Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: the aim of this study was to investigate the neurophysiological effect of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on central and peripheral levels in migraine patients. Methods: An observational cohort study in patients with migraine was performed. All subjects underwent Single-Pulse and Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, as well as a Pressure Pain Threshold assessment. The same protocol was repeated three and four months after the first injection of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Results: A total of 11 patients with a diagnosis of migraine and 11 healthy controls were enrolled. The main findings of this study are the significant effects of anti-CGRP mAb treatment on the TMS parameters of intracortical inhibition and the rise in the resting motor threshold in our group of patients affected by resistant migraine. The clinical effect of therapy on migraine is associated with the increase in short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), resting motor threshold (RMT), and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT). In all patients, all clinical headache parameters improved significantly 3 months after the first injection of mAbs and the improvement was maintained at the 1-month follow-up. At baseline, migraineurs and HCs had significant differences in all TMS parameters and in PPT, while at follow-up assessment, no differences were observed on RMT, SICI, and PPT between the two groups. After anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody injection, a significant increase in the intracortical inhibition, in the motor threshold, and in the Pressure Pain Threshold in critical head areas was observed in patients with migraine, which was related to significant clinical benefits. Conclusions: Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies improved clinical and neurophysiological outcomes, reflecting a normalization of cortical excitability and peripheral and central sensitization. By directly acting on the thalamus or hypothalamus and indirectly on the trigeminocervical complex, treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies may modulate central sensorimotor excitability and peripheral sensitization pain.

Background Rimegepant, a novel oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, has been recently approved for the acute migraine treatment. While its efficacy was confirmed in randomized clinical trials, no data is available regarding real-life effectiveness and tolerability. GAINER, a prospective, multicentric study, aimed to evaluate rimegepant effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting. Methods Our study involved 16 headache centers across Italy. The main outcomes were: i) 2 h pain freedom, and ii) occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events after administration. Participants were instructed to treat one migraine attack with rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet. Using an ad hoc diary, participants prospectively collected migraine attack features at baseline and every 30 min after rimegepant administration, up to 2 h post dose. A 24 h follow up was also collected. Results We enrolled 103 participants with migraine (74.8% female, mean age 44.4 [42.0 – 46.7] years, 24.3% with chronic migraine of whom 44.0% presented a concomitant diagnosis of medication overuse headache). The number of previously failed preventive classes was 2.7 [2.3 – 3.2]. Participants presented a mean of 9.6 [8.2 – 10.9] monthly migraine days at baseline. At rimegepant intake, 40.8% of patients rated migraine intensity as severe. Pain freedom 2 h post dose was reported in 44.7% (46/103) of individuals. Pain freedom 2 h post dose was not influenced by baseline pain severity ( p  = 0.316), but it was associated with timing of intake ( p  = 0.032) with a higher rate of 2 h pain freedom when rimegepant was taken within 1 h from pain onset. Mild adverse events were reported in 15.5% total attacks (16/103), predominantly fatigue ( n  = 6), gastrointestinal symptoms ( n  = 6), somnolence ( n  = 4), and transient cognitive difficulties ( n  = 3). Tolerability was rated as good-to-excellent in 85.4% cases (88/103). Conclusions Our data confirms rimegepant effectiveness and safety in the acute migraine treatment in a real-world setting in a cohort of participants that includes subjects with episodic or chronic migraine, medication overuse and a high number of prior preventive treatment failures. Trial registration The study was preregistered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05903027.

Background: Lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT1F receptor agonist, has been recently approved for acute migraine treatment. While its efficacy was confirmed in randomized clinical trials, scarce data is available regarding effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting. Objectives: To evaluate lasmiditan effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting in 16 Italian headache centers. Design: LasmiDitan as Acute migRaine Treatment (DART) study is a prospective, multicentric, observational study. Methods: We enrolled 58 participants with migraine (84.5% females, age 49.0 (45.2–52.9) years, 24.1% with chronic migraine) reporting 9.4 (7.4–11.3) monthly migraine days. Participants were instructed to treat their migraine attacks with oral lasmiditan 50 or 100 mg. Using an ad hoc electronic diary, participants prospectively collected migraine attack features at baseline and every 30 min after lasmiditan administration, up to 2 h post-dose. The primary outcome was 2-h pain freedom for the first-treated attack after lasmiditan intake. We also collected the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) after administration. Results: Overall, participants treated 100 attacks, of which 58 first-treated attacks. Regarding first-treated attacks, 44.8% of subjects rated migraine intensity as severe at lasmiditan intake. Pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was reported in 32.8% (19/58) of individuals and was associated with baseline pain intensity, being higher in subjects treating a mild/moderate attack (p = 0.044). Conversely, it was not influenced by timing of intake (p = 0.375), dosage (p = 0.727), or previous triptan failure (p = 0.351). Regarding all-treated attacks, pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was 37.0% (37/100). At least one AE was reported by 53.4% of participants (31/58), predominantly asthenia, dizziness, somnolence, anxiety or agitation, and paresthesia. Tolerability was rated as good-to-excellent by 51.8% of subjects. Conclusion: Our study supports clinical effectiveness of oral lasmiditan 50 and 100 mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Lasmiditan effectiveness was not associated with the previous triptan failure and may therefore represent a valuable therapeutic option in subjects who did not benefit from, or have contraindications to, triptans. Trail registration: The study was preregistered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05903040 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05903040?cond=migraine&intr=lasmiditan&rank=5).

BackgroundCentral and peripheral sensitization are characterized by widespread hyperalgesia that is manifested by larger pain extent area and reduction in pressure pain threshold (PPT). PPT decreases in patients with migraine not only over the trigeminal cervical complex but also throughout the body.MethodsA cross-sectional study was adopted to assess the local and widespread hyperalgesia in chronic and episodic migraine patients respect to healthy controls. The guidelines of Andersen’s were used to evaluate the PPT bilaterally over 3 muscles in the trigemino-cervical complex (temporalis, sub-occipitalis, trapezius) and over 1 muscle far from this area (tensor fasciae latae).ResultsThirty subjects with episodic migraine (35.8 ± 2.82 years), 30 with chronic migraine (53.03 ± 19.79 years), and 30 healthy controls (29.06 ± 14.03 years) were enrolled. The interaction effect was present for the trapezius muscle with a significant difference between the right and the left side in episodic group (p = 0.003). A group effect was highlighted in all four muscles analyzed such as suboccipital (p < 0.001), temporalis (p > 0.001), trapezius (p < 0.001), and TFL (p < 0.001). PPT was usually higher in the control group than in the episodic group which in turn was characterized by higher PPT values than the chronic group.ConclusionsPeople with chronic and episodic migraine presented lower PPT than healthy controls both in the trigeminal and in the extra-trigeminal area. People with chronic migraine presented lower PPT than episodic migraine only in the trigeminal area. Temporalis and sub-occipitalis are the most sensitive muscles in people with chronic and episodic migraine.

The main aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a dual task protocol in people with episodic migraine with respect to both active exercises only and cognitive task only treatments, concerning some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes. A randomized control trial was adopted in people with episodic migraine without aura. Some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes were collected (t0): resting motor threshold (rMT), short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF), pressure pain threshold (PPT), trail making test (TMT), frontal assessment battery (FAB), headache-related disability (MIDAS) and headache parameters. Then, participants were randomized into three groups: active exercise only (n = 10), cognitive task only (n = 10) and dual task protocol (n = 10). After 3 months of each treatment and after 1-month follow-up the same neurophysiological and clinical outcomes were revaluated. A significant time x group effect was only found for the trapezius muscle (p = 0.012, pη2 = 0.210), suggesting that PPT increased significantly only in active exercise and dual task protocol groups. A significant time effect was found for rMT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.473), MIDAS (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.426), TMT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.338) and FAB (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.462). A repeated measures ANOVA for SICI at 3 ms highlighted a statistically significant time effect for the dual task group (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.629), but not for the active exercises group (p = 0.565, pη2 = 0.061), and for the cognitive training (p = 0.357, pη2 = 0.108). The dual task protocol seems to have a more evident effect on both habituation and sensitization outcomes than the two monotherapies taken alone in people with migraine.

IntroductionThe purpose of the present study is to compare the effect of the physiotherapy to onabolulinumtoxin-A, and their combination, in relation to cervical and headache parameters in patients with chronic migraine.MethodsThis is an observational cohort study conducted by a headache center and a physiotherapy degree course on 30 patients with chronic migraine. The patients were distributed in three groups of treatments for three months: onabolulinumtoxin-A only, physiotherapy only, and onabolulinumtoxin-A plus physiotherapy. The patients were evaluated, before and after each treatment, using the following: the postural assessment software SAPO for the forward head posture; the CROM goniometer for the cervical range of motion; the Migraine Disability Assessment Score for headache parameters.ResultsAfter 3 months of each treatment, the scores obtained for the headache-related disability and the frequency of migraine decreased significantly for all groups, but the pain intensity scores changed significantly only in the onabolulinumtoxin-A (p = 0.01) and in the onabolulinumtoxin-A plus physiotherapy groups (p = 0.007). On the other hand, the forward head posture was reduced significantly in the physiotherapy (p = 0.002) and in the onabolulinumtoxin-A plus physiotherapy groups (p = 0.003). The cervical range of motion increased significantly in certain directions in the physiotherapy group and in the onabolulinumtoxin-A plus physiotherapy groups.ConclusionsThe physiotherapy improved the cervical parameters. The onabolulinumtoxin-A decreased pain intensity. As a consequence, it can be said that the combined treatment was more useful than a mono-therapy alone. From our results, it can be concluded that onabolulinumtoxin-A plus physiotherapy could be a good option in the management of chronic migraine.

•Migraine with aura is a frequent causes of stroke mimics.•Perfusion computer tomography may be useful to improve detection of infarcts.•Normal perfusion neuroimaging and history of migraine may suggest migrainous aura. The acute-onset of migrainuos aura (MA) can be erroneously diagnosed in Emergency Department (ED) as acute stroke (AS) and it can be classified as “stroke mimic” (SM). Perfusion computer tomography (PCT) may be useful to improve detection of infarcts. The aim of the study was to investigate the role in ED of PCT in improving diagnosis of migrainous aura. Data were compared with the well-defined perfusion patterns in patients with acute ischemic stroke. A standardized Stroke Protocol was planned. The protocol consisted in centralizing in ED all the patients with acute-onset of neurological symptoms compatible with cerebrovascular disease and in performing a general and neurological examination, hematological tests, brain non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), CT angiography (CTA) of the supra-aortic and intracranial arteries and cerebral PCT. Patients with diagnosis of definite or probable acute stroke were hospitalized in Stroke Unit (SU). A six-months retrospective analysis of all the patients included in the Stroke Protocol and discharged from ED or from SU with a diagnosis of migraine with aura was performed. 172 patients were included in the Stroke Protocol and 6 patients were enrolled. NCCT, CTA and PCT were performed after 60–90 min from symptoms onset and revealed normal perfusion. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed only in one patient. Patients with acute-onset of neurological symptoms, who have rapid progressive improvement of symptoms, normal neuroimaging, in particular PCT, and preceding episodes of migraine with aura, may be considered as suffering from MA. In these cases, even if thrombolysis is safe, clinicians may defer a prompt aggressive treatment.

Background Real-world studies on fremanezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention, are few and with limited follow-up. Objective We aimed to evaluate the long-term (up to 52 weeks) effectiveness and tolerability of fremanezumab in high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Methods This s an independent, prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling outpatients in 17 Italian Headache Centers with high-frequency episodic migraine or chronic migraine and multiple preventive treatment failures. Patients were treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly. The primary outcomes included changes from baseline (1 month before treatment) in monthly headache days, response rates (reduction in monthly headache days from baseline), and persistence in medication overuse at months 3, 6, and 12 (all outcome timeframes refer to the stated month). Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline in acute medication intake and disability questionnaires scores at the same timepoints. A last observation carried forward analysis was also performed. Results A total of 90 patients who received at least one dose of fremanezumab and with a potential 12-month follow-up were included. Among them, 15 (18.0%) patients discontinued treatment for the entire population, a reduction in monthly headache days compared with baseline was reported at month 3, with a significant median [interquartile range] reduction in monthly headache days (− 9.0 [11.5], p < 0.001). A statistically different reduction was also reported at month 6 compared with baseline (− 10.0 [12.0]; p < 0.001) and at 12 months of treatment (− 10.0 [14.0]; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with medication overuse was significantly reduced compared with baseline from 68.7% (57/83) to 29.6% (24/81), 25.3% (19/75), and 14.7% (10/68) at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, respectively ( p < 0.001). Acute medication use (days and total number) and disability scores were also significantly reduced ( p < 0.001). A ≥ 50% response rate was achieved for 51.9, 67.9, and 76.5% of all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Last observation carried forward analyses confirmed these findings. Fremanezumab was well tolerated, with just one patient discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. Conclusions This study provides evidence for the real-world effectiveness of fremanezumab in treating both high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine, with meaningful and sustained improvements in multiple migraine-related variables. No new safety issue was identified.

Nonpharmacologic treatment, such as osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMTh; manipulative care provided by foreign-trained osteopaths) may be a beneficial complementary treatment for tension-type headache. However, to the authors’ knowledge, the benefit of OMTh in the management of tension-type headache has not been explored, especially chronic tension-type headache (CTTH).To investigate the effectiveness of OMTh compared with traditional treatment in reducing pain intensity, frequency, and duration of CTTH, and to evaluate the objective postural measurement of the forward head posture (FHP) as an integral parameter in the assessment of the effects of OMTh and traditional management of CTTH.Patients with CTTH were registered at the Headache Centre of Trieste in Italy. At the time of the study, none of the patients had been taking any headache prophylaxis in the past 3 months. A 3-month baseline period was recorded by all patients with an ad hoc diary. Patients were randomly placed in the test or control group using a simple randomization program in Excel (Microsoft). Patients in the OMTh group underwent a 3-month period of OMTh, and patients in the control group were treated with amitriptyline. Pain intensity, frequency, and duration of headaches, as well as FHP were analyzed.The study enrolled 10 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.6 [15.2] years) in the OMTh group and 10 patients (51.4 [17.3] years) in the control group. The final assessment of OMTh patients showed statistically significant changes in all headache parameters: pain intensity decreased from a mean (SD) score of 4.9 (1.4) to 3.1 (1.1) (P=.002); frequency decreased from 19.8 (6) to 8.3 (6.2) days per month (P=.002); and the duration of headaches decreased from 10 (4.2) to 6 (3) hours (P=.01). Significant improvement of all parameters was found in the control group as well: pain intensity decreased from a mean (SD) score of 5.9 (0.7) to 4.2 (1.75) (P=.03); frequency decreased from 23.4 (7.2) to 7.4 (8.7) days per month (P=.003); and duration decreased from 7.8 (2.9) to 3.6 (2.1) hours (P=.002). Forward head posture significantly improved in OMTh patients (P=.003).Our data suggested that OMTh may be an effective treatment to improve headaches in patients with CTTH. Our results also suggest that OMTh may reduce FHP.