Explore the vast range of titles available.

Transition care programmes (TCP) provide older adults with goal-oriented rehabilitation after hospitalisation. However, limited research has focused on understanding older adults' experiences when undertaking TCP. Using a phenomenological approach, we explored the lived experience of older adults undertaking a TCP at a transition care facility in Australia. A purposive sample (N = 33 participants: 16 older adults, four family members and 13 staff) was recruited. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken at three time-points during admission and inductive thematic analysis was utilised. Older adults reflected on their TCP experiences through an emotional lens through which they deliberated, ‘is my destination home?’ Fear of losing independence and uncertainty about their discharge destination strongly influenced older adults' perspectives regarding their TCP experience. Emotional responses, both positive and negative, were influenced by expectations prior to admission, level of family support and staff behaviour. Staff and family concurred that many older adults were confused about their admission to the facility and initially were unprepared to engage in the rehabilitation provided. Older adults experienced TCP as a time of great uncertainty and feared the unknown when discharged from hospital to transition care. They expressed grief at the loss of existing life roles and anxiety about the possibility of being unable to return home. Health professionals need to inform and tailor rehabilitation for older adults to better support this transient time of life.

Background The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in a residential transition care setting to measure older adults’ functional outcomes. Methods A convenience sample of older adults ( n  = 10) and staff ( n  = 4) was recruited. The feasibility of using assessment tools that comprise a CGA to comprehensively measure function in physical, cognitive, social and emotional domains was evaluated pre- and post-rehabilitation. Results 10 older adults (mean ± SD age = 78.9 ± 9.1, n  = 6 male) completed a CGA performed using assessments across physical, cognitive, social and emotional domains. The CGA took 55.9 ± 7.3 min to complete. Staff found CGA using the selected assessment tools to be acceptable and suitable for the transition care population. Older adults found the procedure to be timely and 60% found the assessments easy to comprehend. Participating in CGA also assisted older adults in understanding their present state of health. The older adults demonstrated improvements across all assessed domains including functional mobility (de Morton Mobility Index; baseline 41.5 ± 23.0, discharge 55.0 ± 24.0, p  = 0.01) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L; baseline 59.0 ± 21.7, discharge 78.0 ± 16.0, p  < 0.01). Conclusions Incorporating CGA to evaluate functional outcomes in transition care using a suite of assessment tools was feasible and enabled a holistic assessment.

Objectives There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transition care programs (TCP) in improving health-related outcomes and discharge destination for older adults. This study aimed to (i) identify changes in health-related outcomes in older adults undergoing a facility-based TCP between admission and discharge; and (ii) compare health-related outcomes between participants discharged home and those discharged to permanent residential care. Method A prospective, observational study was conducted with older adults aged ≥60 years who participated in a facility-based TCP that provided short-term rehabilitation including mobility training, group exercise and cognitive activities. Physical, cognitive and social outcomes were measured at admission and discharge. Data were analysed using linear mixed modelling. Results Of the 41 participants (mean age 80.1 (±8.9) years), 26 (63.4%) were discharged home compared with 14 (34.2%) to residential care. Participants showed statistically significantly improvement in performance of activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and health-related quality of life, with a statistically and clinically significant decline in performance of instrumental ADL. Participants discharged home had statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in mobility compared with those discharged to residential care (de Morton mobility index: home, 13.6 (95% CI: 9.8, 17.4) vs residential, 6.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 12.0), Pinteraction = 0.04) and statistically and clinically significant less decline in instrumental ADL (Lawton’s scale: home, −0.8 (95% CI: −1.3, −0.2) vs residential, −2.1 (95% CI: −2.9, −1.4), Pinteraction = 0.002). Conclusion Older adults participating in a facility-based TCP had improvements in physical, cognitive and social functional abilities. However, those who returned home still had residual mobility deficits and decreased performance of instrumental ADL when compared with normative community level recommendations, which could impact on longer term community living. Further research investigating which program service components could be modified to further improve rehabilitation outcomes could benefit older adults in returning and remaining at home.