Explore the vast range of titles available.

In the primary analysis report of the GAIA/CLL13 trial, we found that venetoclax–obinutuzumab and venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib improved undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) rates and progression-free survival compared with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, to our knowledge, no data on direct comparisons of different venetoclax-based combinations are available. GAIA/CLL13 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study conducted at 159 sites in ten countries in Europe and the Middle East. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a life expectancy of at least 6 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status of 0–2, a cumulative illness rating scale score of 6 or lower or a single score of 4 or lower, and no TP53 aberrations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with a computer-generated list stratified by age, Binet stage, and regional study group, to either chemoimmunotherapy, venetoclax–rituximab, venetoclax–obinutuzumab, or venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib. All treatments were administered in 28-day cycles. Patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group received six cycles of treatment, with patients older than 65 years receiving intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m2, days 1–2), whereas patients aged 65 years or younger received intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m2, days 1–3) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2, days 1–3). Intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 2–6) was added to chemotherapy. In the experimental groups, patients received daily venetoclax (400 mg orally) for ten cycles after a 5-week ramp-up phase starting on day 22 of cycle 1. In the venetoclax–rituximab group, intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 2–6) was added. In the obinutuzumab-containing groups, obinutuzumab was added (cycle 1: 100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, and 1000 mg on days 8 and 15; cycles 2–6: 1000 mg on day 1). In the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group, daily ibrutinib (420 mg orally, from day 1 of cycle 1) was added until undetectable MRD was reached in two consecutive measurements (3 months apart) or until cycle 36. The planned treatment duration was six cycles in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 12 cycles in the venetoclax–rituximab and the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group and between 12 and 36 cycles in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group. Coprimary endpoints were the undetectable MRD rate in peripheral blood at month 15 for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab versus standard chemoimmunotherapy and investigator-assessed progression-free survival for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib versus standard chemoimmunotherapy, both analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment) with a split α of 0·025 for each coprimary endpoint. Both coprimary endpoints have been reported elsewhere. Here we report a post-hoc exploratory analysis of updated progression-free survival results after a 4-year follow-up of our study population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02950051, recruitment is complete, and all patients are off study treatment. Between Dec 13, 2016, and Oct 13, 2019, 1080 patients were screened and 926 were randomly assigned to treatment (chemoimmunotherapy group n=229; venetoclax–rituximab group n=237; venetoclax–obinutuzumab group n=229; and venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group n=231); mean age 60·8 years (SD 10·2), 259 (28%) of 926 patients were female, and 667 (72%) were male (data on race and ethnicity are not reported). At data cutoff for this exploratory follow-up analysis (Jan 31, 2023; median follow-up 50·7 months [IQR 44·6–57·9]), patients in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [97·5% CI 0·32–0·69], p<0·0001) and the venetoclax–rituximab group (0·57 [0·38–0·84], p=0·0011). The venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group also had a significantly longer progression-free survival than the chemoimmunotherapy group (0·30 [0·19–0·47]; p<0·0001) and the venetoclax–rituximab group (0·38 [0·24–0·59]; p<0·0001). There was no difference in progression-free survival between the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib and venetoclax–obinutuzumab groups (0·63 [0·39–1·02]; p=0·031), and the proportional hazards assumption was not met for the comparison between the venetoclax–rituximab group versus the chemoimmunotherapy group (log-rank p=0·10). The estimated 4-year progression-free survival rate was 85·5% (97·5% CI 79·9–91·1; 37 [16%] events) in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group, 81·8% (75·8–87·8; 55 [24%] events) in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group, 70·1% (63·0–77·3; 84 [35%] events) in the venetoclax–rituximab group, and 62·0% (54·4–69·7; 90 [39%] events) in the chemoimmunotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (114 [53%] of 216 patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 109 [46%] of 237 in the venetoclax–rituximab group, 127 [56%] of 228 in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab group, and 112 [48%] of 231 in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group). Deaths determined to be associated with study treatment by the investigator occurred in three (1%) patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group (n=1 due to each of sepsis, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and Richter's syndrome), none in the venetoclax–rituximab and venetoclax–obinutuzumab groups, and four (2%) in the venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib group (n=1 due to each of acute myeloid leukaemia, fungal encephalitis, small-cell lung cancer, and toxic leukoencephalopathy). With more than 4 years of follow-up, venetoclax–obinutuzumab and venetoclax–obinutuzumab–ibrutinib significantly extended progression-free survival compared with both chemoimmunotherapy and venetoclax–rituximab in previously untreated, fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, thereby supporting their use and further evaluation in this patient group, while still considering the higher toxicities observed with the triple combination. AbbVie, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Background Insulin like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) is a secreted protein binding insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and activin A. It antagonizes bone morphogenetic proteins and is involved in the tumour propagation of solid as well as haematological malignancies. Its role in multiple myeloma (MM) is not defined so far. We therefore aim here to investigate its prognostic and pathophysiological role in MM. Methods The clinical significance of IGFBP7 gene expression was investigated by gene expression profiling in two independent cohorts (n = 948) of newly-diagnosed MM patients. Methylation of the IGFBP7 promoter was analysed by pyrosequencing and treatment of MM cell lines with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine. The impact of IGFBP7 on MM cells was studied by CCK-8 assay, BrdU assay and flow cytometry, respectively. IGFBP7 expression in bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) was studied by quantitative RT-PCR. For osteoblast development, immortalized and primary human BMSCs were cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium for 7–14 days in the presence of recombinant human IGFBP7 and/or activin A. Results Median IGFBP7 expression is significantly lower in CD138-purified plasma cells from individuals with MGUS and MM, compared to normal bone marrow plasma cells. IGFBP7 gene expression in MM cells is regulated by methylation, shown by pyrosequencing and exposure to demethylating agents (5-aza-2-deoxycytidine). High expression of IGFBP7 in MM cells is associated with adverse survival in two independent cohorts of 247 and 701 newly-diagnosed MM patients treated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. IGFBP7 is associated with prognostically adverse chromosomal aberrations (t(4;14) and gain of 1q21), MMSET expression, and higher myeloma cell proliferation. In vitro , IGFBP7 overcomes activin A induced osteoblast suppression and promotes osteogenesis. MM cells downregulate IGFBP7 in stromal cells, possibly contributing to the osteoblast suppression found in MM. Conversely, higher IGFBP7 expression is associated with a lower probability of myeloma bone disease. Conclusions Our data indicate that IGFBP7 expression is a marker for a specific methylation pattern in myeloma, linked to translocation t(4;14) associated MMSET expression, showing clinical features of adverse prognosis with absence of myeloma bone disease.

The clinical benefit of the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to standard immunochemotherapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) is still unclear. In this retrospective study we analyzed the outcome of 32 consecutive patients with CLL during treatment with FCR. Sixteen patients received G-CSF for treatment of CTC grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia at some point during therapy and 16 did not. Both groups were well balanced for clinical and biological risk factors. Overall response rates were not significantly different (94% vs. 75%; p  = 0.144). Interestingly, a significantly better progression-free survival (100% vs. 35.4% at 24 months; p  < 0.001) and even overall survival (100% vs. 77.8% at 24 months; p  = 0.022) was observed in patients receiving G-CSF. While the underlying cause remains to be elucidated, these data strongly suggest an association of the addition of G-CSF to FCR therapy with final patient outcome.

We used nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in cytostatic drug combinations to treat 37 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and pre-existing cardiac disorder or elderly patients with reduced physical state who were ineligible for conventional anthracycline-containing therapy. High remission rates were observed in this poor-risk population: Complete remission rates were 75% for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 55% for T/NK cell neoplasm (overall response rate of 80% and 89%, respectively). Twenty-seven patients (73%) are still alive after a median observation time of 14 months. No major cardiac or gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. Extravasation of NPLD in two patients resulted in mild inflammation without tissue damage. Hematologic toxicity was comparable to that of conventional anthracycline-containing regimens. We conclude that NPLD is highly active in combination chemotherapy for lymphoma with low cardiac toxicity in patients with pre-existing cardiac disorders or higher age. Moreover, we also observed remarkable efficacy in T/NK cell lymphomas.