightforward manner like the one used by Charles Kahn: Nature loves to hide. Graham argues that despite its popularity, the reading of the fragment by Diels-Kranz is a mistake since the literal translation of the verb loves or the like has been popular among English-language translations.
SOCRATES ON SAMOS
Ion of Chios [says] while he [Socrates] was still young he made a trip to Samos with Archelaus. (Diogenes Laertius 2.23). Most students of Socrates have read over this biographical report many times without taking serious notice of it. But perhaps they have been hasty.