Explore the vast range of titles available.

Helminth parasites defy immune exclusion through sophisticated evasion mechanisms, including activation of host immunosuppressive regulatory T (Treg) cells. The mouse parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus can expand the host Treg population by secreting products that activate TGF-β signalling, but the identity of the active molecule is unknown. Here we identify an H. polygyrus TGF-β mimic ( Hp- TGM) that replicates the biological and functional properties of TGF-β, including binding to mammalian TGF-β receptors and inducing mouse and human Foxp3 + Treg cells. Hp- TGM has no homology with mammalian TGF-β or other members of the TGF-β family, but is a member of the complement control protein superfamily. Thus, our data indicate that through convergent evolution, the parasite has acquired a protein with cytokine-like function that is able to exploit an endogenous pathway of immunoregulation in the host. Heligmosomoides polygyrus can activate mammalian TGF-β signalling pathways, but how it does so is not known. Here the authors identify and isolate a H. polygyrus TFG-β mimic that can bind both mammalian TGF-β receptor subunits, activate Smad signalling and generate inducible regulatory T cells.

Betaglycan (BG) is a transmembrane co-receptor of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family of signaling ligands. It is essential for embryonic development, tissue homeostasis and fertility in adults. It functions by enabling binding of the three TGF-β isoforms to their signaling receptors and is additionally required for inhibin A (InhA) activity. Despite its requirement for the functions of TGF-βs and InhA in vivo, structural information explaining BG ligand selectivity and its mechanism of action is lacking. Here, we determine the structure of TGF-β bound both to BG and the signaling receptors, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2. We identify key regions responsible for ligand engagement, which has revealed binding interfaces that differ from those described for the closely related co-receptor of the TGF-β family, endoglin, thus demonstrating remarkable evolutionary adaptation to enable ligand selectivity. Finally, we provide a structural explanation for the hand-off mechanism underlying TGF-β signal potentiation. Betaglycan is a co-receptor for selective TGF-β family ligands. Here, the authors solve its structure in complex with TGF-β and the signaling receptors, which explains its ligand selectivity and reveals its mechanism in potentiating TGF-β signaling.

Immune receptors have emerged as critical therapeutic targets for cancer immunotherapy. Designed protein binders can have high affinity, modularity, and stability and hence could be attractive components of protein therapeutics directed against these receptors, but traditional Rosetta based protein binder methods using small globular scaffolds have difficulty achieving high affinity on convex targets. Here we describe the development of helical concave scaffolds tailored to the convex target sites typically involved in immune receptor interactions. We employed these scaffolds to design proteins that bind to TGFβRII, CTLA-4, and PD-L1, achieving low nanomolar to picomolar affinities and potent biological activity following experimental optimization. Co-crystal structures of the TGFβRII and CTLA-4 binders in complex with their respective receptors closely match the design models. These designs should have considerable utility for downstream therapeutic applications. Immune receptors regulate immune responses and are key cancer immunotherapy targets. Here, the authors designed helical concave scaffolds to bind convex sites in immune receptors, creating high-affinity protein binders for TGFβRII, CTLA-4, and PD-L1. Co-crystal structures confirmed their therapeutic potential.

TGM6 is a natural antagonist of mammalian TGF-β signaling produced by the murine helminth parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus . It differs from the previously described agonist, TGM1 (TGF-β Mimic-1), in that it lacks domains 1/2 that bind TGFBR1. It nonetheless retains TGFBR2 binding through domain 3 and potently inhibits TGF-β signaling in fibroblasts and epithelial cells, but does not inhibit TGF-β signaling in T cells, consistent with divergent domains 4/5 and an altered co-receptor binding preference. The crystal structure of TGM6 bound to TGFBR2 reveals an interface remarkably similar to that of TGF-β with TGFBR2. Thus, TGM6 has adapted its structure to mimic TGF-β, while engaging a distinct co-receptor to direct antagonism to fibroblasts and epithelial cells. The co-expression of TGM6, along with immunosuppressive TGMs that activate the TGF-β pathway, may minimize fibrotic damage to the host as the parasite progresses through its life cycle from the intestinal lumen to submucosa and back again. The co-receptor-dependent targeting of TGFBR2 by the parasite provides a template for the development of therapies for targeting the cancer- and fibrosis-promoting activities of the TGF-βs in humans. The parasitic helminth H. polygyrus secretes modular TGF-β mimic proteins to dampen host immunity. Here, the authors show H. polygyrus secretes a related protein which inhibits TGF-β signaling in fibroblasts to minimize fibrotic damage to the host.

The best characterized signaling pathway downstream of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) is through SMAD2 and SMAD3. However, TGF-β also induces phosphorylation of SMAD1 and SMAD5, but the mechanism of this phosphorylation and its functional relevance is not known. Here, we show that TGF-β-induced SMAD1/5 phosphorylation requires members of two classes of type I receptor, TGFBR1 and ACVR1, and establish a new paradigm for receptor activation where TGFBR1 phosphorylates and activates ACVR1, which phosphorylates SMAD1/5. We demonstrate the biological significance of this pathway by showing that approximately a quarter of the TGF-β-induced transcriptome depends on SMAD1/5 signaling, with major early transcriptional targets being the ID genes. Finally, we show that TGF-β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition requires signaling via both the SMAD3 and SMAD1/5 pathways, with SMAD1/5 signaling being essential to induce ID1. Therefore, combinatorial signaling via both SMAD pathways is essential for the full TGF-β-induced transcriptional program and physiological responses. Cells communicate with other cells via signaling molecules to coordinate their activities. Signals released from one cell can influence the behavior of neighboring cells. Signaling molecules belonging to the TGF-β family play crucial roles in animals. For example, these molecules guide the formation of tissues and organs and help maintain them throughout the animal’s adult life. Abnormal regulation of TGF-β family signaling can fuel the growth of cancer cells and also contribute to other diseases in humans. Molecules in the TGF-β family bind to and bring together specific receptors on the surface of the receiving cell. This allows the receptors to activate so-called SMAD proteins within that cell. Activated SMADs move to the cell’s nucleus, where they regulate the activity of target genes. This in turn changes how the cell behaves. The best-studied member of the TGF-β family is TGF-β itself. It is well known to activate two particular SMAD proteins called SMAD2 and SMAD3. Recent research showed that TGF-β could also activate two different SMAD proteins, SMAD1 and SMAD5. However, it was not understood how this was achieved, or what its biological consequences were. Ramachandran et al. set out to address these questions in mouse and human cells grown in the laboratory. The experiments showed that, in addition to its known dedicated receptors, TGF-β also requires a third receptor to activate SMAD1 and SMAD5. Also, TGF-β signaling leads to changes in the activity of several thousand genes, and approximately a quarter of them require signaling via SMAD1 and SMAD5. Further work showed that SMAD1 and SMAD5 are needed for a process called epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. This is a normal part of animal development, and is also a common feature of cancer cells, allowing them to spread to distant parts of the body. Understanding of how TGF-β signaling works in more detail may reveal new ways to target this pathway to treat diseases like cancer. The next step is to see how the signaling via SMAD1 and SMAD5 contributes to different aspects of cancer development.

Designing proteins that bind with high affinity to hydrophilic protein target sites remains a challenging problem. Here we show that RFdiffusion can be conditioned to generate protein scaffolds that form geometrically matched extended β-sheets with target protein edge β-strands in which polar groups on the target are complemented with hydrogen bonding groups on the design. We use this approach to design binders against edge-strand target sites on KIT, PDGFRɑ, ALK-2, ALK-3, FCRL5, NRP1, and α-CTX, and obtain higher (pM to mid nM) affinities and success rates than unconditioned RFdiffusion. Despite sharing β-strand interactions, designs have high specificity, reflecting the precise customization of interacting β-strand geometry and additional designed binder-target interactions. A binder-KIT co-crystal structure is nearly identical to the design model, confirming the accuracy of the design approach. The ability to robustly generate binders to the hydrophilic interaction surfaces of exposed β-strands considerably increases the range of computational binder design. This study demonstrates the capability of deep learning protein design models in generating functionally validated β-strand pairing interfaces, expanding the structural diversity of de novo binding proteins and accessible target surfaces.

Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) is a major component of tumor‐derived small extracellular vesicles (TEX) in cancer patients. Mechanisms utilized by TGFβ+ TEX to promote tumor growth and pro‐tumor activities in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are largely unknown. TEX produced by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines carried TGFβ and angiogenesis‐promoting proteins. TGFβ+ TEX stimulated macrophage chemotaxis without a notable M1/M2 phenotype shift and reprogrammed primary human macrophages to a pro‐angiogenic phenotype characterized by the upregulation of pro‐angiogenic factors and functions. In a murine basement membrane extract plug model, TGFβ+ TEX promoted macrophage infiltration and vascularization (p < 0.001), which was blocked by using the TGFβ ligand trap mRER (p < 0.001). TGFβ+ TEX injected into mice undergoing the 4‐nitroquinoline‐1‐oxide (4‐NQO)‐driven oral carcinogenesis promoted tumor angiogenesis (p < 0.05), infiltration of M2‐like macrophages in the TME (p < 0.05) and ultimately tumor progression (p < 0.05). Inhibition of TGFβ signaling in TEX with mRER ameliorated these pro‐tumor activities. Silencing of TGFβ emerges as a critical step in suppressing pro‐angiogenic functions of TEX in HNSCC.

Background Growth/differentiation factor 8 (GDF8) and GDF11 are two highly similar members of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family. While GDF8 has been recognized as a negative regulator of muscle growth and differentiation, there are conflicting studies on the function of GDF11 and whether GDF11 has beneficial effects on age-related dysfunction. To address whether GDF8 and GDF11 are functionally identical, we compared their signaling and structural properties. Results Here we show that, despite their high similarity, GDF11 is a more potent activator of SMAD2/3 and signals more effectively through the type I activin-like receptor kinase receptors ALK4/5/7 than GDF8. Resolution of the GDF11:FS288 complex, apo-GDF8, and apo-GDF11 crystal structures reveals unique properties of both ligands, specifically in the type I receptor binding site. Lastly, substitution of GDF11 residues into GDF8 confers enhanced activity to GDF8. Conclusions These studies identify distinctive structural features of GDF11 that enhance its potency, relative to GDF8; however, the biological consequences of these differences remain to be determined.

Endothelial cells (ECs) respond to concurrent stimulation by biochemical factors and wall shear stress (SS) exerted by blood flow. Disruptions in flow-induced responses can result in remodeling issues and cardiovascular diseases, but the detailed mechanisms linking flow-mechanical cues and biochemical signaling remain unclear. Activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) integrates SS and ALK1-ligand cues in ECs; ALK1 mutations cause hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), marked by arteriovenous malformation (AVM) development. However, the mechanistic underpinnings of ALK1 signaling modulation by fluid flow and the link to AVMs remain uncertain. We recorded EC responses under varying SS magnitudes and ALK1 ligand concentrations by assaying pSMAD1/5/9 nuclear localization using a custom multi-SS microfluidic device and a custom image analysis pipeline. We extended the previously reported synergy between SS and BMP9 to include BMP10 and BMP9/10. Moreover, we demonstrated that this synergy is effective even at extremely low SS magnitudes (0.4 dyn/cm2) and ALK1 ligand range (femtogram/mL). The synergistic response to ALK1 ligands and SS requires the kinase activity of ALK1. Moreover, ALK1’s basal activity and response to minimal ligand levels depend on endocytosis, distinct from cell–cell junctions, cytoskeleton-mediated mechanosensing, or cholesterol-enriched microdomains. However, an in-depth analysis of ALK1 receptor trafficking’s molecular mechanisms requires further investigation.

Activin A receptor like type 1 (ALK1) is a transmembrane serine/threonine receptor kinase in the transforming growth factor-beta receptor family that is expressed on endothelial cells. Defects in ALK1 signaling cause the autosomal dominant vascular disorder, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), which is characterized by development of direct connections between arteries and veins, or arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Although previous studies have implicated ALK1 in various aspects of sprouting angiogenesis, including tip/stalk cell selection, migration, and proliferation, recent work suggests an intriguing role for ALK1 in transducing a flow-based signal that governs directed endothelial cell migration within patent, perfused vessels. In this review, we present an updated view of the mechanism of ALK1 signaling, put forth a unified hypothesis to explain the cellular missteps that lead to AVMs associated with ALK1 deficiency, and discuss emerging roles for ALK1 signaling in diseases beyond HHT.