Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Adult patients surviving with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is growing. We examine the factors associated with heart transplant outcomes in this challenging population with complex anatomy requiring redo-surgeries. Methods We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing-Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database and analyzed 35,952 heart transplants from January 1st, 2000, to September 30th, 2018. We compared transplant characteristics for ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 14,236), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (n = 20,676), and ACHD (n = 1040). Mean follow-up was 6.20 ± 4.84 years. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards analysis were used to analyze survival data. Results Multivariable analysis confirmed that ACHD was associated greater in-hospital death compared to ICM (HR = 0.54, P  < 0.001) and NICM (HR = 0.46, P  < 0.001). Notable factors associated with increased mortality were history of cerebrovascular disease (HR = 1.11, P  = 0.026), prior history of malignancy (HR = 1.12, P  = 0.006), pre-transplant biventricular support (HR = 1.12, P  = 0.069), postoperative stroke (HR = 1.47, P  < 0.001) and postoperative dialysis (HR = 1.71, P  < 0.001). ACHD transplants had a longer donor heart ischemic time ( P  < 0.001) and trend towards more deaths from primary graft dysfunction ( P  = 0.07). In-hospital deaths were more likely with ACHD and use of mechanical support such as use of right ventricular assist device (HR = 2.20, P  = 0.049), biventricular support (HR = 1.62, P  < 0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (HR = 2.36, P  < 0.001). Conditional survival after censoring hospital deaths was significantly higher in ACHD ( P  < 0.001). Conclusion Heart transplant in ACHD is associated with a higher post-operative mortality given anatomical complexity but a better long-term conditional survival. Normothermic donor heart perfusion may improve outcomes in the ACHD population by reducing the impact of longer ischemic times.

To determine how a formula to estimate kinetically changing glomerular filtration rate (keGFR) relates to serum creatinine changes and to compare the discriminatory ability of keGFR to that of perioperative change in serum creatinine to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality. Retrospective cohort study at a single-tertiary-care Midwestern university hospital of 4022 patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2006 and January 2012 immediately after cardiac surgery. Of 4022 patients, 1031 (25.6%) developed at least AKI stage 1 and 1106 (27.5%) developed AKI-min. Patients who developed AKI stage 1 or AKI-min had a greater decrease in keGFR, both by absolute amounts and by percentage. After adjusting for other factors with logistic regression, keGFR had good discrimination (c statistic = 0.787 and 0.749, respectively) in predicting AKI and operative mortality. Despite no change in immediate perioperative serum creatinine levels, keGFR fell and this predicted subsequent AKI. Using keGFR enables identification of patients who, despite unchanged postoperative creatinine, incur clinically significant kidney injury based on reduction in GFR and increased mortality.

Background Systemic inflammation during implant of a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may contribute to adverse outcomes. We investigated the association of the preoperative inflammatory markers with subsequent right ventricular failure (RVF). Materials and methods Prospective data was collected on 489 patients from 2003 through 2017 who underwent implantation of a durable LVAD. Uni- and multivariable correlation with leukocytosis was determined using linear and binary logistic regression. The population was also separated into low (< 10.5 K/ul, n  = 362) and high ( >  10.5 K/ul, n  = 127) white blood cell count (WBC) groups. Mantel-Cox statistics was used to analyze survival data. Results Postop RVF was associated with a higher preop WBC (11.3  +  5.7 vs 8.7  +  3.1) and C-reactive protein (CRP, 5.6  +  4.4 vs 3.3  +  4.7) levels. Multivariable analysis identified an independent association between increased WBC preoperatively with increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, P  < 0.001), heart rate ( P  < 0.001), CRP ( P  = 0.006), creatinine ( P  = 0.048), and INR ( P  = 0.049). The high WBC group was more likely to be on preoperative temporary circulatory support (17.3% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001) with a trend towards greater use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (55.9% vs 47.2%, P  = 0.093). The high WBC group had poorer mid-term survival ( P  = 0.042). Conclusions Postop RVF is associated with a preoperative pro-inflammatory environment. This may be secondary to the increased systemic stress of decompensated heart failure. Systemic inflammation in the decompensated heart failure may contribute to RVF after LVAD implant.

In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services revised its national coverage determination, removing the requirement to obtain review from a Medicare-approved heart transplant center to implant a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for bridge-to-transplant (BTT) intent at an LVAD-only center. The association between center-level transplant availability and access to heart transplant, the gold-standard therapy for advanced heart failure (HF), is unknown. To investigate the association of center transplant availability with LVAD implant strategies and subsequent heart transplant following LVAD implant before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change. A retrospective cohort study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs multicenter US registry database was conducted from April 1, 2012, to June 30, 2020. The population included patients with HF receiving a primary durable LVAD. LVAD center transplant availability (LVAD/transplant vs LVAD only). The primary outcomes were implant strategy as BTT and subsequent transplant by 2 years. Covariates that might affect listing strategy and outcomes were included (eg, patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities) in multivariable models. Parameters for BTT listing were estimated using logistic regression with center-level random effects and for receipt of a transplant using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with death as a competing event. The sample included 22 221 LVAD recipients with a median age of 59.0 (IQR, 50.0-67.0) years, of whom 17 420 (78.4%) were male and 3156 (14.2%) received implants at LVAD-only centers. Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD/transplant center was associated with a 79% increased adjusted odds of BTT LVAD designation (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.35-2.38; P < .001). The 2-year transplant rate following LVAD implant was 25.6% at LVAD/transplant centers and 11.9% at LVAD-only centers. There was an associated 33% increased rate of transplant at LVAD/transplant centers compared with LVAD-only centers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17-1.51) with a similar hazard for death at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.08). Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD-transplant center was associated with increased odds of BTT intent at implant and subsequent transplant receipt for patients at 2 years. The findings of this study suggest that Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change may have the unintended consequence of further increasing inequities in access to transplant among patients at LVAD-only centers.

Background Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is an important clinical problem in recipients of ventricular assist devices (VAD), although data pertaining to the endoscopic evaluation and management of this complication are limited in the medical literature. Aims We sought to identify the most common endoscopic findings in VAD recipients with GIB, and to better define the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of endosopy for this patient population. Methods Twenty-six subjects with VAD and overt GIB were retrospectively identified. Clinical and endoscopic data were abstracted for each subject on to standardized forms in duplicate and independent fashion. Raw data and descriptive statistics were reported. Results Non-peptic vascular lesions were the most common cause of GIB. A definitive cause of bleeding was identified by endoscopy in almost 60% of subjects. Endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in 14/15 patients in whom bleeding did not stop spontaneously. Rebleeding occurred in 50% of subjects and was successfully retreated or stopped spontaneously in all cases. Colonoscopy did not establish a definitive diagnosis or deliver hemostatic therapy in any case. Conclusions Vascular malformations account for the overwhelming majority of bleeding lesions in VAD patients with GIB. Endoscopy seems to be a safe and effective tool for diagnosing, risk stratifying, and treating this patient population, although multiple endoscopies may be necessary before therapeutic success, and the incidence of rebleeding is high. A prospective multi-center registry is necessary to establish evidence-based management algorithms for VAD recipients with GIB.

Multiple major health organisations recommend the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, initial reports of ECMO use in patients with COVID-19 described very high mortality and there have been no large, international cohort studies of ECMO for COVID-19 reported to date. We used data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry to characterise the epidemiology, hospital course, and outcomes of patients aged 16 years or older with confirmed COVID-19 who had ECMO support initiated between Jan 16 and May 1, 2020, at 213 hospitals in 36 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital death in a time-to-event analysis assessed at 90 days after ECMO initiation. We applied a multivariable Cox model to examine whether patient and hospital factors were associated with in-hospital mortality. Data for 1035 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO support were included in this study. Of these, 67 (6%) remained hospitalised, 311 (30%) were discharged home or to an acute rehabilitation centre, 101 (10%) were discharged to a long-term acute care centre or unspecified location, 176 (17%) were discharged to another hospital, and 380 (37%) died. The estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 37·4% (95% CI 34·4–40·4). Mortality was 39% (380 of 968) in patients with a final disposition of death or hospital discharge. The use of ECMO for circulatory support was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·20–2·97). In the subset of patients with COVID-19 receiving respiratory (venovenous) ECMO and characterised as having acute respiratory distress syndrome, the estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 38·0% (95% CI 34·6–41·5). In patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO, both estimated mortality 90 days after ECMO and mortality in those with a final disposition of death or discharge were less than 40%. These data from 213 hospitals worldwide provide a generalisable estimate of ECMO mortality in the setting of COVID-19. None.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a type of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in which the function of the heart and/or lungs is partially or completely replaced by a portable system that provides prolonged support to critically ill patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. There are two major variants of ECMO: veno-venous (VV) ECMO and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. VV ECMO replaces the function of the lung in which it uses a cannula to remove venous blood and oxygenates it using the extracorporeal system, and returns the blood to the right atrium to be pumped to the body. VA ECMO is slightly different in that it replaces the function of the heart and lungs by returning oxygenated blood to the aorta. As a therapy for respiratory failure, ECMO minimizes hypoxia, diminishes lung stress and strain, and allows lung protective mechanical ventilation. As a support for acute and terminal heart failure, ECMO reduces preload, increases aortic flow, and allows for end-organ perfusion. Due to its physiological support and advantages, it is used for a variety of chronic and acute support purposes such as bridge therapy for heart/lung transplant, durable ventricular assist devices, and intermediate-term mechanical support postoperatively. Our review gives a broad overview of the two main types of ECMO strategies and their clinical indications, cannulation strategies, unique clinical utility, and their limitations.

Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated, historically, with a high mortality rate.Treatment options include systemic anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy, surgical embolectomy, fragmentation techniques, and catheter embolectomy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) repeatedly has demonstrated effectiveness in providing cardiopulmonary support for the patient with a massive PE too unstable to undergo thrombolysis or embolectomy. The present case study describes a morbidly obese patient, status post gastric bypass surgery, who presented with PE, and acute respiratory and cardiac failure. A description of the patient’s management plan, which includes a simple, rapidly deployed ECMO system (Levitronix® CentriMag® and Jostra Quadrox D), systemic- and catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy and rheolytic thrombectomy (AngioJet® Series 3000, Possis Medical, Minneapolis, MN).