Explore the vast range of titles available.

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Many patients have inoperable disease at diagnosis or have recurrent disease after resection with curative intent. Gastric cancer is separated anatomically into true gastric adenocarcinomas and gastro-oesophageal-junction adenocarcinomas, and histologically into diffuse and intestinal types. Gastric cancer should be treated by teams of experts from different disciplines. Surgery is the only curative treatment. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy is usually implemented in combination with surgery. In metastatic disease, outcomes are poor, with median survival being around 1 year. Targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, an antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2), and the VEGFR-2 antibody ramucirumab, have been introduced. In this Seminar, we present an update of the causes, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of gastric cancer.

The key goal and main challenge of radiation therapy is the elimination of tumors without any concurring damages of the surrounding healthy tissues and organs. Radiation doses required to achieve sufficient cancer‐cell kill exceed in most clinical situations the dose that can be tolerated by the healthy tissues, especially when large parts of the affected organ are irradiated. High‐precision radiation oncology aims at optimizing tumor coverage, while sparing normal tissues. Medical imaging during the preparation phase, as well as in the treatment room for localization of the tumor and directing the beam, referred to as image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT), is the cornerstone of precision radiation oncology. Sophisticated high‐resolution real‐time IGRT using X‐rays, computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound, enables delivery of high radiation doses to tumors without significant damage of healthy organs. IGRT is the most convincing success story of radiation oncology over the last decades, and it remains a major driving force of innovation, contributing to the development of personalized oncology, for example, through the use of real‐time imaging biomarkers for individualized dose delivery. Sophisticated, high‐resolution, real‐time image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using X‐rays, computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound, enables delivery of high radiation doses to tumors without significant damage of healthy organs. Here, we review IGRT research and applications and discuss how they contribute to the development of personalized oncology, for example, through the use of real‐time imaging biomarkers for individualized dose delivery.

We report the long-term results of a trial of immediate postoperative irradiation versus a wait-and-see policy in patients with prostate cancer extending beyond the prostate, to confirm whether previously reported progression-free survival was sustained. This randomised, phase 3, controlled trial recruited patients aged 75 years or younger with untreated cT0–3 prostate cancer (WHO performance status 0 or 1) from 37 institutions across Europe. Eligible patients were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to postoperative irradiation (60 Gy of conventional irradiation to the surgical bed for 6 weeks) or to a wait-and-see policy until biochemical progression (increase in prostate-specific antigen >0·2 μg/L confirmed twice at least 2 weeks apart). We analysed the primary endpoint, biochemical progression-free survival, by intention to treat (two-sided test for difference at α=0.05, adjusted for one interim analysis) and did exploratory analyses of heterogeneity of effect. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002511. 1005 patients were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy (n=503) or postoperative irradiation (n=502) and were followed up for a median of 10·6 years (range 2 months to 16·6 years). Postoperative irradiation significantly improved biochemical progression-free survival compared with the wait-and-see policy (198 [39·4%] of 502 patients in postoperative irradiation group vs 311 [61·8%] of 503 patients in wait-and-see group had biochemical or clinical progression or died; HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·41–0·59]; p<0·0001). Late adverse effects (any type of any grade) were more frequent in the postoperative irradiation group than in the wait-and-see group (10 year cumulative incidence 70·8% [66·6–75·0] vs 59·7% [55·3–64·1]; p=0.001). Results at median follow-up of 10·6 years show that conventional postoperative irradiation significantly improves biochemical progression-free survival and local control compared with a wait-and-see policy, supporting results at 5 year follow-up; however, improvements in clinical progression-free survival were not maintained. Exploratory analyses suggest that postoperative irradiation might improve clinical progression-free survival in patients younger than 70 years and in those with positive surgical margins, but could have a detrimental effect in patients aged 70 years or older. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Comité de l'Isère, Grenoble, France) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Charitable Trust.

There is a large variability regarding the definition and choice of primary endpoints in phase 2 and phase 3 multimodal rectal cancer trials, resulting in inconsistency and difficulty of data interpretation. Also, surrogate properties of early and intermediate endpoints have not been systematically assessed. We provide a comprehensive review of clinical and surrogate endpoints used in trials for non-metastatic rectal cancer. The applicability, advantages, and disadvantages of these endpoints are summarised, with recommendations on clinical endpoints for the different phase trials, including limited surgery or non-operative management for organ preservation. We discuss how early and intermediate endpoints, including patient-reported outcomes and involvement of patients in decision making, can be used to guide trial design and facilitate consistency in reporting trial results in rectal cancer.

Locally advanced rectal cancer is usually treated with preoperative chemoradiation. After chemoradiation and surgery, 15–27% of the patients have no residual viable tumour at pathological examination, a pathological complete response (pCR). This study established whether patients with pCR have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. In PubMed, Medline, and Embase we identified 27 articles, based on 17 different datasets, for long-term outcome of patients with and without pCR. 14 investigators agreed to provide individual patient data. All patients underwent chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were computed and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated, with the Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were done to test for effect modification by other predicting factors. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed for disease-free survival and overall survival with forest plots and the Q test. 484 of 3105 included patients had a pCR. Median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range 0–277). 5-year crude disease-free survival was 83·3% (95% CI 78·8–87·0) for patients with pCR (61/419 patients had disease recurrence) and 65·6% (63·6–68·0) for those without pCR (747/2263; HR 0·44, 95% CI 0·34–0·57; p<0·0001). The Q test and forest plots did not suggest significant interstudy variation. The adjusted HR for pCR for failure was 0·54 (95% CI 0·40–0·73), indicating that patients with pCR had a significantly increased probability of disease-free survival. The adjusted HR for disease-free survival for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 0·91 (95% CI 0·73–1·12). The effect of pCR on disease-free survival was not modified by other prognostic factors. Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity for local or distant recurrence and improved survival. None.

Purpose In 10–24% of patients with rectal cancer who are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, no residual tumor is found after surgery (ypT0). When accurately selected, these complete responders might be considered for less invasive treatments instead of standard surgery. So far, no imaging method has proven reliable. This study was designed to assess the accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in addition to standard rectal MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation. Methods A total of 120 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from three university hospitals underwent chemoradiation followed by a restaging MRI (1.5T), consisting of standard T2W-MRI and DWI (b0-1000). Three independent readers first scored the standard MRI only for the likelihood of a complete response using a 5-point confidence score, after which the DWI images were added and the scoring was repeated. Histology (ypT0 vs. ypT1-4) was the standard reference. Diagnostic performance for selection of complete responders and interobserver agreement were compared for the two readings. Results Twenty-five of 120 patients had a complete response (ypT0). Areas under the ROC-curve for the three readers improved from 0.76, 0.68, and 0.58, using only standard MRI, to 0.8, 0.8, and 0.78 after addition of DWI ( P  = 0.39, 0.02, and 0.002). Sensitivity for selection of complete responders ranged from 0–40% on standard MRI versus 52–64% after addition of DWI. Specificity was equally high (89–98%) for both reading sessions. Interobserver agreement improved from κ 0.2–0.32 on standard MRI to 0.51–0.55 after addition of DWI. Conclusions Addition of DWI to standard rectal MRI improves the selection of complete responders after chemoradiation.

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of LAPC in the modern era. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were about for LAPC treated with curative-intent modern RT techniques including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and particle beam therapy (PBT) until September 2024. Results: In total, 53 observational studies, encompassing 2548 patients (993 treated with IMRT, 998 with SBRT, and 557 with PBT), met the inclusion criteria. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was implemented in 28 studies, including only 3 studies in the SBRT group. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was adopted in 22%. The pooled 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25–34%) for all patients, with no significant differences among RT techniques: 28% (95% CI, 22–34%) for IMRT, 26% (95% CI, 19–34%) for SBRT, and 43% (95% CI, 28–57%) for PBT (p = 0.1121). The pooled rate of acute hematologic toxicity (HT) ≥ grade 3 was 17% (95% CI, 9–26%), with significant differences among RT techniques: 23% (95% CI, 9–40%) for IMRT, 4% (95% CI, 0–11%) for SBRT, and 20% (95% CI, 6–37%) for PBT (p = 0.0181). In addition, CCRT (p = 0.0084) and ENI (p = 0.0145) significantly increased the risk of acute HT. Gastrointestinal toxicities rarely occurred. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed similar efficacy among modern RT techniques for LAPC management. Since almost all studies have single-arm design, and chemotherapy regimens have changed over time, conclusions must be drawn with caution. The use of modern RT techniques is individually selected according to clinical practice and resource availability.

Background The treatment results of external beam radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients are insufficient with five-year biochemical relapse rates of approximately 35%. Several randomized trials have shown that dose escalation to the entire prostate improves biochemical disease free survival. However, further dose escalation to the whole gland is limited due to an unacceptable high risk of acute and late toxicity. Moreover, local recurrences often originate at the location of the macroscopic tumor, so boosting the radiation dose at the macroscopic tumor within the prostate might increase local control. A reduction of distant metastases and improved survival can be expected by reducing local failure. The aim of this study is to investigate the benefit of an ablative microboost to the macroscopic tumor within the prostate in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods/Design The FLAME-trial ( F ocal L esion A blative M icroboost in prostat E cancer) is a single blind randomized controlled phase III trial. We aim to include 566 patients (283 per treatment arm) with intermediate or high risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate who are scheduled for external beam radiotherapy using fiducial markers for position verification. With this number of patients, the expected increase in five-year freedom from biochemical failure rate of 10% can be detected with a power of 80%. Patients allocated to the standard arm receive a dose of 77 Gy in 35 fractions to the entire prostate and patients in the experimental arm receive 77 Gy to the entire prostate and an additional integrated microboost to the macroscopic tumor of 95 Gy in 35 fractions. The secondary outcome measures include treatment-related toxicity, quality of life and disease-specific survival. Furthermore, by localizing the recurrent tumors within the prostate during follow-up and correlating this with the delivered dose, we can obtain accurate dose-effect information for both the macroscopic tumor and subclinical disease in prostate cancer. The rationale, study design and the first 50 patients included are described. Trial registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01168479

BackgroundDetection of the site of recurrence using PSMA-PET/CT is important to guide treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study was to evaluate the positivity rate of [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa and identify parameters that predict scan positivity as well as the type and number of detected lesions. This monocentric retrospective study included 137 PCa patients with biochemical recurrence who underwent one or more [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT scans between August 2018 and June 2019. PET-positive malignant lesions were classified as local recurrence, lymph node (LN), bone or soft tissue lesions. The association between biochemical/paraclinical parameters, as PSA value, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, Gleason score (GS) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and scan positivity as well as type and number of detected lesions was evaluated using logistic regression analysis (binary outcomes) and Poisson models (count-type outcomes).ResultsWe included 175 [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT scans after radical prostatectomy (78%), external beam radiation therapy (8.8%), ADT (7.3%), brachytherapy (5.1%) and high intensity focused ultrasound (0.7%) as primary treatment (median PSA value 1.6 ng/ml). Positivity rate was 80%. PSA value and PSA velocity were significant predictors of scan positivity as well as of the presence of bone and soft tissue lesions and number of bone, LN and soft tissue lesions, both in uni- and/or multivariable analysis. Multivariable analysis also showed prior ADT as predictor of bone and soft tissue lesions, GS as predictor of the number of bone lesions and ongoing ADT as predictor of the number of LN lesions.Conclusion[18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT showed a high positivity rate in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. PSA value and PSA velocity were significant predictors of scan positivity as well as of the presence and number of bone and soft tissue lesions and the number of LN lesions. Our findings can guide clinicians in optimal patient selection for [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT and support further research leading to the development of a prediction nomogram.

Purpose/objective Prostate cancer (PC) survivors frequently experience multiple co-occurring symptoms that adversely affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Identifying symptom clusters (SCs) may help to improve symptom management and patient care. The aim of this study is to investigate (1) SCs in PC patients, (2) associations of SCs with HRQoL, and (3) predictors of SCs. Material/methods We used data from an international, multi-centre, prospective cohort study (REQUITE). SCs were identified from patient-reported outcomes collected with the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and pelvic symptom questionnaires. Machine learning techniques identified SCs, associations with HRQoL and SCs predictors. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts. Results Data were analysed from 1538 (before radiotherapy (T0)), 1490 (end of radiotherapy (T1)), 1322 (12-months (T2)), and 1219 (24-months (T3)) patients. SCs identified at T0: SC1 (gastro-intestinal), SC2 (fatigue, urinary, emotional and cognitive functioning), and SC3 (pain, physical, role, and social functioning). SCs changed at T1: SC1 (gastro-intestinal symptoms), SC2 (fatigue, urinary problems, insomnia), SC3 (social and role functioning), and SC4 (pain, bowel problems, physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning). At T2, symptoms returned to baseline clusters. SCs including ‘fatigue’ or ‘urinary symptoms’ were most frequent across time-points. At T0, T2 and T3, HRQoL was best predicted by clusters 2 and 3 (35–45% explained variance). At T1, cluster 4 was the best predictor (52% explained variance). Planned radiotherapy target volume, prostate specific antigen (PSA) at pre-diagnostic biopsy, age and alcohol consumption were the best predictors of SC2 at T1 and SC3 and fatigue-dyspnoea at T3. Conclusion Although SCs including fatigue and urinary symptoms were most common, the ‘pain, bowel problems, physical, emotional and cognitive functioning’ SC at T1 was associated most strongly with HRQoL. The predictors can help to identify men at risk for specific SCs.