Explore the vast range of titles available.

Osteoporosis is the most important metabolic bone disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several studies have documented that metformin is osteogenic in vitro. In contrast, others showed no effect of metformin on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Incretin hormones have received much attention because of their beneficial effects beyond glycemia, including on bone health. The study evaluated the anti-osteoporotic effect of metformin and sitagliptin in postmenopausal diabetic women. Forty postmenopausal diabetic women were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 received metformin (Glucophage ® 500 mg) 1 tablet twice daily, and group 2 received sitagliptin (Januvia ® 100 mg) 1 tablet/day, for 12 weeks. Fasting blood and urine samples were collected for measurement of serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD). Laboratory tests were measured at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks, and at the end of the study. Bone mineral density of the anterior posterior lumbar spine was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 weeks of the intervention. In the metformin-treated group, the mean values for all markers of bone turnover at 12 weeks of treatment were not significantly different from baseline. In group 2, the mean serum total ALP was significantly decreased, serum osteocalcin levels were non-significantly decreased gradually by 10 % at 12 weeks, while urinary DPD decreased significantly and was then maintained at 28 % decrease at 12 weeks. In conclusion, metformin is neither osteogenic nor has anti-osteoporotic effect, while sitagliptin could positively regulate bone metabolism.

Anemia in pediatrics is often associated with chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD). It can worsen the disease prognosis and affect quality of life. Injectable dosage forms are predominantly used in its treatment with various side effects. This randomized and parallel clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of oral lactoferrin with intravenous (IV) iron dextran in managing anemia resulted from CKD in pediatrics. The study involved 60 children diagnosed with CKD-related anemia who were allocated into two separate groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 pediatric patients who received 100 mg of oral lactoferrin daily for a period of 3 months. Group 2 included 30 pediatric patients who were given IV iron dextran at a dosage of 50 mg three times weekly for 3 months. Both treatments are effective in treating CKD-induced anemia in pediatrics; however, oral lactoferrin demonstrated superior efficacy as there was a significant change within that group in levels of Hb, RBCs, MCH, iron, RDW-SD, MCHC, IL-6, and GDF-15 before and after treatment. In contrast, IV iron dextran showed significant changes within its group in iron, GFR, IL-6, GDF-15, and RDW-SD. After 3 months of treatment, no significant differences were observed between the two groups.

Aims To investigate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil (TAD) versus pentoxifylline (PTX) in the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Some animal studies and clinical trials reported that tadalafil and pentoxifylline have a reducing effect on different blood glucose parameters and lipid profiles which contribute to progress the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) to DKD . Methods From February 2022 to March 2023, 90 patients with type 2 DM and DKD (micro-albuminuria) were enrolled in this randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three equal groups: control group, TAD group, and PTX group. The three groups received traditional blood glucose lowering therapy + ramipril 10 mg PO. The TAD group also received tadalafil 20 mg PO every other day. The PTX group also received pentoxifylline 400 mg PO twice daily. Results Both TAD and PTX groups produced statistically significant improvement in the primary outcomes by a significant reduction in Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) which was pronounced by a reduction percentage of—47.47%, −53.73% respectively. In addition to a significant decrease in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA 1c ) (mmol/mol), Fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2-h PPG) (p < 0.001). Only the PTX group showed a significant increase in Cr Cl and a significant decrease in S. Cr (p < 0.001). Only the TAD group showed a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein—cholesterol (HDL-C) (p < 0.001), while the PTX group showed a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein—cholesterol (LDL-C) (p-value 0.011), and triglyceride (p-value 0.002). Both TAD and PTX groups showed a decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) which was significant only in the PTX group (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) (p < 0.001), and an increase in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (uNGAL) (p-value 0.850, 0.014 respectively) which was significant only in the PTX group. Conclusions The use of tadalafil or pentoxifylline may serve as an effective adjuvant therapy for patients with diabetic kidney disease. Trial Registration : ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05487755, July 25, 2022.

Background & objectives: Rheumatoid artherits (RA) is a refractory disease and the imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in favor of pro-inflammatory cytokines has been implicated in pathogenesis of RA. In this context, the aim of the present study was to compare the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of candesartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, and atorvastatin in RA patients. Methods: In this single-blinded parallel randomized placebo controlled study, the patients recruited between December 2017 and May 2018 were categorized into three groups: group 1 included 15 RA patients who served as control group and received traditional therapy (+ placebo); group 2 included 15 RA patients who received traditional therapy + candesartan (8 mg/day); and group 3 included 15 patients who received traditional therapy + atorvastatin (20 mg/day) for three months. Clinical status in RA patients was evaluated by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and morning stiffness before and three months after treatment. All groups were subjected to biochemical analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and malondialdehyde (MDA) before and three months after treatment. Results: Both candesartan and atorvastatin treated groups showed significant decrease in serum levels IL-1β and TNF-α, acute-phase reactants (CRP and ESR), number of swollen joint and patient global assessment. This was also associated with improvement in disease activity and quality of life regarding DAS28 and HAQ-DI as compared to baseline data and the control group. Atorvastatin group showed significant decrease in the serum level of oxidative stress marker (MDA). Interpretation & conclusions: Both candesartan and atorvastatin showed anti-inflammatory effect and immunomodulatory effects leading to improvement in clinical status and disease activity in RA patients. However, atorvastatin was superior to candesartan through its anti-oxidant effect.

PurposeInvestigating the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (RUP) versus montelukast (MON) as adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsFrom December 2018 to December 2019, 75 patients with active RA were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three groups (n = 25 in each group); methotrexate (MTX) group which received MTX 15–25 mg/week plus placebo tablet once daily; MTX/RUP group which received MTX plus RUP 10 mg once daily; and MTX/MON group which received MTX plus MON 10 mg once daily. The treatment duration was 3 months. At baseline and 3 months after treatment, blood samples were collected for the biochemical analysis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukins 8 and 17 (IL-8, IL-17), E-selectin, and clusterin (CLU) levels. Clinical and functional assessments using Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) were performed.ResultsBoth RUP and MON produced clinical and functional improvements which were translated by significant improvements in DAS28-CRP score and MDHAQ. Rupatadine significantly reduced all measured parameters (P < 0.05) except for IL-17 and CLU. Montelukast significantly decreased all measured variables (P < 0.05) except for E-selectin. Interleukin-8 was positively correlated with IL-17 and CLU, while hs-CRP was positively correlated with E-selectin and body mass index (BMI). Both drugs were well tolerated; somnolence was the common side effect for RUP. No neuropsychiatric events were reported with MON.ConclusionRupatadine or montelukast may serve as a potential adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis secondary to the preliminary evidence of efficacy and safety.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03770923, December 10, 2018