Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveTo update the “Endocrine Treatment of Transsexual Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline,” published by the Endocrine Society in 2009.ParticipantsThe participants include an Endocrine Society–appointed task force of nine experts, a methodologist, and a medical writer.EvidenceThis evidence-based guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to describe the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. The task force commissioned two systematic reviews and used the best available evidence from other published systematic reviews and individual studies.Consensus ProcessGroup meetings, conference calls, and e-mail communications enabled consensus. Endocrine Society committees, members and cosponsoring organizations reviewed and commented on preliminary drafts of the guidelines.ConclusionGender affirmation is multidisciplinary treatment in which endocrinologists play an important role. Gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons seek and/or are referred to endocrinologists to develop the physical characteristics of the affirmed gender. They require a safe and effective hormone regimen that will (1) suppress endogenous sex hormone secretion determined by the person’s genetic/gonadal sex and (2) maintain sex hormone levels within the normal range for the person’s affirmed gender. Hormone treatment is not recommended for prepubertal gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons. Those clinicians who recommend gender-affirming endocrine treatments—appropriately trained diagnosing clinicians (required), a mental health provider for adolescents (required) and mental health professional for adults (recommended)—should be knowledgeable about the diagnostic criteria and criteria for gender-affirming treatment, have sufficient training and experience in assessing psychopathology, and be willing to participate in the ongoing care throughout the endocrine transition. We recommend treating gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent adolescents who have entered puberty at Tanner Stage G2/B2 by suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Clinicians may add gender-affirming hormones after a multidisciplinary team has confirmed the persistence of gender dysphoria/gender incongruence and sufficient mental capacity to give informed consent to this partially irreversible treatment. Most adolescents have this capacity by age 16 years old. We recognize that there may be compelling reasons to initiate sex hormone treatment prior to age 16 years, although there is minimal published experience treating prior to 13.5 to 14 years of age. For the care of peripubertal youths and older adolescents, we recommend that an expert multidisciplinary team comprised of medical professionals and mental health professionals manage this treatment. The treating physician must confirm the criteria for treatment used by the referring mental health practitioner and collaborate with them in decisions about gender-affirming surgery in older adolescents. For adult gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons, the treating clinicians (collectively) should have expertise in transgender-specific diagnostic criteria, mental health, primary care, hormone treatment, and surgery, as needed by the patient. We suggest maintaining physiologic levels of gender-appropriate hormones and monitoring for known risks and complications. When high doses of sex steroids are required to suppress endogenous sex steroids and/or in advanced age, clinicians may consider surgically removing natal gonads along with reducing sex steroid treatment. Clinicians should monitor both transgender males (female to male) and transgender females (male to female) for reproductive organ cancer risk when surgical removal is incomplete. Additionally, clinicians should persistently monitor adverse effects of sex steroids. For gender-affirming surgeries in adults, the treating physician must collaborate with and confirm the criteria for treatment used by the referring physician. Clinicians should avoid harming individuals (via hormone treatment) who have conditions other than gender dysphoria/gender incongruence and who may not benefit from the physical changes associated with this treatment.Gender affirmation is multidisciplinary treatment. Gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons seek and/or are referred to endocrinologists to develop the physical characteristics of the affirmed gender.

Wolffian ducts (WDs) are the embryonic structures that form the male internal genitalia. These ducts develop in both the male and female embryo. However, in the female they subsequently regress, whereas in the male they are stabilised by testosterone. The WDs then develop into separate but contiguous organs, the epididymis, vas deferens and seminal vesicles. Recently, considerable progress has been made in identifying genes that are involved in these different stages of development which is described in this review. In addition, WD development in (atypical forms of) cystic fibrosis and intersex disorders, such as the complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency and LH-receptor defects, is discussed. The apparent increase in male reproductive tract disorders is briefly discussed from the perspective of the potential endocrine-disrupting effects of the numerous chemicals in the environment to which the developing male foetus can be exposed.

Abstract Context Hormonal interventions in adolescents with gender dysphoria may have adverse effects, such as reduced bone mineral accrual. Objective To describe bone mass development in adolescents with gender dysphoria treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa), subsequently combined with gender-affirming hormones. Design Observational prospective study. Subjects 51 transgirls and 70 transboys receiving GnRHa and 36 transgirls and 42 transboys receiving GnRHa and gender-affirming hormones, subdivided into early- and late-pubertal groups. Main Outcome Measures Bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), age- and sex-specific BMAD z-scores, and serum bone markers. Results At the start of GnRHa treatment, mean areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and BMAD values were within the normal range in all groups. In transgirls, the mean z-scores were well below the population mean. During 2 years of GnRHa treatment, BMAD stabilized or showed a small decrease, whereas z-scores decreased in all groups. During 3 years of combined administration of GnRHa and gender-affirming hormones, a significant increase of BMAD was found. Z-scores normalized in transboys but remained below zero in transgirls. In transgirls and early pubertal transboys, all bone markers decreased during GnRHa treatment. Conclusions BMAD z-scores decreased during GnRHa treatment and increased during gender-affirming hormone treatment. Transboys had normal z-scores at baseline and at the end of the study. However, transgirls had relatively low z-scores, both at baseline and after 3 years of estrogen treatment. It is currently unclear whether this results in adverse outcomes, such as increased fracture risk, in transgirls as they grow older.

Inconclusive and false-positive newborn screening (NBS) results can cause parental stress and increase healthcare expenditures. These results can be reduced by improving NBS algorithms. This was recently done for Congenital Hypothyroidism (CH), Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) and Maple Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD) in the Dutch NBS program. The current study estimates the financial consequences of these improved algorithms related to the reduction in inconclusive results and false-positives. For each improved algorithm, the care pathway of an inconclusive/false-positive result was analyzed. The costs associated with the improvements, based on the change in inconclusive results/false-positives, were assessed to estimate the cost reduction per year. The improvements resulted in a reduction of inconclusive results and/or false-positives, without increasing false-negatives. For CH, false positives decreased by 26 per year with a related cost reduction of EUR 31,156. For CAH, 95 second heel punctures and seven false-positives per year were avoided, leading to a related cost reduction of EUR 7340. For MSUD, five false-positives per year were avoided with a related cost reduction of EUR 11,336. The improved screening algorithms led to a cost reduction of EUR 49,832 annually. Together with the known negative psychosocial effects associated with an inconclusive or false-positive NBS result, these results highlight the importance of improving NBS algorithms.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) are recommended as initial treatment for adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria, providing time to follow gender identity development and consider further treatment wishes without distress caused by unwanted pubertal changes. This has been described as an extended diagnostic phase. However, there are also concerns about the physical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial effects of this treatment. In this retrospective study, we document trajectories after the initiation of GnRHa and explore reasons for extended use and discontinuation of GnRHa. Treatment was considered appropriate in 143 (67%) of the 214 adolescents eligible for GnRHa treatment by virtue of their age/pubertal status, and all started GnRHa (38 transgirls, 105 transboys; median age, 15.0 years [range, 11.1–18.6] and 16.1 years [range, 10.1–17.9]). After a median duration of 0.8 years (0.3–3.8) on GnRHa, 125 (87%) started gender-affirming hormones (GAH). Nine (6%) discontinued GnRHa, five of whom no longer wished gender-affirming treatment. Thirteen had used GnRHa for longer than required by protocol for reasons other than logistics and regularly met with a mental health professional during this time, supporting the use of GnRHa treatment as an extended diagnostic phase. In conclusion, the vast majority who started GnRHa proceeded to GAH, possibly due to eligibility criteria that select those highly likely to pursue further gender-affirming treatment. Due to the observational character of the study, it is not possible to say if GnRHa treatment itself influenced the outcome. Few individuals discontinued GnRHa, and only 3.5% no longer wished gender-affirming treatment.

This week in the Journal , a much-awaited primary report from Chen et al. 1 on 2 years of gender-affirming hormones (GAH) in transgender adolescents appears. The approach to adolescent transgender care with early treatment with puberty blockers, and GAH in youth from 16 years of age, originated in the Netherlands (“the Dutch model”) and became the dominant medical care model for transgender adolescents. 2 Especially over the past decade, marked increases in referrals but limited evidence as to long-term outcomes have led to controversies and debate regarding this approach. Indeed, some European countries are adapting their guidelines and restricting access to care . . .

ObjectiveCongenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency is an inherited adrenal steroid synthesis disorder included in Dutch newborn screening (NBS) since 2002. Screening involves measuring 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) in dried blood spots (DBS) with gestational age-adjusted cut-offs. Since October 2021, a second-tier 21-deoxycortisol (21-DF) test has replaced the 17-OHP measurement in a second heel prick after inconclusive results. This study evaluates the performance of the second-tier test from 1 October 2021 to 30 September 2023.Design17-OHP was measured by immunoassay in regional NBS laboratories. DBS with inconclusive and positive 17-OHP results was sent to Amsterdam UMC for 21-DF measurement by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Genetic analysis of CYP21A2, CYP11B1, POR and HSD3B2 was performed on DBS from newborns with false-positive second-tier results.ResultsOver 2 years, 21-DF was measured in DBS of 147 newborns (=0.04%). Twenty newborns were directly referred to a paediatric endocrinologist based on positive 17-OHP results: 15 had a positive 21-DF and were diagnosed with classical CAH (genetically confirmed), while five were first-tier false-positives. Of 127 newborns with inconclusive 17-OHP results, three had a positive 21-DF and were referred but not diagnosed with CAH: second-tier false-positives. In total, 8/23 referred newborns were false-positives. Genetic analysis of six false-positive second-tier DBS showed pathogenic CYP21A2 variants in five.ConclusionsThe modified protocol improved CAH screening by preventing 127 heel pricks in 2 years and reducing unnecessary referrals (currently 2.4%, previously 7.7%). 5/6 false-positive second-tier tests were most likely due to non-classical CAH. Further optimisation of cut-offs may prevent these false-positives.

According to international transgender care guidelines, transgender adolescents should have medical decision-making competence (MDC) to start puberty suppression (PS) and halt endogenous pubertal development. However, MDC is a debated concept in adolescent transgender care and little is known about the transgender adolescents’, their parents’, and clinicians’ perspectives on this. Increasing our understanding of these perspectives can improve transgender adolescent care. A qualitative interview study with adolescents attending two Dutch gender identity clinics (eight transgender adolescents who proceeded to gender-affirming hormones after PS, and six adolescents who discontinued PS) and 12 of their parents, and focus groups with ten clinicians was conducted. From thematic analysis, three themes emerged regarding transgender adolescents’ MDC to start PS: (1) challenges when assessing MDC, (2) aspects that are considered when assessing MDC, and (3) MDC’s relevance. The four criteria one needs to fulfill to have MDC—understanding, appreciating, reasoning, communicating a choice—were all, to a greater or lesser extent, mentioned by most participants, just as MDC being relative to a specific decision and context. Interestingly, most adolescents, parents and clinicians find understanding and appreciating PS and its consequences important for MDC. Nevertheless, most state that the adolescents did not fully understand and appreciate PS and its consequences, but were nonetheless able to decide about PS. Parents’ support of their child was considered essential in the decision-making process. Clinicians find MDC difficult to assess and put into practice in a uniform way. Dissemination of knowledge about MDC to start PS would help to adequately support adolescents, parents and clinicians in the decision-making process.

Abstract Context Larger studies on outcomes in males with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism are rare. Objective To compare health outcomes in males with 45,X/46,XY diagnosed as a result of either genital abnormalities at birth or nongenital reasons later in life. Design A retrospective, multicenter study. Setting Sixteen tertiary centers. Patients or Other Participants Sixty-three males older than 13 years with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism. Main Outcome Measures Health outcomes, such as genital phenotype, gonadal function, growth, comorbidities, fertility, and gonadal histology, including risk of neoplasia. Results Thirty-five patients were in the genital group and 28 in the nongenital. Eighty percent of all patients experienced spontaneous pubertal onset, significantly more in the nongenital group (P = 0.023). Patients were significantly shorter in the genital group with median adult heights of 156.7 cm and 164.5 cm, respectively (P = 0.016). Twenty-seven percent of patients received recombinant human GH. Forty-four patients had gonadal histology evaluated. Germ cells were detected in 42%. Neoplasia in situ was found in five patients. Twenty-five percent had focal spermatogenesis, and another 25.0% had arrested spermatogenesis. Fourteen out of 17 (82%) with semen analyses were azoospermic; three had motile sperm. Conclusion Patients diagnosed as a result of genital abnormalities have poorer health outcomes than those diagnosed as a result of nongenital reasons. Most patients, however, have relatively good endocrine gonadal function, but most are also short statured. Patients have a risk of gonadal neoplasia, and most are azoospermic, but almost one-half of patients has germ cells present histologically and up to one-quarter has focal spermatogenesis, providing hope for fertility treatment options. Clinical health outcomes in males with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism vary depending on reason for diagnosis. However, pre-neoplasia and ongoing spermatogenesis are both relatively common in all patients.