Explore the vast range of titles available.

Most cardiovascular disease risk prediction equations in use today were derived from cohorts established last century and with participants at higher risk but less socioeconomically and ethnically diverse than patients they are now applied to. We recruited a nationally representative cohort in New Zealand to develop equations relevant to patients in contemporary primary care and compared the performance of these new equations to equations that are recommended in the USA. The PREDICT study automatically recruits participants in routine primary care when general practitioners in New Zealand use PREDICT software to assess their patients' risk profiles for cardiovascular disease, which are prospectively linked to national ICD-coded hospitalisation and mortality databases. The study population included male and female patients in primary care who had no prior cardiovascular disease, renal disease, or congestive heart failure. New equations predicting total cardiovascular disease risk were developed using Cox regression models, which included clinical predictors plus an area-based deprivation index and self-identified ethnicity. Calibration and discrimination performance of the equations were assessed and compared with 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs). The additional predictors included in new PREDICT equations were also appended to the PCEs to determine whether they were independent predictors in the equations from the USA. Outcome events were derived for 401 752 people aged 30–74 years at the time of their first PREDICT risk assessment between Aug 27, 2002, and Oct 12, 2015, representing about 90% of the eligible population. The mean follow-up was 4·2 years, and a third of participants were followed for 5 years or more. 15 386 (4%) people had cardiovascular disease events (1507 [10%] were fatal, and 8549 [56%] met the PCEs definition of hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) during 1 685 521 person-years follow-up. The median 5-year risk of total cardiovascular disease events predicted by the new equations was 2·3% in women and 3·2% in men. Multivariable adjusted risk increased by about 10% per quintile of socioeconomic deprivation. Māori, Pacific, and Indian patients were at 13–48% higher risk of cardiovascular disease than Europeans, and Chinese or other Asians were at 25–33% lower risk of cardiovascular disease than Europeans. The PCEs overestimated of hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease by about 40% in men and by 60% in women, and the additional predictors in the new equations were also independent predictors in the PCEs. The new equations were significantly better than PCEs on all performance metrics. We constructed a large prospective cohort study representing typical patients in primary care in New Zealand who were recommended for cardiovascular disease risk assessment. Most patients are now at low risk of cardiovascular disease, which explains why the PCEs based mainly on old cohorts substantially overestimate risk. Although the PCEs and many other equations will need to be recalibrated to mitigate overtreatment of the healthy majority, they also need new predictors that include measures of socioeconomic deprivation and multiple ethnicities to identify vulnerable high-risk subpopulations that might otherwise be undertreated. Health Research Council of New Zealand, Heart Foundation of New Zealand, and Healthier Lives National Science Challenge.

We describe trends in acute rheumatic fever (ARF), rheumatic heart disease (RHD), and RHD deaths among population groups in New Zealand. We analyzed initial primary ARF and RHD hospitalizations during 2000-2018 and RHD mortality rates during 2000-2016. We found elevated rates of initial ARF hospitalizations for persons of Māori (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 11.8, 95% CI 10.0-14.0) and Pacific Islander (aRR 23.6, 95% CI 19.9-27.9) ethnicity compared with persons of European/other ethnicity. We also noted higher rates of initial RHD hospitalization for Māori (aRR 3.2, 95% CI 2.9-3.5) and Pacific Islander (aRR 4.6, 95% CI 4.2-5.1) groups and RHD deaths among these groups (Māori aRR 12.3, 95% CI 10.3-14.6, and Pacific Islanders aRR 11.2, 95% CI 9.1-13.8). Rates also were higher in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. To curb high rates of ARF and RHD, New Zealand must address increasing social and ethnic inequalities.

Introduction and aimMāori experience higher rates of disease and poorer health outcomes than non-Māori, highlighting inequities in the health system in Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa). Māori eye health has historically been under-researched. Kaupapa Māori (by Māori, with Māori, for Māori) approaches to research have been recognised as critical for developing and informing equitable and inclusive health service solutions for Māori. This scoping review aims to summarise the literature on interventions to improve Māori eye health and investigate the extent to which Kaupapa Māori approaches have been used within these studies.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist and informed by Kaupapa Māori research and strengths-based methodologies. Electronic searches of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and Google Scholar were performed using keywords focused on Māori eye health, Kaupapa Māori and eye health interventions. The search was performed by an information specialist without language or time restrictions. Peer-reviewed and grey literature reports will be included if they report any intervention that aimed to improve eye health for Māori. Two reviewers will independently screen abstracts and full texts, followed by data charting in Covidence. Data items will include publication, study and intervention characteristics and whether a Kaupapa Māori approach was used, in which case the characteristics of the approach will be charted. The responsiveness to Māori of each included study will be assessed using the MĀORI framework and CONSIDER statement. Data will be summarised in tables, graphs, maps and text.Ethics and disseminationTo the best of our knowledge, the scoping review is the first to investigate published and publicly accessible literature related to interventions for improving Māori eye health and Kaupapa Māori approaches. Ethical approval is not required for this review as we will include information available in the public domain. We anticipate that the findings will be useful for Hauora Māori providers, organisations, education training and research providers of eyecare services. The scoping review also informs a more extensive project examining Indigenous perspectives in optometry to achieve equitable outcomes. Dissemination will include publication of the scoping review findings in an open-access peer-reviewed journal, as well as presentations at conferences, to Māori community and service organisations, scholars and staff working in the field of Māori eye health.RegistrationOpen science framework (https://osf.io/4vqaw/). On 27 February 2025.

Background Prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is high among Māori and other Pacific Island peoples in New Zealand. Current health services to address T2DM largely take place in primary healthcare settings and have, overall, failed to address the significant health inequities among Māori and Pacific people with T2DM. Culturally comprehensive T2DM management programmes, aimed at addressing inequities in Māori or Pacific diabetes management and workforce development, are not extensively available in New Zealand. Deliberate strategies to improve cultural safety, such as educating health professionals and fostering culturally safe practices must be priority when funding health services that deliver T2DM prevention programmes. There is a significant workforce of community-based, non-clinical workers in South Auckland delivering diabetes self-management education to Māori and Pacific peoples. There is little information on the perspectives, challenges, effectiveness, and success of dietitians, community health workers and kai manaaki (KM) in delivering these services. This study aimed to understand perspectives and characteristics of KM and other community-based, non-clinical health workers, with a focus on how they supported Māori and Pacific Peoples living with T2DM to achieve better outcomes. Methods This qualitative study undertaken was underpinned by the Tangata Hourua research framework. Focus groups with dietitians, community health workers (CHWs) and KM took place in South Auckland, New Zealand. Thematic analysis of the transcripts was used to identify important key themes. Results Analysis of focus group meetings identified three main themes common across the groups: whakawhanaungatanga (actively building relationships), cultural safety (mana enhancing) and cultural alignment to role, with a further two themes identified only by the KM and CHWs, who both strongly associated a multidisciplinary approach to experiences of feeling un/valued in their roles, when compared with dietitians. Generally, all three groups agreed that their roles required good relationships with the people they were working with and an understanding of the contexts in which Māori and Pacific Peoples with T2DM lived. Conclusions Supporting community based, non-clinical workers to build meaningful and culturally safe relationships with Māori and Pacific people has potential to improve diabetes outcomes.

IntroductionRural Māori experience inequities in heart health outcomes compared to rural non-Māori and urban Māori. Access to health care is a significant contributor to these inequities. There is a wealth of literature that explores Māori access to health care; however, the voice of rural Māori within the literature is limited. Under Te Tiriti o Waitangi (The Treaty of Waitangi), Māori have legislative rights to access, engage, and participate in the health care system equitably.AimThis study aimed to investigate the barriers and facilitators of accessing heart health care for rural Māori.MethodsThe study was informed by Kaupapa Māori Theory, which centres on Māori worldviews and epistemologies. Rural Māori (n = 11) with lived experience of (or who had supported their whānau (family) member with) acute coronary syndrome, heart failure or cardiovascular risk assessment were interviewed, and reflective thematic analysis of the data was undertaken.ResultsThree overarching themes were generated: rural Māori desires and expectations of heart health care; how the system engages with rural Māori; and knowing what is important to rural Māori when it comes to heart health.DiscussionParticipants experienced many barriers to accessing quality heart health care, some of which were unique to rural settings. Participants sought heart health care that was close to home, culturally responsive, included a representative Māori workforce, involved their whānau, and valued partnership. System-level action is needed to adequately address inequities in health care access and outcomes in rural Māori and to meet obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

IntroductionMāori (the Indigenous peoples of New Zealand) are disproportionately represented in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, morbidity and mortality rates, and are less likely to receive evidence-based CVD healthcare. Rural Māori experience additional barriers to treatment access, poorer health outcomes and a more significant burden of CVD risk factors compared with non-Māori and Māori living in urban areas. Importantly, these inequities are similarly experienced by Indigenous peoples in other nations impacted by colonisation. Given the scarcity of available literature, we are conducting a scoping review of literature exploring barriers and facilitators in accessing quality CVD healthcare for rural Māori and other Indigenous peoples in nations impacted by colonisation.Methods and analysisA scoping review will be conducted to identify and map the extent of research available and identify any gaps in the literature. This review will be underpinned by Kaupapa Māori Research methodology and will be conducted using Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) methodological framework. A database search of MEDLINE (OVID), PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre and NZResearch.org will be used to explore empirical research literature. A grey literature search will also be conducted. Two authors will independently review and screen search results in an iterative manner. The New Zealand Ministry of Health Te Tiriti o Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi) Framework principles will be used as a framework to summarise and construct a narrative of existing literature. Existing literature will also be appraised using the CONSolIDated critERia for strengthening the reporting of health research involving Indigenous Peoples (CONSIDER) statement.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has not been sought for this review as we are using publicly available data. We will publish this protocol and the findings of our review in an open-access peer-reviewed journal. This protocol has been registered on Open Science Framework (DOI:10.17605/osf.io/xruhy).

Exploring the results of the COVID-19 response in New Zealand (Aotearoa) is warranted so that insights can inform future pandemic planning. We compared the COVID-19 response in New Zealand to that for the more severe 1918–19 influenza pandemic. Both pandemics were caused by respiratory viruses, but the 1918–19 pandemic was short, intense, and yielded a higher mortality rate. The government and societal responses to COVID-19 were vastly superior; responses had a clear strategic direction and included a highly effective elimination strategy, border restrictions, minimal community spread for 20 months, successful vaccination rollout, and strong central government support. Both pandemics involved a whole-of-government response, community mobilization, and use of public health and social measures. Nevertheless, lessons from 1918–19 on the necessity of action to prevent inequities among different social groups were not fully learned, as demonstrated by the COVID-19 response and its ongoing unequal health outcomes in New Zealand.

BackgroundCardiovascular disease is a major health issue for Māori that requires timely and effective first-response care. Māori report culturally unsafe experiences in health care, resulting in poor health outcomes. Research in the pre-hospital context is lacking. This study aimed to explore experiences of cultural (un)safety for Māori and their whānau who received acute pre-hospital cardiovascular care from paramedics.MethodsUtilising a qualitative descriptive methodology and Kaupapa Māori Research (KMR), in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 10 Māori patients and/or whānau, and a general inductive approach was used for analysis.ResultsThree key themes were identified: (1) interpersonal workforce skills, (2) access and service factors and (3) active protection of Māori. Participants described paramedics’ clinical knowledge and interpersonal skills, including appropriate communication and ability to connect. Barriers to accessing ambulance services included limited personal and community resources and workforce issues. The impact of heart health on communities and desire for better preventative care highlighted the role of ambulance services in heart health.ConclusionMāori experience culturally unsafe pre-hospital care. Systemic and structural barriers were found to be harmful despite there being fewer reports of interpersonal discrimination than in previous research. Efforts to address workforce representation, resource disparities and cultural safety education (focussing on communication, partnership and connection) are warranted to improve experiences and outcomes for Māori.

Objective The increasing complexity of healthcare systems demands a general practice workforce equipped with entrepreneurial competencies to lead innovation, adapt to system pressures, and enhance service sustainability. Traditional medical education for general practitioners (GPs) emphasizes clinical expertise but often overlooks essential skills in business acumen, leadership, and innovation. The aim of this scoping review was to examine how entrepreneurship is conceptualized, practiced, and supported among GPs in primary care, with a particular focus on identifying the barriers, enablers, and gaps across education, practice, and policy. Methods A scoping review following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and JBI’s guidelines, to ensure methodological rigor. Literature searches were performed across SCOPUS, PubMed, and EMBASE (via Ovid), supplemented by citation searches. The strategy focused on entrepreneurship, primary healthcare, and General Practitioner. After screening and removing duplicates, relevant publications were selected through team discussion, resolving discrepancies by consensus. All included papers were coded for key themes and patterns, followed by thematic analysis to uncover key insights and trends in the field. Results Eighteen studies were included, with most (13) examining entrepreneurship in GP practice, three focusing on education, and two addressing both. Seven themes were identified: challenges in practice, areas and types of investment, medical school characteristics, contextual factors, entrepreneurial skills, behaviours and orientation, policy-level factors, and motivations. Barriers were most pronounced at the micro (individual) and meso (practice/organisational) levels, including limited business training, role conflict, operational difficulties, and lack of structural support. Macro-level constraints, such as restrictive funding and regulation, further curtailed innovation. Despite these barriers, GPs engaged in diverse entrepreneurial activity, from corporate and partnership models to social ventures, often in response to workforce pressures and growing demand for chronic care. Evidence was heavily concentrated in Western contexts, highlighting the need for more globally diverse perspectives. Conclusion The review highlights significant gaps in educational preparation and systemic support, pointing to the need for changes in curricula, policy incentives, and practice structures. Guidance from medical councils, accreditation bodies, and GP associations will be key to embedding entrepreneurship into GP training and practice.

BackgroundIn New Zealand (NZ), Indigenous Māori and Pacific peoples experience a higher burden of obesity and obesity-related disease. Counties Manukau Health (CMH) provides the largest public bariatric service in NZ housing a higher proportion (64%) of non-European groups (Asian, Pacific and Māori). This study investigated whether ethnic disparities in the receipt of bariatric surgery exist within one of the most ethnically diverse populations in NZ.MethodsAll patients accepted on to the CMH bariatric programme between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017 were identified through hospitalisation records. Logistic regression modelling with multivariate adjustment was utilised to assess the likelihood (odds ratio) of receipt of bariatric surgery by ethnicity.ResultsA total of 2519 referrals were received, of which 1051 proceeded to surgery. The proportion of patients referred who eventually underwent bariatric surgery was significantly higher for Other Europeans (68%) and NZ Europeans (63%) compared to Asian (42%), Māori (41%) and Pacific peoples (28%, p < 0.05). The likelihood of receipt of bariatric surgery was significantly lower for Māori (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42–0.68) and Pacific (OR, 0.3; 95%CI, 0.23–0.40). These disparities were not explained by differences in socio-demographics, comorbidity or attrition.ConclusionsEthnic disparities in the receipt of publicly funded bariatric surgery exist where NZ European and Other European patients are more likely to gain access to publicly funded bariatric surgery. These findings challenge current selection criteria and prompt discussion around whether equity targets based on ethnicity need to be established.