Explore the vast range of titles available.

Deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) results in a strong mutator phenotype known as microsatellite instability (MSI), which is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. MSI is characterized by length alterations within simple repeated sequences that are called microsatellites. Lynch syndrome is primarily caused by mutations in the MMR genes, mainly MLH1 and MSH2, and less frequently in MSH6, and rarely PMS2, and large genomic rearrangements account for 5–20 % of all mutations. Germ line hemiallelic methylations of MLH1 or MSH2 are termed as epimutations and have been identified as causative of Lynch syndrome. Moreover, germ line 3′ deletions of EPCAM gene is involved in MSH2 methylation. MSI is also observed in about 15 % of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), and endometrial cancer (EC), and at lower frequencies in other cancers, often in association with hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene. Trimethylation of histone H3 on Lys36 (H3K36 me3) is an epigenetic histone mark that was required for DNA MMR in vivo. Thus, mutations in the H3K36 trimethyltransferase SETD2 have been reported as a potential cause of MSI. Genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic differences have been identified between cancers with and without MSI. Recent comprehensive molecular characterizations of CRC, EC, and GC by The Cancer Genome Atlas indicate that MSI+ cancers are distinct biological entities. The BRAF V600E mutation is specifically associated with sporadic MSI+ CRCs with methylated MLH1, but is not associated with Lynch syndrome-related CRCs. Accumulating evidence indicates a role of interactions between MSI and microRNA (miRNA) in the pathogenesis of MSI-positive (MSI+) cancer. As another new mechanism underlying MSI, overexpression of miR-155 or miR-21 has been shown to downregulate the expression of the MMR genes. Gene targets of frameshift mutations caused by MSI are involved in various cellular functions, including DNA repair (MSH3 and MSH6), cell signaling (TGFBR2 and ACVR2A), apoptosis (BAX), epigenetic regulation (HDAC2 and ARID1A), and miRNA processing (TARBP2 and XPO5), and a subset of MSI+ CRCs reportedly shows the mutated miRNA machinery phenotype. Moreover, microsatellite repeats in miRNA genes, such as hsa-miR-1273c, may be novel MSI targets for CRC, and mutations in noncoding regulatory regions of MRE11, BAX (BaxΔ2), and HSP110 (HSP110ΔE9) may affect the efficiency of chemotherapy. Thus, analyses of MSI and its related molecular alterations in cancers are increasingly relevant in clinical settings, and MSI is a useful screening marker for identifying patients with Lynch syndrome and a prognostic factor for chemotherapeutic interventions. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the pathogenesis of MSI and focus on genome-wide analyses that indicate the potential use of MSI and related alterations as biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets.

Multifunctional molecules involved in tumor progression and metastasis have been identified as valuable targets for immunotherapy. Among these, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4), a significant tumor cell membrane-bound proteoglycan, has emerged as a promising target, especially in light of advances in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. The profound bioactivity of CSPG4 and its role in pivotal processes such as tumor proliferation, migration, and neoangiogenesis underline its therapeutic potential. We reviewed the molecular intricacies of CSPG4, its functional attributes within tumor cells, and the latest clinical-translational advances targeting it. Strategies such as blocking monoclonal antibodies, conjugate therapies, bispecific antibodies, small-molecule inhibitors, CAR T-cell therapies, trispecific killer engagers, and ribonucleic acid vaccines against CSPG4 were assessed. CSPG4 overexpression in diverse tumors and its correlation with adverse prognostic outcomes emphasize its significance in cancer biology. These findings suggest that targeting CSPG4 offers a promising avenue for future cancer therapy, with potential synergistic effects when combined with existing treatments.

Key Points The concept of specific molecular targeting has been applied to the development of innovative cancer-treatment strategies. At present, two main approaches are available for use in clinical practice: therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule agents. We focus on the ErbB receptor family, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, also known as ERBB1) as an example of a target in our comparison of mAbs and small-molecule inhibitors. Cetuximab, a mAb, and gefitinib and erlotinib, which are small-molecule inhibitors, differ markedly in their basic properties and their underlying mechanisms of action. The presence of activating mutations within the ATP-binding cleft of the EGFR kinase domain is associated with the sensitivity of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to gefitinib, but not to cetuximab. By contrast, cetuximab shows a clinical benefit for colorectal cancers that overexpress EGFR in a manner independent of EGFR mutations. In malignant glioma, the sensitivity to gefitinib is closely related to deletions within the ectodomain of EGFR. In contrast to these drug-sensitivity mutations, the appearance of the T790M mutation confers resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC. There are unique immune-effector mechanisms that are only triggered by therapeutic mAbs, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. By contrast, the effects of small-molecule agents are not directly linked to the activation of an immune response against tumour cells. In general, mild adverse effects such as dermatological complications are commonly observed with these two classes of EGFR inhibitors. Although interstitial lung diseases or diarrhoea are more commonly associated with small-molecule therapies, therapeutic murine mAbs or chimeric mAbs can cause immunogenicity, leading to the production of human anti-mouse antibodies or human antichimeric antibodies, respectively. It has been shown that mAbs such as trastuzumab and cetuximab exert synergistic anti-tumour effects in combination with chemotherapeutic agents more frequently than small-molecule inhibitors. The combination of distinct classes of EGFR inhibitors could not only increase their efficacy, but also contribute to overcoming resistance to one class of EGFR inhibitor. Further investigation into the distinct properties of these two classes of targeted agents should not only contribute to the development of new targeted agents but also provide an optimal therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, thereby leading to the improvement of dual-targeted or multi-targeted therapy. Several small-molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies are now approved for the therapy of various cancers. Focusing on the example of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, this Review compares and contrasts these two classes of agents. The 'magic bullet' concept of specifically targeting cancer cells at the same time as sparing normal tissues is now proven, as several monoclonal antibodies and targeted small-molecule compounds have been approved for cancer treatment. Both antibodies and small-molecule compounds are therefore promising tools for target-protein-based cancer therapy. We discuss and compare the distinctive properties of these two therapeutic strategies so as to provide a better view for the development of new drugs and the future direction of cancer therapy.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor of the pleural cavity. Pathologically distinguishing MPM from other pleural lesions is often difficult. We searched for marker antigens to facilitate the pathological diagnosis of MPM and found useful markers for the pathological detection of malignant mesothelioma. Among them, the anti-mesothelioma monoclonal antibody SKM9-2, which was isolated as a clone binding to specimens of MPM (but not to specimens of lung adenocarcinoma) by immunohistochemical screening, showed higher specificity and sensitivity than traditional mesothelioma markers. SKM9-2 recognizes both sialylated O-glycans and peptide sequences in HEG1, and its glycan modifications are specific to mesothelioma. New effective treatments for MPM are needed because the prognosis of patients with MPM is usually poor. SKM9-2 can be used as a seed for next-generation antibody drugs with strong cytotoxic activities. In this review, we have summarized our research on antibody development for MPM diagnosis and treatment.

PRDI-BF1 and RIZ (PR) domain zinc finger protein 14 (PRDM14), first reported in 2007 to be overexpressed in breast cancer, plays an important role in breast cancer proliferation. Subsequent studies reported that PRDM14 is expressed in embryonic stem cells, primordial germ cells, and various cancers. PRDM14 was reported to confer stemness properties to cancer cells. These properties induce cancer initiation, cancer progression, therapeutic resistance, distant metastasis, and recurrence in refractory tumors. Therefore, PRDM14 may be an ideal therapeutic target for various types of tumors. Silencing PRDM14 expression using PRDM14-specific siRNA delivered through an innovative intravenous drug delivery system reduced the size of inoculated tumors, incidence of distant metastases, and increased overall survival in nude mice without causing adverse effects. Therapeutic siRNA targeting PRDM14 is now being evaluated in a human phase I clinical trial for patients with refractory breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer.

Oligonucleotide therapeutics, drugs consisting of 10–50 nucleotide‐long single‐ or double‐stranded DNA or RNA molecules that can bind to specific DNA or RNA sequences or proteins, include antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), aptamers, and decoys. These oligonucleotide therapeutics could potentially become the third pillar of drug development. In particular, ASOs and siRNAs are advanced tools that are widely used to silence gene expression. They are used in clinical trials, as they have high specificity for target mRNAs and non‐coding RNAs and limited toxicity. However, their clinical application remains challenging. Although chemotherapy has benefits, it has severe adverse effects in many patients. Therefore, new modalities for targeted molecular therapy against tumors, including oligonucleotide therapeutics, are required, and they should be compatible with diagnosis using next‐generation sequencing. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic uses of ASOs, siRNAs, and miRNAs in clinical studies on malignant tumors. Understanding previous research and development will help in developing novel oligonucleotide therapeutics against malignant tumors. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are widely‐used advanced tools for silencing gene expression, and even suitable for targets that are not druggable via other therapeutic modalities. However, their application in clinical studies is limited because of the off‐target effects, and poor accumulation at their target sites and cells. Drug delivery systems (DDSs) for oligonucleotides play an important role in overcoming these difficulties.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to be responsible for tumor initiation, drug and radiation resistance, invasive growth, metastasis, and tumor relapse, which are the main causes of cancer‐related deaths. Gastrointestinal cancers are the most common malignancies and still the most frequent cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide. Because gastrointestinal CSCs are also thought to be resistant to conventional therapies, an effective and novel cancer treatment is imperative. The first reported CSCs in a gastrointestinal tumor were found in colorectal cancer in 2007. Subsequently, CSCs were reported in other gastrointestinal cancers, such as esophagus, stomach, liver, and pancreas. Specific phenotypes could be used to distinguish CSCs from non‐CSCs. For example, gastrointestinal CSCs express unique surface markers, exist in a side‐population fraction, show high aldehyde dehydrogenase‐1 activity, form tumorspheres when cultured in non‐adherent conditions, and demonstrate high tumorigenic potential in immunocompromised mice. The signal transduction pathways in gastrointestinal CSCs are similar to those involved in normal embryonic development. Moreover, CSCs are modified by the aberrant expression of several microRNAs. Thus, it is very difficult to target gastrointestinal CSCs. This review focuses on the current research on gastrointestinal CSCs and future strategies to abolish the gastrointestinal CSC phenotype. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to be responsible for tumor initiation, drug and radiation resistance, invasive growth, metastasis, and tumor relapse, which are the main causes of cancer‐related deaths. Therefore, since CSCs are thought to be highly resistant to conventional therapies, an effective and novel cancer treatment would need to eliminate CSCs. This review focuses on current research on gastrointestinal CSCs and future strategies to abolish the CSC phenotype.

Therapeutic antibodies have revolutionized hematology, offering targeted and effective treatments for both malignant and non-malignant diseases. In hematologic malignancies, anti-CD20, anti-CD19, anti-CD38, and anti–B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibodies have markedly improved survival outcomes, whereas antibody–drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies continue to expand therapeutic possibilities. Besides cancer, complement inhibitors such as eculizumab, ravulizumab, and the recently approved crovalimab have redefined paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome management, and the bispecific antibody emicizumab has transformed prophylaxis in hemophilia A. Furthermore, novel antibody formats such as the trifunctional anti-CD38 × CD3 antibody (Tri-31C2) exhibit enhanced anti-myeloma activity compared to chimeric CD38 antibodies, underscoring the future potential of T-cell–redirecting designs. This review summarizes key developments in therapeutic antibodies for hematological disorders, their action mechanisms, and emerging strategies to further optimize their efficacy and safety.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), with BCMA-directed products demonstrating unprecedented response rates in heavily pretreated patients. Despite these advances, variabilities in response durability, treatment-related toxicities, and the emergence of resistance underscore the need for strategies that extend beyond CAR construct design alone. Accumulating evidence has indicated that the therapeutic outcomes of this approach are determined by a complex interplay between tumor burden, antigen dynamics, CAR T-cell functional fitness, and host immune context at the time of infusion. Effector-to-target balance and antigen load, in particular, have emerged as modifiable biological determinants of efficacy and safety, with pre-infusion disease control and response to bridging therapy exerting a profound influence on post-infusion CAR T-cell expansion, persistence, and clinical outcomes. Soluble BCMA (sBCMA) has also gained increasing attention as a practical biomarker that integrates tumor burden and antigen dynamics to facilitate the biologically informed optimization of treatment timing and patient selection. In addition to tumor- and antigen-related factors, the intrinsic properties of CAR T-cell products—including the spatial organization and clustering of CAR molecules on the T-cell surface—represent an additional layer of biological determinants that correlate with treatment responses. The quantitative functional assessment of CAR T-cell products may complement conventional clinical and tumor-based biomarkers and improve the prediction of therapeutic potency prior to infusion. This review summarizes recent advances in CAR T-cell therapy for treating MM, focusing on key mechanisms of resistance, the optimization of pre-infusion disease control, the integration of biological markers into clinical decision-making, and emerging combinations and sequential strategies. We also propose a design-oriented and patient-centered framework that integrates CAR engineering with disease biology and host immune factors to enhance the consistency, durability, and safety of CAR T-cell therapy. Such biologically guided optimization strategies will likely prove critical for fully realizing the transformative potential of CAR T-cell therapy across the evolving treatment continuum of MM.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is an effective treatment for hematological cancers; however, challenges remain in its application to solid tumors. Among these, the control of CAR-T cell exhaustion is important. The relationship between tonic signals generated by the CAR self-activation and CAR-T cell exhaustion has attracted considerable attention. The magnitude of the tonic signal is known to depend on the structure of the extracellular portion of CAR, but the role of the linker sequence of the single-chain variable region (scFv) in the tonic signal and function in CAR-T cells has not been clarified. In this study, we compared two scFv linkers, G4S and Whitlow/218, in self-activating SKM-CAR, which recognized a malignant mesothelioma-specific modified HEG1 molecule. We observed no differences in cell surface phenotypes, NFAT and NFκB signaling intensities, and gene expression profiles between SKM-CAR T cells with these different linkers. However, switching from the G4S to the Whitlow/218 linker in SKM-CAR-T cells with the CD28 co-stimulatory domain significantly altered cytokine expression after antigen stimulation and improved the in vitro tumor cell killing activity, but not the in vivo tumor control. This is the first study describing the advantages of the Whitlow/218 linker over the G4S linker for some aspects of CAR-T cell function.