Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background While clinical pathways have the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs, their true impact has been limited by variable implementation strategies and suboptimal research designs. This paper explores a comprehensive set of factors perceived by emergency department staff and administrative leads to influence clinical pathway implementation within the complex and dynamic environments of community emergency department settings. Methods This descriptive, qualitative study involved emergency health professionals and administrators of 15 community hospitals across Ontario, Canada. As part of our larger cluster randomized controlled trial, each site was in the preparation phase to implement one of two clinical pathways: pediatric asthma or pediatric vomiting and diarrhea. Data were collected from three sources: (i) a mediated group discussion with site champions during the project launch meeting; (ii) a semi-structured site visit of each emergency department; and (iii) key informant interviews with an administrative lead from each hospital. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to guide the interviews and thematically analyze the data. Domains within each major theme were then mapped onto the COM-B model—capability, opportunity, and motivation—of the Behaviour Change Wheel. Results Seven discrete themes and 58 subthemes were identified that comprised a set of barriers and enablers relevant to the planned clinical pathway implementation. Within two themes, three distinct levels of impact emerged, namely (i) the individual health professional, (ii) the emergency department team, and (iii) the broader hospital context. The TDF domains occurring most frequently were Memory, Attention and Decision Processes, Environmental Context and Resources, Behavioural Regulation, and Reinforcement. Mapping these barriers and enablers onto the COM-B model provided an organized perspective on how these issues may be interacting. Several factors were viewed as both negative and positive across different perspectives. Two of the seven themes were limited to one component, while four involved all three components of the COM-B model. Conclusions Using a theory-based approach ensured systematic and comprehensive identification of relevant barriers and enablers to clinical pathway implementation in ED settings. The COM-B system of the Behaviour Change Wheel provided a useful perspective on how these factors might interact to effect change. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01815710 .

The COVID-19 pandemic had profound effects on the mental wellbeing of adolescents. We sought to evaluate pandemic-related changes in health care use for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm. We obtained data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information on emergency department visits and hospital admissions from April 2015 to March 2022 among adolescents aged 10–18 years in Canada. We calculated the quarterly percentage of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for a composite outcome comprising suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm relative to all-cause emergency department visits and hospital admissions. We used interrupted time-series methods to compare changes in levels and trends of these outcomes between the prepandemic (Apr. 1, 2015–Mar. 1, 2020) and pandemic (Apr. 1, 2020–Mar. 31, 2022) periods. The average quarterly percentage of emergency department visits for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm relative to all-cause emergency department visits was 2.30% during the prepandemic period and 3.52% during the pandemic period. The level (0.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.79% to 0.95%) or trend (0.07% per quarter, 95% CI −0.14% to 0.28%) of this percentage did not change significantly between periods. The average quarterly percentage of hospital admissions for the composite outcome relative to all-cause admissions was 7.18% during the prepandemic period and 8.96% during the pandemic period. This percentage showed no significant change in level (−0.70%, 95% CI −1.90% to 0.50%), but did show a significantly increasing trend (0.36% per quarter; 95% 0.07% to 0.65%) during the pandemic versus prepandemic periods, specifically among females aged 10–14 years (0.76% per quarter, 95% CI 0.22% to 1.30%) and females aged 15–18 years (0.56% per quarter, 95% CI 0.31% to 0.81%). The quarterly change in the percentage of hospital admissions for suicidal ideation, self-poisoning and self-harm increased among adolescent females in Canada during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. This underscores the need to promote public health policies that mitigate the impact of the pandemic on adolescent mental health.

Emergency department overcrowding has been associated with increased odds of hospital admission and mortality after discharge from the emergency department in predominantly adult cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between crowding and the odds of several adverse outcomes among children seen at a pediatric emergency department. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all children visiting 8 Canadian pediatric emergency departments across 4 provinces between 2010 and 2014. We analyzed the association between mean departmental length of stay for each index visit and hospital admission within 7 days or death within 14 days of emergency department discharge, as well as hospital admission at index visit and return visits within 7 days, using mixed-effects logistic regression modelling. A total of 1 931 465 index visits occurred across study sites over the 5-year period, with little variation in index visit hospital admission or median length of stay. Hospital admission within 7 days of discharge and 14-day mortality were low across provinces (0.8%–1.5% and < 10 per 100 000 visits, respectively), and their association with mean departmental length of stay varied by triage categories and across sites but was not significant. There were increased odds of hospital admission at the index visit with increasing departmental crowding among visits triaged to Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) score 1–2 (odds ratios [ORs] ranged from 1.01 to 1.08) and return visits among patients with a CTAS score of 4–5 discharged at the index visit at some sites (ORs ranged from 1.00 to 1.06). Emergency department crowding was not significantly associated with hospital admission within 7 days of the emergency department visit or mortality in children. However, it was associated with increased hospital admission at the index visit for the sickest children, and with return visits to the emergency department for those less sick.

Background Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first access point for children and youth seeking mental health (MH) and addiction care. However, many EDs are unprepared to manage large volumes of pediatric MH patients. In addition, the fragmented Canadian MH system is challenged in connecting youth seen in the ED for follow-up community services. A provincial Emergency Department Mental Health Clinical Pathway (EDMHCP) for children and youth presenting to the ED with MH concerns was developed to address these challenges. The objective of the current study was to determine if EDMHCP implementation resulted in: (1) pathway use, (2) more patients discharged with MH recommendations, (3) MH service recommendations that aligned with patients’ risk assessments, and (4) changes in service outcomes, including ED length of stay (LOS), revisits, and admissions/transfers. Methods We implemented the pathway at four ED sites from 2018 to 2019 using the Theoretical Domains Framework to develop a tailored strategy at each site. We conducted chart reviews retrospectively in 2017–2018 (pre-implementation) and prospectively in 2019–2020 (post-implementation). Non-parametric tests examined differences in service outcomes between the implementation periods. Results Pathway use varied widely across sites, ranging from 3.1% at site 4 to 83.0% at the lead site (site 2). More referrals to community MH agencies ( p  <.001) were made at discharge during post-implementation at the lead site compared to pre-implementation, and mixed results were obtained regarding whether clinicians’ risk assessments aligned with MH service recommendations. LOS significantly increased at the lead site ( p  <.001) and non-lead sites (sites 1, 3, 4; p  =.02) between pre- and post-implementation. Revisits and admissions/transfers did not change significantly at any site. Conclusion Implementation was partially successful at the lead site, showing high pathway use and greater referrals to community MH agencies. These findings emphasize the complexity of implementing pathways in various ED settings. Successful implementation requires integration into existing workflows. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590302). Registered on 29 October 2015.

Background An evidence-based standardized ED asthma care pathway (EDACP) was developed and implemented in Ontario, Canada. Objective To determine the impact of EDACP implementation and access to ED asthma management resources and specialists on return ED visits. Methods All 173 Ontario hospitals were surveyed regarding their access to community and ED asthma specialists and ED asthma management resources, including EDACP implementation date and status as of August 2017. Survey data were linked to provincial health administrative data to quantify acute health services utilization. A Poisson regression interrupted time series analysis was conducted. Results Of the 123 hospitals responding to the survey, 44 (35.8%) had approved the EDACP. Data were analyzed for the 5 years preceding (30,028 asthma visits) and 17 months following (7,916 asthma visits) implementation, with a 3-month implementation black-out period. After controlling for auto-regressive factors, EDACP implementation was associated with a 2% reduction in the absolute rate of return ED visits within 72 h ( p  = 0.0124), and within 7 days ( p  = 0.0295) at teaching hospitals. The same effect was not seen at community hospitals. Peak expiratory flow testing (available at 77% of sites) and spirometry (available at 45% of sites) were associated with 34% ( p  = 0.0071) and 23% ( p  = 0.028) reductions in the odds of return ED visits within 72 h, respectively. Conclusion The positive results from this large-scale effort to implement an evidence-based knowledge translation initiative in diverse settings, suggests there is merit in continuing to invest time and resources to overcome barriers to adoption and implementation of this EDACP.

Canadian pediatric emergency department visits are increasing, with a disproportionate increase in low-acuity visits locally (33% of volume in 2008-09, 41% in 2011-12). We sought to understand: 1) presentation patterns and resource implications; 2) parents' perceptions and motivations; and 3) alternate health care options considered prior to presenting with low-acuity problems. We conducted a prospective cohort study at our tertiary pediatric emergency department serving two provinces to explore differences between patients with and without a primary care provider. During four, 2-week study periods over 1 year, parents of low-acuity visits received an anonymous survey. Presentation times, interventions, diagnoses and dispositions were captured on a data collection form linked to the survey by study number. Parents completed 2,443 surveys (74.1% response rate), with survey-data collection form pairs available for 2,146 visits. Overall, 89.7% of respondents had a primary care provider; 68% were family physicians. Surprisingly, 40% of visits occurred during weekday office hours and 27.3% occurred within 4 hours of symptom onset; 67.5% of those early presenters were for injuries. Few parents sought care from their primary care provider (25%), health information line (20.7%), or urgent care clinic (18.5%); 36% reported that they believed their child's problem required the emergency department. Forty-five percent required only a history, physical exam and reassurance; only 11% required an intervention not available in an office setting. Patients without a primary care provider were significantly more likely to present during weekday office hours (p = 0.003), have longer symptom duration (p<0.001), and not know of other options (p = 0.001). Many parents seek pediatric emergency department care for low-acuity problems despite their child having a primary care provider. Ensuring timely access to these providers may help reduce pediatric emergency department overuse. Educational initiatives should inform parents about low-acuity problems and where appropriate care can/should be accessed.

Objectives Suicide is the second leading cause of mortality among Canadian youth. As wait times for mental health (MH) support have increased, adolescents with mild-to-moderate suicidal ideation (SI) are waiting longer for support compared to those with more acute SI. Building Resilience and Attachment in Vulnerable Adolescents (BRAVA) is a 6-week virtual group intervention designed to provide support to adolescents with mild to moderate SI and their caregivers. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of BRAVA in reducing symptoms of SI, depression, and anxiety in adolescents, and improving life stress in caregivers. Design/Methods Outcome measures were administered to both groups [BRAVA, Enhanced Treatment-as-Usual (ETU)] at intake and exit, and at 3-month follow-up (BRAVA only) for SI (primary outcome), anxiety and depression (adolescent), perceived stress (youth and caregiver), attachment and family functioning (caregiver). SI was measured using Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire Junior. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis was performed for youth and caregiver cohorts. Results Ninety-nine eligible youth presenting with mild-to-moderate SI and their caregivers were recruited from hospital and community MH services. Families were randomized to BRAVA ( n  = 50) or ETU ( n  = 49). Adolescents were on average 14.6 years old, mostly female (64%), and of European racial heritage (44%). In ITT analysis, both BRAVA and ETU groups improved in youth SI from intake to exit, with no statistically significant differences between groups at exit. Sensitivity analysis without multiple imputations demonstrated a significant difference in SI scores at exit between the groups, where improvements in the BRAVA group were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Significant differences between groups on youth perceived stress, and depression and anxiety scores were also observed in BRAVA participants at post-treatment compared to the ETU control group. No statistically significant differences were observed for any caregiver outcomes measured except a trend for improved perceived caregiver stress in the BRAVA group post-treatment. Conclusions BRAVA was associated with significantly greater improvements in anxiety/depression and adolescent perceived stress compared to ETU. Although the intervention did not result in significant caregiver reported improvements, group cohesion and treatment satisfaction were high for both youth and caregivers. Clinical trial registration BRAVA: Building Resilience and Attachment in Vulnerable Adolescents (BRAVA); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ : NCT04751968.

Background The majority of children receiving care in the emergency department (ED) are discharged home, making discharge communication a key component of quality emergency care. Parents must have the knowledge and skills to effectively manage their child’s ongoing care at home. Parental fatigue and stress, health literacy, and the fragmented nature of communication in the ED setting may contribute to suboptimal parent comprehension of discharge instructions and inappropriate ED return visits. The aim of this study was to examine how and why discharge communication works in a pediatric ED context and develop recommendations for practice, policy, and research. Methods We systematically reviewed the published and gray literature. We searched electronic databases CINAHL, Medline, and Embase up to July 2017. Policies guiding discharge communication were also sought from pediatric emergency networks in Canada, USA, Australia, and the UK. Eligible studies included children less than 19 years of age with a focus on discharge communication in the ED as the primary objective. Included studies were appraised using relevant Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Textual summaries, content analysis, and conceptual mapping assisted with exploring relationships within and between data. We implemented an integrated knowledge translation approach to strengthen the relevancy of our research questions and assist with summarizing our findings. Results A total of 5095 studies were identified in the initial search, with 75 articles included in the final review. Included studies focused on a range of illness presentations and employed a variety of strategies to deliver discharge instructions. Education was the most common intervention and the majority of studies targeted parent knowledge or behavior. Few interventions attempted to change healthcare provider knowledge or behavior. Assessing barriers to implementation, identifying relevant ED contextual factors, and understanding provider and patient attitudes and beliefs about discharge communication were identified as important factors for improving discharge communication practice. Conclusion Existing literature examining discharge communication in pediatric emergency care varies widely. A theory-based approach to intervention design is needed to improve our understanding regarding discharge communication practice . Strengthening discharge communication in a pediatric emergency context presents a significant opportunity for improving parent comprehension and health outcomes for children. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007106.

Background:Pediatric emergency departments (ED) in many countries are implementing electronic tools such as kiosks, mobile apps, and electronic patient portals, to improve the effectiveness of discharge communication.Objective:This study aimed to survey nurse and physician readiness to adopt these tools.Methods:An electronic, cross-sectional survey was distributed to a convenience sample of currently practicing ED nurses and physicians affiliated with national pediatric research organizations in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Survey development was informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, sustainability framework. Measures of central tendency, and parametric and nonparametric tests were used to describe and compare nurse and physician responses.Results:Out of the 270 participants, the majority were physicians (61%, 164/270), female (65%, 176/270), and had 5 or more years of ED experience (76%, 205/270). There were high levels of consensus related to the value proposition of electronic discharge communication tools (EDCTs) with 82% (221/270) of them agreeing that they help parents and patients with comprehension and recall. Lower levels of consensus were observed for organizational factors with only 37% (100/270) agreeing that their staff is equipped to handle challenges with communication technologies. Nurses and physicians showed significant differences on 3 out of 21 readiness factors. Compared to physicians, nurses were significantly more likely to report that EDs have a responsibility to integrate EDCTs as part of a modern system (P<.001) and that policies are in place to guide safe and secure electronic communication (P=.02). Physicians were more likely to agree that using an EDCT would change their routine tasks (P=.04). One third (33%, 89/270) of participants indicated that they use or have used EDCT.Conclusions:Despite low levels of uptake, both nurses and physicians in multiple countries view EDCTs as a valuable support to families visiting pediatric ED. Leadership for technology change, unclear impact on workflow, and disparities in digital literacy skills require focused research effort.

Background One of the most important transitions in the continuum of care for children is discharge to home. Optimal discharge communication between healthcare providers and caregivers (e.g., parents or other guardians) who present to the emergency department (ED) with their children is not well understood. The lack of policies and considerable variation in practice regarding discharge communication in pediatric EDs pose a quality and safety risk for children and their parents. Methods The aim of this mixed methods study is to better understand the process and structure of discharge communication in a pediatric ED context to contribute to the design and development of discharge communication interventions. We will use surveys, administrative data and real-time video observation to characterize discharge communication for six common illness presentations in a pediatric ED: (1) asthma, (2) bronchiolitis, (3) abdominal pain, (4) fever, (5) diarrhea and vomiting, and (6) minor head injury. Participants will be recruited from one of two urban pediatric EDs in Canada. Video recordings will be analyzed using Observer XT. We will use logistic regression to identify potential demographic and visit characteristic cofounders and multivariate logistic regression to examine association between verbal and non-verbal behaviours and parent recall and comprehension. Discussion Video recording of discharge communication will provide an opportunity to capture important data such as temporality, sequence and non-verbal behaviours that might influence the communication process. Given the importance of better characterizing discharge communication to identify potential barriers and enablers, we anticipate that the findings from this study will contribute to the development of more effective discharge communication policies and interventions.