Explore the vast range of titles available.

Mortality for these injuries has been described as high as 30 per cent and they are also associated with high patient morbidity.1, 2 Anatomically shielded by upper thoracic muscular and bony structures, the subclavian and proximal axillary arteries can be challenging to operatively expose. Incisions such as sternotomy, thoracotomy, trap door, supraclavicular, and infraclavicular have been described.3 Injury location can necessitate a variety of operative approaches and necessitate damage control or definitive repair.3 More modern approaches such as endovascular intervention and temporary vascular shunting have also been described.3, 4 As such, these injuries require rapid decision-making and intervention. A CT angiogram demonstrated subclavian artery disruption with surrounding ballistic fragments and active extravasation, and he was taken for operative evaluation (Fig. 1).

Social media has become a permeating form of communication with billions of daily users. Twitter in particular has become a tool for the surgical community to engage with other providers, as well as patients, through active online discussions, sharing of research, and highlighting opportunities for community outreach. Twitter can help with personal branding, mentorship, and international collaboration on multiple types of academic endeavors. Likewise, institutional and residency programs can harness the power of social media to develop an online presence and aid in resident recruitment.

Esophageal lung is a rare type of bronchopulmonary foregut malformation where an anomalous main bronchus arises from the esophagus rather than the trachea. This differentiates from an esophageal bronchus where a lobar bronchus arises from the esophagus. Fewer than 30 of these anomalies have been reported in the literature. A female infant was born at 35 weeks gestational age and found to have multiple congenital abnormalities including cleft palate, long-gap esophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), imperforate anus, and renal anomalies. She initially underwent thoracoscopic ligation of TEF with colostomy and mucus fistula creation. Bronchoscopy found no right mainstem bronchus, and subsequent computed tomography scan was consistent with possible esophageal bronchus. Esophagoscopy through the gastrostomy discovered a fistulous connection between the distal esophagus and anomalous main right bronchus. Right thoracotomy with pneumonectomy of the hypoplastic lung was performed. She subsequently underwent vaginostomy for hydrometrocolpos. Her proximal esophagus was diverted with a cervical esophagostomy for control of secretions. She also required tracheotomy and is currently at home on minimal ventilator settings awaiting staged reconstruction. Esophageal lung is a rare congenital abnormality with few reported cases. Surgical treatment with pneumonectomy is often required, and pediatric surgeons should be familiar with these congenital bronchopulmonary malformations.

Background Prehospital chest decompression can be a lifesaving procedure in severe chest trauma. Studies investigating prehospital chest decompression are mostly European where physicians are assigned to prehospital care units. This report is one of the first to compare demographics and outcomes in patients undergoing prehospital chest decompression by trained aeromedical nonphysician personnel to hospital chest decompression by physicians. Methods Prehospital tube thoracostomy (PTT) patients were identified from January 2014 to January 2019 and were matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and chest Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) to patients who underwent hospital tube thoracostomy (HTT) within 24 hours of admission. Results Forty-nine PTT patients were matched to 98 HTT patients. PTT patients had lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), a higher rate of pre-chest tube needle decompression, and higher level 1 trauma activation. PTT were placed sooner (21.9 vs 157.0 minutes, P < .001). Rates of tube malposition, organ injury, tube dislodgement, empyema, and hospital-acquired pneumonia over the course of hospital admission were not significantly different between the 2 groups. PTT patients had longer intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), but similar hospital LOS, and overall mortality. Discussion This report demonstrates that PTT is performed sooner than hospital placed tubes. Complication rates associated with tube thoracostomy and patient outcomes were not statistically different between PTT and HTT groups.

Background Operative rib fixation (ORF) of traumatic rib fractures has been shown to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and mortality. ORF performed within 1 day of admission has been shown to have favorable outcomes compared to later ORF. This report examines the ORF experience over 10 years at a level I trauma center. Methods ORF patients from January 2007-January 2018 were matched to nonoperative controls in a 1:2 ratio based on age, injury severity score (ISS), chest Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), and head AIS. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data were collected from the trauma registry and medical records. Hospital day of ORF was identified for each ORF patient. Hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and mortality were compared against matched nonoperative controls. Results Ninety-five ORF patients were matched to 190 nonoperative patients. ORF patients had a higher number of rib fractures (9.6 vs 6.4, P < .001). ORF patients with short time to operation (0-2 days) had a shorter average hospital stay than those with delayed operations (11.8 vs 12.6 vs 13.4 vs 19.6 days, P = .003). ORF patients with operations performed 3-4 days and >6 days after admission also had statistically significant longer ICU LOS and ventilator days. Patient mortality was higher when ORF was performed after 6 days. Discussion Early ORF may improve pulmonary function, patient outcomes, and decrease LOS. Shifting practice toward early fixation may help further solidify the benefits of this procedure in the treatment of blunt chest trauma.

Complex injury patterns require rapid evaluation and decision-making, with limited time for diagnostic investigation.1, 2 If surgical intervention is warranted, the body cavity with the most life-threatening injury should be explored first.2 Rare individuals requiring dual cavity intervention such as thoracotomy and laparotomy have been reported to have a mortality as high as 67 per cent.1 Blunt disruption of the pulmonary vasculature is a rare injury also associated with significant mortality. [...]the patient had received 74 total units of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma.Although more blood was being transported from the blood bank, the patient suffered a cardiac arrest. [...]despite the cardiac perfusionist being privy to the conversation about no more blood, that individual apparently did not comprehend the entire situation when they had a significant amount of blood readily available.

Few studies have investigated risk factors for recurrence of blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH). Twenty trauma centers identified repaired TAWH from January 2012 to December 2018. Logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors for recurrence. TAWH were repaired in 175 patients with 21 (12.0%) known recurrences. No difference was found in location, defect size, or median time to repair between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Mesh use was not protective of recurrence. Female sex, injury severity score (ISS), emergency laparotomy (EL), and bowel resection were associated with hernia recurrence. Bowel resection remained significant in a multivariable model. Female sex, ISS, EL, and bowel resection were identified as risk factors for hernia recurrence. Mesh use and time to repair were not associated with recurrence. Surgeons should be mindful of these risk factors but could attempt acute repair in the setting of appropriate physiologic parameters. [Display omitted] •Bowel resection is a recurrence risk factor in blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias.•Time to repair and mesh use are not associated with recurrence.•Early repair of these injuries is feasible.

A massive transfusion protocol (MTP) was implemented at a Level I trauma center in 2007 for patients with massive blood loss. A goal ratio of plasma to pheresed platelets to packed red blood cells (PRBCs) of 1:1:1 was established. From 2007 to 2014, trauma nurse clinicians (TNCs) administered the MTP during initial resuscitation and anesthesia personnel administered the MTP intraoperatively. In 2015, TNCs began administering the MTP intraoperatively. This study evaluates intraoperative blood product ratios and crystalloid volume administered by anesthesia personnel or TNCs. A retrospective review of trauma registry patients requiring MTP from 2007 to 2017 was performed. Patient data were stratified according to MTP administration by either anesthesia personnel (2007–2015) or TNCs (2015–2017). Ninety-seven patients were included with 54 anesthesia patients and 44 TNC patients. Patients undergoing resuscitation by MTP administered by TNCs received less median crystalloid (3000 mL vs 1500 mL, P < 0.001). The ratio of plasma:PRBC (0.75 vs 0.93, P = 0.027) and platelets:PRBC (0.75 vs 1.04, P = 0.003) was found to be significantly closer to 1:1 for TNC patients. MTP intraoperative blood product administration by TNCs reduced the amount of infused crystalloid and improved adherence to MTP in achieving a 1:1:1 ratio of blood products.

Background Rib fractures are one of the most common traumatic injuries and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Despite growing evidence, technological advances and increasing acceptance, surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) remains not uniformly considered in trauma centers. Indications, contraindications, appropriate timing, surgical approaches and utilized implants are part of an ongoing debate. The present position paper, which is endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), and supported by the Chest Wall Injury Society, aims to provide a review of the literature investigating the use of SSRF in rib fracture management to develop graded position statements, providing an updated guide and reference for SSRF. Methods This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on the position statements. Results A total of 287 studies (systematic reviews, randomized clinical trial, prospective and retrospective comparative studies, case series, original articles) have been selected from an initial pool of 9928 studies. Thirty-nine graded position statements were put forward to address eight crucial aspects of SSRF: surgical indications, contraindications, optimal timing of surgery, preoperative imaging evaluation, rib fracture sites for surgical fixation, management of concurrent thoracic injuries, surgical approach, stabilization methods and material selection. Conclusion This consensus document addresses the key focus questions on surgical treatment of rib fractures. The expert recommendations clarify current evidences on SSRF indications, timing, operative planning, approaches and techniques, with the aim to guide clinicians in optimizing the management of rib fractures, to improve patient outcomes and direct future research.