Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Guice, Jordan"
Sort by:
Correlation between intracranial pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury with hospital length of stay and discharge disposition: a retrospective observational cohort study
by
Bar-Or, David
,
Jarvis, Stephanie
,
Doan, Xuan-Lan
in
Brain
,
Brief Report
,
Comparative analysis
2022
Objectives
Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is recommended for severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI) but some data suggests it may not improve outcomes. The objective was to investigate the effect of ICP monitoring among TBI.
Methods
This retrospective observational cohort study (1/1/2015–6/1/2020) included severe TBI patients. Outcomes [discharge destination, length of stay (LOS)] were compared by ICP monitoring and were stratified by GCS (3 vs. 4–8), α < 0.05.
Results
Of the123 patients who met inclusion criteria, 47% received ICP monitoring. There were baseline differences in the two groups characteristics, ICP monitored patients were younger (
p
= 0.02), had a subarachnoid hemorrhage less often (
p
= 0.04), and a subdural hematoma more often (
p
= 0.04) than those without ICP monitors. ICP monitored patients had a significantly longer median LOS (12 vs. 3,
p
< 0.01) than patients without monitoring. There was a trend towards more ICP monitored patients discharged home (40% vs. 23%,
p
= 0.06). Among patients with GCS = 3, ICP monitored patients had a longer LOS (
p
< 0.01) with no significant differences in discharge destinations. For those with a GCS of 4–8, ICP monitoring was associated with a longer LOS (
p
= 0.01), but fewer were discharged to a skilled nursing facility or long-term care (
p
= 0.01).
Conclusions
For TBI patients, ICP monitoring was associated with an increased LOS, with no significant differences in discharge destinations when compared to those without ICP monitoring. However, among only those with a GCS of 4–8, ICP monitoring was associated with a decreased proportion of patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility or long-term acute care .
Journal Article
Clinical and laboratory predictors of blood loss in young swine: a model for pediatric hemorrhage
2018
BackgroundThe pediatric patient’s response to hemorrhage as a function of young age is not well understood. As a result, there is no consensus on optimal resuscitation strategies for hemorrhagic shock in pediatric patients, or on the identification of clinical triggers to prompt implementation. The study objective was to develop a model of pediatric hemorrhage using young pigs to simulate school-aged children, and determine clinical and laboratory indicators for significant hemorrhage.Materials and methods29 non-splenectomized female pigs, aged 3 months, weighing 30–40 kg, were randomized into groups with varying degrees of hemorrhage. Bleeding occurred intermittently over 5 h while the animals were anesthetized but spontaneously breathing. Various physiologic and biochemical markers were used to monitor the piglets during hemorrhage.ResultsSwine experiencing up to 50% hemorrhage survived without exception throughout the course of hemorrhage. 80% (4/5) of the animals in the 60% hemorrhage group survived. Need for respiratory support was universal when blood loss reached 50% of estimated blood volume. Blood pressure was not useful in classifying the degree of shock. Heart rate was helpful in differentiating between the extremes of blood loss examined. Arterial pCO2, pH, lactate, HCO3 and creatinine levels, as well as urine output, changed significantly with increasing blood loss.ConclusionsYoung swine are resilient against hemorrhage, although hemorrhage of 50% or greater universally require respiratory support. In this animal model, with the exception of heart rate, vital signs were minimally helpful in identification of shock. However, change in select laboratory values from baseline was significant with increasing blood loss.Level of evidenceThis was a level II prospective comparative study.
Journal Article