Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
10 result(s) for "Isabele Pardo"
Sort by:
The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in the prevention of post-COVID conditions: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the latest research
Objective:We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination against post-COVID conditions (long COVID) among fully vaccinated individuals.Design:Systematic literature review/meta-analysis.Methods:We searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from December 1, 2019, to June 2, 2023, for studies evaluating the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against post-COVID conditions among fully vaccinated individuals who received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine. A post-COVID condition was defined as any symptom that was present four or more weeks after COVID-19 infection. We calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (95% confidence interval) for post-COVID conditions between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as 100% x (1-DOR).Results:Thirty-two studies with 775,931 individuals evaluated the effect of vaccination on post-COVID conditions, of which, twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled DOR for post-COVID conditions among fully vaccinated individuals was 0.680 (95% CI: 0.523–0.885) with an estimated VE of 32.0% (11.5%–47.7%). Vaccine effectiveness was 36.9% (23.1%–48.2%) among those who received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine before COVID-19 infection and 68.7% (64.7%–72.2%) among those who received three doses before COVID-19 infection. The stratified analysis demonstrated no protection against post-COVID conditions among those who received COVID-19 vaccination after COVID-19 infection.Conclusions:Receiving a complete COVID-19 vaccination prior to contracting the virus resulted in a significant reduction in post-COVID conditions throughout the study period, including during the Omicron era. Vaccine effectiveness demonstrated an increase when supplementary doses were administered.
Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Infectious Uveitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review
Background: Infectious uveitis is a potentially sight-threatening condition that requires timely and accurate pathogen identification to guide effective therapy. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) often lack sensitivity and the inclusiveness of pathogen detection. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers an unbiased approach to detecting a broad range of pathogens. This review evaluates its diagnostic performance in detecting infectious uveitis. Methods: A systematic search across multiple databases identified studies assessing the use of mNGS for diagnosing infectious uveitis. The included studies compared mNGS to CMTs, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture, serology, and the IGRA (Interferon-Gamma Release Assay). The study characteristics; the detection rates; and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were extracted. The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were calculated using CMTs as a reference. Results: Twelve studies comprising 859 patients were included. The sensitivity of mNGS compared to that of CMTs ranged from 38.4% to 100%, while specificity varied between 15.8% and 100%. The commonly detected pathogens included varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, and herpes simplex virus. In some cases, mNGS outperformed PCR in viral detection, aiding diagnosis when the standard methods failed. However, contamination risks and inconsistent diagnostic thresholds were noted. Conclusions: mNGS enables the diagnosis of infectious uveitis, particularly for viral causes, but its variable performance and standardization challenges warrant further investigation.
Association between hemoglobin/red blood cell distribution width ratio and acute kidney injury in sepsis and heart failure patients
The hemoglobin/red blood cell distribution width (Hb/RDW) ratio has emerged as a potential biomarker for acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in patients with cardiovascular conditions. This study investigated the relationship between Hb/RDW ratio and AKI incidence in critically ill patients diagnosed with sepsis and heart failure (HF). A retrospective study was conducted with 119 critically ill patients with sepsis and 83 patients with HF, analyzed according to the presence or absence of kidney injury. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of AKI. Outcomes between higher and lower Hb/RDW groups were compared. Patients who developed AKI showed higher C-reactive protein levels, elevated RDW (15.7 ± 2.2 vs. 14.9 ± 1.8; p = 0.01), and higher SAPS 3 scores, along with markedly lower Hb concentrations and Hb/RDW ratios (75.1 ± 1.6 vs. 85.5 ± 1.9; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, serum urea (OR 1.016; 95% CI 1.005-1.027 per mg/dL), SAPS 3, and Hb/RDW ratio (OR 0.977; 95% CI 0.959-0.996) were independently associated with AKI. Patients with a lower Hb/RDW ratio had higher frequencies of AKI, kidney-replacement therapy, red-cell transfusion, and mortality. During a 7-year follow-up, progression to dialysis-dependent stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD-V) occurred in 10.8% of HF patients and 2.5% of sepsis patients, indicating that a lower Hb/RDW ratio was also associated with worse long-term renal outcomes. The Hb/RDW ratio is independently associated with AKI and may also reflect long-term kidney prognosis, representing a cost-effective and readily available ICU marker to identify patients at risk for both acute and chronic renal deterioration in sepsis or HF.
Beyond the Virus: The Collateral Impact of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Consumption, Microbial Resistance, and Pharmacoeconomics
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had major global repercussions for hospitalized patients, affecting multiple aspects of hospital care. Understanding these effects is important for improving healthcare management and infection control practices. This study aimed to analyze and compare the pandemic’s impact on antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients, with emphasis on therapeutic, microbiological, and pharmacoeconomic aspects. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at a Brazilian tertiary hospital (2018–2022). Adult patients receiving antimicrobials were included. Variables analyzed were antimicrobial consumption, incidence of healthcare-associated infections, resistance profiles, hospital costs, adverse drug reactions, and pharmacy activities. Data were obtained from anonymized institutional records and analyzed using descriptive statistics, time series, and linear regression. Results: Analysis of 268,713 hospitalizations showed that the median monthly number of patients receiving antimicrobials did not increase significantly during the pandemic. Higher consumption of carbapenems, glycopeptides, polymyxins, and echinocandins was linked to more healthcare-associated infections by multidrug-resistant organisms. Clostridioides difficile infections declined. Mortality rose significantly, especially among COVID-19 patients. Costs increased by 39%, with antimicrobial-related expenses up 45.7%. Conclusions: The pandemic intensified antimicrobial use, resistance, and costs. While limited by its single-center design and the use of all inpatients as the denominator, these findings highlight the important need for reinforced antimicrobial stewardship to build healthcare system resilience.
The effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines in the prevention of post-COVID conditions in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination against post-COVID conditions (long COVID) in the pediatric population. Systematic literature review/meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from December 1, 2019, to August 14, 2023, for studies evaluating the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against post-COVID conditions among vaccinated individuals < 21 years old who received at least 1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine. A post-COVID condition was defined as any symptom that was present 4 or more weeks after COVID-19 infection. We calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (95% CI) for post-COVID conditions between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Eight studies with 23,995 individuals evaluated the effect of vaccination on post-COVID conditions, of which 5 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of children who did not receive COVID-19 vaccines ranged from 65% to 97%. The pooled prevalence of post-COVID conditions was 21.3% among those unvaccinated and 20.3% among those vaccinated at least once. The pooled DOR for post-COVID conditions among individuals vaccinated with at least 1 dose and those vaccinated with 2 doses were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77-1.49) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.08), respectively. A significant proportion of children and adolescents were unvaccinated, and the prevalence of post-COVID conditions was higher than reported in adults. While vaccination did not appear protective, conclusions were limited by the lack of randomized trials and selection bias inherent in observational studies.
Effectiveness of heterologous and homologous COVID-19 vaccination among immunocompromised individuals: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
We assessed the effectiveness of heterologous vaccination strategy in immunocompromised individuals regarding COVID-19 outcomes, comparing it to homologous approaches. Systematic literature review/meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1, 2020 to September 29, 2023. We included studies that evaluated the heterologous vaccination strategy on immunocompromised individuals through outcomes related to COVID-19 (levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG, neutralizing antibodies, symptomatic COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death) in comparison to homologous schemes. We also used random-effect models to produce pooled odds ratio estimates. Heterogeneity was investigated with I estimation. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Fourteen of them provided quantitative data for inclusion in the meta-analysis on vaccine response, being four of them also included in the vaccine effectiveness meta-analysis. The vaccination strategies (heterologous vs homologous) showed no difference in the odds of developing anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG (odds ratio 1.12 [95% Cl: 0.73-1.72]). Heterologous schemes also showed no difference in the production of neutralizing antibodies (odds ratio 1.48 [95% Cl: 0.72-3.05]) nor vaccine effectiveness in comparison to homologous schemes (odds ratio 1.52 [95% CI: 0.66-3.53]). Alternative heterologous COVID-19 vaccinations have shown equivalent antibody response rates and vaccine effectiveness to homologous schemes, potentially aiding global disparity of vaccine distribution.
Diagnostic stewardship and dermatology consultation in cellulitis management: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Cellulitis is a common skin infection often requiring antibiotic treatment. However, misdiagnosis and inappropriate antibiotic use contribute to antibiotic resistance and healthcare costs. We aimed to evaluate the impact of dermatology consultation on treatment modification in patients with suspected cellulitis and to determine whether dermatologists’ evaluation can be used as a reference to diagnose suspected cellulitis. We explored MedLine (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus and Embase, including publications from database inception to July 25, 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated treatment modifications involving the use of antibiotics for patients with suspected cellulitis with and without dermatology consultation. We excluded comments or reviews, pilot studies, and studies without a non-dermatology control group, treatment modifications, the use of antibiotics, or patients with cellulitis. Of the 49 full-text articles, 14 studies met the selection criteria.This systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Of five independent reviewers (GYC, IP, MG, MKH, and AMRP), two abstracted data for each article using a standardized abstraction form. We used the Downs and Black scale to evaluate study quality. Subgroup analysis was conducted regarding readmission rate within 30 days for two independent populations seen by a non-dermatologist physician or a dermatologist. We employed random-effects models to obtain pooled mean differences. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared value. The impact of dermatology consultation on treatment modification involving antibiotics in patients with suspected cellulitis and readmission rates in 30 days. Dermatology consultation changed initial treatment plans involving antibiotics from 47 to 96% of the time, improving diagnostic accuracy and, consequently, antibiotic stewardship of cellulitis. Dermatology consultation was not significantly associated with lower readmission rates in 30 days (pooled OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.25, I2 = 0%). Dermatology consultation in patients with suspected cellulitis may improve diagnosis and management, thereby reducing antibiotic misuse, unnecessary tests, and prolonged hospitalizations.
Syphilis Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Investigating Nonpenicillin Therapeutic Strategies
Abstract Background Penicillin's long-standing role as the reference standard in syphilis treatment has led to global reliance. However, this dependence presents challenges, prompting the need for alternative strategies. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of these alternative treatments against nonneurological syphilis. Methods We searched MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to 28 August 2023, and we included studies that compared penicillin or amoxicillin monotherapy to other treatments for the management of nonneurological syphilis. Our primary outcome was serological cure rates. Random-effect models were used to obtain pooled mean differences, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Results Of 6478 screened studies, 27 met the inclusion criteria, summing 6710 patients. The studies were considerably homogeneous, and stratified analyses considering each alternative treatment separately revealed that penicillin monotherapy did not outperform ceftriaxone (pooled odds ratio, 1.66 [95% confidence interval, .97–2.84]; I2 = 0%), azithromycin (0.92; [.73–1.18]; I2 = 0%), or doxycycline (0.82 [.61–1.10]; I2 = 1%) monotherapies with respect to serological conversion. Conclusions Alternative treatment strategies have serological cure rates equivalent to penicillin, potentially reducing global dependence on this antibiotic. This review and meta-analysis compared nonneurological syphilis treatments. Results indicate alternative therapies like doxycycline, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin have similar effectiveness and safety as penicillin. Combination therapies demonstrated promise. These findings offer alternatives when penicillin is unavailable, reducing reliance on it. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Association between hemoglobin/red blood cell distribution width ratio and acute kidney injury in sepsis and heart failure patients
IntroductionThe hemoglobin/red blood cell distribution width (Hb/RDW) ratio has emerged as a potential biomarker for acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in patients with cardiovascular conditions. This study investigated the relationship between Hb/RDW ratio and AKI incidence in critically ill patients diagnosed with sepsis and heart failure (HF).MethodsA retrospective study was conducted with 119 critically ill patients with sepsis and 83 patients with HF, analyzed according to the presence or absence of kidney injury. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of AKI. Outcomes between higher and lower Hb/RDW groups were compared.ResultsPatients who developed AKI showed higher C-reactive protein levels, elevated RDW (15.7 ± 2.2 vs. 14.9 ± 1.8; p = 0.01), and higher SAPS 3 scores, along with markedly lower Hb concentrations and Hb/RDW ratios (75.1 ± 1.6 vs. 85.5 ± 1.9; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, serum urea (OR 1.016; 95% CI 1.005-1.027 per mg/dL), SAPS 3, and Hb/RDW ratio (OR 0.977; 95% CI 0.959-0.996) were independently associated with AKI. Patients with a lower Hb/RDW ratio had higher frequencies of AKI, kidney-replacement therapy, red-cell transfusion, and mortality. During a 7-year follow-up, progression to dialysis-dependent stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD-V) occurred in 10.8% of HF patients and 2.5% of sepsis patients, indicating that a lower Hb/RDW ratio was also associated with worse long-term renal outcomes.ConclusionThe Hb/RDW ratio is independently associated with AKI and may also reflect long-term kidney prognosis, representing a cost-effective and readily available ICU marker to identify patients at risk for both acute and chronic renal deterioration in sepsis or HF.
Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing in Patients With Infectious Meningoencephalitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
We aimed to assess the accuracy, clinical efficacy, and limitations of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for diagnosing infectious meningoencephalitis. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the performance of mNGS to determine the cause of infectious meningoencephalitis. We explored PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science up to 12 November 2024. To perform a meta-analysis, we calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for mNGS and for conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) compared to the clinical diagnosis. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with mNGS-positive rates ranging from 43.5% to 93.5% for infectious meningoencephalitis. The meta-analysis included 23 studies with 1660 patients. The pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], .67-.72), and its specificity was 0.93 (95% CI, .92-.94). The DOR for mNGS was 26.7 (95% CI, 10.4-68.8), compared to 12.2 (95% CI, 3.2-47.0) for CMTs. For tuberculosis meningoencephalitis, mNGS demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI, .61-.72) and specificity of 0.97 (95% CI, .95-.99), with a DOR of 43.5 (95% CI, 7.4-256.6). Our review indicates that mNGS can be a valuable diagnostic tool for infectious meningoencephalitis, offering high sensitivity and specificity. mNGS's superior DOR compared to that of CMTs highlights its potential for more accurate diagnoses and targeted interventions. Further research is needed to optimize which patients and at what point in the diagnostic process mNGS should be used.