Explore the vast range of titles available.

In our previous randomized trial, we suggested a possible role for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided celiac plexus block in the treatment of abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our prospective experience with EUS-guided celiac plexus block for controlling pain attributed to chronic pancreatitis, including follow-up on response rates and complications. All subjects enrolled had documented chronic pancreatitis by ERCP and EUS criteria and presented with chronic abdominal pain unresponsive to current treatment options. All were treated with EUS-guided celiac plexus block under the guidance of linear array endosonography using a 22-gauge FNA needle (GIP, Mediglobe Inc., Tempe, AZ) inserted on each side of the celiac area, followed by injection of 10 cc bupivacaine (0.25%) and 3 cc (40 mg) triamcinolone on each side of the celiac plexus. Individual pain scores, based on a visual analog scale (0–10), were determined preblock and postblock by a nurse at 2, 7, 14 days and monthly thereafter. Subjects also rated their overall comfort level during the EUS procedure. EUS-guided celiac plexus block was performed in 90 subjects (40 males, 50 females) having a mean age of 45 yr (range 17–76 yr) between July 1, 1995 and December 30, 1996. A significant improvement in overall pain scores occurred in 55% (50/90) of patients. The mean pain score decreased from 8 to 2 post EUS celiac block at both 4 and 8 wk follow-up (p < 0.05). In 26% of patients there was persistent benefit beyond 12 wk, and 10% still had persistent benefit at 24 wk, including three patients who were pain-free between 35 and 48 wk. Younger patients (<45 yr of age) and those having previous pancreatic surgery for chronic pancreatitis were unlikely to respond to the EUS-guided celiac block. Three patients experienced diarrhea post EUS celiac block, which resolved in 7–10 days; however, it is unclear whether this diarrhea was due to the block or to refractory disease. A cost comparison between the EUS ($1200) and CT ($1400) techniques shows the EUS celiac block to be less costly and perhaps more cost efficient in a subset of subjects. EUS-guided celiac plexus block appears to be safe, effective, and economical for controlling pain in some patients with chronic pancreatitis. Younger patients (<45 yr) and those having prior pancreatic surgery for chronic pancreatitis do not appear to benefit from this technique. Prophylactic antibiotics should be considered if acid suppressing agents are being taken.

Background The purposes of this study are: (1) to prospectively evaluate clinically relevant outcomes including sedation-related complications for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures performed with the use of propofol deep sedation administered by monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and (2) to compare these results with a historical case-control cohort of EUS procedures performed using moderate sedation provided by the gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopist. Materials And Methods Patients referred for EUS between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2002 were enrolled. Complication rates for EUS using MAC sedation were observed and also compared with a historical case-control cohort of EUS patients who received meperidine/midazolam for moderate sedation, administered by the GI endoscopist. Logistic regression analysis was used to isolate possible predictors of complications. Results A total of 1,000 patients underwent EUS with propofol sedation during the period from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002 (mean age 64 years, 53% female). The distribution of EUS indications based on the primary area of interest was: 170 gastroduodenal, 92 anorectal, 508 pancreaticohepatobiliary, 183 esophageal, and 47 mediastinal. The primary endpoint of the study was development of sedation-related complications occurring during a performed procedure. A total of six patients experienced complications: duodenal perforation (one), hypotension (one), aspiration pneumonia (one), and apnea requiring endotracheal intubation (three). The complication rate with propofol was 0.60%, compared with 1% for the historical case-control (meperidine/midazolam moderate sedation) group. Conclusions There does not appear to be a significant difference between complication rates for propofol deep sedation with MAC and meperidine/midazolam administered for moderate sedation.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) occurs in 14% to 61% of patients after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, but its pathogenesis is unclear. We hypothesized that DGE may be due to pylorospasm secondary to vagal injuries at operation and may be preventable by the addition of pyloromyotomy. Patients operated on consecutively between April 2000 and August 2003 were studied. Pyloromyotomy was of the Fredet-Ramstedt type combined with antroplasty. DGE-free recovery was defined as tolerance of a diet for three successive days by postoperative day 8. The symptom of nausea was used as a basis for nasogastric tube removal and diet resumption. A gastric emptying test (GET) with solid food was obtained. Patients with difficulty swallowing were fed via a feeding tube. There were 47 patients. Two patients were excluded because of death (n = 1) and ileus with pancreatic fistula (n = 1). Diagnoses were pancreatic cancer (n = 23), chronic pancreatitis (n = 11), ampullary cancer (n = 5), mucinous cystic neoplasm (n = 5), and duodenal villous adenoma (n = 3). Median times to nasogastric tube removal, start of liquid diet, and start of solid diet were postoperative days 2, 3, and 5, respectively. Two patients had tube feedings. Preoperative GET was abnormal in 51%, and postoperative GET was abnormal in 37%. The average length of stay was 9.5 days (median, 7 days). DGE occurred in only one patient (2.2%). There were no late complications during a 6-month follow-up. The addition of pyloromyotomy to pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is effective in preventing DGE. Results are supportive of the hypothesis that DGE may be caused by operative injuries of the vagus innervating the pyloric region.

The ability of endosonography to diagnose a variety of gastrointestinal pathology has been significantly advanced with the introduction of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy. EUS-FNA technology can also be applied to the evaluation of non-GI disorders. The role of EUS-FNA to establish the diagnosis of unexplained mediastinal masses has not been previously described. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy, impact on subsequent workup, and role of EUS-FNA in treating mediastinal masses of unknown cause. A total of 26 patients (15 men and 11 women, mean age 61 yr, range 39–77 yr) underwent EUS-FNA in patients presenting with unexplained mediastinal masses at four tertiary referral centers. Presenting symptoms includedchest pain (10 patients), dysphagia (eight), cough (seven), fever (six), night sweats (three), and no symptoms/abnormal x-ray (five patients). Five of 26 patients had prior history of cancer (three lung, one tracheal, and one esophageal). Final diagnosis using EUS-FNA, surgery, autopsy, other diagnostic study, or long-term follow-up was available in all patients. EUS-FNA results were classified under three disease categories1) infectious, 2) benign/inflammatory, and 3) malignant. Final diagnosis included infectious in five patents, benign/inflammatory in nine, and malignant in 12. EUS-FNA was successful in 21 of 26 patients (81%) for all disease categories (infectious 60%, benign/inflammatory 78%, and malignant 92%). EUS-FNA was successful in directing subsequent workup in 77% (20 of 26) and therapy in 73% (19 of 26). Mean EUS-FNA passes for adequate tissue sampling was lower of nonmalignant disease categories (3.0 and 3.4) versus malignant disease (4.4). No complications were seen during the course of this study. EUS-FNA in patients presenting with idiopathic mediastinal masses establishes the diagnosis in the vast majority of cases, particularly for those with malignant disease. The emergence of transesophageal EUS-FNA of the mediastinum provides the ability to alter subsequent workup and therapy, obviating the need for more invasive diagnostic studies such as thoracotomy.

The Gastroenterology (GI) Core Curriculum is a culmination of efforts from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy to develop a review of knowledge and skills for those training in a gastrointestinal subspecialty. Fellows are expected to conduct scholarly activity, attend seminars, and read textbooks and syllabus materials. While efforts to standardize education across the nation are welcomed, we sought to ascertain the learning preferences of GI fellows and attending physicians. A national online survey was e-mailed to directors of US adult GI programs, who were also asked to invite their colleagues and fellows to participate. While majorities of both fellows and attendings affirmed regular attendance at national conferences, more attendings affirmed that their knowledge was improved by their participation. Asked how they acquire knowledge best, 45 fellows and 67 attendings responded; 42% of attendings favored journal articles, and 40% of fellows favored conferences. More attendings than fellows felt that writing a manuscript and belonging to a GI society improved knowledge. We believe the Gastroenterology Core Curriculum provides trainees with essential tools for becoming an autonomous gastroenterologist who can appreciate various learning modalities.

Both the American and the German federal systems are acting under the impact of increasing globalization and are involved in processes of macro-regional integration. These developments are of vital interest for the constituent members of both federations. In such transformations, the nature of the representation of subnational units is a pivotal element. The crucial point is whether the federation and/or the new transnational regimes provide for the representation of subnational territorial units and give space for their horizontal cooperation.

Chronic abdominal pain can be associated with benign and malignant disease. Pain associated with pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis can be severely debilitating, with significant impairment in quality of life. Frequently, chronic abdominal pain is not adequately responsive to conventional medical therapies, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids. For this reason, alternative methods to alleviate pain have been developed. Celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac block involve injecting an agent at the celiac axis, with the goal of either selectively destroying the celiac plexus or temporarily blocking visceral afferent nociceptors to alleviate chronic abdominal pain. Agents most commonly used for this purpose include alcohol or phenol for neurolysis and bupivacaine and triamcinolone for temporary block. Methods to administer such agents to the celiac ganglion include CT imaging, percutaneous ultrasound, fluoroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, or surgery (ganglionectomy). Response rates and complications vary depending on technique but are relatively low. This review highlights the techniques of celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac block and their status in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer pain.

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas have a more favorable prognosis than ductal adenocarcinoma. Management of a subgroup, intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms, is controversial. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration biopsy may emerge as the imaging modality of choice. There are few studies describing the EUS features of these tumors. A total of 35 consecutive cases of cystic tumors of the pancreas with an established pathological diagnosis were analyzed for characteristic EUS features. Mucinous cystadenocarcinomas (n = 14) were more likely to be characterized by hypoechoic cystic/solid mass or complex cyst and were frequently associated with a dilated main pancreatic duct. Benign mucinous duct ectasia (n = 6) were characterized by a dilated main pancreatic duct in conjunction with hyperechoic thickening of the duct wall. The two cases of intraductal mucinous hyperplasia additionally showed a hypoechoic mass. Intraductal papillary carcinoma (n = 11) had features in common with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma but also had echogenic foci in the mass and intraductal hyperechoic lesions. The two cases of microcystic cystadenoma showed either a mixed hypoechoic solid/cystic mass or a complex cyst without the additional features seen in mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. EUS features seem to exist that may help to differentiate cystic neoplasms from adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and, thus, to establish the preoperative diagnosis of cystic tumors of the pancreas.

Subnational governments in federal systems are among the institutions being buffeted by economic trends and institutional developments associated with globalization. While the national governments' ability to maintain policy autonomy in a global age is frequently examined, less attention has been devoted to the subnational leaders' capacity for responding to global circumstances while still preserving the traditions and priorities of their jurisdictions. This article explores the responses of a single German Land, Hesse, to international events between 1982 and 1999. The analysis concentrates first on changes in governmental structure and procedure that reflect developments in Hesse's global environment, and then on changes in economic and environmental policy, a policy domain central to Hessian politics throughout the period. Hesse's political leadership has not been able to insulate the Land from global pressures, but by acknowledging their distinct circumstances, they have shaped institutions and policies in ways that have enhanced their ability to derive significant advantage from trends originating outside their borders.

The K-ras, p53, p16 and DPC4 genes are among those most frequently altered in pancreatic ductal carcinoma. We analyzed 22 cell lines for alterations in these genes by direct sequence analysis and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. These cell lines showed mutations in K-ras and p53 at frequencies of 91% and 95%, respectively. Alterations in p16INK4a were found in all cases and included nine homozygous deletions, seven mutations and promoter methylation in six cases. Eight cell lines (36%) had an alteration of DPC4, including one mutation and seven homozygous deletions. The most typical mutational profile involved K-ras, p53, and p16INK4a, concurrently aberrated in 20 cases (91%). Eight cell lines had alterations in all four genes. Inactivation of DPC4 was always accompanied by alteration of all of the other three genes. This comprehensive data regarding the cumulative genetic alterations in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines will be of great value for studies involving drug sensitivity or resistance that may be associated with inactivation of a particular gene or molecular pathway.