Explore the vast range of titles available.

The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100B concentrations. Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Operating room. 190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries. Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5. The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day. 95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; p = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (p = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (p = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (p = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100B concentrations (p = 0.821) between the groups. Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults. •Older adults are at-risk for prolonged recovery after volatile anesthesia.•The effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane on recovery is not entirely clear.•Postoperative recovery was not significantly faster after desflurane anesthesia.•PONV, delirium and cognitive dysfunction were similar between the groups.

IntroductionThe effect of different anaesthetics on the incidence of postoperative delirium is still not entirely clear. Therefore, we will evaluate the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane versus propofol for the maintenance of anaesthesia on the incidence of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing moderate- to high-risk major non-cardiac surgery. We will further compare the incidences of delayed neurocognitive recovery, long-term postoperative neurocognitive disorder, postoperative nausea and vomiting between the groups.Methods and analysisIn this multicentre, prospective, observer-blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial, we will include 1332 patients ≥65 years of age undergoing moderate- to high-risk major non-cardiac surgery lasting at least 2 hours. Patients will be randomly 1:1:1 assigned to receive desflurane, sevoflurane or propofol for anaesthesia. Maintenance of anaesthesia will be performed in a goal-directed manner using processed electroencephalography with an intraoperative goal of bispectral index 40–60. Our primary outcome will be the incidence of postoperative delirium within the first five postoperative days. Postoperative delirium will be assessed using the three-dimensional-confusion assessment method (3D-CAM) or CAM-intensive care unit (ICU) in the morning and evening of the first five postoperative days by blinded study personnel. The primary outcome, the incidence of postoperative delirium, will be compared between the three study groups using a χ2 test. Furthermore, a logistic regression model for the incidence of postoperative delirium will be performed, accounting for randomised groups as well as other predefined confounding factors.Ethics and disseminationThis clinical trial has been approved by the ethics committee and the Federal Office for Safety in Healthcare as the competent authority for clinical trials in Austria. The results of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT05990790.

IntroductionIncreased inflammatory processes after non-cardiac surgery are very common. The association between postoperative inflammation and the occurrence of cardiovascular complications after non-cardiac surgery are still not entirely clear. Therefore, we will evaluate the association between postoperative inflammation and the occurrence of major cardiovascular complications in patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing non-cardiac surgery. We will further evaluate the association of postoperative inflammation and days-at-home within 30 days after surgery (DAH30), the incidence of acute kidney injury, postoperative N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations and neurocognitive decline.Methods and analysisIn this multicentre study, we will include 1400 patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Our primary aim is to evaluate the association of postoperative maximum C-reactive protein concentration and the occurrence of a composite of five major cardiovascular complications (myocardial infarction, myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery, new onset of atrial fibrillation, stroke and death) within 30 days after surgery using a Mann-Whitney-U test as well as a logistic regression model. As our secondary aim, we will evaluate the association of a composite of three inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin 6, procalcitonin and copeptin) on the occurrence of our composite of five cardiovascular complications within 30 days and 1 year after surgery, acute kidney injury, DAH30 and NT-proBNP concentrations using linear or logistic regression models. We will measure inflammatory biomarkers before surgery, and on the first, second, third and fifth postoperative day. We will check medical records and conduct a telephone survey 30 days and 1 year after surgery. We evaluate neurocognitive function, using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment, before and 1 year after surgery.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the ethics committees at the Medical University of Vienna (2458/2020) and at the Medical University of Graz (33-274 ex 20/21).Trial registration numberNCT04753307.

IntroductionElevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) after non-cardiac surgery is a strong predictor for cardiovascular complications and reflects increased myocardial strain. NT-pro-BNP concentrations significantly rise after non-cardiac surgery within the first 3 days. Levosimendan is a potent inotropic drug that increases calcium sensitivity to cardiac myocytes, which results in improved cardiac contractility that last for approximately 7 days. Thus, we will test the effect of a pre-emptive perioperative administration of levosimendan on postoperative NT-pro-BNP concentration as compared with the administration of a placebo in patients undergoing moderate-risk to high-risk major abdominal surgery.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a double-blinded prospective randomised trial at the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (and potentially a second centre in Germany), including 230 patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 12.5 mg levosimendan versus placebo after induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome will be the postoperative maximum NT-pro-BNP concentration between both group within the first three postoperative days. Our secondary outcomes will be the incidence of myocardial ischaemia, myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery and a composite of myocardial infarction and death within 30 days and 1 year after surgery between both groups. Our further secondary outcome will be stratification of NT-pro-BNP values according to previously thresholds to predict mortality of myocardial infarction after surgery.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna on 14 July 2020 (EK 2187/2019). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients a day before surgery. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT04329624.

The effect of Levosimendan on postoperative natriuretic peptides in noncardiac surgical patients remains unknown. Thus, this study evaluates the effect of a perioperative levosimendan administration on postoperative N-terminal brain pro natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. In this prospective, double-blinded, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase III trial 115 patients were assigned to perioperative single-dose of 12.5 mg of levosimendan and 115 to placebo between October 2020 through November 2023 (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04329624). The primary outcome was postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentration within the first 3 postoperative days. 228 patients completed the trial. Postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentrations did not differ significantly between the groups (effect estimate: −64.51 ng.L -1 ; 95% CI −332.66 to 195.56; p = 0.61). Here, we show that perioperative levosimendan administration did not lead to a significantly lower release in postoperative NT-proBNP after noncardiac surgery. Here, the authors investigate the effect of perioperative levosimendan on postoperative subclinical heart failure, evaluated via NT-proBNP measurements in cardiac risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, and show no significant difference between levosimendan and placebo on the postoperative maximum NT-proBNP release.

Volatile anesthetics modulate inflammatory responses, but it remains unclear whether desflurane and sevoflurane differ in their effects on postoperative inflammation. We evaluated in this secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial, the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative inflammatory biomarkers in older adults undergoing minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery. We included all 190 patients who were enrolled in the main trial in this analysis. We administered desflurane or sevoflurane, aiming for a BIS value of 50 ± 5. C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin concentrations were measured preoperatively, within one hour after surgery, and on the second postoperative day. We observed no significant difference in maximum postoperative Interleukin-6 (8.11 pg ml [IQR 4.77; 15.7] versus 7.84 pg ml [IQR 4.67; 12.62]) (p = 0.357), C-Reactive Protein (0.32 mg dl [IQR 0.13; 0.9] versus 0.26 mg dl [IQR 0.13; 0.83] (p = 0.433), and Procalcitonin (0.04 ng ml [IQR 0.03; 0.07] versus 0.04 ng ml [IQR 0.03; 0.06]) (p = 0.709) between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. We did not find a significant difference in the concentration of postoperative inflammatory biomarkers. While prior studies indicated different effects on inflammation between different types of volatile anesthetics, we cannot observe this in our study. Our findings indicate that in this specific clinical setting, the choice between sevoflurane or desflurane for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery does not significantly affect the minor postoperative inflammatory response in older patients when volatile anesthetics at low MAC concentrations are administered.

Perioperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) are common complications after noncardiac surgery. Inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of both disorders. The COP-AF trial tests the hypothesis that colchicine reduces the incidence of perioperative AF and MINS in patients undergoing major noncardiac thoracic surgery. The ‘COlchicine for the Prevention of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation’ (COP-AF) trial is an international, blinded, randomized trial that compares colchicine to placebo in patients aged at least 55 years and undergoing major noncardiac thoracic surgery with general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria include a history of AF and a contraindication to colchicine (eg, severe renal dysfunction). Oral colchicine at a dose of 0.5 mg or matching placebo is given within 4 hours before surgery. Thereafter, patients receive colchicine 0.5 mg or placebo twice daily for a total of 10 days. The 2 independent co-primary outcomes are clinically important perioperative AF (including atrial flutter) and MINS during 14 days of follow-up. The main safety outcomes are sepsis or infection and non-infectious diarrhea. We aim to enroll 3,200 patients from approximately 40 sites across 11 countries to have at least 80% power for the independent evaluation of the 2 co-primary outcomes. The COP-AF main results are expected in 2023. COP-AF is a large randomized and blinded trial designed to determine whether colchicine reduces the risk of perioperative AF or MINS in patients who have major noncardiac thoracic surgery. [Display omitted]

Background/Objectives: Previous preclinical studies have shown that desflurane might have the most significant cardioprotective effect of all volatile anesthetics. However, data regarding the cardioprotective effects of desflurane versus sevoflurane are lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of the maintenance of anesthesia using desflurane versus sevoflurane on the postoperative maximum concentrations of cardiac biomarkers in older adults undergoing low- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery. Methods: In this secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial, we included all 190 older adults undergoing low- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery. Patients were randomized to receive desflurane or sevoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia. We administered desflurane or sevoflurane, aiming at a BIS value of 50 ± 5. The cardiac-specific biomarkers included troponin T, NT-proBNP, and copeptin, which were measured preoperatively, within one hour after surgery, and on the second postoperative day. Results: There were no significant differences between the desflurane and sevoflurane groups in the postoperative maximum concentrations of troponin T (11 ng.L−1 [8; 16] versus 13 ng.L−1 [9; 18]; p = 0.595), NT-proBNP (196 pg.mL−1 [90; 686] versus 253 pg.mL−1 [134; 499]; p = 0.288), or copeptin (19 pmol.L−1 [7; 58] versus 12 pmol.L−1 [6; 41]; p = 0.096). We also observed no significant differences in the troponin T, NT-proBNP, or copeptin concentrations between the desflurane and sevoflurane groups at any measured timepoint (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: In contrast to preclinical studies, we did not observe a significant difference in the postoperative maximum concentrations of cardiac biomarkers. It seems likely that desflurane does not exert significant clinical meaningful cardioprotective effects in older adults. Thus, our results do not support the use of desflurane in patients undergoing low- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery.

Increased von Willebrand Factor (vWF) activity mediates platelet adhesion and might be a contributor to the development of thrombotic complications after surgery. Although in vitro studies have shown that hyperoxia induces endovascular damage, the effect of perioperative supplemental oxygen as a possible trigger for increased vWF activity has not been investigated yet. We tested our primary hypothesis that the perioperative administration of 80% oxygen concentration increases postoperative vWF activity as compared to 30% oxygen concentration in patients at risk of cardiovascular complications undergoing major noncardiac surgery. A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to receive 80% versus 30% oxygen throughout surgery and for two hours postoperatively. We assessed vWF activity and Ristocetin cofactor activity in all patients shortly before the induction of anesthesia, within two hours after surgery and on the first and third postoperative day. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. We found no significant difference in vWF activity in the overall perioperative time course between both randomization groups. We observed significantly increased vWF activity in the overall study population throughout the postoperative time course. Perioperative supplemental oxygen showed no significant effect on postoperative vWF and Ristocetin cofactor activity in cardiac risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. In conclusion, we found no significant influence of supplemental oxygen in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery on postoperative vWF activity and Ristocetin cofactor activity.

Noncardiac surgery is associated with hemodynamic perturbations, fluid shifts and hypoxic events, causing stress responses. Copeptin is used to assess endogenous stress and predict myocardial injury. Myocardial injury is common after noncardiac surgery, and is often caused by myocardial oxygen demand-and-supply mismatch. In this secondary analysis, we included 173 patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 80% or 30% oxygen throughout surgery and the first two postoperative hours. We evaluated the effect of supplemental oxygen on postoperative Copeptin concentrations. Copeptin concentrations were measured preoperatively, within two hours after surgery, on the first and third postoperative days. In total, 85 patients received 0.8 FiO2, and 88 patients received 0.3 FiO2. There was no significant difference in postoperative Copeptin concentrations between both study groups (p = 0.446). Copeptin increased significantly within two hours after surgery, compared with baseline in the overall study population (estimated effect: −241.7 pmol·L−1; 95% CI −264.4, −219.1; p < 0.001). Supplemental oxygen did not significantly attenuate postoperative Copeptin release. Copeptin concentrations showed a more immediate postoperative increase compared with previously established biomarkers. Nevertheless, Copeptin concentrations did not surpass Troponin T in early determination of patients at risk for developing myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.