Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeThere is growing evidence that vertebral column function and dysfunction play a vital role in neuromuscular control. This invited review summarises the evidence about how vertebral column dysfunction, known as a central segmental motor control (CSMC) problem, alters neuromuscular function and how spinal adjustments (high-velocity, low-amplitude or HVLA thrusts directed at a CSMC problem) and spinal manipulation (HVLA thrusts directed at segments of the vertebral column that may not have clinical indicators of a CSMC problem) alters neuromuscular function. MethodsThe current review elucidates the peripheral mechanisms by which CSMC problems, the spinal adjustment or spinal manipulation alter the afferent input from the paravertebral tissues. It summarises the contemporary model that provides a biologically plausible explanation for CSMC problems, the manipulable spinal lesion. This review also summarises the contemporary, biologically plausible understanding about how spinal adjustments enable more efficient production of muscular force. The evidence showing how spinal dysfunction, spinal manipulation and spinal adjustments alter central multimodal integration and motor control centres will be covered in a second invited review.ResultsMany studies have shown spinal adjustments increase voluntary force and prevent fatigue, which mainly occurs due to altered supraspinal excitability and multimodal integration. The literature suggests physical injury, pain, inflammation, and acute or chronic physiological or psychological stress can alter the vertebral column’s central neural motor control, leading to a CSMC problem. The many gaps in the literature have been identified, along with suggestions for future studies.ConclusionSpinal adjustments of CSMC problems impact motor control in a variety of ways. These include increasing muscle force and preventing fatigue. These changes in neuromuscular function most likely occur due to changes in supraspinal excitability. The current contemporary model of the CSMC problem, and our understanding of the mechanisms of spinal adjustments, provide a biologically plausible explanation for how the vertebral column’s central neural motor control can dysfunction, can lead to a self-perpetuating central segmental motor control problem, and how HVLA spinal adjustments can improve neuromuscular function.

ObjectiveSpinal cord injury (SCI) results in debilitating sensory, functional deficits and paralysis requiring neurorehabilitation solutions. In this regard, focal muscle vibration (FMV) is an emerging neuro-rehabilitation tool that uses mechanical vibration on muscles/tendons to stimulate underlying nerves and consequently modulate neural pathways. We conducted a systematic review to understand the exact effectiveness of FMVs on the sensorimotor function and mobility/strength in the SCI population.DesignSystematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach.Data sourcesPEDro, Springer, PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched through 15 February 2025.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe included studies adhering to the following population–intervention–comparison–outcomes (PICO) elements. Population: SCI, intervention: FMV, comparison: unexposed controls, outcome: either of sensorimotor function or mobility and strength.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) scale. Findings were summarised and a narrative synthesis is provided.Results25 studies were included. 9 studies used FMV in the upper limb and 14 in the lower limb. The analysis includes 427 patients with SCI, with a focus on male, chronic SCI cases and a prevalence of North American studies.ConclusionOur systematic review of 25 studies, with 21 (84%) reporting positive outcomes, suggests that FMV may improve sensory perception, motor function, mobility and strength in individuals with SCIs, with benefits observed in both limbs. However, substantial heterogeneity in FMV parameters, study designs, participant characteristics and the high prevalence of serious/critical risk of bias (13/25 studies, 52%) limit definitive conclusions. Further research with optimised protocols, larger sample sizes and longitudinal designs is needed to confirm efficacy and establish clinical guidelines.

Increasing evidence suggests that a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust directed at a dysfunctional vertebral segment in people with subclinical spinal pain alters various neurophysiological measures, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). We hypothesized that an HVLA thrust applied to a clinician chosen vertebral segment based on clinical indicators of vertebral dysfunction, in short, segment considered as “relevant” would significantly reduce the N30 amplitude compared to an HVLA thrust applied to a predetermined vertebral segment not based on clinical indicators of vertebral dysfunction or segment considered as “non-relevant”. In this double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design study, 96 adults with recurrent mild neck pain, ache, or stiffness were randomly allocated to receiving a single thrust directed at either a segment considered as “relevant” or a segment considered as “non-relevant\" in their upper cervical spine. SEPs of median nerve stimulation were recorded before and immediately after a single HVLA application delivered using an adjusting instrument (Activator). A linear mixed model was used to assess changes in the N30 amplitude. A significant interaction between the site of thrust delivery and session was found (F 1,840  = 9.89, p  < 0.002). Pairwise comparisons showed a significant immediate decrease in the N30 complex amplitude after the application of HVLA thrust to a segment considered “relevant” (− 16.76 ± 28.32%, p  = 0.005). In contrast, no significant change was observed in the group that received HVLA thrust over a segment considered “non-relevant” ( p  = 0.757). Cervical HVLA thrust applied to the segment considered as “relevant” altered sensorimotor parameters, while cervical HVLA thrust over the segment considered as “non-relevant” did not. This finding supports the hypothesis that spinal site targeting of HVLA interventions is important when measuring neurophysiological responses. Further studies are needed to explore the potential clinical relevance of these findings.

Dehydration is a common problem among older adults. It can seriously affect their health and wellbeing and sometimes leads to death, given the diminution of thirst sensation as we age. It is, therefore, essential to keep older adults properly hydrated by monitoring their fluid intake and estimating how much they drink. This paper aims to investigate the effect of surface electromyography (sEMG) features on the detection of drinking events and estimation of the amount of water swallowed per sip. Eleven individuals took part in the study, with data collected over two days. We investigated the best combination of a pool of twenty-six time and frequency domain sEMG features using five classifiers and seven regressors. Results revealed an average F-score over two days of 77.5±1.35% in distinguishing the drinking events from non-drinking events using three global features and 85.5±1.00% using three subject-specific features. The average volume estimation RMSE was 6.83±0.14 mL using one single global feature and 6.34±0.12 mL using a single subject-specific feature. These promising results validate and encourage the potential use of sEMG as an essential factor for monitoring and estimating the amount of fluid intake.

Previous reports suggest that the progression from subacute to chronic non-specific low back pain (nsLBP) involves functional changes in both the nervous and immune systems. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the gene expression profiles of circulating immune cells that affect the interaction between these two systems when subacute nsLBP turns into chronic nsLBP. Participants aged 18–55 were included based on the presence or duration of LBP, with peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected for RNA sequencing from 20 healthy controls (no nsLBP), 20 subclinical patients (intermittent nsLBP), and 19 chronic patients (long-term nsLBP). The data revealed that chronic nsLBP is linked to a distinct gene expression profile, with 139 uniquely differentially expressed genes (DEGs), differing from those in the subclinical and control groups. Interestingly, comparing chronic and subclinical groups showed minimal overlap in DEGs, indicating a clear inflammatory distinction between subclinical nsLBP and chronic nsLBP. The findings also indicated that patients with chronic nsLBP were different from other individuals regarding axon guidance, indicating neuroplastic changes when intermittent nsLBP turns into chronic nsLBP. Hence, early recognition of the transition from subclinical to chronic nsLBP using RNA profiling may pave the way for more precise therapeutic strategies targeting neuroplastic changes and inflammatory processes.

Longer-term effects of chiropractic care on neuroplasticity, stress, and immune biomarkers remain unclear. This study evaluates the effects of chiropractic care on physiological biomarkers, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), cortisol (saliva, blood, hair), and inflammatory cytokines [interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), C-reactive protein (CRP), B-lymphocytes (CD19), T-helper cells (CD4), cytotoxic T cells (CD8), and natural killer cells (CD56)] in subclinical spinal pain patients. Parallel-group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial conducted at the Rehabilitation Center of Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Intervention: 12 weeks; follow-up: 16 weeks (May-December 2022). Participants with subclinical spinal pain were randomly assigned by using simple lottery method to either 12 weeks of chiropractic or sham care. We aimed to recruit up to 150 participants over three months; however, given the pragmatic nature of the trial and logistical constraints, including the availability of chiropractors, the final number enrolled was determined by how many eligible participants could be recruited during this time. Adults aged 20-60 years with subclinical spinal pain (n = 106 randomized; 88 completed 12-week measures; 73 completed 16-week follow-up). Among those who finished 12 weeks: chiropractic, 26 males/15 females, mean age 37.49 ± 12.39 years; sham, 24 males/23 females, mean age 26.85 ± 7.13 years. The primary outcome blood BDNF and secondary outcome, including saliva, blood and hair cortisol, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, CRP, CD19, CD4, CD8, and CD56 levels were measured at baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention, and at a 16-week follow-up. Linear and linear mixed-effects regression models were used to assess the effect of care and time on biological measures. Significant between-group differences were observed after 12 weeks of intervention, with higher salivary cortisol 5 ± 2 [0, 10], p = 0.045 and blood BDNF150 ± 60 (40, 270), p = 0.009 and IL-6 1.0 ± 0.3 [0.5, 1.5], p < 0.001 levels in the chiropractic care group. At the 16-week follow-up, blood cortisol -9 ± 4 [-17, -1], p = 0.024, IFN-γ - 22 ± 7 [-35, -9], and TNF-α -2 ± 1 [-5, 0], p = 0.028 levels increased in the sham group. Within-group comparisons showed a non-significant 10 ± 20 [-20, 50], p = 0.439 reduction in hair cortisol levels in the chiropractic group at 12 weeks, along with increased levels of blood cortisol, BDNF, CD8, CD4, IL-6, and CD19. 12 weeks of Chiropractic care modulates biomarkers linked to neuroplasticity, inflammation, and stress. Increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor and interleukin-6 suggest enhanced neuroplasticity and inflammatory responses, while decreases in tumor necrosis factor-alpha indicate a regulatory effect on systemic inflammation. These findings support the notion that chiropractic care modulates physiological systemic biomarkers, which may underscore its benefits on clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05369156.

Background: Sensory feedback from the upper cervical regions is used by the central nervous system to stabilize the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) joint for leveled vision and to assess head position, which is used in sensorimotor integration (SMI) of neck and upper limb motor control. However, few studies have specifically investigated the impact of C0-C1 dysfunction and/or its rectification on SMI related outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of restricted C0-C1 mobility and musculoskeletal pain on neck and upper limb motor control, whether these motor control deficits persist without treatment, and whether motor control improves following treatment designed to improve C0-C1 mobility. Methods: Twenty-two participants with restricted C0-C1 mobility attended three data collection sessions (baseline, control (2 to 5 days later), and post-treatment) at a private clinic. The One-to Zero (OTZ) system which treats the C0-C1 first followed by other spinal regions if clinically indicated, was administered twice weekly until participants reached 80% improvement from baseline symptoms. Shoulder range of motion, peak force and electromyography during maximal resisted scapular elevation (upper trapezius) and neck flexion (sternocleidomastoid), peak grip, and quadricep strength were measured before and after treatment. Repeated measures ANOVAs with pre-planned contrasts (e.g., control to baseline, and post-treatment to baseline) were conducted. Results: Neck and limb control impairments persisted without treatment, with no changes between the double baseline (p > 0.05). Shoulder abduction and extension, and peak force output of the sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, and quadriceps improved post-intervention (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Selective improvement in neck and limb motor control outcomes post-treatment suggests that increased corticospinal drive/motor neuron excitability from normalized afferent input may impact gross motor output first. Clinical Registration Number: ACTRN12625000627459. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=389394&isReview=true.

Background/Objectives: Sensorimotor dysfunction is often reported in individuals experiencing neck pain, irrespective of severity and chronicity. The treatment of neck dysfunction has been found to positively impact sensorimotor integration (SMI), thereby improving sensorimotor function. However, no patient-reported outcome measure has been validated for discrimination between healthy individuals and neck pain patients with disordered SMI, nor has there been documentation of positive change in SMI following neck pain treatment.The purpose of this study was to administer the Sensory-Motor Dysfunction Questionnaire (SMD-Q), for the purposes of: (1) known-group validity between individuals without and with chronic neck pain (CNP) or subclinical neck pain (SCNP); (2) assess the questionnaire’s capacity to quantify changes in altered SMI following a tailored treatment plan. Methods: Part 1—Known Group Validity: The SMD-Q was administered to 30 neck pain (13 with CNP, and 17 with SCNP), and 30 healthy participants. Part 2—Sensitivity to Change: The SMD-Q was re-administered to neck pain participants following their tailored treatment plans (SCNP—8-weeks and CNP—12 weeks). Results: The SMD-Q can discriminate between healthy and neck pain participants (p ≤ 0.001), and may be sensitive to showing treatment effects (ηp2 = 0.162; large effect size (ES)), but the sample size was too small to determine if it can discriminate treatment effects between groups (ηp2 = 0.070; medium ES). Conclusions: Differing degrees of disordered SMI can be discriminated by the SMD-Q, but further research is needed to determine its sensitivity to treatment.

The objectives of the study were to investigate changes in pain perception and neural activity during tonic pain due to altered sensory input from the spine following chiropractic spinal adjustments. Fifteen participants with subclinical pain (recurrent spinal dysfunction such as mild pain, ache or stiffness but with no pain on the day of the experiment) participated in this randomized cross-over study involving a chiropractic spinal adjustment and a sham session, separated by 4.0 ± 4.2 days. Before and after each intervention, 61-channel electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at rest and during 80 seconds of tonic pain evoked by the cold-pressor test (left hand immersed in 2 °C water). Participants rated the pain and unpleasantness to the cold-pressor test on two separate numerical rating scales. To study brain sources, sLORETA was performed on four EEG frequency bands: delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (12–32 Hz). The pain scores decreased by 9% after the sham intervention ( p  < 0.05), whereas the unpleasantness scores decreased by 7% after both interventions ( p  < 0.05). sLORETA showed decreased brain activity following tonic pain in all frequency bands after the sham intervention, whereas no change in activity was seen after the chiropractic spinal adjustment session. This study showed habituation to pain following the sham intervention, with no habituation occurring following the chiropractic intervention. This suggests that the chiropractic spinal adjustments may alter central processing of pain and unpleasantness.

The cerebellum processes pain inputs and is important for motor learning. Yet, how the cerebellum interacts with the motor cortex in individuals with recurrent pain is not clear. Functional connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex can be measured by a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique in which stimulation is applied to the cerebellum prior to stimulation over the motor cortex, which inhibits motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by motor cortex stimulation alone, called cerebellar inhibition (CBI). Healthy individuals without pain have been shown to demonstrate reduced CBI following motor acquisition. We hypothesized that CBI would not reduce to the same extent in those with mild-recurrent neck pain following the same motor acquisition task. We further hypothesized that a common treatment for neck pain (spinal manipulation) would restore reduced CBI following motor acquisition. Motor acquisition involved typing an eight-letter sequence of the letters Z,P,D,F with the right index finger. Twenty-seven neck pain participants received spinal manipulation (14 participants, 18-27 years) or sham control (13 participants, 19-24 years). Twelve healthy controls (20-27 years) also participated. Participants had CBI measured; they completed manipulation or sham control followed by motor acquisition; and then had CBI re-measured. Following motor acquisition, neck pain sham controls remained inhibited (58 ± 33% of test MEP) vs. healthy controls who disinhibited (98 ± 49% of test MEP, P<0.001), while the spinal manipulation group facilitated (146 ± 95% of test MEP, P<0.001). Greater inhibition in neck pain sham vs. healthy control groups suggests that neck pain may change cerebellar-motor cortex interaction. The change to facilitation suggests that spinal manipulation may reverse inhibitory effects of neck pain.