Explore the vast range of titles available.

Gastric cancer (GC) represents a global health concern. Despite advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, GC is still the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with more than 720,000 estimated deaths in 2012. Overall survival for advanced disease is about 1 year, a dismal prognosis that is partly due to the high levels of biological heterogeneity found in GC. Indeed, GC is a highly heterogeneous disease from morphological and molecular standpoints. The numerous histological and molecular classifications currently available reflect such heterogeneity. Although recent high-throughput studies cluster the molecular data obtained into subgroups with clinical relevance, we still need a practical, prognostic, and predictive classification system, integrating morphological and molecular features, towards the identification of novel therapeutic targets. It is noteworthy that GC heterogeneity encompasses not only interpatient variability (intertumour heterogeneity), but also variations within the same tumour (intratumour heterogeneity). The latter encompasses spatial heterogeneity (in different tumour areas) and temporal heterogeneity (along progression from primary to recurrent and/or metastatic disease). In this review, we analyse the morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular heterogeneity in GC as the basis for a better understanding of the disease, and discuss the practical implications for diagnostic pathology, prognostic evaluation, and precision therapy.

Gastric cancer (GC) pathogenesis is complex and heterogeneous, reflecting morphological, molecular and genetic diversity. Diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal gastric cancer (IGC) are the major histological types. GC may be sporadic or hereditary; sporadic GC is related to environmental and genetic low‐risk factors and hereditary GC is caused by inherited high‐risk mutations, so far identified only for the diffuse histotype. DGC phenotypic heterogeneity challenges the current understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis. The definition of a DGC‐specific mutational profile remains controversial, possibly reflecting the heterogeneity of DGC‐related histological subtypes [signet‐ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and poorly cohesive carcinoma not otherwise specified (PCC‐NOS)]. Indeed, DGC and DGC‐related subtypes may present specific mutational profiles underlying the particularly aggressive behaviour and dismal prognosis of DGC vs IGC and PCC‐NOS vs SRCC. In this systematic review, we revised the histological presentations, molecular classifications and approved therapies for gastric cancer, with a focus on DGC. We then analysed results from the most relevant studies, reporting mutational analysis data specifying mutational frequencies, and their relationship with DGC and IGC histological types, and with specific DGC subtypes (SRCC and PCC‐NOS). We aimed at identifying histology‐associated mutational profiles with an emphasis in DGC and its subtypes (DGC vs IGC; sporadic vs hereditary DGC; and SRCC vs PCC‐NOS). We further used these mutational profiles to identify the most commonly affected molecular pathways and biological functions, and explored the clinical trials directed specifically to patients with DGC. This systematic analysis is expected to expose a DGC‐specific molecular profile and shed light into potential targets for therapeutic intervention, which are currently missing. The main diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) histological subtypes are signet‐ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and poorly cohesive carcinoma not otherwise specified (PCC‐NOS). Clinical trials, targeted therapies and predictive markers of therapy response directed to any of these entities are residual. This systematic review exposes the lack of integrated knowledge in these clinical entities and uses their mutational profiles to rethink therapeutic intervention.

BackgroundGastric cancer with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) is characterized by prominent stromal infiltration of T-lymphocytes. The aim of this study was to investigate GCLS biology through analysis of clinicopathological features, EBV infection, microsatellite instability (MSI), immune gene-expression profiling and PD-L1 status in neoplastic cells and tumor immune microenvironment.MethodsTwenty-four GCLSs were analyzed by RNA in situ hybridization for EBV (EBER), PCR/fragment analysis for MSI, immunohistochemistry (PD-L1, cytokeratin, CD3, CD8), co-immunofluorescence (CK/PD-L1, CD68/PD-L1), NanoString gene-expression assay for immune-related genes and PD-L1 copy number alterations. CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities were calculated by digital analysis. Fifty-four non-GCLSs were used as control group.ResultsGCLSs displayed distinctive clinicopathological features, such as lower pTNM stage (p = 0.02) and better overall survival (p = 0.01). EBV+ or MSI-high phenotype was found in 66.7 and 16.7% cases, respectively. GCLSs harbored a cytotoxic T-cell-inflamed profile, particularly at the invasive front of tumors (p < 0.01) and in EBV+ cases (p = 0.01). EBV+ GCLSs, when compared to EBV− GCLSs, showed higher mRNA expression of genes related to Th1/cytotoxic and immunosuppressive biomarkers. PD-L1 protein expression, observed in neoplastic and immune stromal cells (33.3 and 91.7%, respectively), and PD-L1 amplification (18.8%) were restricted to EBV+/MSI-high tumors and correlated with high values of PD-L1 mRNA expression.ConclusionsThis study shows that GCLS has a distinctive clinico-pathological and molecular profile. Furthermore, through an in-depth study of tumor immune microenvironment—by digital analysis and mRNA expression profiling—it highlights the role of EBV infection in promoting an inflamed tumor microenvironment, with putative therapeutic implications.

Background Gastric dysplasia is classified as adenomatous/type I (intestinal phenotype) and foveolar or pyloric/type II (gastric phenotype) according to morphological (architectural and cytological) features. The immunophenotypic classification of dysplasia, based on the expression of the mucins, CD10 and CDX2, recognizes the following immunophenotypes: intestinal (MUC2, CD10, and CDX2); gastric (MUC5AC and/or MUC6, absence of CD10, and absent or low expression of CDX2); hybrid (gastric and intestinal markers); and null. Methods Sixty-six cases of nonpolypoid epithelial dysplasia of the stomach were classified according to morphological features (histotype and grade) and immunophenotype. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CD10, CDX2, chromogranin, synaptophysin, Ki-67, and TP53. HER2 alterations were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and silver-enhanced in situ hybridization. Results By conventional histology, dysplasia was classified as adenomatous/intestinal ( n  = 42; 64 %) and foveolar or pyloric/gastric ( n  = 24; 36 %) and graded as low grade ( n  = 37; 56 %) or high grade ( n  = 29; 44 %). Immunophenotypic classification showed intestinal ( n  = 22; 33.3 %), gastric ( n  = 25; 37.9 %), hybrid ( n  = 17; 25.8 %), or null ( n  = 2; 3.0 %) phenotypes. In 20 cases a coexistent intramucosal carcinoma was identified. The intestinal immunophenotype was shown to be significantly associated with low-grade dysplasia ( p  = 0.001), high expression of CDX2 ( p  = 0.015), TP53 ( p  = 0.034), synaptophysin ( p  = 0.003), and chromogranin ( p  < 0.0001); the gastric immunophenotype was significantly associated with high-grade dysplasia ( p  = 0.001), high Ki-67 proliferative index ( p  = 0.05), and coexistence of intramucosal carcinoma ( p  = 0.013). HER2 amplification was observed in 3 cases, typed as gastric or hybrid. Conclusions Epithelial nonpolypoid dysplasia of the stomach with gastric immunophenotype shows features of biological aggressiveness and may represent the putative precursor lesion in a pathway of gastric carcinogenesis originated de novo from the native gastric mucosa, leading to gastric-type adenocarcinoma.

Cadherins are cell–cell adhesion molecules, fundamental for cell architecture and polarity. E-cadherin to P-cadherin switch can rescue adherens junctions in epithelial tumours. Herein, we disclose a mechanism for E-cadherin to P-cadherin switch in gastric cancers. CDH1 and CDH3 mRNA expression was obtained from 42 gastric tumours’ RNA-seq data. CRISPR-Cas9 was used to knock out CDH1 and a putative regulatory element. CDH1-depleted and parental cells were submitted to proteomics and enrichment GO terms analysis; ATAC-seq/4C-seq with a CDH1 promoter viewpoint to assess chromatin accessibility and conformation; and RT-PCR/flow cytometry to assess CDH1/E-cadherin and CDH3/P-cadherin expression. In 42% of gastric tumours analysed, CDH1 to CDH3 switch was observed. CDH1 knockout triggered CDH1/E-cadherin complete loss and CDH3/P-cadherin expression increase at plasma membrane. This switch, likely rescuing adherens junctions, increased cell migration/proliferation, commonly observed in aggressive tumours. E- to P-cadherin switch accompanied increased CDH1 promoter interactions with CDH3–eQTL, absent in normal stomach and parental cells. CDH3–eQTL deletion promotes CDH3/CDH1 reduced expression. These data provide evidence that loss of CDH1/E-cadherin expression alters the CDH3 locus chromatin conformation, allowing a CDH1 promoter interaction with a CDH3-eQTL, and promoting CDH3/P-cadherin expression. These data highlight a novel mechanism triggering E- to P-cadherin switch in gastric cancer.

Gastric carcinoma (GC) represents the most common cause of death in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). However, a limited number of cases have been characterised so far. In this study, we analysed the clinical features, bacterial/viral infections, detailed morphology and immune microenvironment of nine CVID patients with GC. The study of the immune microenvironment included automated digital counts of CD20+, CD4+, CD8+, FOXP3+, GATA3+ and CD138+ immune cells, as well as the evaluation of PD-L1 expression. Twenty-one GCs from non-CVID patients were used as a control group. GC in CVID patients was diagnosed mostly at early-stage (n = 6/9; 66.7%) and at younger age (median-age: 43y), when compared to non-CVID patients (p < 0.001). GC pathogenesis was closely related to Helicobacter pylori infection (n = 8/9; 88.9%), but not to Epstein-Barr virus (0.0%) or cytomegalovirus infection (0.0%). Non-neoplastic mucosa (non-NM) in CVID-patients displayed prominent lymphocytic gastritis (100%) and a dysfunctional immune microenvironment, characterised by higher rates of CD4+/CD8+/Foxp3+/GATA3+/PD-L1+ immune cells and the expected paucity of CD20+ B-lymphocytes and CD138+ plasma cells, when compared to non-CVID patients (p < 0.05). Changes in the immune microenvironment between non-NM and GC were not equivalent in CVID and non-CVID patients, reflecting the relevance of immune dysfunction for gastric carcinogenesis and GC progression in the CVID population.

In gastric cancer (GC), biomarkers that define prognosis and predict treatment response remain scarce. We hypothesized that the extent of CD44v6 membranous tumor expression could predict prognosis and therapy response in GC patients. Two GC surgical cohorts, from Portugal and South Korea (n = 964), were characterized for the extension of CD44v6 membranous immuno-expression, clinicopathological features, patient survival, and therapy response. The value of CD44v6 expression in predicting response to treatment and its impact on prognosis was determined. High CD44v6 expression was associated with invasive features (perineural invasion and depth of invasion) in both cohorts and with worse survival in the Portuguese GC cohort (HR 1.461; 95% confidence interval 1.002–2.131). Patients with high CD44v6 tumor expression benefited from conventional chemotherapy in addition to surgery (p < 0.05), particularly those with heterogeneous CD44v6-positive and -negative populations (CD44v6_3+) (p < 0.007 and p < 0.009). Our study is the first to identify CD44v6 high membranous expression as a potential predictive marker of response to conventional treatment, but it does not clarify CD44v6 prognostic value in GC. Importantly, our data support selection of GC patients with high CD44v6-expressing tumors for conventional chemotherapy in addition to surgery. These findings will allow better stratification of GC patients for treatment, potentially improving their overall survival.

The determination of molecular aberrations within tumours is important for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes. Pathologists play a critical role in the workflow of molecular diagnostics, by assuring accurate pathological diagnosis, requesting appropriate molecular testing, selecting the adequate tissue section for molecular analysis, enriching tumour cell content by manual macrodissection and estimating the tumour cellularity. Particularly, the assessment of the malignant cell fraction within a tumour section is a key determinant for an appropriate interpretation of the molecular findings. Several factors may impact the estimation of tumour cellularity and constitute a potential pitfall for the final interpretation of the molecular analysis. Evidence suggests that the reliability of morphological control could be improved by training. The scope of this commentary is to provide the training morpho-molecular pathologists with the practical tools necessary to master microscopic morphological control for solid tumours, as well as a set of images that could serve as a training set.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome that is characterised by a high prevalence of diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. It is largely caused by inactivating germline mutations in the tumour suppressor gene CDH1, although pathogenic variants in CTNNA1 occur in a minority of families with HDGC. In this Policy Review, we present updated clinical practice guidelines for HDGC from the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC), which recognise the emerging evidence of variability in gastric cancer risk between families with HDGC, the growing capability of endoscopic and histological surveillance in HDGC, and increased experience of managing long-term sequelae of total gastrectomy in young patients. To redress the balance between the accessibility, cost, and acceptance of genetic testing and the increased identification of pathogenic variant carriers, the HDGC genetic testing criteria have been relaxed, mainly through less restrictive age limits. Prophylactic total gastrectomy remains the recommended option for gastric cancer risk management in pathogenic CDH1 variant carriers. However, there is increasing confidence from the IGCLC that endoscopic surveillance in expert centres can be safely offered to patients who wish to postpone surgery, or to those whose risk of developing gastric cancer is not well defined.