Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectivesEarly occupational exposure to asbestos has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of pleural mesothelioma (PM), which suggests that the timing of exposure might play a role in the dose–response relationship. However, none studies has evaluated the relative impact of increasing the annual intensity of occupational exposure to asbestos at each time of the whole exposure history. Yet such evaluation would allow the comparison of the risks of PM associated with different longitudinal profiles of occupational exposure to asbestos. Our objective was to estimate the time-dependent relative impact of asbestos exposure intensity over the whole occupational history and to compare the resulting estimated risks of PM associated with different profiles of exposure, using data from a large French case–control study.MethodsThis study included 1196 male cases recruited in 1987–2006 and 2369 matched controls on birth year. Occupational exposure to asbestos was assessed using a job exposure matrix and represented in logistic regression models using a flexible weighted cumulative index of exposure.ResultsDue to much stronger weights of early doses of asbestos exposure, subjects who accumulated 20 fibres/mL over their entire job history with high doses during the first years and low doses thereafter were at higher risk of PM than those who accumulated most of the doses later (OR=2.37 (95% CI 2.01 to 2.87)).ConclusionThis study provides new insights on the dose-time-response relationship between occupational asbestos and PM and illustrates the importance of considering timing of exposure in its association with cancer risk.

Purpose While targeted temperature management (TTM) has been recommended in patients with shockable cardiac arrest (CA) and suggested in patients with non-shockable rhythms, few data exist regarding the impact of the rewarming rate on systemic inflammation. We compared serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL6) measured with two rewarming rates after TTM at 33 °C in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods ISOCRATE was a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing rewarming at 0.50 °C/h versus 0.25 °C/h in patients coma after shockable OHCA in 2016–2020. The primary outcome was serum IL6 level 24–48 h after reaching 33 °C. Secondary outcomes included the day-90 Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) and the 48-h serum neurofilament light-chain (NF-L) level. Results We randomized 50 patients. The median IL6 area-under-the-curve was similar between the two groups (12,389 [7256–37,200] vs. 8859 [6825–18,088] pg/mL h; P  = 0.55). No significant difference was noted in proportions of patients with favorable day-90 CPC scores (13/25 patients at 0.25 °C/h (52.0%; 95% CI 31.3–72.2%) and 13/25 patients at 0.50 °C/h (52.0%; 95% CI 31.3–72.2%; P  = 0.99)). Median NF-L levels were not significantly different between the 0.25 °C/h and 0.50 °C/h groups (76.0 pg mL, [25.5–3074.0] vs. 192 pg mL, [33.6–4199.0]; P  = 0.43; respectively). Conclusion In our RCT, rewarming from 33 °C at 0.25 °C/h, compared to 0.50 °C/h, did not decrease the serum IL6 level after shockable CA. Further RCTs are needed to better define the optimal TTM strategy for patients with CA. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02555254 . Registered September 14, 2015. Take-Home Message : Rewarming at a rate of 0.25 °C/h, compared to 0.50 °C, did not result in lower serum IL6 levels after achievement of hypothermia at 33 °C in patients who remained comatose after shockable cardiac arrest. No associations were found between the slower rewarming rate and day-90 functional outcomes or mortality. 140-character Tweet : Rewarming at 0.25 °C versus 0.50 °C did not decrease serum IL6 levels after hypothermia at 33 °C in patients comatose after shockable cardiac arrest.

ObjectiveTo investigate whether high levels of screen time exposure are associated with self-perceived levels of attention problems and hyperactivity in higher education students.DesignCross-sectional study among participants of the i-Share cohort.SettingFrench-speaking students of universities and higher education institutions.Participants4816 graduate students who were at least 18 years old.ExposureScreen time was assessed by self-report of the average time spent on five different screen activities on smartphone, television, computer and tablet and categorised into quartiles.Main outcome measureWe used the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) concerning students’ behaviour over the past 6 months to measure self-perceived levels of attention problems and hyperactivity. Responses were summarised into a global score as well as scores for attention problems and hyperactivity.ResultsThe 4816 participants of this study had a mean age of 20.8 years and 75.5% were female. Multivariable ordinary regression models showed significant associations of screen time exposure with quintiles of the total score of self-perceived attention problems and hyperactivity levels as well as the individual domains. Compared to the lowest screen time exposure category, the ORs (95% CI) were 1.58 (1.37 to 1.82) for each increasing level of quintiles of the global score, 1.57 (1.36 to 1.81) for increasing quintiles of attention levels and 1.25 (1.09 to 1.44) for increasing quartiles of hyperactivity.ConclusionsResults of this large cross-sectional study among French university and higher education students show dose-dependent associations between screen time and self-perceived levels of attention problems and hyperactivity. Further studies are warranted to evaluate whether interventions could positively influence these associations.

Hydrocortisone is used in preterm infants. However, early disruption of growth velocities was observed in infants exposed to hydrocortisone. This retrospective study aimed to explore the postnatal brain growth of extremely preterm infants requiring hydrocortisone treatment as well as its association with perinatal factors. Extremely preterm infants exposed to hydrocortisone from 2011 to 2016 who survived up to 12 months were included. Each of them was matched with two infants not treated with hydrocortisone exhibiting similar gestational ages and nearly similar birth head circumferences. The outcome variables were brain tissue areas on MRIs performed at term-equivalent age and postnatal head circumference growth up to a corrected age of 12 months. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed. Infants treated with hydrocortisone (n=20) were matched with 40 infants not exposed to hydrocortisone. The infants exposed to hydrocortisone exhibited a lower birth weight (p=0.04) and a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (p<0.0001). Infants treated with hydrocortisone exhibited a smaller basal ganglia/thalamus area (p=0.04) at term-equivalent age and a smaller head circumference at a corrected age of 12 months (p=0.003). However, the basal ganglia/thalamus area and the postnatal brain growth were independently associated with the duration of mechanical ventilation and not with hydrocortisone. Interestingly, a significant interaction between hydrocortisone and sex was observed (p=0.04).Conclusion: This study supports previous data that indicated no obvious impact of hydrocortisone on brain growth and highlights the relationship between the severity of the neonatal course and postnatal brain growth in extremely preterm infants. What is Known: • Postnatal hydrocortisone disrupts transiently growth velocities including the head circumference growth. • Postnatal hydrocortisone has less impact on neurodevelopment than dexamethasone.What is New: • Hydrocortisone prescribed for infants in the most severe conditions did not show independent effect on brain growth up to the corrected age of 12 months. However, a different effect of hydrocortisone according to sex can't be excluded and needs further explorations. • Perinatal factors as birth weight and duration of mechanical ventilation were determinant for the subsequent brain growth.