Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
76 result(s) for "Hakama, Matti"
Sort by:
Prostate-Cancer Mortality at 11 Years of Follow-up
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer continues to show a 21% reduction in prostate-cancer mortality in the screening group, after 11 years of follow-up. The number of cancers that would need to be detected to prevent one prostate-cancer death is 37. Screening does not affect all-cause mortality. Screening for prostate cancer has remained controversial, despite results showing a significant reduction in the rate of death from prostate cancer (relative reduction, 20%) among men offered screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA). 1 The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) is a multicenter trial initiated in 1991 in the Netherlands and in Belgium, with five more European countries (Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland) joining between 1994 and 1998. Recruitment was completed in these centers between 1995 and 2003. Later, France also joined, with enrollment in 2000–2005, but data from the French cohort were not included in the . . .
Knowledge transfer as a tool towards improvement of cancer care in low- and middle-income countries. 6th European Roundtable Meeting (ERTM), June 14th, 2019, Berlin, Germany
PurposeTo identify key factors for the best practice of knowledge transfer from high-income settings to low- and middle-income settings.ResultsInteractive sessions led to the identification of European learnings that can and should be shared beyond Europe. Furthermore, methods were characterised which may lead to successful knowledge transfer with subsequent quality improvement.ConclusionTo ensure successful implementation of knowledge and new methods, political support is extremely important. A strong focus should be an improvement of collaboration and network development. Rehabilitation, early and late pallative care, cost effectiveness and long-term follow-up are priorities. Limitations are budget constraints which limit the execution of NCCPs.
Prostate Cancer Risk and Prediagnostic Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels (Finland)
Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the association between serum vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) level and risk of prostate cancer. Methods: The nested case-control study was based on a 13-year follow-up of about 19,000 middle-aged men who attended the first screening visit within the Helsinki Heart Study and were free of clinically verified prostate cancer at baseline. Through record linkage with the files of the Finnish Cancer Registry, 149 prostate cancer cases were identified in the cohort. They were matched (1:4) to probability density sampled controls for age, time of sample retrieval, and residence. Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-VD) at entry were measured for cases and controls. The relative risks of prostate cancer were derived using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: Prostate cancer risk, analyzed by quartiles of the 25-VD levels, was inversely related to 25-VD. Men with 25-VD concentration below the median had an adjusted relative risk (OR) of 1.7 compared to men with 25-VD level above the median. The prostate cancer risk was highest among younger men (<52 years) at entry and low serum 25-VD (OR 3.1 nonadjusted and 3.5 adjusted). Among those younger men (<52 years), low 25-VD entailed a higher risk of non-localized cancers (OR 6.3). The mean age at diagnosis of the patients with 25-VD concentration above the median was 1.8 years higher than that of patients with vitamin D below the median (63.1 vs 61.3 years). Conclusions: We conclude that low levels of 25-VD associated with an increased risk for subsequent earlier exposure and more aggressive development of prostate cancer, especially before the andropause.
Tobacco Use or Body Mass – Do They Predict Tuberculosis Mortality in Mumbai, India? Results from a Population-Based Cohort Study
Tobacco use and under-nutrition are major public health concerns and tuberculosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in India. Using a cohort of 148,173 persons (recruited 1991-1997 and followed-up 1997-2003) the joint effects of tobacco use and BMI on tuberculosis mortality was studied. Tobacco use in any form and low-BMI had joint effect on tuberculosis mortality and the interaction effect was synergistic in men and antagonistic in women. Self-reported tuberculosis was associated with increased risk of tuberculosis mortality. In contrast, no such association was observed for self-reported diabetes persons. The risk pattern remained unchanged even after excluding tuberculosis deaths occurred within 1(st) two years of follow-up. This study highlights importance of age consideration of individual while excluding early deaths. Around 27% male tuberculosis deaths were attributable to their being underweight and smoker, while 22% male and 37% female deaths were attributable to their being underweight and smokeless tobacco user.
Results from a blind and a non-blind randomised trial run in parallel: experience from the Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy (EPHT) Trial
Background The Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy (EPHT) Trial assigned 4170 potential participants prior to recruitment to blind or non-blind hormone therapy (HT), with placebo or non-treatment the respective alternatives. Before having to decide on participation, women were told whether they had been randomised to the blind or non-blind trial. Eligible women who were still willing to join the trial were recruited. After recruitment participants in the non-blind trial (N = 1001) received open-label HT or no treatment, participants in the blind trial (N = 777) remained blinded until the end of the trial. The aim of this paper is to analyse the effect of blinding on internal and external validity of trial outcomes. Methods Effect of blinding was calculated as the hazard ratio of selected chronic diseases, total mortality and all outcomes. For analysing the effect of blinding on external validity, the hazard ratios from women recruited to the placebo arm and to the non-treatment arm were compared with those not recruited; for analysing the effect of blinding on internal validity, the hazard ratios from the blind trial were compared with those from the non-blind trial. Results The women recruited to the placebo arm had less cerebrovascular disease events (HR 0.43; 95% CI: 0.26-0.71) and all outcomes combined (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63-0.91) than those who were not recruited. Among women recruited or not recruited to the non-treatment arm, no differences were observed for any of the outcomes studied. Among women recruited to the trial, the risk for coronary heart disease events (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.93), cerebrovascular disease events (HR 0.66; 95%CI: 0.47-0.92), and all outcomes combined (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.94) was smaller among participants in the blind trial than in the non-blind trial. There was no difference between the blind and the non-blind trial for total cancer (HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.64-1.42), bone fractures (0.93; 95% CI: 0.74-1.16), and total mortality (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.53-1.98). Conclusions The results from blind and non-blind trials may differ, even if the target population is the same. Blinding may influence both internal and external validity. The effect of blinding may vary for different outcome events. Trial registration [ ISRCTN35338757 ]
Risk indicators for varicose veins in forty‐ to sixty‐year‐olds in the tampere varicose vein study
The objectives of the study were to discover the main determinants for the prevalence of varicose veins in a general population, and to assess the possibilities for prevention of this common surgical disease. Varicose veins were evaluated in three defined cohorts of 3284 men and 3590 women aged 40, 50, and 60 years by using a validated questionnaire. The response rate was 75% among men and 86% among women, and varicose veins were determined by self‐assessment. Increasing age, female sex, childbirths, standing posture at work, higher weight or height, and positive family history were significantly associated with varicose veins in a univariate analysis. These factors were further taken into a multivariate logistic regression analysis, and female gender (adjusted odds ratio, OR 2.2), increasing age (OR 2.2–2.8), a reported positive family history for varicose veins (OR 4.9), increasing number of births (OR 1.2–2.8), standing posture at work (OR 1.6), and higher weight (OR 1.2) and height (OR 1.4) were found to independent and significant risk indicators of varicose veins. Increasing age, positive family history of varicose veins, and child‐births in women were the most important factors in terms of population etiologic fractions. Familial predisposition and pregnancy‐related factors bear important associations with varicose veins. Thus prevention of varicose veins appears to be difficult. Varicose veins are nonlethal and, therefore, higher age is related to higher prevalence. Résumé Les objectifs de cette étude ont été de déterminer les facteurs favorisants des varices, si fréquentes dans la population générale, et d’évaluer la possibilité de leur prévention. Les varices ont été évaluées dans trois cohortes bien définies de 3284 hommes et 3590 femmes, âgés respectivement de 40, 50 et 60 ans, par l’intermédiaire d’un questionnaire validé au préalable. Le taux de réponse a été de 75% parmi les hommes et de 86% parmi les femmes; l’évaluation des varices a été réalisée par ê malade lui‐même. Les principaux facteurs retrouvés en analyse univariée comprenaient l’âge, le sexe féminin, l’accouchement, la position debout au travail, le poids et la taille, ainsi qu’une histoire familiale. En analyse multivariée (régression logistique) les facteurs indépendants étaient le sexe féminin (rapport de côte ajusté (RCA): 2.2), l’âge (RCA: 2.2–2.8), l’antécédent familial (RCA: 4.9), un nombre élevé d’accouchements (RCA: 1.2–2.8), position debout au travail (RCA: 1.6) et un poids élevé (RCA: 1.2) et une grande taille (RCA: 1.4). En termes d’étiologies, les facteurs les plus importants étaient l’âge, des antécédents familiaux de varices, et un nombre élevé d’accouchements chez la femme. La prédisposition familiale et les facteurs en rapport avec la grossesse sont les facteurs les plus liés à l’apparition des varices. Ainsi, la prévention apparat comme étant difficile. Les varices étaint une maladie non létale, l’âge est donc un facteur de prévalence élevée. Resumen El objetivo de este estudio fue intentar averiguar los factores etiológicos más importantes causantes de varices para tratar así de prevenir esta tan frecuente afección quirúrgica. Empleando un cuestionario valoramos las varices en tres cohortes bien definidos que comprenden 3284 hombres y 3590 mujeres cuyas edades fueron 40, 50 y 60 años. El porcentaje de cuestionarios contestados fue del 75% para los hombres y 86% para las mujeres, que valoraran por sí mismos las características de sus varices. En un análisis uni y multivariante se constató que las varices: aumentaban con la edad; eran más frecuentes en las mujeres y guardaban una estrecha relación con el número de partos, la permanencia de pie en el trabajo, el peso y talla así como con antecedentes familiares de varices. Todos estos factores se analizaron mediante una regresión logística multivariante, registrándose como factores independientes y significativos indicadores de riesgo de desarrollar varices: el sexo femenino (cociente de odds ajustado: OR 2.2), el incremento de la edad (OR 2.2–2.8) antecedentes familiares positivos (OR 4.9) número de embarazos (OR 1.2–2.8), posición erecta en el trabajo (OR 1.6), sobrepeso (OR 1.2), elevada talla (OR 1.4). En las mujeres los factores etiológicos más importantes fueron: el envejecimiento, número de partos y los antecedentes familiares. La predisposición familiar y las alteraciones producidas por los embarazos son los factores más importantes en la génesis de venas varicosas. Por ello, la prevención parece difícil. Las varices no constituyen una afección letal y por tanto cuando mayor sea la edad mayor será la su frecuencia.
Effect of family history on the risk of varicose veins is affected by differential misclassification
We assessed differential misclassification in self-reported family history of varicose veins by comparing consistency of subject's own varicose vein status and the consistency of information on varicose veins in family members. A population-based cohort study of 4,903 middle-aged residents of the city of Tampere, Finland. A questionnaire was used at entry and at the end of the 5-year follow-up. The estimated prevalence of positive family history of varicose veins varied depending on subject's own varicose veins from odds ratio (OR) 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.58), in those with varicose veins reported in the first but not the second survey to OR 6.0 (95% CI = 2.0–47.8), in those with varicose veins reported in the second survey but not in the first. The incidence of varicose veins varied from 0.4 (95% CI = 0.1–1.4) to 4.1 (95% CI = 2.1–7.1) (per 100 person-years) depending how the proband memorized the family history. Results on the effect of family history on varicose veins are subject to bias, which reduces the credibility of the reports proposing a strong hereditary component of varicose veins.
Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
The European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown significant reductions in prostate cancer mortality after 9 years and 11 years of follow-up, but screening is controversial because of adverse events such as overdiagnosis. We provide updated results of mortality from prostate cancer with follow-up to 2010, with analyses truncated at 9, 11, and 13 years. ERSPC is a multicentre, randomised trial with a predefined centralised database, analysis plan, and core age group (55–69 years), which assesses prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in eight European countries. Eligible men aged 50–74 years were identified from population registries and randomly assigned by computer generated random numbers to screening or no intervention (control). Investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality in the core age group. Analysis was by intention to treat. We did a secondary analysis that corrected for selection bias due to non-participation. Only incidence and no mortality data at 9 years’ follow-up are reported for the French centres. This study is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN49127736. With data truncated at 13 years of follow-up, 7408 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in the intervention group and 6107 cases in the control group. The rate ratio of prostate cancer incidence between the intervention and control groups was 1·91 (95% CI 1·83–1·99) after 9 years (1·64 [1·58–1·69] including France), 1·66 (1·60–1·73) after 11 years, and 1·57 (1·51–1·62) after 13 years. The rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality was 0·85 (0·70–1·03) after 9 years, 0·78 (0·66–0·91) after 11 years, and 0·79 (0·69–0·91) at 13 years. The absolute risk reduction of death from prostate cancer at 13 years was 0·11 per 1000 person-years or 1·28 per 1000 men randomised, which is equivalent to one prostate cancer death averted per 781 (95% CI 490–1929) men invited for screening or one per 27 (17–66) additional prostate cancer detected. After adjustment for non-participation, the rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality in men screened was 0·73 (95% CI 0·61–0·88). In this update the ERSPC confirms a substantial reduction in prostate cancer mortality attributable to testing of PSA, with a substantially increased absolute effect at 13 years compared with findings after 9 and 11 years. Despite our findings, further quantification of harms and their reduction are still considered a prerequisite for the introduction of populated-based screening. Each centre had its own funding responsibility.
The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultasonography
We studied which, age of the patient or density of the breast accounts for the sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography (US). Furthermore we studied whether the overall impression on the density of the breast or the density in tumour area accounts for the sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography. The material consisted of 572 consecutive histologically and 5 cytologically verified breast cancer cases. Mammography and US examinations were performed immediately before breast cancer operations and information on the findings were received from the original patient files and classified as malignant or benign. The density of breast parenchyma to fatty, mixed or dense in total breast and separately in tumour area was defined by a radiologist group from the original mammograms by comparing to model mammograms. The sensitivity (Se) of mammography and US was compared in 3 age groups (26-49, 50-59 and 60-92) and in the different density classes. Sensitivity of mammography increased by age (density-adjusted OR = 0.2, 95%, CI 0.1-0.5) in age group 26-49 compared to age group 60-92) and with fattiness of the breast (age-adjusted OR= 0.4, 95%, CI 0.1-1.0 for dense breast parenchyma in tumour area compared to fatty breast). Sensitivity of US was inversely related to age (density-adjusted OR = 2.3, 95%, CI 1.0-5.2 in age group 26-49 compared to age group 60-92) and directly related with fattiness of breast (age-adjusted OR = 0.5, 95%, CI 0.2-0.9 by dense breast parenchyma in tumour area compared to fatty breast). Density in the tumour area compared to total breast density was related only mariginally better sensitivity both of mammography (0.4 vs. 0.6) and of US (0.5 vs. 0.6). Sensitivity of both mammography and sensitivity of US are independently related both to the age of the patient and to the density of the breast. The effect of age is inverse and that of density parallel between mammography and US on sensitivity. The effect of overall breast density was close to the effect of density at the site of the tumour on the sensitivity of both mammography and US.