Explore the vast range of titles available.

The interaction between thrombosis and inflammation appears central to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and likely contributes to poor outcomes. Tissue factor is a driver of disordered coagulation and inflammatory signaling in viral infections and is important for viral replication; therefore, tissue factor may be an important therapeutic target in COVID-19. ASPEN-COVID-19 (NCT04655586) is a randomized, prospective open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE), active comparator Phase 2b trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of recombinant Nematode Anticoagulant Protein c2 (rNAPc2), a potent tissue factor inhibitor, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with elevated D-dimer levels. This report describes the design of the Phase 2b dose ranging and proof of concept study. Participants are randomly assigned, in a 1:1:2 ratio, to lower or higher dose rNAPc2 by subcutaneous injection on days 1, 3, and 5 or to heparin according to local standard of care; randomization is stratified by baseline D-dimer level (at 2X upper limit of normal). The primary efficacy endpoint for Phase 2b is proportional change in D-dimer concentration from baseline to Day 8 or day of discharge, whichever is earlier. The primary safety endpoint is major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding through Day 8. Phase 2b enrollment began in December 2020 and is projected to complete ∼160 participants by Q4 2021. ASPEN-COVID-19 will provide important data on a novel therapeutic approach that may improve outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients beyond available anticoagulants by targeting tissue factor, with potential effects on not only thrombosis but also inflammation and viral propagation.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, and those with disease in the lower extremities are at risk of major adverse limb events primarily driven by atherothrombosis. Traditionally, PAD refers to diseases of the arteries outside of the coronary circulation, including carotid, visceral and lower extremity peripheral artery disease, and the heterogeneity of PAD patients is represented by different atherothrombotic pathophysiology, clinical features and related antithrombotic strategies. The risk in this diverse population includes systemic risk of cardiovascular events as well as risk related to the diseased territory (e.g., artery to artery embolic stroke for patients with carotid disease, lower extremity artery to artery embolism and atherothrombosis in patients with lower extremity disease). Moreover, until the last decade, clinical data on antithrombotic management of PAD patients have been drawn from subanalyses of randomized clinical trials addressing patients affected by coronary artery disease. The high prevalence and related poor prognosis in PAD patients highlight the pivotal role of tailored antithrombotic therapy in patients affected by cerebrovascular, aortic and lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Thus, the proper assessment of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with PAD represents a key clinical challenge that must be met to permit the optimal antithrombotic prescription for the various clinical settings in daily practice. The aim of this updated review is to analyze different features of atherothrombotic disease as well as current evidence of antithrombotic management in asymptomatic and secondary prevention in PAD patients according to each arterial bed.

Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding P2Y12 receptor antagonist used clinically for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor has been shown in vitro to be a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6, a clinically important enzyme for the metabolism of many drugs. This study assessed the effects of coadministration of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2D6 substrate venlafaxine. The impact of venlafaxine on ticagrelor pharmacokinetic parameters was also investigated. Healthy subjects (N = 22) received a single 180-mg oral dose of ticagrelor on days 1 and 9 and oral doses of venlafaxine on day 4 (37.5 mg BID) and days 5 through 10 (75 mg BID). Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor, venlafaxine, and their metabolites (AR-C124910XX and O-desmethylvenlafaxine [ODV], respectively) were quantified for pharmacokinetic analyses. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Overall, 19 of 25 subjects were male; 14 were white, 10 were black, and 1 was Asian. Mean (SD) age was 26 (6) years, and mean (SD) body mass index was 24.3 (2.9) kg/m2. Ticagrelor had no effect on overall exposure to venlafaxine, as assessed by the AUC0–τ (geometric least squares mean ratio, 110.32 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 106.27–114.52]). Venlafaxine Cmax was increased by 22% in the presence of ticagrelor (121.83 ng/mL [90% CI, 111.80–132.75]). ODV AUC0–τ and Cmax were unaffected by coadministration with ticagrelor (98.71 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 96.61–100.85] and 101.44 ng/mL [90% CI, 98.34–104.65], respectively). Venlafaxine had no effect on the Cmax or AUC0–∞ of ticagrelor (96.54 ng/mL [90% CI, 85.03–109.61] and 89.67 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 82.78–97.14]) or AR-C124910XX (106.39 ng/mL [90% CI, 96.10–117.78] and 106.32 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 97.28–116.21], respectively). Ticagrelor and venlafaxine were well tolerated whether given alone or in combination. Ticagrelor had no clinically relevant effect on the plasma levels of venlafaxine and its CYP2D6-generated active metabolite, ODV. On the basis of these data, ticagrelor is not expected to affect CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism to a clinically relevant extent. Venlafaxine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor.

Background: Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) play a critical role in wound healing. Corlicyte® is an MSC product derived from allogeneic umbilical cord tissue donated under an institutional review board-approved protocol and processed in accordance with section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. This open-label phase 1 trial was performed under a United States Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug Application to establish the safety and tolerability of Corlicyte® in patients with diabetes and chronic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Methods: Escalating doses were applied topically twice a week for up to 8 weeks after ulcer debridement, wound photography, and measurement. Subjects were followed for 4 weeks after the treatment phase. Adverse events were assessed at every visit. Results: Nine subjects in 2 dosing cohorts completed the trial. No subjects experienced a serious adverse reaction to Corlicyte® or the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. Sixty percentage of subjects in the lower dose cohort experienced ulcer closure by Day 70 of follow-up, while the mean ulcer size was reduced by 54–67% in the other subjects. Conclusions: Topical administration of Corlicyte®, a novel biologic therapy consisting of allogeneic umbilical cord lining MSCs, appeared safe and tolerable and resulted in a significant decrease in ulcer area, demonstrating its potential as a therapy for healing of chronic DFU.

To assess trends in assigned International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision ( ICD-10 ) codes for patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) from 2018 to 2022 in 2 large US health systems. Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of ICD-10 codes assigned to patients hospitalized with HF in the Providence Health and University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) systems. The study included patients discharged from the Providence Health and UCHealth systems between 2018 and 2022 with a primary diagnosis of HF. ICD-10 codes analyzed included systolic HF (I50.2), diastolic HF (I50.3), combined systolic and diastolic HF (I50.4), hypertensive heart disease with HF (I11.0), and hypertensive heart disease with HF and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (I13.0, I13.2). Hospitalization data were analyzed separately for each health system due to privacy policies. Between 2018 and 2022, 61,238 HF hospitalizations occurred in the Providence Health system, and 13,576 occurred in UCHealth. Hypertensive heart disease with HF and CKD was the most common diagnosis, accounting for 42% to 56% of HF hospitalizations, followed by hypertensive heart disease with HF (34%-42%). Together, these diagnoses represented 85% to 90% of HF hospitalizations. Systolic, diastolic, and combined HF codes accounted for only 9% to 18% of hospitalizations. Significant variability in hypertension prevalence (ie, 100% in Providence Health and 38%-39% in UCHealth) was observed between the 2 health systems in patients with codes I13.0 and I13.2. The study highlighted a significant shift in HF diagnosis codes, with hypertensive heart disease with HF with and without CKD now predominant. The findings highlight the need for standardized coding practices across health systems for quality improvement initiatives and health services research.

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to stimulate bone formation in laboratory studies, both in vitro and in vivo. While early epidemiologic studies showed lower risk for hip fracture among statin users than nonusers, subsequent studies have produced mixed results. To examine the association of statin use with incidence of hip, lower arm or wrist, and other clinical fractures and with baseline levels of bone density. Prospective study. Women's Health Initiative Observational Study conducted in 40 clinical centers in the United States. 93 716 postmenopausal women ages 50 to 79 years. Rates of hip, lower arm or wrist, and other clinical fractures were compared among 7846 statin users and 85 870 nonusers over a median follow-up of 3.9 years. In 6442 women enrolled at three clinical centers, baseline levels of total hip, posterior-anterior spine, and total-body bone density measured by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were compared according to statin use. Age-adjusted rates of hip, lower arm or wrist, and other clinical fractures were similar between statin users and nonusers regardless of duration of statin use. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for current statin use were 1.22 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.81) for hip fracture, 1.04 (CI, 0.85 to 1.27) for lower arm or wrist fracture, and 1.11 (CI, 1.00 to 1.22) for other clinical fracture. Bone density levels did not statistically differ between statin users and nonusers at any skeletal site after adjustment for age, ethnicity, body mass index, and other factors. Statin use did not improve fracture risk or bone density in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. The cumulative evidence does not warrant use of statins to prevent or treat osteoporosis.

Effects of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on LDL and HDL Particle Concentrations in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome A randomized, double-blind, controlled study Robert S. Rosenson , MD 1 , James D. Otvos , PHD 2 and Judith Hsia , MD 3 1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 2 LipoScience, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina; 3 AstraZeneca PLC, Wilmington, Delaware. Corresponding author: Robert S. Rosenson, rrosenso{at}umich.edu . Abstract OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of statin therapy on lipoprotein particle concentrations in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Changes in lipoprotein particle concentration may predict the risk of coronary heart disease more accurately than lipoprotein cholesterol levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome ( n = 318) were randomly assigned in a double-blind study comparing 10 mg rosuvastatin (RSV), 10 mg atorvastatin, or placebo daily for 6 weeks. From weeks 6 to 12, patients in the RSV and placebo groups received 20 mg RSV, whereas the ATV group increased their dose to 20 mg daily. Lipoprotein particle concentrations were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, LDL cholesterol was measured by β-quantification, and other lipoproteins were measured by standard methods at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Lipoprotein levels were compared by analysis of covariance. RESULTS Statins reduced LDL particle concentration less than LDL cholesterol (−30 to −38 vs. −38 to −51%). Reductions were greater with RSV than with ATV ( P < 0.05 for LDL particle concentration and P < 0.001 for LDL cholesterol). Most patients attained LDL cholesterol <2.59 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) at 12 weeks (80% with RSV and 59% with ATV; P = 0.003), but only 27% of patients receiving RSV and 19% receiving ATV attained the goal of LDL particle concentration <1,000 nmol/l ( P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS In patients with the metabolic syndrome, statin-induced changes in LDL cholesterol do not accurately reflect changes in LDL particle concentration. Consequently, despite attainment of LDL cholesterol goals, these patients may retain considerable residual coronary heart disease risk. Footnotes The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received September 12, 2008. Accepted February 23, 2009. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association.

COVID-19 is associated with both venous and arterial thrombotic complications. While prophylactic anticoagulation is now widely recommended for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19 has not been established. PREVENT-HD is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pragmatic, event-driven phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in symptomatic outpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at risk for thrombotic events, hospitalization, and death. Several challenges posed by the pandemic have necessitated innovative approaches to clinical trial design, start-up, and conduct. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by time from COVID-19 confirmation, to either rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or placebo for 35 days. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, non-central nervous system systemic embolization, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety end point is fatal and critical site bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition. Enrollment began in August 2020 and is expected to enroll approximately 4,000 participants to yield the required number of end point events. PREVENT-HD is a pragmatic trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in the outpatient setting to reduce major venous and arterial thrombotic events, hospitalization, and mortality associated with COVID-19.

The metabolic syndrome is a cluster of clinical characteristics thought to be associated with increased coronary risk. This analysis evaluates angiographic progression of coronary disease in women who are postmenopausal with and without the metabolic syndrome enrolled in the Women’s Angiographic Vitamin & Estrogen (WAVE) trial, a randomized, controlled trial of hormone therapy and antioxidant vitamins. A total of 425 women who are postmenopausal and have angiographic coronary disease were enrolled at 7 clinics between July 1997 and August 1999. Women were categorized as having the metabolic syndrome when they met the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition. Coronary angiograms were performed at baseline and after 2.8 ± 0.9 years (mean ± SD). Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was performed at a core laboratory. Women with the metabolic syndrome (177/294, 60%) were more likely to be taking cholesterol-lowering medication (65% vs 51%, P = .01) and had higher body mass index (33 ± 6 vs 28 ± 6 kg/m 2, P <.001). The mean reduction in minimum lumen diameter was greater (−0.041 ± 0.151 vs −0.023 ± 0.148 mm/year, P = .33) and new lesions were more frequent (34% vs 23%, P = .054) in women with the metabolic syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the metabolic syndrome was not an independent predictor of angiographic disease progression. However, clinical events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary death) were more frequent among women with the metabolic syndrome ( P = .02). The metabolic syndrome was prevalent among postmenopausal women with coronary disease enrolled in the WAVE trial. Having the metabolic syndrome was not independently associated with changes in minimum lumen diameter or the development of new or progressing coronary lesions, but did confer an increased risk of clinical cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVE:--The Treating to New Targets study showed that intensive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day provides significant clinical benefit beyond that afforded by atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). The objective of our study was to investigate whether similar benefits of high-dose intensive atorvastatin therapy can be achieved in patients with CHD and diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--A total of 1,501 patients with diabetes and CHD, with LDL cholesterol levels of <130 mg/dl, were randomized to double-blind therapy with either atorvastatin 10 (n = 753) or 80 (n = 748) mg/day. Patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the time to first major cardiovascular event, defined as death from CHD, nonfatal non-procedure-related myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or fatal or nonfatal stroke. RESULTS:--End-of-treatment mean LDL cholesterol levels were 98.6 mg/dl with atorvastatin 10 mg and 77.0 mg/dl with atorvastatin 80 mg. A primary event occurred in 135 patients (17.9%) receiving atorvastatin 10 mg, compared with 103 patients (13.8%) receiving atorvastatin 80 mg (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.58-0.97], P = 0.026). Significant differences between the groups in favor of atorvastatin 80 mg were also observed for time to cerebrovascular event (0.69 [0.48-0.98], P = 0.037) and any cardiovascular event (0.85 [0.73-1.00], P = 0.044). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the rates of treatment-related adverse events and persistent elevations in liver enzymes. CONCLUSIONS:--Among patients with clinically evident CHD and diabetes, intensive therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg significantly reduced the rate of major cardiovascular events by 25% compared with atorvastatin 10 mg.