Explore the vast range of titles available.

Solid-organ and hematopoietic stem-cell transplants are widely used for various life-threatening medical disorders. Prophylaxis against transplant rejection and graft-versus-host disease is often immunosuppressive and can increase the risk of lymphoproliferative disease.

Despite a characteristic indolent course, a substantial subset of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients has an early relapse with a poor outcome. Cells in the microenvironment may be a key contributor to treatment failure. We used a discovery and validation study design to identify microenvironmental determinants of early failure and then integrated these results into the FLIPI. In total, 496 newly diagnosed FL grade 1–3 A patients who were prospectively enrolled into the MER cohort from 2002 to 2012 were evaluated. Tissue microarrays were stained for CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD32b, CD14, CD68, CD70, SIRP-α, TIM3, PD-1, and PD-L1. Early failure was defined as failing to achieve event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24) in immunochemotherapy-treated patients and EFS12 in all others. CyTOF and CODEX analysis were performed to characterize intratumoral immunophenotypes. Lack of intrafollicular CD4 expression was the only predictor of early failure that replicated with a pooled OR 2.37 (95%CI 1.48–3.79). We next developed a bio-clinical risk model (BioFLIPI), where lack of CD4 intrafollicular expression moved patients up one FLIPI risk group, adding a new fourth high-risk group. Compared with BioFLIPI score of 1, patients with a score of 2 (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.08–4.69), 3 (OR 3.53; 95% CI 1.78–7.54), and 4 (OR 8.92; 95% CI 4.00–21.1) had increasing risk of early failure. The favorable intrafollicular CD4 T cells were identified as activated central memory T cells, whose prognostic value was independent from genetic features. In conclusion, lack of intrafollicular CD4 expression predicts early failure in FL and combined with FLIPI improves identification of high-risk patients; however, independent validation is warranted.

Immunochemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ndDLBCL) yet is inadequate for many patients. In this work, we perform unsupervised clustering on transcriptomic features from a large cohort of ndDLBCL patients and identify seven clusters, one called A7 with poor prognosis, and develop a classifier to identify these clusters in independent ndDLBCL cohorts. This high-risk cluster is enriched for activated B-cell cell-of-origin, low immune infiltration, high MYC expression, and copy number aberrations. We compare and contrast our methodology with recent DLBCL classifiers to contextualize our clusters and show improved prognostic utility. Finally, using pre-clinical models, we demonstrate a mechanistic rationale for IKZF1/3 degraders such as lenalidomide to overcome the low immune infiltration phenotype of A7 by inducing T-cell trafficking into tumors and upregulating MHC I and II on tumor cells, and demonstrate that TCF4 is an important regulator of MYC- related biology in A7. Researchers identified 7 biological group of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, one with poor prognosis. They developed a gene expression classifier to detect these groups, potentially improving prognosis and future treatments for the high-risk patients.

EBV-positive polymorphic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, NOS (poly B-LPD), is a newly defined entity in the 2022 International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms. Its clinical behavior and optimal treatment approach remain poorly characterized. We conducted a retrospective study of 31 patients diagnosed with EBV+ poly B-LPD at Mayo Clinic (2003–2024), excluding transplant recipients. Median age was 56 years; 71% had extranodal involvement, 68% presented with stage III/IV disease, and 52% had autoimmune conditions. Thirty-five percent ( n  = 11) were on immunosuppressive therapy at diagnosis, all of whom underwent reduction of immunosuppression (RIS); five underwent RIS alone, achieving four complete responses including two with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Rituximab was effective in patients with or without prior immunosuppression. Histologic transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or emergence of T-cell lymphomas occurred in immunochemotherapy non-responders or at relapse, emphasizing the role of re-biopsy in this subset of patients. At a median follow-up of 6 years, median event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.5 and 8.7 years, respectively. EFS was not significantly influenced by increasing IPI scores ( p  = 0.09), CNS involvement ( p  = 0.5), or immunosuppression at diagnosis ( p  = 0.2). There was a trend towards improved OS in patients who were on immunosuppressive therapy at diagnosis, however, this was not statistically significant, p  = 0.054. This is the first study to characterize EBV+ poly B-LPD within the ICC 2022 framework. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings, define prognostic markers and guide therapy.

AbstractFront-line treatment for follicular lymphoma has evolved with the introduction of maintenance therapy, bendamustine (Benda), obinutuzumab (G), and lenalidomide (Len). We conducted a random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the regimens with superior efficacy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between 11 modern regimens with different immunochemotherapy and maintenance strategies. G-Benda-G resulted in with the best PFS, with an HR of 0.41 compared to R-Benda, a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.97, a probability of being the best treatment (PbBT) of 72%, and a posterior ranking distribution (PoRa) of 1 (95% BCI 1–3). This was followed by R-Benda-R4 (HR = 0.49, PbBT = 25%, PoRa = 2) and R-Benda-R (HR = 0.60, PbBT = 3%, PoRa = 3). R-CHOP-R (HR = 0.96) and R-Len-R (HR = 0.97) had similar efficacy to R-Benda. Bendamustine was a better chemotherapy backbone than CHOP either with maintenance (R-Benda-R vs R-CHOP-R, HR = 0.62; G-Benda-G vs G-CHOP-G, HR = 0.55) or without maintenance therapy (R-Benda vs R-CHOP, HR = 0.68). Rituximab maintenance improved PFS following R-CHOP (R-CHOP-R vs R-CHOP, HR = 0.65) or R-Benda (R-Benda-R vs R-Benda, HR = 0.60; R-Benda-R4 vs R-Benda, HR = 0.49). In the absence of multi-arm RCTs that include all common regimens, this NMA provides an important and useful guide to inform treatment decisions.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage when the patient presents with a palpable lymph node or symptoms such as pain and fatigue. However, due to advances in imaging techniques used for many diseases and cancer screening, incidental diagnosis of FL is expected to rise. In this study, we investigated FL disease characteristics and outcomes in patients diagnosed incidentally versus symptomatically, providing insights into what might be detected with multi-cancer early detection tests (MCEDs). We conducted a review of 908 patients with newly diagnosed FL enrolled in the Mayo Clinic component of the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) from 2002 to 2015. We compared disease characteristics and outcomes between the incidental and symptomatic groups. Of the 908 patients, 259 (28.5%) were diagnosed incidentally. The incidental group was more likely to present with early-stage disease (stage I/II: 43.2% vs. 30.6%, p  = 0.0003), normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (87.2% vs. 80.8%, p  = 0.03), and trended towards having lower FLIPI scores (49.8% vs. 42.2%, p  = 0.1). However, there were no significant differences in event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) or lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) between the two groups. In conclusion, incidental detection of FL is associated with earlier stages and more favorable disease characteristics. However, this did not translate into improved survival outcomes. Whether even earlier detection of FL using emerging MCEDs translates into improved outcomes remains an open question requiring further investigation.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia is a B-cell malignancy with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the bone marrow or lymphatic tissue and a monoclonal immunoglobulin M protein (IgM) in the serum. It is incurable with current therapy, and the decision to treat patients as well as the choice of treatment can be complex. Using a risk-adapted approach, we provide recommendations on timing and choice of therapy. Patients with smoldering or asymptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia and preserved hematologic function should be observed without therapy. Symptomatic patients with modest hematologic compromise, IgM-related neuropathy that requires therapy, or hemolytic anemia unresponsive to corticosteroids should receive standard doses of rituximab alone without maintenance therapy. Patients who have severe constitutional symptoms, profound hematologic compromise, symptomatic bulky disease, or hyperviscosity should be treated with the DRC (dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide) regimen. Any patient with symptoms of hyperviscosity should first be treated with plasmapheresis. For patients who experience relapse after a response to initial therapy of more than 2 years' duration, the original therapy should be repeated. For patients who had an inadequate response to initial therapy or a response of less than 2 years' duration, an alternative agent or combination should be used. Autologous stem cell transplant should be considered in all eligible patients with relapsed disease.

Recent genetic and molecular classification of DLBCL has advanced our knowledge of disease biology, yet were not designed to predict early events and guide anticipatory selection of novel therapies. To address this unmet need, we used an integrative multiomic approach to identify a signature at diagnosis that will identify DLBCL at high risk of early clinical failure. Tumor biopsies from 444 newly diagnosed DLBCL were analyzed by WES and RNAseq. A combination of weighted gene correlation network analysis and differential gene expression analysis was used to identify a signature associated with high risk of early clinical failure independent of IPI and COO. Further analysis revealed the signature was associated with metabolic reprogramming and identified cases with a depleted immune microenvironment. Finally, WES data was integrated into the signature and we found that inclusion of ARID1A mutations resulted in identification of 45% of cases with an early clinical failure which was validated in external DLBCL cohorts. This novel and integrative approach is the first to identify a signature at diagnosis, in a real-world cohort of DLBCL, that identifies patients at high risk for early clinical failure and may have significant implications for design of therapeutic options.

Up to 40% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients do not experience a durable response to frontline immunochemotherapy, and prospective identification of high-risk cases that may benefit from personalized therapeutic management remains an unmet need. Molecular phenotyping techniques have established a landscape of genomic variants in diagnostic DLBCL; however, these have not yet been applied in large-scale studies of relapsed/refractory DLBCL, resulting in incomplete characterization of mechanisms driving tumor progression and treatment resistance. Here, we performed an integrated multiomic analysis on 228 relapsed/refractory DLBCL samples, including 24 with serial biopsies. Refined cell-of-origin subtyping identified patients harboring GCB and DZsig+ relapsed/refractory tumors in cases with primary refractory disease with remarkably poor outcomes, and comparative analysis of genomic features between relapsed and diagnostic samples identified subtype-specific mechanisms of therapeutic resistance driven by frequent alteration to MYC , BCL2 , BCL6 , and TP53 among additional strong lymphoma driver genes. Tumor evolution dynamics suggest innate mechanisms of chemoresistance are present in many DLBCL tumors at diagnosis, and that relapsed/refractory tumors are primarily comprised of a homogenous clonal expansion with reduced tumor microenvironment activity. Adaptation of personalized therapeutic strategies targeting DLBCL subtype-specific resistance mechanisms should be considered to benefit these high-risk populations.

Over the last two decades, the frontline therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has evolved. However, the impact of subsequent lines of therapy on survival outcomes has not been well characterized. In this study, we investigated the treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL treated with second-line (2 L) therapy. Adult patients with newly diagnosed MCL from 2002 to 2015 were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Clinical characteristics, 2 L treatment details, and outcomes were compared between patients who received 2 L treatment between 2003–2009 (Era 1), 2010–2014 (Era 2), and 2015–2021 (Era 3). 2 L treatment was heterogenous in all eras, and there was a substantial shift in the pattern of 2 L therapy over time. The estimated 2-year EFS rate was 21% (95% CI, 13–35), 40% (95% CI, 30–53), and 51% (95% CI, 37–68) in Era 1–3 respectively, and the 5-year OS rate was 31% (95% CI, 21–45), 37% (95% CI, 27–50), and 67% (95% CI, 54–83) in Era 1–3, respectively. These results provide real-world evidence on evolving treatment patterns of 2 L therapy based on the era of relapse. The changes in 2 L treatment correlated with improved EFS and OS, suggesting that treatment advances are associated with improved outcomes in patients with R/R MCL.