Explore the vast range of titles available.

Inhibition of histone deacetylation allows the transcription factor Ascl1 to bind to key gene loci in Müller glia and drive the functional generation of retinal neurons in adult mice. Retina regeneration in rodents Fish, birds and reptiles maintain the capacity to regenerate functional retinal neurons after injury, yet this form of regeneration does not occur in adult mammals. Humans can suffer from a significant number of diseases involving the loss of vision due to retinal disease and damage, so understanding why adult mammals lack this regenerative capacity is crucial. Here, Thomas Reh and colleagues express transcription factor Ascl1, previously known to enhance retinal neuron regeneration in fish, in Müller glia cells of rodents. Ascl1 was only able to drive functional generation of new retinal neurons in adult mice in conjunction with the inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. The HDAC inhibitors enabled Ascl1 to bind at key gene loci in the Müller glia, allowing for the reprogramming of these cells to retinal neurons. Many retinal diseases lead to the loss of retinal neurons and cause visual impairment. The adult mammalian retina has little capacity for regeneration. By contrast, teleost fish functionally regenerate their retina following injury, and Müller glia (MG) are the source of regenerated neurons 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 . The proneural transcription factor Ascl1 is upregulated in MG after retinal damage 1 , 7 in zebrafish and is necessary for regeneration 8 . Although Ascl1 is not expressed in mammalian MG after injury 9 , forced expression of Ascl1 in mouse MG induces a neurogenic state in vitro 10 and in vivo after NMDA ( N -methyl- d -aspartate) damage in young mice 11 . However, by postnatal day 16, mouse MG lose neurogenic capacity, despite Ascl1 overexpression 11 . Loss of neurogenic capacity in mature MG is accompanied by reduced chromatin accessibility, suggesting that epigenetic factors limit regeneration. Here we show that MG-specific overexpression of Ascl1, together with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, enables adult mice to generate neurons from MG after retinal injury. The MG-derived neurons express markers of inner retinal neurons, synapse with host retinal neurons, and respond to light. Using an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC–seq), we show that the histone deacetylase inhibitor promotes accessibility at key gene loci in the MG, and allows more effective reprogramming. Our results thus provide a new approach for the treatment of blinding retinal diseases.

Stimulus- or context-dependent routing of neural signals through parallel pathways can permit flexible processing of diverse inputs. For example, work in mouse shows that rod photoreceptor signals are routed through several retinal pathways, each specialized for different light levels. This light-level-dependent routing of rod signals has been invoked to explain several human perceptual results, but it has not been tested in primate retina. Here, we show, surprisingly, that rod signals traverse the primate retina almost exclusively through a single pathway – the dedicated rod bipolar pathway. Identical experiments in mouse and primate reveal substantial differences in how rod signals traverse the retina. These results require reevaluating human perceptual results in terms of flexible computation within this single pathway. This includes a prominent speeding of rod signals with light level – which we show is inherited directly from the rod photoreceptors themselves rather than from different pathways with distinct kinetics.

Amacrine cells constitute a diverse class of interneurons that contribute to visual signal processing in the inner retina, but surprisingly, little is known about the physiology of most amacrine cell subtypes. Here, we have taken advantage of the sparse expression of vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGLUT3) in the mammalian retina to target the expression of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) to a unique population of amacrine cells using a new transgenic mouse line. Electrophysiological recordings made from YFP-positive (VGLUT3+) amacrine cells provide the first functional data regarding the active membrane properties and synaptic connections of this recently identified cell type. We found that VGLUT3+ amacrine cells receive direct synaptic input from bipolar cells via both N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and non-NMDARs. Voltage-gated sodium channels amplified these excitatory inputs but repetitive spiking was never observed. VGLUT3+ amacrine cells responded transiently to both light increments (ON response) and decrements (OFF response); ON responses consisted exclusively of inhibitory inputs, while OFF responses comprised both excitatory and inhibitory components, although the inhibitory conductance was larger in amplitude and longer in time course. The physiological properties and anatomical features of the VGLUT3+ amacrine cells suggest that this bistratified interneuron may play a role in disinhibitory signaling and/or crossover inhibition between parallel pathways in the retina.

The authors combine electrophysiology, calcium imaging and immunohistochemistry to show that L-type Ca v channels in rat A17 amacrine cells are well placed to mediate reciprocal inhibitory feedback to rod bipolar cells. However, they find that the contribution of these channels to GABA release is diminished by large-conductance Ca 2+ -activated potassium (BK) channels, which suppress postsynaptic depolarization in A17s and limit Ca v channel activation. In the mammalian retina, A17 amacrine cells provide reciprocal inhibitory feedback to rod bipolar cells, thereby shaping the time course of visual signaling in vivo . Previous results have indicated that A17 feedback can be triggered by Ca 2+ influx through Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors and can occur independently of voltage-gated Ca 2+ (Ca v ) channels, whose presence and functional role in A17 dendrites have not yet been explored. We combined electrophysiology, calcium imaging and immunohistochemistry and found that L-type Ca v channels in rat A17 amacrine cells were located at the sites of reciprocal synaptic feedback and that their contribution to GABA release was diminished by large-conductance Ca 2+ -activated potassium (BK) channels, which suppress postsynaptic depolarization in A17s and limit Ca v channel activation. We also found that BK channels, by limiting GABA release from A17s, regulate the flow of excitatory synaptic transmission through the rod pathway.

Cross-synaptic synchrony—correlations in transmitter release across output synapses of a single neuron—is a key determinant of how signal and noise traverse neural circuits. The anatomical connectivity between rod bipolar and A17 amacrine cells in the mammalian retina, specifically that neighboring A17s often receive input from many of the same rod bipolar cells, provides a rare technical opportunity to measure cross-synaptic synchrony under physiological conditions. This approach reveals that synchronization of rod bipolar cell synapses is near perfect in the dark and decreases with increasing light level. Strong synaptic synchronization in the dark minimizes intrinsic synaptic noise and allows rod bipolar cells to faithfully transmit upstream signal and noise to downstream neurons. Desynchronization in steady light lowers the sensitivity of the rod bipolar output to upstream voltage fluctuations. This work reveals how cross-synaptic synchrony shapes retinal responses to physiological light inputs and, more generally, signaling in complex neural networks. The human eye is capable of detecting a single photon of starlight. This level of sensitivity is made possible by the high sensitivity of photoreceptors called rods. There are around 120 million rods in the retina, and they support vision in levels of light that are too low to activate the photoreceptors called cones that allow us to see in color. This is why we cannot see colors in the dark. Signals are relayed through the retina via a circuit made up of multiple types of neurons. The activation of rods leads to activation of cells known as ‘rod bipolar cells’ which, in turn, activate amacrine cells and ganglion cells, with the latter sending signals via the optic nerve to the brain. All of these neurons communicate with one another at junctions called synapses. Activation of a rod bipolar cell, for example, triggers the release of molecules called neurotransmitters: these molecules bind to and activate receptors on the amacrine cells, enabling the signal to be transmitted. For the brain to detect that a single photon has struck a rod, the eye must transmit information along this chain of neurons in a way that is highly reliable while adding very little noise to the signal. Grimes et al. have now revealed a key step in how this is achieved. Electrical recordings from the mouse retina revealed that, in the dark, small fluctuations in the activity of rod bipolar cells lead to the near-deterministic release of neurotransmitters. This reduces the impact of random fluctuations in neurotransmitter release produced at individual synapses and ensures that the signals from rod bipolar cells (and thus from rods) are transmitted faithfully through the circuit with minimal added noise. As light levels increase, this tight synchrony of transmitter release breaks down, reducing the sensitivity to individual photons. Given that many other brain regions share the features that enable retinal cells to coordinate the release of neurotransmitters, this mechanism might be used throughout the brain to increase the signal-to-noise ratio for the transmission of information through neural circuits.

Visual perception across a broad range of light levels is shaped by interactions between rod- and cone-mediated signals. Because responses of retinal ganglion cells, the output cells of the retina, depend on signals from both rod and cone photoreceptors, interactions occurring in retinal circuits provide an opportunity to link the mechanistic operation of parallel pathways and perception. Here we show that rod- and cone-mediated responses interact nonlinearly to control the responses of primate retinal ganglion cells; these nonlinear interactions, surprisingly, were asymmetric, with rod responses strongly suppressing subsequent cone responses but not vice-versa. Human psychophysical experiments revealed a similar perceptual asymmetry. Nonlinear interactions in the retinal output cells were well-predicted by linear summation of kinetically-distinct rod- and cone-mediated signals followed by a synaptic nonlinearity. These experiments thus reveal how a simple mechanism controlling interactions between parallel pathways shapes circuit output and perception. The inner surface at the back of the eye is called the retina and contains two types of light-sensitive cells: rod cells and cone cells. Rods outnumber cones by roughly twenty to one and are responsible for vision under low light levels. Cone cells, by contrast, provide detailed vision in bright light, as well as the ability to see in color. Rods and cones provide input to two distinct networks of cells that convey information in parallel to cells called ganglion cells, which then relay this information out of the retina. However, the signals from activated rods can feed into the cone pathway at several points, meaning that the responses of rods and cones are not independent. At dawn and dusk—and indeed under street lighting at night—rods and cones are both active and interactions between rod and cone responses influence many aspects of vision, including sensitivity to color and contrast. Grimes et al. have now identified a neural mechanism behind these interactions by combining measurements of human vision with recordings of electrical activity in retinas from non-human primates. The experiments confirmed that activating either type of photoreceptor briefly suppresses the responses of the other, although unexpectedly rods inhibit cones more than cones inhibit rods. The site of this interaction is the connection—or synapse—between the very last cell in the cone pathway and the retinal output cells. Prior to this ‘gateway’ synapse, rod and cone-mediated responses are largely independent. Vision at dawn and dusk is shaped by a complex set of interactions between rod and cone signals—such as the ability of activated rods to change color perception at dusk. These findings show that these seemingly complex behaviors can arise from simple interactions at the level of neural circuits.

Inward rectifying potassium (Kir) channels participate in regulating potassium concentration (K⁺) in the central nervous system (CNS), including in the retina. We explored the contribution of Kir channels to retinal function by delivering Kir antibodies (Kir-Abs) into the rat eye in vivo to interrupt channel activity. Kir-Abs were coupled to a peptide carrier to reach intracellular epitopes. Functional effects were evaluated by recording the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electro-retinogram (ERG) noninvasively with an electrode on the cornea to determine activity of the rod and cone pathways, respectively. Intravitreal delivery of Kir2.1-Ab coupled to the peptide carrier diminished these ERG responses equivalent to dimming the stimulus 10- to 100-fold. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed Kir2.1 immunostaining of retinal bipolar cells (BCs) matching the labeling pattern obtained with conventional IHC of applying Kir2.1-Ab to fixed retinal sections postmortem. Whole-cell voltage-clamp BC recordings in rat acute retinal slices showed suppression of barium-sensitive Kir2.1 currents upon inclusion of Kir2.1-Ab in the patch pipette. The in vivo functional and structural results implicate a contribution of Kir2.1 channel activity in these electronegative ERG potentials. Studies with Kir4.1-Ab administered in vivo also suppressed the ERG components and showed immunostaining of Müller cells. The strategy of administering Kir antibodies in vivo, coupled to a peptide carrier to facilitate intracellular delivery, identifies roles for Kir2.1 and Kir4.1 in ERG components arising in the proximal retina and suggests this approach could be of further value in research.

Dopaminergic amacrine cells (DACs) are a subclass of amacrine cells that modulate retinal processing and light adaptation by releasing dopamine. Although the role of dopamine is largely conserved, their retinal distribution across mammals remains incompletely characterized. In mice, rats, thirteen-lined ground squirrels (TLGSs), and macaques, we systematically compared the localization, number, and topography of DACs by their expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a crucial enzyme in the biosynthesis of dopamine. In all species examined, TH+ cells were primarily located in the inner nuclear layer; however, there was a species-dependent influence on their number and distribution. Mice exhibited the highest density of TH+cells but completely lacked displaced TH+cells (dTH+cells) in the ganglion cell layer. Despite interspecies variation in the total number of TH+cells in the retina, the overall density in rats, TLGSs, and macaques was similar. Most species displayed a higher density of DACs toward central retinal regions. However, rats exhibited a distinctive dorsal concentration, particularly among dTH+cells. Although most species examined exhibited a similar ratio of TH+cells to Brn3a+ retinal ganglion cells, TLGSs showed a marked reduction, indicating a potentially diminished dopaminergic modulatory role. Species-specific DAC topographies aligned with specialized visual regions, such as the visual streak in TLGS and the macula in macaques. These results reveal both conserved and divergent features of retinal dopamine circuitry, reflecting evolutionary adaptations to visual processing demands.

Feedback is a ubiquitous feature of neural circuits in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Analogous to pure electronic circuits, neuronal feedback provides either a positive or negative influence on the output of upstream components/neurons. Although the particulars (i.e., connectivity, physiological encoding/processing/signaling) of circuits in higher areas of the brain are often unclear, the inner retina proves an excellent model for studying both the anatomy and physiology of feedback circuits within the functional context of visual processing. Inner retinal feedback to bipolar cells is almost entirely mediated by a single class of interneurons, the amacrine cells. Although this might sound like a simple circuit arrangement with an equally simple function, anatomical, molecular, and functional evidence suggest that amacrine cells represent an extremely diverse class of CNS interneurons that contribute to a variety of retinal processes. In this review, I classify the amacrine cells according to their anatomical output synapses and target cell(s) (i.e., bipolar cells, ganglion cells, and/or amacrine cells) and discuss specifically our current understandings of amacrine cell-mediated feedback and output to bipolar cells on the synaptic, cellular, and circuit levels, while drawing connections to visual processing.

The neurovascular unit (NVU), comprising vascular, glial and neural elements, supports the energetic demands of neural computation, but this aspect of the retina's trilaminar vessel network is poorly understood. Only the innermost vessel layer - the superficial vascular plexus (SVP) - is ensheathed by astrocytes, like brain capillaries, whereas glial ensheathment in other layers derives from radial Müller glia. Using serial electron microscopy reconstructions from mouse and primate retina, we find that Müller processes cover capillaries in a tessellating pattern, mirroring the tiled astrocytic endfeet wrapping brain capillaries. However, gaps in the Müller sheath, found mainly in the intermediate vascular plexus (IVP), permit different neuron types to contact pericytes and the endothelial cells directly. Pericyte somata are a favored target, often at spine-like structures with a reduced or absent vascular basement lamina. Focal application of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to the vitreal surface evoked Ca signals in Müller sheaths in all three vascular layers. Pharmacological experiments confirmed that Müller sheaths express purinergic receptors that, when activated, trigger intracellular Ca signals that are amplified by IP -controlled intracellular Ca stores. When rod photoreceptors die in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa ( ), Müller sheaths dissociate from the deep vascular plexus (DVP) but are largely unchanged within the IVP or SVP. Thus, Müller glia interact with retinal vessels in a laminar, compartmentalized manner: glial sheathes are virtually complete in the SVP but fenestrated in the IVP, permitting direct neural-to-vascular contacts. In the DVP, the glial sheath is only modestly fenestrated and is vulnerable to photoreceptor degeneration.