Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Johansson, Pauline E"
Sort by:
The Use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) Among Personnel and Students in Health Care: A Review
Health care personnel need access to updated information anywhere and at any time, and a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) has the potential to meet these requirements. A PDA is a mobile tool which has been employed widely for various purposes in health care practice, and the level of its use is expected to increase. Loaded with suitable functions and software applications, a PDA might qualify as the tool that personnel and students in health care need. In Sweden today, despite its leadership role in mobile technologies, PDAs are not commonly used, and there is a lack of suitable functions and software applications. The aim of the present review was to obtain an overview of existing research on the use of PDAs among personnel and students in health care. The literature search included original peer-reviewed research articles written in English and published from 1996 to 2008. All study designs were considered for inclusion. We excluded reviews and studies focusing on the use of PDAs in classroom situations. From March 2006 to the last update in May 2008, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, IngentaConnect, and a local search engine (ELIN@Kalmar). We conducted a content analysis, using Nielsen's Model of System Acceptability as a theoretical framework in structuring and presenting the results. From the 900 references initially screened, 172 articles were selected and critically assessed until 48 articles remained. The majority originated in North-America (USA: n=24, Canada: n=11). The categories which emerged from our content analysis coincided to a certain extent to Nielsen's Model of System Acceptability (social and practical acceptability), including usefulness (utility and usability) subcategories such as learnability, efficiency, errors, and satisfaction. The studies showed that health care personnel and students used PDAs in patient care with varied frequency. Most of the users were physicians. There is some evidence that the use of a PDA in health care settings might improve decision-making, reduce the numbers of medical errors, and enhance learning for both students and professionals, but the evidence is not strong, with most studies being descriptive, and only 6 randomized controlled trials. Several special software programs have been created and tested for PDAs, and a wide range of situations for their use have been reported for different patient groups. Drug and medical information were commonly accessed by PDA users, and the PDA was often viewed as the preferred tool when compared to paper-based documents. Some users regarded the PDA easy to operate, while others found it difficult in the beginning. This overview of the use of PDAs revealed a positive attitude towards the PDA, which was regarded as a feasible and convenient tool. The possibility of immediate access to medical information has the potential to improve patient care. The PDA seems to be a valuable tool for personnel and students in health care, but there is a need for further intervention studies, randomized controlled trials, action research, and studies with various health care groups in order to identify its appropriate functions and software applications.
Single cell genotyping of matched bone marrow and peripheral blood cells in treatment naive and AZA-treated MDS and CMML
Progressively acquired somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells are central to pathogenesis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). They can lead to proliferative advantages, impaired differentiation and progressive cytopenias. MDS or CMML patients with high-risk disease are treated with hypomethylating agents including 5-azacytidine (AZA). Clinical improvement does not require eradication of mutated cells and may be related to improved differentiation capacity of mutated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). However, the contribution of mutated HSPCs to steady-state hematopoiesis in MDS and CMML is unclear. To address this, we characterised the somatic mutations of individual stem, progenitor (common myeloid progenitor, granulocyte monocyte progenitor, megakaryocyte erythroid progenitor), and matched circulating (monocyte, neutrophil, naive B cell) haematopoietic cells in treatment naive and AZA-treated MDS and CMML via high-throughput single cell genotyping. The mutational burden was similar across multiple hematopoietic cell types, and even the most mutated stem and progenitor clones maintained their capacity to differentiate to mature myeloid and, in some cases, lymphoid cell types in vivo. Our data show that even highly mutated HSPCs contribute significantly to circulating blood cells in MDS and CMML, prior to and following AZA treatment. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.