Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
4,446
result(s) for
"Jan, Eric"
Sort by:
20,000 leagues under the sea
A retelling of the classic Jules Verne story, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, in illustrated format.
Book
Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence
Most neuroscientists would agree that for brain research to progress, we have to know which experimental manipulations have no effect as much as we must identify those that do have an effect. The dominant statistical approaches used in neuroscience rely on P values and can establish the latter but not the former. This makes non-significant findings difficult to interpret: do they support the null hypothesis or are they simply not informative? Here we show how Bayesian hypothesis testing can be used in neuroscience studies to establish both whether there is evidence of absence and whether there is absence of evidence. Through simple tutorial-style examples of Bayesian t-tests and ANOVA using the open-source project JASP, this article aims to empower neuroscientists to use this approach to provide compelling and rigorous evidence for the absence of an effect.Keysers et al. show why P values do not differentiate inconclusive null findings from those that provide important evidence for the absence of an effect. They provide a tutorial on how to use Bayesian hypothesis testing to overcome this issue.
Journal Article
One statistical analysis must not rule them all
Any single analysis hides an iceberg of uncertainty. Multi-team analysis can reveal it.
Any single analysis hides an iceberg of uncertainty. Multi-team analysis can reveal it.
Journal Article
A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations
We propose a default Bayesian hypothesis test for the presence of a correlation or a partial correlation. The test is a direct application of Bayesian techniques for variable selection in regression models. The test is easy to apply and yields practical advantages that the standard frequentist tests lack; in particular, the Bayesian test can quantify evidence in favor of the null hypothesis and allows researchers to monitor the test results as the data come in. We illustrate the use of the Bayesian correlation test with three examples from the psychological literature. Computer code and example data are provided in the journal archives.
Journal Article
A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values
In the field of psychology, the practice of p value null-hypothesis testing is as widespread as ever. Despite this popularity, or perhaps because of it, most psychologists are not aware of the statistical peculiarities of the p value procedure. In particular, p values are based on data that were never observed, and these hypothetical data are themselves influenced by subjective intentions. Moreover, p values do not quantify statistical evidence. This article reviews these p value problems and illustrates each problem with concrete examples. The three problems are familiar to statisticians but may be new to psychologists. A practical solution to these p value problems is to adopt a model selection perspective and use the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for statistical inference (Raftery, 1995). The BIC provides an approximation to a Bayesian hypothesis test, does not require the specification of priors, and can be easily calculated from SPSS output.
Journal Article
Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence
A sizeable literature exists on the use of frequentist power analysis in the null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm to facilitate the design of informative experiments. In contrast, there is almost no literature that discusses the design of experiments when Bayes factors (BFs) are used as a measure of evidence. Here we explore Bayes Factor Design Analysis (BFDA) as a useful tool to design studies for maximum efficiency and informativeness. We elaborate on three possible BF designs, (a) a fixed-
n
design, (b) an open-ended Sequential Bayes Factor (SBF) design, where researchers can test after each participant and can stop data collection whenever there is strong evidence for either
ℋ
1
or
ℋ
0
, and (c) a modified SBF design that defines a maximal sample size where data collection is stopped regardless of the current state of evidence. We demonstrate how the properties of each design (i.e., expected strength of evidence, expected sample size, expected probability of misleading evidence, expected probability of weak evidence) can be evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations and equip researchers with the necessary information to compute their own Bayesian design analyses.
Journal Article
Informed Bayesian t-Tests
Across the empirical sciences, few statistical procedures rival the popularity of the frequentist
-test. In contrast, the Bayesian versions of the
-test have languished in obscurity. In recent years, however, the theoretical and practical advantages of the Bayesian
-test have become increasingly apparent and various Bayesian t-tests have been proposed, both objective ones (based on general desiderata) and subjective ones (based on expert knowledge). Here, we propose a flexible t-prior for standardized effect size that allows computation of the Bayes factor by evaluating a single numerical integral. This specification contains previous objective and subjective t-test Bayes factors as special cases. Furthermore, we propose two measures for informed prior distributions that quantify the departure from the objective Bayes factor desiderata of predictive matching and information consistency. We illustrate the use of informed prior distributions based on an expert prior elicitation effort.
Supplementary materials
for this article are available online.
Journal Article
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis
Despite the increasing popularity of Bayesian inference in empirical research, few practical guidelines provide detailed recommendations for how to apply Bayesian procedures and interpret the results. Here we offer specific guidelines for four different stages of Bayesian statistical reasoning in a research setting:
planning
the analysis,
executing
the analysis,
interpreting
the results, and
reporting
the results. The guidelines for each stage are illustrated with a running example. Although the guidelines are geared towards analyses performed with the open-source statistical software JASP, most guidelines extend to Bayesian inference in general.
Journal Article