Explore the vast range of titles available.

Acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death are often caused by rupture and thrombosis of lipid-rich atherosclerotic coronary plaques (known as vulnerable plaques), many of which are non-flow-limiting. The safety and effectiveness of focal preventive therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention of vulnerable plaques in reducing adverse cardiac events are unknown. We aimed to assess whether preventive percutaneous coronary intervention of non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques improves clinical outcomes compared with optimal medical therapy alone. PREVENT was a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial done at 15 research hospitals in four countries (South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and New Zealand). Patients aged 18 years or older with non-flow-limiting (fractional flow reserve >0·80) vulnerable coronary plaques identified by intracoronary imaging were randomly assigned (1:1) to either percutaneous coronary intervention plus optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone, in block sizes of 4 or 6, stratified by diabetes status and the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention in a non-study target vessel. Follow-up continued annually in all enrolled patients until the last enrolled patient reached 2 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven target-vessel revascularisation, or hospitalisation for unstable or progressive angina, assessed in the intention-to-treat population at 2 years. Time-to-first-event estimates were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test. This report is the principal analysis from the trial and includes all long-term analysed data. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02316886, and is complete. Between Sept 23, 2015, and Sept 29, 2021, 5627 patients were screened for eligibility, 1606 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to percutaneous coronary intervention (n=803) or optimal medical therapy alone (n=803). 1177 (73%) patients were men and 429 (27%) were women. 2-year follow-up for the primary outcome assessment was completed in 1556 (97%) patients (percutaneous coronary intervention group n=780; optimal medical therapy group n=776). At 2 years, the primary outcome occurred in three (0·4%) patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention group and in 27 (3·4%) patients in the medical therapy group (absolute difference –3·0 percentage points [95% CI –4·4 to –1·8]; p=0·0003). The effect of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention was directionally consistent for each component of the primary composite outcome. Serious clinical or adverse events did not differ between the percutaneous coronary intervention group and the medical therapy group: at 2 years, four (0·5%) versus ten (1·3%) patients died (absolute difference –0·8 percentage points [95% CI –1·7 to 0·2]) and nine (1·1%) versus 13 (1·7%) patients had myocardial infarction (absolute difference –0·5 percentage points [–1·7 to 0·6]). In patients with non-flow-limiting vulnerable coronary plaques, preventive percutaneous coronary intervention reduced major adverse cardiac events arising from high-risk vulnerable plaques, compared with optimal medical therapy alone. Given that PREVENT is the first large trial to show the potential effect of the focal treatment for vulnerable plaques, these findings support consideration to expand indications for percutaneous coronary intervention to include non-flow-limiting, high-risk vulnerable plaques. The CardioVascular Research Foundation, Abbott, Yuhan Corp, CAH-Cordis, Philips, and Infraredx, a Nipro company.

Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for at least 12 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, available data about the optimal duration of DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are scant. We aimed to investigate whether a 6-month duration of DAPT would be non-inferior to the conventional 12-month or longer duration of DAPT in this population. We did a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial at 31 centres in South Korea. Patients were eligible if they had unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned, via a web-based system by computer-generated block randomisation, to either the 6-month DAPT group or to the 12-month or longer DAPT group, with stratification by site, clinical presentation, and diabetes. Assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 18 months after the index procedure in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint; definite or probable stent thrombosis as defined by the Academic Research Consortium; and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2–5 bleeding at 18 months after the index procedure. The primary endpoint was also analysed per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01701453. Between Sept 5, 2012, and Dec 31, 2015, we randomly assigned 2712 patients; 1357 to the 6-month DAPT group and 1355 to the 12-month or longer DAPT group. Clopidogrel was used as a P2Y12 inhibitor for DAPT in 1082 (79·7%) patients in the 6-month DAPT group and in 1109 (81·8%) patients in the 12-month or longer DAPT group. The primary endpoint occurred in 63 patients in the 6-month DAPT group and in 56 patients in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (cumulative event rate 4·7% vs 4·2%; absolute risk difference 0·5%; upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 1·8%; pnon-inferiority=0·03 with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 2·0%). Although all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the 6-month DAPT group and the 12-month or longer DAPT group (35 [2·6%] patients vs 39 [2·9%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·90 [95% CI 0·57–1·42]; p=0·90) and neither did stroke (11 [0·8%] patients vs 12 [0·9%]; 0·92 [0·41–2·08]; p=0·84), myocardial infarction occurred more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (24 [1·8%] patients vs ten [0·8%]; 2·41 [1·15–5·05]; p=0·02). 15 (1·1%) patients had stent thrombosis in the 6-month DAPT group compared with ten (0·7%) in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (HR 1·50 [95% CI 0·68–3·35]; p=0·32). The rate of BARC type 2–5 bleeding was 2·7% (35 patients) in the 6-month DAPT group and 3·9% (51 patients) in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·45–1·05]; p=0·09). Results from the per-protocol analysis were similar to those from the intention-to-treat analysis. The increased risk of myocardial infarction with 6-month DAPT and the wide non-inferiority margin prevent us from concluding that short-term DAPT is safe in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with current-generation DES. Prolonged DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome without excessive risk of bleeding should remain the standard of care. Abbott Vascular Korea, Medtronic Vascular Korea, Biosensors Inc, and Dong-A ST.

Acute coronary syndromes are commonly caused by the rupture of vulnerable plaque, which often appear angiographically not severe. Although pharmacologic management is considered standard therapy for stabilizing plaque vulnerability, the potential role of preventive local treatment for vulnerable plaque has not yet been determined. The PREVENT trial was designed to compare preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) with OMT alone in patients with functionally nonsignificant high-risk vulnerable plaques. The PREVENT trial is a multinational, multicenter, prospective, open-label, active-treatment-controlled randomized trial. Eligible patients have at least 1 angiographically significant stenosis (diameter stenosis >50% by visual estimation) without functional significance (fractional flow reserve [FFR] >0.80). Target lesions are assessed by intracoronary imaging and must meet at least 2 imaging criteria for vulnerable plaque; (1) minimal lumen area <4.0 mm2; (2) plaque burden >70%; (3) maximal lipid core burden index in a 4 mm segment >315 by near infrared spectroscopy; and (4) thin cap fibroatheroma as determined by virtual histology or optical coherence tomography. Enrolled patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either preventive PCI with either bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds or metallic everolimus-eluting stents plus OMT or OMT alone. The primary endpoint is target-vessel failure, defined as the composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, ischemic-driven target-vessel revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina, at 2 years after randomization. Enrollment of a total of 1,608 patients has been completed. Follow-up of the last enrolled patient will be completed in September 2023 and primary results are expected to be available in early 2024. The PREVENT trial is the first large-scale, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of preventive PCI on non–flow-limiting vulnerable plaques containing multiple high-risk features that is appropriately powered for clinical outcomes. PREVENT will provide compelling evidence as to whether preventive PCI of vulnerable plaques plus OMT improves patient outcomes compared with OMT alone. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02316886. The PREVENT trial is the first, large-scale randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of preventive PCI on non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaque with high-risk features. It will provide compelling evidence to determine whether PCI of focal vulnerable plaques on top of OMT improves patient outcomes.

The optimal strategy for long-term antiplatelet maintenance for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients who completed a standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following PCI with drug-eluting stents. In this multicentre, randomised, open-label trial, patients aged 19 years or older at high risk of recurrent ischaemic events (previous myocardial infarction at any time before enrolment, medication-treated diabetes, or complex coronary lesions) who completed a standard duration of DAPT after PCI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive clopidogrel (75 mg once a day) or aspirin (100 mg once a day) oral monotherapy at 26 sites in South Korea. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were captured as part of the secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04418479). It is closed to accrual and extended follow-up is ongoing. Between Aug 10, 2020, and July 31, 2023, 5542 patients were assessed for eligibility and 5506 were randomly assigned (2752 to clopidogrel monotherapy and 2754 to aspirin monotherapy). The median time between PCI and randomisation was 17·5 months (IQR 12·6–36·1 months). During a median follow-up period of 2·3 years (IQR 1·6–3·0), the primary endpoint occurred in 92 patients in the clopidogrel group and 128 patients in the aspirin group (Kaplan–Meier estimated 3-year incidence 4·4% [95% CI 3·4–5·4] vs 6·6% [5·4–7·8]; hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·54–0·93]; p=0·013). Death from any cause occurred in 50 patients in the clopidogrel group and 70 in the aspirin group (2·4% [1·6–3·1] vs 4·0% [2·9–5·0] at 3 years; 0·71 [0·49–1·02]); myocardial infarction in 23 patients in the clopidogrel group and 42 in the aspirin group (1·0% [0·6–1·4] vs 2·2% [1·4–2·9] at 3 years; 0·54 [0·33–0·90]); and stroke in 23 in the clopidogrel group and 29 in the aspirin group (1·3% [0·7–2·0] vs 1·3% [0·8–1·7] at 3 years; 0·79 [0·46–1·36]). There was no difference in the risk of bleeding between the clopidogrel and aspirin groups (3·0% [2·0–3·9] vs 3·0% [2·2–3·9] at 3 years; 0·97 [0·67–1·42]). Clopidogrel was not associated with a higher incidence of any adverse event compared with aspirin. Among patients who were at high risk of recurrent ischaemic events and who completed the standard duration of DAPT following PCI, clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with aspirin monotherapy, significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke, without an apparent increase in the risk of bleeding. Dong-A ST.

Controversy remains regarding the optimal antiplatelet regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and aspirin monotherapy in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data on 4,453 patients were pooled from SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE randomized trials. Antiplatelet therapy regimens were categorized as P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT), conventional DAPT (12-month or longer DAPT), and aspirin monotherapy (aspirin monotherapy after 6-month DAPT). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). Inverse-probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed. At 1 year, patients in the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy had a comparable risk of MACCE compared with those in the conventional DAPT (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.655; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.393 to 1.094; p = 0.106), and tended to have a lower risk of MACCE than those in the aspirin monotherapy (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.606; 95% CI, 0.347 to 1.058; p = 0.078). The adjusted hazard for the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5 bleeding was significantly lower in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy than in conventional DAPT (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.341; 95% CI, 0.190 to 0.614; p < 0.001) and in aspirin monotherapy (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.359; 95% CI, 0.182 to 0.708; p = 0.003). In conclusion, among patients with ACS undergoing PCI, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT reduced risk of bleeding compared with conventional DAPT and aspirin monotherapy after 6-month DAPT without increasing MACCE.

We evaluated the clinical impact of residual non-culprit left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) on prognosis in patients undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). A total of 429 patients who underwent PCI for AMI complicated by CS was enrolled from 12 centers in the Republic of Korea. The patients were divided into two groups according to presence of non-culprit LMCAD or not: the LMCAD non-culprit group (n = 43) and the no LMCAD group (n = 386). Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce selection bias and potential confounding factors. During a 12-month follow-up, a total of 168 MACEs occurred (LMCAD non-culprit group, 17 [39.5%] vs. no LMCAD group, 151 [39.1%]). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference in the incidence of MACE at 12 months between the LMCAD non-culprit and no LMCAD groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58 to 1.62, p = 0.901). After propensity score matching, the incidence of MACE was still similar between the two groups (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.23; p = 0.180). The similarity of MACEs between the two groups was consistent across a variety of subgroups. After adjusting for baseline differences, residual non-culprit LMCAD does not appear to increase the risk of MACEs at 12 months in patients undergoing emergent PCI for AMI complicated by CS.

•This detailed time-point outcome assessment, which accounts for the number of patients at risk during specific periods, could be a step toward developing an advanced risk prediction model for time-course personalized medicine.•Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) initially had a significantly higher mortality rate than those with non-STEMI; however, this trend was inverted since the second week.•The higher mortality rate in patients with STEMI versus non-STEMI was inverted since the second week for male patients but only since the tenth week for female patients.•Several baseline variables, including Killip class, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and STEMI diagnosis, had significantly different effects on deaths over time after acute myocardial infarction. Limited data exist regarding time-point risk stratification models after acute coronary syndrome. This study aimed to investigate time-point mortality rates in patients with acute myocardial infarction, focusing on comparison by type of myocardial infarction, in a real-world cohort. A total of 12,836 patients from a nationwide Korean registry were analyzed. Mortality rates at yearly, monthly, and weekly time points after admission were calculated by dividing the number of deaths during a specific period by the number of patients at risk in the same period for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) groups. In the first week after admission, patients with STEMI had a significantly higher mortality rate than patients with NSTEMI (4.62% vs 1.79%, p <0.001). However, this trend was inverted since the second week. The higher mortality rate in patients with STEMI versus NSTEMI was inverted since the second week for male patients but only since the tenth week for female patients. Temporal assessment of correlates of mortality revealed that several baseline variables, including Killip class, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and STEMI diagnosis, had significantly different effects on deaths over time. In conclusion, temporal assessment of time-point outcomes from the Korean registry revealed that an initially higher mortality rate in patients with STEMI versus NSTEMI was inverted in the second week. This outcome assessment could be a step toward developing an advanced risk prediction model for time-course personalized medicine. Further studies are needed to clarify this issue.

The redox-dependent inhibition of thioredoxin (TRX) by thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) plays a pivotal role in various cancers and metabolic syndromes. However, the molecular mechanism of this regulation is largely unknown. Here, we present the crystal structure of the TRX–TXNIP complex and demonstrate that the inhibition of TRX by TXNIP is mediated by an intermolecular disulphide interaction resulting from a novel disulphide bond-switching mechanism. Upon binding to TRX, TXNIP undergoes a structural rearrangement that involves switching of a head-to-tail interprotomer Cys63-Cys247 disulphide between TXNIP molecules to an interdomain Cys63-Cys190 disulphide, and the formation of a de novo intermolecular TXNIP Cys247-TRX Cys32 disulphide. This disulphide-switching event unexpectedly results in a domain arrangement of TXNIP that is entirely different from those of other arrestin family proteins. We further show that the intermolecular disulphide bond between TRX and TXNIP dissociates in the presence of high concentrations of reactive oxygen species. This study provides insight into TRX and TXNIP-dependent cellular regulation. The protein thioredoxin regulates the activity of many signalling molecules. Here, Hwang et al. report structural and biochemical evidence that the interaction between thioredoxin and its inhibitor thioredoxin-interacting protein is regulated by a redox-dependent disulphide bond-switching mechanism.

We sought to investigate the relation between worsening renal function (WRF) at 1-year follow-up and clinical outcomes at 3 years after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We analyzed data from 13,104 patients enrolled in the national AMI registry from November 2011 to December 2015. Patients with all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), and rehospitalization for heart failure at 1-year follow-up after AMI were excluded. A total of 6,235 patients were extracted and divided into WRF and non-WRF groups. WRF was defined as a ≥25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was 3-year major adverse cardiac events, a composite of all-cause death, re-MI, and rehospitalization for heart failure. On average, a −1.5 ml/min/1.73 m2/y rate of decrease in eGFR was exhibited, and 575 patients (9.2%) exhibited WRF at 1-year follow-up. After multiple adjustments, WRF at 1-year follow-up was independently associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.498, 95% confidence interval 1.113 to 2.016, p = 0.01), all-cause death, and re-MI at 3-year follow-up. Older age, female, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, non–ST-segment elevation AMI, anterior AMI, anemia, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, and baseline eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 were identified as independent predictors of WRF after AMI. In conclusion, WRF at 1-year follow-up after AMI intuitively seems like a risk marker indicating multiple co-morbidities. Monitoring serum creatinine in patients at 1-year follow-up after AMI may help to identify those who are at the highest risk and guide effective long-term therapeutics.

Among the 146 patients enrolled in the Korean FH registry, 83 patients who had undergone appropriate LLT escalation and were followed-up for ≥ 6 months were analyzed for pathogenic variants (PVs). The achieved percentage of expected low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction (primary variable) and achievement rates of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL were assessed. The correlations between the treatment response and the characteristics of PVs, and the weighted 4 SNP-based score were evaluated. The primary variables were significantly lower in the PV-positive patients than in the PV-negative patients (p = 0.007). However, the type of PV did not significantly correlate with the primary variable. The achievement rates of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was very low, regardless of the PV characteristics. Patients with a higher 4-SNP score showed a lower primary variable (R 2  = 0.045, p = 0.048). Among evolocumab users, PV-negative patients or those with only defective PVs revealed higher primary variable, whereas patients with at least one null PV showed lower primary variables. The adjusted response of patients with FH to LLT showed significant associations with PV positivity and 4-SNP score. These results may be helpful in managing FH patients with diverse genetic backgrounds.