Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
261 result(s) for "Howard, Eric William"
Sort by:
Eliminating serious injury and death from road transport : a crisis of complacency
\"The book explodes the myths that currently drive society's view of traffic safety and limit progress in reducing death and serious injury. It presents current scientific knowledge in a non-technical way and draws parallels with other areas of public safety and public health. It uses examples from the media and from public policy debates to paint a clear picture of a flawed public policy approach and offers preventive medicine principles to take the field forward\"-- Provided by publisher.
Eliminating Serious Injury and Death from Road Transport
The book explodes the myths that currently drive society's view of traffic safety and limit progress in reducing death and serious injury. It presents current scientific knowledge in a non-technical way and draws parallels with other areas of public safety and public health.
Approaching Traffic Safety as Preventive Medicine
In Western society, the major public health challenges of the twenty-first century will be dominated by lifestyle-related threats: obesity, abuse of alcohol and drugs, and trauma resulting from the way we use the roads.52,140 Compounding this there is a growing culture of immediacy that pervades all aspects of our lives; everything has to be fast, now, and personally gratifying-interpersonal communication (cell phones, social media), modes of doing business (Internet marketing, online sales), IT processing speeds, minimum personal journey times, and so on.141 Reconciling the demands for immediacy with safe road use and resolving the disconnect between the perception that driving behaviour is a matter of personal choice and the reality of interdependent social behaviour both require fundamental culture change at the whole-of-society level. How we might set about achieving such lasting change is the theme of this book.
The Way We View Safety Is a Big Part of the Problem
The 2009 World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Global Status Report on Road Safety estimated that more than 1.2 million people die each year on the world’s roads, and that between 20 and 50 million suffer nonfatal injuries.17 It also estimated that more than 90% of the world’s fatalities resulting from road crashes occur in lowincome and middle-income countries, which have only 48% of the world’s registered motor vehicles. Of immense concern is the fact that these countries are now rapidly motorising and the death and disabling injury totals will increase dramatically over the next couple of decades unless radical change occurs.
The Car in Society
As we pointed out in Chapter 1, the car is unquestionably central to the lifestyle of most people in modern Western societies, and the nature of the personal mobility it provides is likely to remain one of mankind’s most prized assets for as much of the twenty-first century as we can reasonably foresee.50,51Dorling, in his Westminster oration on traffic safety in 2010, went so far as to say: “We prioritise what is good for the motor industry over what is good for human beings. We do this because the industry has become a force in its own right.”52 Society has such an affinity with cars that Nobel Prize-winning novelist William Faulkner claimed: “The American really loves nothing but his automobile: not his wife his child nor his country nor even his bank-account first.”53 Others have described our car dependency as a Faustian bargain.51
Brief History of How and Why Science Takes a Back Seat
We should not forget that personal mobility through motorised transport has a relatively short history, albeit a history of rapid evolution. The horse and carriage and the bicycle began to give way to the motorcycle and the motorcar barely 100 years ago. The initial response was an immediate focus on infrastructure provision; more and better roads were needed. As motorised traffic volumes increased, an additional focus was needed on traffic management, including legislation and regulation. For example, the world’s first traffic light was only switched on in 1914 (in Cleveland, Ohio),25 while the first traffic act in France appeared in 1921 and the first in China not until 1955.97Education about road rules and safe driving quickly became the principal tool within governments’ crash prevention strategies based upon the (now quaint) belief that if drivers understood what was good, safe practice, they would always apply it! It was the birth of the moral approach, which has proven remarkably, and tragically, resilient. As Jennifer Clark wrote:While enforcement was a supplementary strategy, it was with a “soft glove” because the police saw traffic enforcement as secondary to the enforcement of “real crime.”99 The fledgling profession of traffic engineering had no choice but to become the interpreters of human behaviour in traffic, sadly without any training in behavioural science. Traffic engineers were undoubtedly happy to be supported by road safety councils comprising eminent and concerned citizens who led the (largely) educational efforts.
Serious Crashes Have Impacts Way Beyond Those Injured
We have, in the preceding chapters, painted a picture of where we are, how we got there, and where we might aim to go. As a motivator for action, we put a human face on serious injury in Chapter 2. Before turning to how we might start the new journey, we add a further dimension to the human face of trauma.
Confronting Complacency
In Chapter 1, we stated: “It is impossible to escape the conclusion that we have the level of trauma that we, as motorised societies, are comfortable with” and that we were going to try to “understand why complacency rules.”
Eliminating Serious Injury and Death from Road Transport Is Not a Pipe Dream
Every one of us uses the roads every day, most of us several times a day. We walk, cycle, and drive as part of our daily lives; this is how we “get around” in order to do all the things we want to do. Roads, and the vehicles they service, are also the dominant means by which the vast majority of the goods we consume, and almost all of the services we use, move from farm, port, factory, or business to warehouse, tradesman’s premise, service centre, or retail outlet to our homes. Road use is such a fundamental part of our lives that we take it for granted. A modern, efficient road and road transport system is unquestionably critical to our standard of living. Not surprisingly, though, given the staggering volume of road use and the ever-present opportunity for something to go wrong, crashes are also commonplace daily events.
Evolution of Safe System Thinking
Very few of us stop to consider the basic characteristics of our road transport system. When we visit low-income countries we note with a wry smile that motorcycle helmet and seat belt use are rare, that walking on the road is common, and that when sidewalks do exist, they tend be filled with traders and their goods. These are things we, in motorised societies, no longer tolerate, but we do tolerate, unquestioningly, seriously unsafe designs, even though they are within our understanding and in front of our eyes every day. We tolerate and blithely accept them because we have grown up with them and we believe that we are totally in control of our own destiny on the roads, and that serious crashes only happen to unskilled or reckless others.