Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objectives. To assess the impact of state COVID-19 vaccine mandates for health care workers (HCWs) on health sector employment in the United States. Methods. Using monthly state-level employment data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages between January and October 2021, we employed a partially pooled synthetic control method that accounted for staggered mandate adoption and heterogeneous treatment effects. We conducted analyses separately for the 4 health care subsectors—ambulatory health care services, hospitals, nursing and residential care, and social assistance—with an additional analysis of 2 industry groups—skilled nursing care and community care for the elderly—under the nursing and residential care subsector. We further explored possible heterogeneous impacts according to the test-out option availability. Results. Mandate impact estimates were statistically indistinguishable from zero. Results further ruled out a mandate-associated decrease in employment larger than 2.1% of premandate employment levels for the 6 health care domains examined and for states with no test-out option. Conclusions. State COVID-19 vaccine mandates for HCWs were not found to be associated with significant adverse impacts on health sector employment even in states without a testing alternative to vaccination. The findings support vaccine mandates as a viable preventive measure without material disruption to the health care workforce, including in times of public health emergencies. ( Am J Public Health. 2025;115(3):344–348. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307906 )

Objectives. To demonstrate the spatially uneven effects of abortion restriction laws in Texas. Methods. We used network analysis to determine the change in distance to the nearest surgical abortion provider for 5253 Texas neighborhoods after the passing of Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8; 2021) and the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) decision. We identified associations between key measures of neighborhood socioeconomic context and change in distance to providers using multivariable linear regression models. Results. After the Dobbs decision, Texas residents experienced an average change in distance to the nearest provider of 457 miles (SD = 179). Neighborhoods of concentrated disadvantage experienced the greatest increase in distance to abortion providers after SB8’s passing, and neighborhoods with high levels of income inequality experienced the greatest increase in distance after the Dobbs decision. Conclusions. We document the rapidly changing abortion landscape in a highly restrictive state and show that women living in more disadvantaged and unequal areas are most affected by the increasing distance to providers. Public Health Implications. Our methods and findings will continue to be relevant in understanding the burden placed on women in areas where medical abortion has been restricted because of the Dobbs decision. ( Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307652 )

Background This paper evaluates the increase in coverage and use of Covid-19 testing services for vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations through the introduction of community-based walk-up sites in New Orleans, LA. While most GIS work on Covid-19 testing coverage and access has used census tract or ZIP code aggregated data, this manuscript is unique in that it uses individual level demographics and exact addresses to calculate distances actually traveled by patients. Methods We used testing data recorded for 9721 patients at 20 sites operating in May–June 2020. The dataset includes detailed age, race and ethnicity, and testing results as well as the exact address of each individual. Using GIS, we estimated changes in testing coverage for minority neighborhoods and calculated the actual distance covered by individuals. Logistic regression and multivariate linear regression were used to identify socio-demographic variables associated with distance travelled to and used of nearest testing site. We used a secondary dataset from drive-through sites to evaluate change in coverage at the census tract level for the metropolitan area. Results Walk-up sites significantly increased testing availability in New Orleans, and specifically in minority neighborhoods. Both African Americans and Asians were more likely (14.7 and 53.0%) to be tested at the nearest walk-up site. They also covered shorter distances to get tested. Being elderly was also significantly and positively associated with testing at the nearest site. Hispanics, however, were not associated with increased proximity to and use of nearest sites, and they traveled an additional 0.745 km to get tested. Individuals who tested positive also travelled significantly longer distances to obtain a test. Conclusions Walk-up sites increased testing availability for some vulnerable populations who took advantage of the sites’ proximity, although inequalities appear at the metropolitan scale. As cities are planning community vaccination campaigns, mobile, walk-up sites appear to improve both coverage and accessibility for hard-to-reach populations. With adequate technical (vaccine dose refrigeration) and messaging (addressing reticence to immunization) adaptations, they could constitute a key complementary approach to health facility points of delivery.

Background Evidence suggests that the single-disease paradigm does not accurately reflect the individual experience, with increasing prevalence of chronic disease multimorbidity, and subtle yet important differences in types of co-occurring diseases. Knowledge of multimorbidity patterns can aid clarification of individual-level burden and needs, to inform prevention and treatment strategies. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of multimorbidity in Jamaica, identify population subgroups with similar and distinct disease profiles, and examine consistency in patterns identified across statistical techniques. Methods Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to examine multimorbidity patterns in a sample of 2,551 respondents aged 15–74 years, based on data from the nationally representative Jamaica Health and Lifestyle Survey 2007/2008 and self-reported presence/absence of 11 chronic conditions. Secondary analyses compared results with patterns identified using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Results Nearly one-quarter of the sample (24.1%) were multimorbid (i.e. had ≥2 diseases), with significantly higher burden in females compared to males (31.6% vs. 16.1%; p<0.001). LCA revealed four distinct classes, including a predominant Relatively Healthy class, comprising 52.7% of the sample, with little to no morbidity. The remaining three classes were characterized by varying degrees and patterns of multimorbidity and labelled Metabolic (30.9%), Vascular-Inflammatory (12.2%), and Respiratory (4.2%). Four diseases determined using physical assessments (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia) were primary contributors to multimorbidity patterns overall. EFA identified three patterns described as “Vascular” (hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, stroke); “Respiratory” (asthma, COPD); and “Cardio-Mental-Articular” (cardiovascular disease, arthritis, mental disorders). Conclusion This first study of multimorbidity in the Caribbean has revealed a high burden of co-existing conditions in the Jamaican population, that is predominantly borne by females. Consistency across methods supports the validity of patterns identified. Future research into the causes and consequences of multimorbidity patterns can guide development of clinical and public health strategies that allow for targeted prevention and intervention.

Board games themed around environmental topics are promising tools for promoting awareness of complex sustainability issues, as the materiality, sociality, and multidimensionality of gameplay can help overcome some of the inherent limitations of more traditional learning formats. To explore the potential relevance of board games for communicating about agrifood system topics in particular, we designed and tested a game called Companion: An Agroecological Adventure, in which players take on the role of community gardeners who must apply both social and ecological principles of agroecology to cultivate a thriving garden plot. In this paper, we present the results of a study in which a group of 50 undergraduate students in an introductory agroecology course at Syracuse University learned, played, and provided qualitative feedback on the game. Our analysis of student comments demonstrates that by immersing players in a simulated environment and providing them with the agency to make and reflect on decisions, playing Companion effectively stimulated student learning about the characteristics of small-scale sustainable agroecosystems. At the same time, the process of playing the game also promoted the development of a variety of relevant skills and competencies, especially students’ ability to think critically, contextually, and holistically about local agrifood systems and their place within them. These results demonstrate that by bringing the spirit of experiential education into the classroom, playing agroecology games can facilitate the type of transformative learning that is critical for promoting meaningful food system reform.

Background Non-communicable disease (NCD) multimorbidity is associated with impaired functioning, lower quality of life and higher mortality. Susceptibility to accumulation of multiple NCDs is rooted in social, economic and cultural contexts, with important differences in the burden, patterns, and determinants of multimorbidity across settings. Despite high prevalence of individual NCDs within the Caribbean region, exploration of the social epidemiology of multimorbidity remains sparse. This study aimed to examine the social determinants of NCD multimorbidity in Jamaica, to better inform prevention and intervention strategies. Methods Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to examine social determinants of identified multimorbidity patterns in a sample of 2551 respondents aged 15–74 years, from the nationally representative Jamaica Health and Lifestyle Survey 2007/2008. Multimorbidity measurement was based on self-reported presence/absence of 11 chronic conditions. Selection of social determinants of health (SDH) was informed by the World Health Organization’s Commission on SDH framework. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between individual-level SDH and class membership. Results Approximately one-quarter of the sample (24.05%) were multimorbid. LCA revealed four distinct profiles: a Relatively Healthy class (52.70%), with a single or no morbidity; and three additional classes, characterized by varying degrees and patterns of multimorbidity, labelled Metabolic (30.88%), Vascular-Inflammatory (12.21%), and Respiratory (4.20%). Upon controlling for all SDH (Model 3), advancing age and recent healthcare visits remained significant predictors of all three multimorbidity patterns ( p  < 0.001). Private insurance coverage (relative risk ratio, RRR = 0.63; p  < 0.01) and higher educational attainment (RRR = 0.73; p  < 0.05) were associated with lower relative risk of belonging to the Metabolic class while being female was a significant independent predictor of Vascular-Inflammatory class membership (RRR = 2.54; p  < 0.001). Material circumstances, namely housing conditions and features of the physical and neighbourhood environment, were not significant predictors of any multimorbidity class. Conclusion This study provides a nuanced understanding of the social patterning of multimorbidity in Jamaica, identifying biological, health system, and structural determinants as key factors associated with specific multimorbidity profiles. Future research using longitudinal designs would aid understanding of disease trajectories and clarify the role of SDH in mitigating risk of accumulation of diseases.

Gender-based violence in high schools undermines adolescents' rights, well-being and opportunities at a critical moment in their psycho-social development. While violence prevalence has been partially assessed in Sub-Saharan Africa, there remain gaps in understanding how adolescents themselves define, interpret and navigate these situations. This phenomenological qualitative study conducted in four high schools in Kinshasa (DR Congo) centers adolescent voices to explore how they perceive, legitimize, and manage School-Based Gender-Based Violence. It aims to identify the individual beliefs and practices that can be used to interpret, accept or challenge violence, as well as the institutional structures that produce and legitimize these conditions. In December 2024, 90 adolescents aged 15-17 participated in focus group discussions and individual interviews. Data were thematically analyzed using NVivo and iterative validation. Violence was pervasive and multifaceted, encompassing physical abuse, humiliations, economic coercion, and sexual harassment. Some instances of violence were seen as legitimate based on institutional and gendered expectations, and victim blaming was frequent. Community judgement deeply framed students' narratives, leading to stronger condemnation of arbitrary acts, public humiliations, and economic sanctions. Correspondingly, fear of reputational harm discouraged reporting, and silence and conformity emerged as key coping strategies. Students' ability to respond effectively appeared entirely constrained by their pre-existing reputation in the community, which determined whether they were believed, supported, or blamed. Findings indicate that addressing GBV in Kinshasa high schools requires both community- and school-level interventions that confront the norms legitimizing violence and victim-blaming, policies that strengthen accountability mechanisms and protect students who report abuse, and further research on adolescent-led strategies to transform harmful institutional and social expectations. Supporting adolescents' voices in defining and resisting school-based GBV is critical to safeguarding their rights and fostering equitable education.

While community-based interventions are a proven high-impact strategy to increase contraceptive uptake in low-income countries, their capacity to support women’s contraceptive choices (including continued use, switching and discontinuation) in the long run remains insufficiently discussed. This cohort study follows 883 women 3 and 6 months after they received a modern method during community campaigns organized in Kinshasa (D.R. Congo), to analyze their contraceptive trajectories and the factors associated with ever discontinuing contraceptive use in the first 6 months following a campaign. In the community-based distribution (CBD) model currently institutionalized in DRC, campaign clients are not provided with additional doses or support, besides baseline counseling, to (dis-)continue using the method they received, but must rely on Family Planning resources within the existing local health system. Almost a third (28.9%) of all women discontinued modern contraception during the study period, with much higher discontinuation rates for short-acting methods (38.7% for pills and up to 68.9% for DMPA-SC). Variables previously associated with high discontinuation (marital status, fertility intentions and side-effects) led to higher odds of “ever discontinuing”. However, these variables became non-significant when controlling for resupply issues. Women’s self-reported reasons for discontinuation confirmed the multivariate regression results. Detailed sub-analysis of resupply issues for pills, injectables and Cyclebeads pointed to the role of cost, unreliable campaign schedules and weak integration of community-based strategies into the formal health system. Extremely low rates of implants removal suggest similar access to FP services issues. The study highlights the need to identify CBD strategies best suited to support women’s choices and preferences towards successful contraceptive trajectories in fragile health systems. Plain Language Summary In countries with insufficient access to health facilities, such as the D. R. Congo, the provision of contraceptives through campaigns implemented in community settings is a commonly used strategy to increase the number of contraceptive users. However, the long-term trajectories of campaign clients are not often examined, and it is unclear whether these events can be an effective way to support women’s choices and preferences when it comes to using, switching or stopping a contraceptive method. Our study looks at the contraceptive trajectories of 883 women who obtained a method during a community event to see whether they were still using that a modern contraceptive method 3 and 6 months later. Almost a third of the women discontinued at some point in that period, with much higher discontinuation rates for monthly pills and injectable contraceptives. While some individual characteristics (marital status, desired number of children, experienced side-effects) influenced discontinuation risk, the most important factor was the woman’s ability to resupply her method. Implant removal was also much lower than expected and this suggested difficulties in accessing existing family planning services. Our findings indicate that campaigns are still too disconnected from existing family planning services to successfully support women’s contraceptive choices in the long run.

Background The use of implants has steadily increased in Kinshasa since 2013 but clinic-based access to this family planning method is limited due to distance and costs barriers. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of providing Implanon NXT at the community level using medical and nursing students (M/N) as distributors, as part of a strategy to improve contraceptive uptake in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods A cohort of 531 women who chose to receive Implanon NXT from a M/N student during community-based campaign days participated in three rounds of a quantitative survey administered at the time of insertion of the method, and at 6 and 12 months later. We conducted descriptive analysis to assess the feasibility and acceptability of providing the method through M/N students in terms of method choice, user profiles, contraceptive history, experience with insertion and side effects, continuation / discontinuation of the method, and overall satisfaction with FP services as well as students’ preparedness and capacity to safely offer the method, and their satisfaction with the experience.. Results The study demonstrated the feasibility of training students for community-based provision of Implanon NXT and 95% of them were satisfied with their experience. Acceptability of both the method and the service delivery strategy was high among participants, including among young and first-time contraceptive users. Out of the 441 women with a known outcome at 12 months, 92% still had Implanon NXT inserted, despite some of them reporting experiencing side effects. The vast majority (79%) would “strongly recommend” obtaining NXT from a M/N student if a friend wanted to avoid pregnancies. Conclusions The provision of Implanon NXT at the community-level is a promising solution to address some of the barriers to accessing this method for women living in Kinshasa. However, strengthening pre-insertion counseling, particularly on expected side-effects and the possibility of early removal, is necessary to increase informed choice for the women and potentially limit method discontinuation.

Background Male partner’s approval is a key determinant of contraceptive use for women living in Sub-Saharan Africa and improving men’s support and couple communication is a cornerstone of family planning programs. However, approval is often only measured through the women’s perception of their partner’s opinion. Methods This study conducted in Kinshasa compares contraceptive approval variables from matched male and female partners (n = 252 couples) to establish the frequency of (in)accurate perceptions by the woman, then test their association with modern contraceptive use. Additional regressions estimate individual and couple variables associated with (in)correct perceptions. Results Results confirm women are poorly aware of their partner’s opinion but indicate that perceived approval or disapproval by the woman is a much stronger determinant of modern contraceptive use than her partner’s actual opinion. Higher educational achievement from the woman is the strongest driver of misunderstanding her partner’s approval. Conclusions Women’s perceptions of partner’s approval are much stronger determinant of contraceptive use than the latter’s actual opinion, and stereotyping men’s opinion of family planning is a common error of appreciation. However, findings also suggest these misunderstandings might serve women’s capacity to negotiate contraceptive use. Plain language summary Research indicates that women living in Sub-Saharan Africa may not use contraceptive methods if their partner disapproves. However, there are methodological gaps in how this relation has been measured so far. For example, women are often the only ones asked whether their partner approves of contraception and surveys rarely assess how women know of their partner’s disapproval and how strongly it has been communicated to them, nor do they ask said partner for his actual opinion on the matter. In this study we address some of those questions by interviewing men and women from married couples separately and comparing their opinion of family planning use. The research uses a population-based survey conducted among couples living in military camps in the capital city of the Democratic Republic Congo, Kinshasa. The results show that women overall are poorly aware of their partner’s actual opinion, but act based on those perceptions, nonetheless. In particular, women whose husband disapproves of family planning but (falsely) perceive his approval have some of the highest odds in our cohort for contraceptive use. Conversely, women in a “false negative” scenario (husband approves but they perceive disapproval) are less likely to use modern contraception. Additional analysis indicates that this latter scenario is more common among women who are more educated than their partner, possibly because they are stereotyping his family planning desires. The findings and the discussion also raise the possibility that women may however benefit from ignoring their partners’ true wishes in order to fulfill their own contraceptive choice.