Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Guz Dmitri"
Sort by:
Ceftriaxone 1 g versus 2 g per day, for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study
2023
Guidelines recommend intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone at a dose of 1–2 g/d as empirical treatment in adults hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia (CAP), with the addition of macrolide. We examined whether 1 g/d of IV ceftriaxone is associated with similar clinical outcomes to those of 2 g/d. This is a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of all adult patients hospitalized at Rabin Medical Center between 2015 and 2018 with CAP. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses, using logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 2045 patients were treated with IV ceftriaxone 1 g/d and were and compared to 1944 patients who were treated with 2 g/d. The groups were comparable in their baseline characteristics and their clinical presentation. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was similar between the groups (301/2045 (14.7%) for 1 g/d vs. 312/1944 (16.0%) for 2 g/d, p = 0.24). The rate of C.difficile infection (CDI) was significantly decreased with 1 g/d compared to 2 g/d (4/2045 (0.2%) vs. 12/1944 (0.6%), p = 0.03) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (median 4 days interquartile range (IQR) 3–7 vs. 5 days IQR 3–8, p = 0.02). None of the blood isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were penicillin or ceftriaxone resistant. For hospitalized patients with CAP, IV ceftriaxone 1 g/d was associated with similar mortality rates as IV ceftriaxone 2 g/d, with a decreased rate of CDI and shorter length of stay. Ceftriaxone 1 g/d may be sufficient to treat patients with CAP in countries with low prevalence of drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Journal Article
Clinical and pathological predictors for FDG-PET/CT avidity in patients with marginal zone lymphoma—a retrospective cohort study
by
Priss Miriam
,
Catalano, Onofrio A
,
Buchrits Shira
in
Avidity
,
Cohort analysis
,
Computed tomography
2022
Abstract BackgroundThe clinical value of FDG-PET/CT for staging and monitoring treatment response in patients with aggressive lymphoma is well established. Conversely, its role in the assessment and management of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is less conclusive. We aimed to assess clinical, laboratory, and pathological predictors for FDG uptake in these patients, in an attempt to identify MZL patients whose management will benefit from this imaging modality.MethodsIn this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we included all adult patients diagnosed with MZL at the Rabin Medical Center between January 2006 and December 2020 who underwent FDG-PET/CT at the time of diagnosis. Primary outcomes were FDG avidity (defined as a visual assessment of at least moderate intensity), SUVmax, and SUVliver. Variables such as advanced clinical stage, primary disease site, hemoglobin level (Hb), platelet count (Plt), serum albumin, LDH level, β-2 microglobulin, and Ki 67 index were evaluated univariate and multivariate analysis using logistic and linear regression models. Association between FDG avidity and progression-free and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis.ResultsA total of 207 MZL patients were included in this study, 76 of whom (36.7%) had FDG-avid disease. Baseline patients’ characteristics such as age, gender, and comorbid conditions were similar between patients with and without significant FDG uptake. In a multivariate logistic regression model, non-gastric MALT (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.78–10), Ki 67 index ≥ 15% (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.36–9.76), and elevated LDH level (OR 8.6, 95% CI 3.2–22.8) were all associated with positive FDG avidity. In a multivariate linear regression model, a combination of advanced clinical stage, specific disease subtypes, LDH level, and Ki 67 index predicted the value of SUVmax (P value < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 33.8%) and SUVmax/SUVliver (P value < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 27%). Baseline FDG avidity was associated to PFS and OS only in univariate analyses.ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort study, we present prediction models for positive FDG uptake and SUVmax in MZL patients. These models aim to help clinicians choose patients suitable for incorporation of FDG-PET/CT for staging and monitoring disease and reduce the costs of redundant tests.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of Glofitamab in patients with R/R DLBCL in real life setting– a retrospective study
2025
Glofitamab, a CD20-directed CD3 T-cell engager, was recently FDA-approved after demonstrating a 52% overall response rate (ORR) and a 39% complete response (CR) rate in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety remain limited. This study evaluated glofitamab’s performance in clinical practice. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL treated via a national compassionate use program. Patients received at least one dose of glofitamab after failing ≥ 2 prior therapies. Recruitment spanned September 2020–January 2023. Outcomes included ORR, CR (per Lugano criteria), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events were classified per ASTCT 2019 criteria, and risk factors for PFS and OS were assessed via logistic regression. Thirty-five patients from six Israeli centers were included (median age: 67 years; 66% male). The median number of prior therapies was 5, with 43% being primary refractory and 91% post-CAR-T therapy. ORR was 34%, with 14% achieving CR. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 4 months, respectively. Treatment was prematurely discontinued in 86%, mainly due to disease progression (46%) and to infections in responding patients (17%). Male sex was a significant risk factor for poor PFS and OS. In this real-world cohort, glofitamab’s efficacy was lower than in clinical trials, likely due to a more heavily pretreated population. However, its manageable toxicity supports its potential role in r/r DLBCL treatment.
Journal Article