Explore the vast range of titles available.

Why this research matters: Leukaemia is a type of blood cancer. It can make people feel tired, worried, and alone. Doctors can help by talking clearly and kindly to patients. What we did: Our study looked at how good communication between doctors and patients affects how people with leukaemia feel in their daily lives. We asked people to fill out an online survey, and over 2,000 with leukaemia from 64 countries replied. Our survey asked about people’s diagnosis, treatment, and how well doctors explained things. We included a tool called HM-PRO, which measures how leukaemia affects someone’s life. We used statistics and computer models to find patterns in the answers. What we found: Patients who said their doctors gave clear information and involved them in decisions felt better overall. Younger patients and people with fast-growing types of leukaemia reported more problems. We found that feeling depressed or lonely were key to overall scores of the HM-PRO, but our models were not as accurate as we would want. What this means: There is more work to be done to develop better models, but our work suggests that doctors can help patients feel better by giving clear information and listening to their views. Talking kindly and involving patients in decisions can reduce stress and improve wellbeing. This is especially important for younger people. Hospitals and support groups can use these findings to improve care and make sure patients get the help they need.

High-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a promising approach to treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. In this paper, we present the long-term outcomes of a prospective single-center study with the analysis of the safety and efficacy of HDIT + AHSCT with reduced-intensity BEAM-like conditioning regimen in 99 MS patients: mean age—35 years old; male/female—39/60; median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 3.5; 43 relapsing/remitting MS, 56 progressive MS. No transplant-related deaths were observed. The mobilization and transplantation procedures were well tolerated. At 6 months post-transplant, neurological improvement or stabilization was observed in all the patients except one. Cumulative incidence of disease progression was 16.7 % at 8 years after HDIT + AHSCT. Estimated event-free survival at median follow-up of 48.9 months was 80 %: 83.3 % in relapsing/remitting MS vs 75.5 % in progressive MS. Sixty-four patients who did not progress during the first 3 years post-transplant and were monitored for more than 3 years were included in long-term outcome analysis. At the median long-term follow-up of 62 months, 47 % of patients improved by at least 0.5 points on the EDSS scale as compared to baseline and exhibited improvement during the entire period of follow-up; 45 % of patients were stable. No active, new, or enlarging lesions on magnetic resonance imaging were registered in patients without disease progression. AHSCT was accompanied by a significant improvement in patient’s quality of life. Due to the fact that patient selection was quite different to the other studies and that the information about disease activity prior in the disease course and its treatment was inhomogeneous, comparison with the results in the literature should be done with caution. Thus, the risk/benefit ratio of HDIT + AHSCT with reduced-intensity BEAM-like conditioning regimen in our population of MS patients is very favorable. The consistency of our long-term clinical and quality of life results, together with the persistence of improvement, is in favor of the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach in MS patients.

Background: Our aim was to identify health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) issues and symptoms in patients with haematological malignancies (HMs) and develop a conceptual framework to reflect the inter-relation between them. Methods: A total of 129 patients with HMs were interviewed in a UK multicentre qualitative study. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo-11. Results: Overall, 34 issues were reported by patients and were grouped into two parts: quality of life (QoL) and symptoms. The most prevalent HRQoL issues were: eating and drinking habits; social life; physical activity; sleep; and psychological well-being. Furthermore, most prevalent disease-related symptoms were: tiredness; feeling unwell; breathlessness; lack of energy; and back pain. The most prevalent treatment side effects were: tiredness; feeling sick; disturbance in sense of taste; and breathlessness. Conclusions: Both HMs and their treatments have a significant impact on patients’ HRQoL, in particular on issues such as job-role change, body image and impact on finances.

Background Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) constitutes a biologically and clinically heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies, with varying prognoses and treatment aims between indolent and aggressive subtypes. While survival outcomes remain key efficacy measures, they insufficiently capture the impact of disease and treatment on daily physical and psychosocial functioning, as well as quality of life (QoL). Objectives To characterize the use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adult NHL randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including the trajectory of PRO dissemination throughout the trial reporting process. Methods MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were systematically searched from 1 January 2017 to 19 January 2023 for NHL RCTs irrespective of subtype, with databases being re-searched until 4 February 2025. Cross-sectional and longitudinal descriptive analyses were conducted to investigate PRO use and reporting practices. Findings 549 completed and ongoing RCTs met the eligibility criteria, of which 176 trials (32.1%) included a reference to PROs, and 27 (4.9%) used a PRO as a primary outcome. Overall, 95 PRO measures were identified across trials, with EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Lymphoma, and EQ-5D being referenced most frequently. Among trials with published results that pre-specified PROs, 25.0% entirely and 10.5% partly omitted PRO findings from their main full-texts, without addressing this shortcoming in subsequent publications. Conclusion PROs are underused and underreported in RCTs in NHL. Standardized PRO evaluation methodology and guidance for the selection of fit-for-purpose PRO measures are needed, along with clear positioning of PROs alongside survival outcomes in clinical trial design and interpretation.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the unmet needs of myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) patients and their caregivers, focusing on how these needs impact quality of life (QoL) and daily functioning. MDS predominantly affects older adults. It is often complicated by severe red blood cell transfusion-dependent anemia and may require frequent hospital visits, conferring a substantial burden on patients and caregivers. Methods: A national survey was conducted between June 2022 and May 2023 in 46 hematology centers across Italy, involving 259 patients and 105 caregivers. The survey included validated QoL tools (QOL-E and HM-PRO) to measure the impact of disease and treatments on health-related QoL and symptoms. Results: Of the 259 patients surveyed, 42% were transfusion-dependent, with 45% reporting distress related to hospital travel, which was significantly associated with lower QoL scores (QOL-E physical score 50.0 vs. 62.5, p < 0.001). Transfusion dependency led to worse outcomes across physical, emotional, and social domains (HM-PRO Part A score 59.8 vs. 23.7, p < 0.001). Anxiety affected 66% of patients, while 56% reported feeling emotionally distressed. Forty-eight percent of patients required a caregiver, and among caregivers, 29% reported significant disruption to their work, including changing their job or reduced hours. Patients requiring frequent hospital visits showed notably worse QoL scores (HM-PRO emotional score 56.8 vs. 31.8, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study identified substantial unmet needs for MDS patients, particularly in addressing the heavy burden of transfusions and hospital visits. Both patients and caregivers experienced significant impact on daily life and on QoL, highlighting the urgent need for treatments that reduce hospital dependency, improve patient outcomes, and alleviate the caregiver burden.

The quality of life of patients at all stages of hematological malignancy is greatly affected by the disease and its treatment. There is a wide range of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues important to these patients. Any new instrument developed to measure HRQoL of such patients should be content valid, i.e., the items should be comprehensively relevant to the patients and their health condition. The aim of the present study was to examine content validity of a hematological malignancy specific patient reported outcome measure (HM-PRO) developed for use in routine clinical practice. Following literature review and semi-structured interviews, the generated themes and sub-themes were discussed to develop the prototype version of the HM-PRO. A 4-step approach was used for content validation: initial testing and cognitive interviewing; item rating; content validity panel meeting; final field testing and cognitive interviewing. Additional questions related to patients' perception of recall period and preferred sentence structure (i.e., question or statement) of the items were also asked during cognitive interviews. The content analysis of 129 transcribed semi-structured interviews resulted in the prototype version of the instrument consisting of 58 items grouped into two parts: Part A (impact/HRQoL - 34 items) and Part B (signs and symptoms - 24 items). The initial testing showed intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of >0.8 for both Part A and Part B. Item rating for language clarity, completeness, relevance, and response scale by experts and patients showed content validity index for scales average >0.8 for both Part A and Part B, except 0.64 for relevance for Part A by the patient panel. The final testing of the revised version of the instrument showed the Cronbach's alpha value of 0.91 for Part A and 0.76 for Part B, suggesting high internal consistency, and ICC of 0.91 for Part A and 0.76 for Part B. The recall period of \"today\" for Part-A and \"last 3 days\" for Part-B were the patients' preferred \"recall period.\" Furthermore, the patients expressed preference to the HM-PRO items as statements. The findings of this study confirm that the HM-PRO possesses a strong content validity, includes all the issues important to patients and is easy to read, understand and respond to spontaneously.

Validity is the ability of an instrument to measure what it claims to measure. It means the degree to which the empirical evidence supports the trustworthiness of interpretations based on the calculated scores. The hematological malignancy (HM) specific patient reported outcome measure (HM-PRO), is a newly developed instrument for use in daily clinical practice as well as in research. This study, provides the evidence for construct validity of the HM-PRO, specifically focusing on the convergent and divergent validity compared to the other established instruments used in hematology. This validation study adopted a prospective cross-sectional design where a heterogeneous group of patients diagnosed with different HMs and different disease state were recruited. A total of 905 patients were recruited from seven secondary care hospitals in the UK and online through five patient organizations. Patients were asked to complete the HM-PRO and other cancer specific PRO's, FACT-G and EORTC QLQ C-30. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 23 statistical software. A total of 486 males (53.7%) and 419 females (46.3%), with a mean age of 64.3 (± 12.4) years and mean time since diagnosis of 4.6 ( ± 5.2) were recruited. The total score of Part A of the HM-PRO highly correlated with the five functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Physical = -0.71, Role = -0.72, Emotional = -0.64, Cognitive = -0.58, Social = -0.74-p < 0.001). With respect to correlation with FACT-G, the total score of Part A of the HM-PRO highly correlated with Physical (-0.74), Emotional (-0.57), Functional (-0.66) domains and overall score of FACT-G (-0.74). Similarly, the total score of Part B of the HM-PRO highly correlated with three symptoms scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 (Fatigue scale = -0.74, Nausea and Vomiting = -0.52, Pain = -0.59-p < 0.001) and individual symptom items (Dyspnea = 0.51, Insomnia= 0.43, Appetite loss = 0.54-p < 0.001). The construct validity evidence presented in this research is a testimony to the HM-PRO's ability to measure HRQoL issues which it intends to measure. This is of utmost importance when a PRO is used in routine clinical practice so that the interpretation of the scores or response to an individual item is understood by the clinicians/nurses as intended by the patients.