Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "Jensen, Frederikke Schade"
Sort by:
Effects of the cooling phase on the fire performance of encapsulated timber elements
Timber structures are vulnerable during the cooling phase of a fire, especially in compression, a factor not currently addressed by design methods based on standard fire exposure. This paper presents an experimental investigation on the thermal and mechanical performance of encapsulated cross-laminated timber (CLT) elements during and after standard fire heating. Data from two reduced-scale furnace tests on CLT specimens, encapsulated with either one or two layers of fire-rated plasterboard, were used to evaluate the reduction in compression and bending capacity. The effective cross-section and bending capacities were determined using the Reduced Cross-Section Method (RCSM) and an Advanced Calculation Method (ACM), both provided in the current and proposed versions of Eurocode 5. The most significant capacity reductions were predicted for the cooling phase when using the ACM, where the bending capacity dropped below 45% of the original capacity for both cases. In the RCSM, the capacity fell below 85% for both samples when using the current Eurocode 5 and below 67% for both samples when using the revised Eurocode 5. These results show the inadequacy of simplified methods based on standard fire exposure to predict the capacity of timber elements in the cooling phase of a fire.