Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose To define the phenotypic and mutational spectrum of epilepsies related to DEPDC5 , NPRL2 and NPRL3 genes encoding the GATOR1 complex, a negative regulator of the mTORC1 pathway Methods We analyzed clinical and genetic data of 73 novel probands (familial and sporadic) with epilepsy-related variants in GATOR1-encoding genes and proposed new guidelines for clinical interpretation of GATOR1 variants. Results The GATOR1 seizure phenotype consisted mostly in focal seizures (e.g., hypermotor or frontal lobe seizures in 50%), with a mean age at onset of 4.4 years, often sleep-related and drug-resistant (54%), and associated with focal cortical dysplasia (20%). Infantile spasms were reported in 10% of the probands. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) occurred in 10% of the families. Novel classification framework of all 140 epilepsy-related GATOR1 variants (including the variants of this study) revealed that 68% are loss-of-function pathogenic, 14% are likely pathogenic, 15% are variants of uncertain significance and 3% are likely benign. Conclusion Our data emphasize the increasingly important role of GATOR1 genes in the pathogenesis of focal epilepsies (>180 probands to date). The GATOR1 phenotypic spectrum ranges from sporadic early-onset epilepsies with cognitive impairment comorbidities to familial focal epilepsies, and SUDEP.

Stéphanie Baulac and colleagues report the identification of mutations in the DEPDC5 gene that cause focal epilepsies. The main familial focal epilepsies are autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, familial temporal lobe epilepsy and familial focal epilepsy with variable foci. A frameshift mutation in the DEPDC5 gene (encoding DEP domain–containing protein 5) was identified in a family with focal epilepsy with variable foci by linkage analysis and exome sequencing. Subsequent pyrosequencing of DEPDC5 in a cohort of 15 additional families with focal epilepsies identified 4 nonsense mutations and 1 missense mutation. Our findings provided evidence of frequent (37%) loss-of-function mutations in DEPDC5 associated with a broad spectrum of focal epilepsies. The implication of a DEP (Dishevelled, Egl-10 and Pleckstrin) domain–containing protein that may be involved in membrane trafficking and/or G protein signaling opens new avenues for research.

Novel biomarkers of the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) are needed to better inform people with epilepsy of their individual risk and identify those at a high risk. The aim of this study was to identify such biomarkers, particularly with the exploration of seizures characteristics that have not been previously investigated, including peri-ictal peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and site of seizure onset. We conducted a nested case–control study of SUDEP within a dedicated nationwide prospective cohort. Eligible participants were adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing in-hospital seizure monitoring at 16 epilepsy monitoring units in France. Clinical data, results from presurgical investigations, and raw recordings from video EEG, electrocardiogram (ECG), and SpO2 were collected until the end of the recruitment period. The French National Directory of Natural Persons Identification was queried annually to identify deaths. SUDEP cases were adjudicated on the basis of medical records and interviews documenting the circumstances of death. Each SUDEP case was matched to four controls on the basis of study centre and date of inclusion. SUDEP risk factors were identified using LASSO-penalised conditional logistic regression. From May 18, 2010, to Aug 23, 2015, we enrolled a total of 1074 participants and followed their vital status until the end of 2018, yielding a total of 6828 patient-years of follow-up. 42 participants died during follow-up, including 18 cases of definite or probable SUDEP, resulting in a SUDEP rate of 2·64/1000 patient-years (95% CI 1·36–3·92). Four risk factors were significantly associated with the risk of SUDEP: an extratemporal epileptogenic zone (OR 37·8, 95% CI 3·21–446·2, p=0·0039), a BMI of 30 or higher (26·0, 2·0–339·6, p=0·013), male sex (12·6, 1·5–106·8, p=0·0201), and predominantly nocturnal seizures (6·0, 1·2–28·7, p=0·026). In contrast, the presence of peri-ictal SpO2 of less than 80% during focal seizures, the frequency of focal-to-bilateral tonic–clonic seizures, heart rate variability, age at epilepsy onset, number of antiseizure medications, and history of depression were not significantly associated with SUDEP. Extratemporal epilepsies involving the perisylvian region or frontal lobe appear to be associated with an increased risk of SUDEP. This finding warrants confirmation in larger cohorts and underscores the need to improve the diagnosis and surgical management of extratemporal epilepsies, which might contribute to improved SUDEP risk stratification and prevention. French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National 2009).

A novel methylation class, “neuroepithelial tumor, with PLAGL1 fusion” (NET-PLAGL1), has recently been described, based on epigenetic features, as a supratentorial pediatric brain tumor with recurrent histopathological features suggesting an ependymal differentiation . Because of the recent identification of this neoplastic entity, few histopathological, radiological and clinical data are available. Herein, we present a detailed series of nine cases of PLAGL1 -fused supratentorial tumors, reclassified from a series of supratentorial ependymomas, non- ZFTA/ non -YAP1 fusion-positive and subependymomas of the young. This study included extensive clinical, radiological, histopathological, ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation profiling) data for characterization. An important aim of this work was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a novel fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting the PLAGL1 gene. Using histopathology, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, we confirmed the ependymal differentiation of this new neoplastic entity. Indeed, the cases histopathologically presented as “mixed subependymomas-ependymomas” with well-circumscribed tumors exhibiting a diffuse immunoreactivity for GFAP, without expression of Olig2 or SOX10. Ultrastructurally, they also harbored features reminiscent of ependymal differentiation, such as cilia. Different gene partners were fused with PLAGL1 : FOXO1, EWSR1 and for the first time MAML2 . The PLAGL1 FISH presented a 100% sensitivity and specificity according to RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling results. This cohort of supratentorial PLAGL1 -fused tumors highlights: 1/ the ependymal cell origin of this new neoplastic entity; 2/ benefit of looking for a PLAGL1 fusion in supratentorial cases of non- ZFTA/ non -YAP1 ependymomas; and 3/ the usefulness of PLAGL1 FISH.

Summary The ILAE Task Force on Classification presents a road map for the development of an updated, relevant classification of the epilepsies. Our objective is to explain the process to date and the plan moving forward as well as to invite further discussion about the newly proposed terms and concepts. Here, we present our response to feedback about the 2010 Organization of the Epilepsies and clarify the reintroduction of the word “classification” to map out a framework for epilepsy diagnosis. We introduce some new concepts and suggest four diagnostic levels: seizure type, epilepsy category, epilepsy syndrome, and epilepsy with (specific) etiology to denote specific levels of diagnosis. We expand the etiological categories to six, focusing on those with treatment implications. Finally, we discuss the changes in terminology originally suggested and modifications in response to comments from the epilepsy community. We welcome feedback and discussion from the global epilepsy community, particularly for the new suggested terms, so that we can cement a classification that both reflects current thinking and scientific understanding and provides a dynamic, evolving framework.

Objective Investigate real‐world outcomes in drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients treated with cenobamate as adjunctive treatment to other antiseizure medications (ASMs) within the Early Access Programs (EAP) in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Methods DRE adults with uncontrolled focal‐onset seizures were included from 19 hospitals participating in the EAP in this retrospective study. Data were sourced from clinical records. Participants were evaluated at baseline, 1 months, and 3 months from cenobamate start, and 3, 6, and 12 months after maintenance. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the 50% responder rate, defined as the reduction in seizure frequency ≥50%. Results Data were collected from 298 patients who received at least one dose of cenobamate; efficacy was evaluated on 216 patients with seizure data available. At baseline, the median epilepsy duration was 22.2 years, and 41.9% of patients had previous epilepsy surgery, including vagus nerve stimulation, with a median of nine previously failed ASMs. The median number of seizures/month was 8.8. After 3 months of maintenance, the 50% responder rate (primary endpoint) was 49.3%; the median percentage seizure reduction from baseline was 49.1%. A total of 100%, ≥90%, and ≥75% seizures reduction were reported in 13.6%, 20.0%, and 33.6% of patients, respectively. Both the responder rate and the median percentage seizure reduction steadily increased during the observation period. At 6‐month maintenance, the seizure‐free rate was 24.2%. The retention rate assessed by Kaplan–Meier decreased from 96.6% at 1‐month cenobamate start to 69.7% at 12‐month maintenance. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) to cenobamate occurred in 30.9% of patients, with asthenia, dizziness, and somnolence being the most frequent; the majority were mild‐to‐moderate and resolved during the observation period; three patients (1.0%) experienced a total of seven serious ADRs, all during titration. Significance In this study, cenobamate demonstrated to be an effective option for people with uncontrolled epilepsy even after multiple failed ASMs or failure of epilepsy surgery. Plain Language Summary This study involved patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, who had continued seizures despite using at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Patients received cenobamate (Ontozry) as epilepsy treatment during the Early Access Program (EAP) in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. An EAP allows patients to receive promising new drugs under clinical supervision before they are commercially available. After 6 months from cenobamate start, 49.3% of patients had their seizures cut by half or more, and 13.6% became seizure‐free. A total of 30.9% of patients had an undesirable reaction to cenobamate, mostly mild‐to‐moderate and resolved; the most frequent were asthenia, dizziness, and somnolence.

Familial adult myoclonus epilepsy (FAME) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by adult onset, involuntary muscle jerks, cortical myoclonus and occasional seizures. FAME is genetically heterogeneous with more than 70 families reported worldwide and five potential disease loci. The efforts to identify potential causal variants have been unsuccessful in all but three families. To date, linkage analysis has been the main approach to find and narrow FAME critical regions. We propose an alternative method, pedigree free identity-by-descent (IBD) mapping, that infers regions of the genome between individuals that have been inherited from a common ancestor. IBD mapping provides an alternative to linkage analysis in the presence of allelic and locus heterogeneity by detecting clusters of individuals who share a common allele. Succeeding IBD mapping, gene prioritization based on gene co-expression analysis can be used to identify the most promising candidate genes. We performed an IBD analysis using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data followed by gene prioritization on a FAME cohort of ten European families and one Australian/New Zealander family; eight of which had known disease loci. By identifying IBD regions common to multiple families, we were able to narrow the FAME2 locus to a 9.78 megabase interval within 2p11.2–q11.2. We provide additional evidence of a founder effect in four Italian families and allelic heterogeneity with at least four distinct founders responsible for FAME at the FAME2 locus. In addition, we suggest candidate disease genes using gene prioritization based on gene co-expression analysis.

Video‐encephalographic (vEEG) seizure recordings make essential contributions to the differentiation of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). The yield of vEEG examinations can be increased through suggestive seizure manipulation (SSM) (ie, activation/provocation/cessation procedures), but its use has raised ethical concerns. In preparation for guidelines on the investigation of patients with PNES, the ILAE PNES Task Force carried out an international survey to investigate practices of and opinions about SSM. An online questionnaire was developed by the ILAE PNES Task Force. Questions were asked at clinical unit or individual respondent level. All ILAE chapters were encouraged to send questionnaires to their members. The survey was open from July 1, 2019, to August 31, 2019. A total of 487 clinicians from 411 units across 94 countries responded. Some form of SSM was used in 296/411 units (72.0%). Over 90% reported the use of verbal suggestion, over 80% the use of activation procedures also capable of eliciting epileptic activity (hyperventilation or photic stimulation). Only 26.3% of units used techniques specifically intended to provoke PNES (eg, saline injection). Fewer than 10% of units had established protocols for SSM, only 20% of units required written patient consent, in 12.2% of units patients received explicitly false information to provoke seizures. Clinicians using SSM tended to perceive no ethical problems, whereas those not using SSM were likely to have ethical concerns about these methods. We conclude that the use of invasive nocebo techniques intended to provoke PNES in diagnostic settings has declined, but SSM is commonly combined with activation procedures also capable of eliciting epileptic activity. While research suggests that openness about the use of PNES‐specific nocebo techniques does not reduce diagnostic yield, very few units have suggestion protocols or seek patient consent. This could be addressed through establishing consensus guidance for the practice of SSM.

Mutations in the sodium‐activated potassium channel gene KCNT1 have been associated with nonlesional sleep‐related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE). We report the co‐occurrence of mild malformation of cortical development (mMCD) and KCNT1 mutations in four patients with SHE. Focal cortical dysplasia type I was neuropathologically diagnosed after epilepsy surgery in three unrelated MRI‐negative patients, periventricular nodular heterotopia was detected in one patient by MRI. Our findings suggest that KCNT1 epileptogenicity may result not only from dysregulated excitability by controlling Na+K+ transport, but also from mMCD. Therefore, pathogenic variants in KCNT1 may encompass both lesional and nonlesional epilepsies.

Objective Evaluating the efficacy of an opioid antagonist, naloxone (NLX), to reduce the severity of post‐ictal hypoxemia and immobility after focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (FBTCS). Methods ENALEPSY is a double‐blind placebo (PCB)‐controlled trial conducted in patients with focal epilepsy undergoing long‐term video‐EEG monitoring (LTM). Patients with a FBTCS during LTM were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous NLX or PCB within the 2 min following the end of FBTCS. After database lock, a discrepancy between the allocated arm and the received treatment was detected, resulting in a 4:1 NLX:PCB ratio. To further explore the efficacy of NLX, we used historical control (HC) data collected in patients included in the REPO2MSE study whose characteristics matched those of patients randomized in ENALEPSY. The efficacy of NLX was then assessed versus PCB and versus HC. The primary endpoint was the delay between the end of the seizure and recovery of SpO2 ≥ 90%. Secondary efficacy outcomes included desaturation nadir and duration of the post‐ictal immobility. Results 33 patients contributed to the NLX group, 7 to the PCB group, and 43 to the HC group. The proportion of FBTCS type 1 or 3 was 84% in NLX, 100% in PCB, and 84% in HC. NLX did not improve the delay of recovery of SpO2 ≥ 90% or the desaturation nadir. By contrast, the duration of the post‐ictal immobility differed across groups. The time to mobility recovery within the first 5 min post‐ictal was very similar in the PCB (200.3 ± 215.8 s) and HC (194.4 ± 192.0 s) groups, and significantly shorter in the NLX group (128.9 ± 151.1 s) when compared to HC (Hazard Ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.11–3.05; p = 0.021). Significance NLX did not prevent post‐ictal respiratory dysfunction but might reduce the duration of post‐ictal immobility. Confirmation of this effect and its impact on SUDEP risk will require additional studies. Plain Language Summary Release of endogenous opioids might participate in the severity of post‐ictal hypoxemia and immobility after focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (FBTCS). We conducted a multicenter double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an opioid antagonist, naloxone (NLX), administered within 2 min following the end of FBTCS. The efficacy of NLX was further explored with a comparison with historical control. NLX did not improve the delay of recovery or the severity of post‐ictal hypoxemia. Post‐ictal immobility was significantly shorter in the NLX group when compared to historical control. The impact of these results on SUDEP prevention will require additional studies.