Explore the vast range of titles available.

A randomized trial tested whether the addition of apalutamide, an androgen receptor blocker, to androgen-deprivation therapy might improve radiographic (including MRI-detected) progression–free survival and overall survival. Apalutamide was significantly more effective than placebo for both end points.

The phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib in patients with treatment‐naive advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) demonstrated significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) and higher objective response rate (ORR) with the combination vs sunitinib. Japanese patients enrolled in the study (N = 67) were randomized to receive avelumab + axitinib (N = 33) or sunitinib (N = 34); 67% vs 59% had PD‐L1+ tumors (≥1% of immune cells) and 6%/64%/27% vs 6%/82%/12% had International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable/intermediate/poor risk status. In patients who received avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib, median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was not estimable (8.1 months, not estimable) vs 11.2 months (1.6 months, not estimable) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.152, 1.563) in patients with PD‐L1+ tumors and 16.6 months (8.1 months, not estimable) vs 11.2 months (4.2 months, not estimable) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.296, 1.464) in patients irrespective of PD‐L1 expression. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached in either arm in patients with PD‐L1+ tumors and irrespective of PD‐L1 expression. ORR (95% CI) was 60.6% (42.1%, 77.1%) vs 17.6% (6.8%, 34.5%) in patients irrespective of PD‐L1 expression. Common treatment‐emergent adverse events (all grade; grade ≥3) in each arm were hand‐foot syndrome (64%; 9% vs 71%; 9%), hypertension (55%; 30% vs 44%; 18%), hypothyroidism (55%; 0% vs 24%; 0%), dysgeusia (21%; 0% vs 56%; 0%) and platelet count decreased (3%; 0% vs 65%; 32%). Avelumab + axitinib was efficacious and tolerable in treatment‐naive Japanese patients with advanced RCC, which is consistent with results in the overall population. The phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib in patients with treatment‐naive advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) demonstrated significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) and higher objective response rate (ORR) with the combination vs sunitinib. In Japanese patients who received avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib, median PFS (95% CI) was not estimable (8.1 months, not estimable) vs 11.2 months (1.6 months, not estimable) (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.152, 1.563) in patients with PD‐L1+ tumors and 16.6 months (8.1 months, not estimable) vs 11.2 months (4.2 months, not estimable) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.296, 1.464) in patients irrespective of PD‐L1 expression. Avelumab + axitinib was efficacious and tolerable in treatment‐naive Japanese patients with advanced RCC, which is consistent with results in the overall population.

BackgroundIn the phase III open-label KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) study, first-line pembrolizumab and axitinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). KEYNOTE-426 evaluated patients enrolled from 25 sites in Japan.MethodsPatients enrolled in Japan were included in this post hoc subgroup analysis. Adults with clear cell mRCC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus oral axitinib 5 mg twice daily or oral sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review. Objective response rate (ORR) and safety were secondary endpoints.ResultsThe Japanese subgroup comprised 94 patients (pembrolizumab–axitinib, n = 44; sunitinib, n = 50; 11% of the intent-to-treat population). Median time from randomization to data cutoff (January 6, 2020) was 29.5 months (range 24.6–37.3). Consistent with the intent-to-treat population, the OS, PFS, and ORR suggested improvement with pembrolizumab–axitinib versus sunitinib in the Japanese subgroup. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 70% of patients receiving pembrolizumab–axitinib versus 78% receiving sunitinib; 11 (25%) patients receiving pembrolizumab–axitinib and 13 (27%) patients receiving sunitinib discontinued the study medication due to AEs. TRAEs led to the discontinuation of pembrolizumab, axitinib, pembrolizumab–axitinib, or sunitinib in 32%, 34%, 14%, and 20%, respectively. No deaths from TRAEs occurred.ConclusionsEfficacy outcomes for the Japanese subgroup were consistent with those of the global population. Safety in Japanese patients was consistent with the results from the global population.

BackgroundThe phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) with avelumab as first-line (1L) maintenance therapy + best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that had not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Efficacy and safety were assessed in patients enrolled in Japan.MethodsPatients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that had not progressed with 4–6 cycles of 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized to avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) + BSC or BSC alone. The primary endpoint was OS, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.ResultsIn Japanese patients (n = 73) randomized to avelumab + BSC (n = 36) or BSC alone (n = 37), median OS was 24.7 months (95% CI, 18.2-not estimable) vs 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.8–33.0), respectively (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.41–1.58]), and median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.9–9.4) vs 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.8), respectively (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.36–1.11]). In the avelumab + BSC and BSC-alone arms, grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 50.0% vs 8.1%, including grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 13.9% vs 0%, respectively. Efficacy and safety results in Japanese patients were generally consistent with findings in the overall trial population.ConclusionAvelumab 1L maintenance treatment showed a favorable benefit-risk balance in Japanese patients, supporting avelumab 1L maintenance as a new standard of care in Japanese patients with advanced UC that has not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02603432.

BackgroundIn a phase III clinical trial, CheckMate 025, treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with nivolumab demonstrated superior efficacy over everolimus. However, as the clinical trial excluded patients with specific complications and poor performance status (PS), the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in clinical practice, in which patients with various clinical complications are treated, is unclear. This study explored real-world nivolumab treatment in Japanese mRCC patients.MethodsThis is an interim analysis of a multicenter, non-interventional, medical record review study (minimum follow-up: 9 months). All eligible Japanese mRCC patients who first received nivolumab between February and October 2017 were included; data cut-off was April 2019. We analyzed nivolumab treatment patterns, efficacy (including overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response) and safety (including immune-related adverse events).ResultsOf 208 evaluable patients, 31.7% received nivolumab as fourth- or later line of treatment. At data cut-off, 26.9% of patients were continuing nivolumab treatment. The major reason for discontinuation was disease progression (n = 100, 65.8%). Median overall survival was not reached; the 12-month survival rate was 75.6%. Median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, the objective response rate was 22.6%, and median duration of response was 13.3 months. Patients who were excluded or limited in number in CheckMate 025, such as those with non-clear cell RCC or poor PS, also received benefits from nivolumab treatment. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 27.4% of patients (grade ≥ 3, 10.1%).ConclusionNivolumab was effective and well-tolerated in real-world Japanese mRCC patients.Trial registrationUMIN000033312

BackgroundIn metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC), recent clinical trials have shown efficacy of first-line combination therapy, as evidenced by better clinical outcome over target therapy. However, there are insufficient real-world evidences in mRCC patients in Japan.MethodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective study of 72 mRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment between September 2018 and July 2021. Patient’s characteristics, clinical outcomes and safety were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapy.ResultsOf all patients, the median age was 70 years (range, 36–86) and the major type of histology was clear cell RCC (n = 55; 76.4%). Progressive disease (n = 25; 34.8%) and irAEs (n = 22; 30.6%) were the most common causes for discontinuing treatment. Median PFS and OS seemed similar between patients who discontinued treatment because of irAEs and for patients who did not (p = 0.360 and p = 0.069, respectively). Importantly, for patients with synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis (n = 56), nephrectomy before initiating nivolumab plus ipilimumab had a significantly positive impact on better OS when compared to that in patients without nephrectomy (p = 0.028).ConclusionThis study confirms efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for mRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with a better outcome in patients who had undergone nephrectomy at diagnosis for synchronous mRCC.

Gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the development and progression of prostate cancer, with previous studies indicating that certain bacterial taxa are more abundant in castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) compared to hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Notably, the composition of gut microbiota can vary significantly by geographic region, and Japanese individuals have a distinct microbial profile. However, research exploring these differences within Japanese populations remains limited. This study investigated the gut microbiota differences between Japanese men with HSPC and CRPC and further validated these findings using a transgenic mouse model. Rectal swab samples were collected from 140 Japanese men diagnosed with HSPC (n = 84) or CRPC (n = 56) between September 2020 and July 2022. Gut microbiota composition was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Additionally, Pten‐KO mice, which model the progression from HSPC to CRPC, underwent similar microbiota analysis. Results revealed significant differences in gut microbiota composition between HSPC and CRPC patients. Specifically, the CRPC group showed a higher abundance of Firmicutes, including Gemella and Lactobacillus, compared to the HSPC group. These differences were mirrored in the mouse model, where CRPC mice also showed an increase in these bacteria. This study identifies distinct microbial differences between HSPC and CRPC in Japanese men, suggesting that Gemella and Lactobacillus may be associated with the progression to castration resistance in prostate cancer. These findings suggest that gut microbiota differences may be associated with prostate cancer progression. Further research is needed to explore the potential of targeting the microbiota as a therapeutic strategy. There are significant differences in gut microbiota between Japanese men with hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer and castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), with CRPC patients showing a higher abundance of Gemella and Lactobacillus. These findings, confirmed in a mouse model, suggest that targeting gut microbiota could be a potential therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer.

In males, testosterone levels have been implicated in various diseases. Recently, the influence of gut microbial-derived compounds on host metabolism has become evident, and it has been suggested that some gut bacteria may be involved in testosterone metabolism. In the present study, we examined the relationship between testosterone levels and gut microbiota in elderly Japanese men. We collected samples from Japanese male subjects suspected of having prostate cancer and underwent prostate biopsies and excluded patients with positive biopsies to avoid the effect of prostate cancer on the gut microbiota. In total, 54 Japanese males with negative biopsy results were included in our study. The gut microbiota was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of bacterial DNA extracted from rectal swabs. Gut microbiota compositions were compared between the two groups according to the level of serum testosterone (above or below 3.5 ng /mL). The median age of the cohort was 71 years, and the quartile range was 67 to 73 years. We observed no significant difference in alpha or beta diversity, but some bacteria belonging to the phylum Firmicutes (Clostridiales, , and ) were increased in the high testosterone group. Serum testosterone levels positively correlated with the relative amount of Firmicutes ( =0.3323, p=0.0141), and the amount of Firmicutes affected serum testosterone levels independent of host factors (age, body mass index, triglyceride, and total cholesterol; β=0.770, p=0.0396). Some intestinal bacteria belonging to the phylum Firmicutes were associated with testosterone levels in elderly males. Therefore, the gut microbiota could affect testosterone metabolism in elderly males.

BackgroundThis all-case post-marketing surveillance (PMS) evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with un-resectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, non-interventional, observational PMS study (registered from August 2016 to January 2017) was conducted in patients who were newly initiated on nivolumab monotherapy. Assessments included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of special interest, patient characteristics affecting safety, and effectiveness over 12 months.ResultsOverall, 580 patients were enrolled; 555 and 554 patients comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. The median (range) age of the population was 66 (14–90) years. Nivolumab was initiated as 1st-, 2nd-, and ≥ 3rd-line treatment in 0.2%, 42.0%, and 57.8% of patients, respectively. TRAEs were reported in 275 (49.5%) patients. The most common TRAEs of special interest included thyroid dysfunction (9.5%), hepatic dysfunction (8.6%), and interstitial lung disease (6.7%). The incidence of TRAEs was significantly higher in elderly patients (≥ 65 vs < 65 years; ≥ 75 vs < 75 years); patients with lower C-reactive protein levels (< 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/dL); and patients with vs without a past medical history, including hepatic, thyroid, and autoimmune diseases. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 71.8% and 57.9%, respectively.ConclusionThe safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced RCC was similar to that in the phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial. No new safety signals were observed in this study.

The final analysis of the phase 3 Targeted Investigational Treatment Analysis of Novel Anti-androgen (TITAN) trial showed improvement in overall survival (OS) and other efficacy endpoints with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As ethnicity and regional differences may affect treatment outcomes in advanced prostate cancer, a post hoc final analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of apalutamide in the Asian subpopulation. Event-driven endpoints were OS, and time from randomization to initiation of castration resistance, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and second progression-free survival (PFS2) on first subsequent therapy or death. Efficacy endpoints were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards models without formal statistical testing and adjustment for multiplicity. Participating Asian patients received once-daily apalutamide 240 mg (n = 111) or placebo (n = 110) plus ADT. After a median follow-up of 42.5 months and despite crossover of 47 placebo recipients to open-label apalutamide, apalutamide reduced the risk of death by 32% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.13), risk of castration resistance by 69% (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.21-0.46), PSA progression by 79% (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35) and PFS2 by 24% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.44-1.29) relative to placebo. The outcomes were comparable between subgroups with low- and high-volume disease at baseline. No new safety issues were identified. Apalutamide provides valuable clinical benefits to Asian patients with mCSPC, with an efficacy and safety profile consistent with that in the overall patient population.