Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
10
result(s) for
"Jerkins, Terri"
Sort by:
Successful debulking of plurihormonal pituitary macroadenoma with long‐acting pasireotide and dopamine agonist combination therapy
2019
Key Clinical Message Long‐acting pasireotide and bromocriptine provided biochemical control of growth hormone and prolactin in a patient with plurihormonal pituitary macroadenoma, allowing near‐complete tumor excision while restoring pituitary function and avoiding adjunctive radiotherapy. Pasireotide initiation resulted in hyperglycemia, which stabilized after a few months and resolved upon pasireotide discontinuation (ACCESS; NCT01995734). Long‐acting pasireotide and bromocriptine provided biochemical control of growth hormone and prolactin in a patient with plurihormonal pituitary macroadenoma, allowing near‐complete tumor excision while restoring pituitary function and avoiding adjunctive radiotherapy. Pasireotide initiation resulted in hyperglycemia, which stabilized after a few months and resolved upon pasireotide discontinuation (ACCESS; NCT01995734).
Journal Article
Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity and prevalent heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the SELECT trial
2024
Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with overweight or obesity, but the effects of this drug on outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure are unknown. We report a prespecified analysis of the effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg on ischaemic and heart failure cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to investigate if semaglutide was beneficial in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a history of heart failure compared with placebo; if there was a difference in outcome in patients designated as having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; and if the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure was related to baseline characteristics or subtype of heart failure.
The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, event-driven phase 3 trial in 41 countries. Adults aged 45 years and older, with a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four using an interactive web response system in a double-blind manner to escalating doses of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide over 16 weeks to a target dose of 2·4 mg, or placebo. In a prespecified analysis, we examined the effect of semaglutide compared with placebo in patients with and without a history of heart failure at enrolment, subclassified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or unclassified heart failure. Endpoints comprised MACE (a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death); a composite heart failure outcome (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation or urgent hospital visit for heart failure); cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597.
Between Oct 31, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 17 604 patients with a mean age of 61·6 years (SD 8·9) and a mean BMI of 33·4 kg/m2 (5·0) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (8803 [50·0%] patients) or placebo (8801 [50·0%] patients). 4286 (24·3%) of 17 604 patients had a history of investigator-defined heart failure at enrolment: 2273 (53·0%) of 4286 patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 1347 (31·4%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 666 (15·5%) had unclassified heart failure. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without heart failure. Patients with heart failure had a higher incidence of clinical events. Semaglutide improved all outcome measures in patients with heart failure at random assignment compared with those without heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60–0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·64–0·98 for the heart failure composite endpoint; 0·76, 0·59–0·97 for cardiovascular death; and 0·81, 0·66–1·00 for all-cause death; all pinteraction>0·19). Treatment with semaglutide resulted in improved outcomes in both the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·49–0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·58–1·08 for the composite heart failure endpoint) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction groups (0·69, 0·51–0·91 for MACE; 0·75, 0·52–1·07 for the composite heart failure endpoint), although patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher absolute event rates than those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For MACE and the heart failure composite, there were no significant differences in benefits across baseline age, sex, BMI, New York Heart Association status, and diuretic use. Serious adverse events were less frequent with semaglutide versus placebo, regardless of heart failure subtype.
In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diease and overweight or obesity, treatment with semaglutide 2·4 mg reduced MACE and composite heart failure endpoints compared with placebo in those with and without clinical heart failure, regardless of heart failure subtype. Our findings could facilitate prescribing and result in improved clinical outcomes for this patient group.
Novo Nordisk.
Journal Article
Efficacy and Safety of Degludec versus Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes
by
Brown-Frandsen, Kirstine
,
Haahr, Poul-Martin
,
Pratley, Richard E
in
Adolescents
,
Aged
,
Blood Glucose - analysis
2017
In this randomized, double-blind trial involving patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, basal insulin degludec was noninferior to glargine with respect to major cardiovascular events.
Journal Article
Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome (EIAS) Presenting in an Elderly, Long-Term Patient with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus that Resolved with Low-Cost Outpatient Therapy with Mycophenolate Mofetil and Regular Insulin by Pump
by
Stockham, Katherine
,
Jerkins, Terri
,
Bell, David S. H.
in
Cardiology
,
Care and treatment
,
Case Report
2024
Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS) has until recently been a rarely described complication of exogenous insulin therapy. EIAS results not only in hyperglycemia, but also in hypoglycemia and occasionally in ketoacidosis (DKA). The incidence of EIAS is increasing probably due to an overall increase in autoimmunity associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) epidemic resulting in increasing binding of insulin by antibodies. Herein, we describe a case of EIAS occurring in an elderly patient with longstanding type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who had progressive loss of glycemic control. It responded positively, as we have previously described, to oral mycophenolate mofetil and the use of soluble regular insulin delivered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Therefore, EIAS is an increasingly frequent cause of hyperglycemia with and without DKA, and hypoglycemia in subjects with T1DM. Once diagnosed, they can be treated with mycophenolate mofetil and soluble insulin in an outpatient setting, which will decrease the rate of hospitalization and lower the expense of therapy.
Journal Article
Development of Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome in a Patient with Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Successfully Treated with Oral Immunosuppressive Monotherapy
2021
Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS), which rarely occurs in the patient with type 1 diabetes, results in antibody-induced insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, ketosis, ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemia when insulin is released from the saturated insulin antibodies. Recommended treatment regimens include glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and plasmapheresis. In the patient with type 1 diabetes, glucocorticoids may by inducing and/or worsening ketoacidosis be contraindicated. With immunosuppressants, various anecdotal treatment regimens have been reported. Currently the most commonly recommended regimen is intravenous immunosuppressive therapy in combination with oral immunosuppressants. Herein we describe a patient in whom oral immunosuppressant monotherapy with mycophenolate resulted in the cure of EIAS, thus avoiding the expense associated with intravenous immunosuppressant therapy and/or hospitalization for plasmapheresis.
Journal Article
Testosterone Deficiency is Not Protective Against the Development of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate in a Type 1 Diabetic Patient
2022
We present a case of prostate cancer (PC) developing in a hypogonadal patient with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. The purpose of reporting this case is to emphasize that regular prostate examinations and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements should be preformed in the diabetic male, even though the incidence of PC is lower in this group of patients. In addition, these examinations and tests need to be preformed even in the hypogonadal patient with diabetes since the presence of a low serum testosterone (T) level does not preclude the development of PC. This is because the development of PC is not related to serum androgen levels but to the androgen levels within the prostate, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels and not T levels within the prostate gland are responsible for the development of PC. In the hypogonadal male, intraprostatic DHT may be high since DHT can be formed from adrenal androgens, particularly androstenedione, through activation of 5α-reductase 2, which is the minority enzyme in the normal prostate but becomes the major enzyme in the formation and growth of PC.
Journal Article