Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
Is Full-Text AvailableIs Full-Text Available
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
292
result(s) for
"Jaffe, Sarah"
Sort by:
From the ashes : grief and revolution in a world on fire
\"Our era is one of significant and substantial loss, yet we barely have time to acknowledge it. The losses range from the personal grief of a single COVID death to the planetary disaster wrought by climate change, in an age of unraveling hopes and expectations, of dreams curtailed, of aspirations desiccated. This is capitalism's death phase. It has become clear that the cost of wealth creation for a few is enormous destruction for others, for the marginalized and the vulnerable but increasingly for all of us. At the same time, we are denied the means of mourning those futures that are being so brutally curtailed. At such a moment, taking the time to grieve is a political act. Sarah Jaffe shows how the act of public memorialization has become a radical statement, a vibrant response to loss, and a path to imagining a better world. When we are able to grieve well the ones we have lost, the causes they fought for, or the examples they bequeathed us, we are better prepared to fight for a transformed future\"-- Provided by publisher.
Seventy questions of importance to the conservation of the North Central grasslands of the United States in a changing climate
by
Yocum, Heather M.
,
Ahlering, Marissa
,
Cross, Molly
in
actionable science
,
adaptation
,
Animal species
2023
Successful conservation of ecosystems in a changing climate requires actionable research that directly supports the rethinking and revising of management approaches to address changing risks and opportunities. As an important first step toward actionable research, we reviewed and synthesized grassland management‐related documents to identify broadly shared questions that, if answered, would help to support collective conservation of the grasslands in the northern Great Plains of the United States in a changing climate. A Management Priorities Working Group reviewed 183 grassland‐relevant management documents and identified 70 questions. Feedback was iteratively provided by a Climate and Ecology Working Group, an Advisory Committee, and representatives from grassland management agencies and organizations. The identified questions generally fall under 15 topics: land conversion; restoration; disturbance regimes; woody encroachment; herbaceous invasives; grazing; water quality, quantity, and availability; animal species; private land; public understanding; legal and policy changes; economic incentives; coordination across management entities; accessibility of science and tools; and novel ways of thinking. These questions can inform a research agenda for researchers looking to conduct actionable science in the Great Plains grassland ecosystems. Both the approach and the questions presented here can also be adapted and applied in other regions and ecosystems.
Journal Article
It’ll Take a Movement
by
Jaffe, Sarah
in
Amazon Workers vs. Bare-Knuckle Union-Busting: Lessons from Bessemer
,
Congressional elections
,
Internet
2021
The Amazon workers union election in Bessemer, Alabama was the most-covered union drive in many years. The New York Times treated it like a congressional race, with a live vote count on its website. The final count was 738-1798 against the union. Amazon declared victory; the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union filed objections to the conduct of the election and related unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board; and \"hot takes\" proliferated across the internet. As Amazon's footprint - and working conditions - spread across the US and the world, it has become increasingly clear that the labor movement has to crack Amazon.
Journal Article
Why Did a Majority of White Women Vote for Trump?
2018
No single fact about the highly improbable election of Donald Trump seems to be more confounding than the fact that Trump’s margin of victory included a slim majority of white women voters.White women were presumed to be in the bag for Hillary Clinton; after all, she would be the first woman president. When the tape of Trump bragging about what sounded a lot like sexual assault hit the airwaves, reporters assumed—not for the first time—that his campaign was toast. Yet on Election Day, 53 per- cent of white women voters pulled the lever for Trump. Clinton won women voters overall, but that puzzling number has befuddled commentators or eluded their attention completely.
Journal Article