Explore the vast range of titles available.

A randomized, multicenter trial that compared endovascular repair with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm showed no significant difference between these approaches in overall survival after 8 years.

Background In this secondary analysis of the VA Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST‐D) study we used antidepressant response trajectories to assess the association of treatment and multiple clinical/demographic factors with the probability of response. Methods Using data from VAST‐D, a multi‐site, randomized, single‐blind trial with parallel‐assignment to one of three treatment interventions in 1522 Veterans whose major depressive disorder was unresponsive to at least one antidepressant trial, we evaluated response patterns using group‐based trajectory modeling (GBTM). A weighted multinomial logistic regression analysis with backward elimination and additional exploratory analyses were performed to evaluate the association of multiple clinical/demographic factors with the probability of inclusion into specific trajectories. Additional exploratory analyses were used to identify factors associated with trajectory group membership that could have been missed in the primary analysis. Results GBTM showed the best fit for depression symptom change was comprised of six trajectories, with some trajectories demonstrating minimal improvement and others showing a high probability of remission. High baseline depression and anxiety severity scores decreased, and early improvement increased, the likelihood of inclusion into the most responsive trajectory in both the GBTM and exploratory analyses. Conclusion While multiple factors influence responsiveness, the probability of inclusion into a specific depression symptom trajectory is most strongly influenced by three factors: baseline depression, baseline anxiety, and the presence of early improvement. Highlights In a large study of U.S. Veterans with moderate to severe depression group‐based trajectory modeling demonstrated six response trajectories as the best fit for depression symptom change over time. A weighted multinomial logistic regression analysis with backward elimination identified multiple factors influencing antidepressant responsiveness, but response trajectories are most strongly influenced by three factors: baseline depression, baseline anxiety, and the presence of early improvement.

To assess whether survival differences exist between patients undergoing immediate open repair vs surveillance with selective repair for 4.0- to 5.4-cm abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and whether these differences vary by diameter, within sexes, or overall. The study cohort included 2226 patients randomized to immediate repair or surveillance for the UK Small Aneurysm Trial (September 1, 1991, through July 31, 1998; follow-up, 2.6-6.9 years) or the Aneurysm Detection and Management trial (August 1, 1992, through July 31, 2000; follow-up, 3.5-8.0 years). Survival differences were assessed with proportional hazard models, adjusted for a comprehensive array of clinical and nonclinical risk factors. Interaction between treatment and AAA size was added to the model to assess whether the effect of immediate open repair vs surveillance varied by AAA size. The adjusted analysis revealed no statistically significant survival difference between immediate open repair and surveillance patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.18; mean follow-up time, 1921 days for both study groups). This lack of treatment effect persisted when men (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21) and women (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.49-1.86) were examined separately and did not vary by AAA size (P=.39 for the entire cohort and P=.24 for women). Immediate open repair offered no significant survival benefit, even in patients with the largest AAAs and highest risk of rupture. Because recent trials failed to find a survival benefit of immediate endovascular repair over surveillance for small asymptomatic AAAs, our findings suggest that the gray area of first-line management for these patients should be resolved in favor of surveillance.

Randomized controlled trials have shown no significant difference in survival between immediate open repair and surveillance with selective repair for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms of 4.0 to 5.5 cm in diameter. This lack of difference has been shown to hold true for all diameters in this range, in men and women, but the question of whether patients of different ages might obtain different benefits has remained unanswered. Using the pooled patient-level data for the 2,226 patients randomized to immediate open repair or surveillance in the United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial (UKSAT; September 1, 1991, to July 31, 1998; follow-up 2.6 to 6.9 years) or the Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) trial (August 1, 1992, to July 31, 2000; follow-up 3.5 to 8.0 years), the adjusted effect of age on survival in the 2 treatment groups was estimated using a generalized propensity approach, accounting for a comprehensive array of clinical and nonclinical risk factors. No significant difference in survival between immediate open repair and surveillance was observed for patients of any age, overall (p = 0.606) or in men (p = 0.371) or women separately (p = 0.167). In conclusion, survival did not differ significantly between immediate open repair and surveillance for patients of any age, overall or in men or women. Combined with the previous evidence regarding diameter, and the lack of benefit of immediate endovascular in trials comparing it with surveillance repair for small abdominal aortic aneurysms, these results suggest that surveillance should be the first-line management strategy of choice for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms of 4.0 to 5.5 cm. •Immediate open repair offers no greater survival benefit compared with surveillance for patients with asymptomatic small (4.0 to 5.5 cm) AAAs.•There is no difference in survival between immediate open repair and surveillance for any AAA diameter within the range of 4.0 to 5.5 cm, overall or in men or women.•There is no difference in survival between immediate open repair and surveillance for patients with small AAAs of any age, overall or in men or women.•Surveillance, as the least invasive option, should be the first-line management strategy of choice for asymptomatic AAAs of 4.0 to 5.5 cm.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) contributes to suicide risk. Treating MDD effectively is considered a key suicide prevention intervention. Yet many patients with MDD do not respond to their initial medication and require a 'next-step'. The relationship between next-step treatments and suicidal thoughts and behaviors is uncharted. The VA Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Depression trial randomized 1522 participants to one of three next-step treatments: Switching to Bupropion, combining with Bupropion, and augmenting with Aripiprazole. In this secondary analysis, features associated with lifetime suicidal ideation (SI) and attempts (SA) at baseline and current SI during treatment were explored. Compared to those with SI only, those with lifetime SI + SA were more likely to be female, divorced, or separated, unemployed; and to have experienced more childhood adversity. They had a more severe depressive episode and were more likely to respond to 'next-step' treatment. The prevalence of SI decreased from 46.5% (694/1492) at baseline to 21.1% (315/1492) at end-of-treatment. SI during treatment was associated with baseline SI; low positive mental health, more anxiety, greater severity and longer duration of current MDD episode; being male and White; and treatment with S-BUP or C-BUP as compared to A-ARI. SI declines for most patients during next-step medication treatments. But about 1 in 5 experienced emergent or worsening SI during treatment, so vigilance for suicide risk through the entire 12-week acute treatment period is necessary. Treatment selection may affect the risk of SI.

Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV) that established latency in sensory and autonomic neurons during primary infection. In the Shingles Prevention Study (SPS), a large efficacy trial of live attenuated Oka/Merck zoster vaccine (ZVL), PCR-confirmed second episodes of HZ occurred in two of 660 placebo and one of 321 ZVL recipients with documented HZ during a mean follow-up of 3.13 years. An additional two ZVL recipients experienced a second episode of HZ in the Long-Term Persistence Substudy. All episodes of HZ were caused by wild-type VZV. The first and second episodes of HZ occurred in different dermatomes in each of these five participants, with contralateral recurrences in two. Time between first and second episodes ranged from 12 to 28 months. One of the five participants, who was immunocompetent on study enrollment, was immunocompromised at the onset of his first and second episodes of HZ. VZV DNA isolated from rash lesions from the first and second episodes of HZ was used to sequence the full-length VZV genomes. For the unique-sequence regions of the VZV genome, we employed target enrichment of VZV DNA, followed by deep sequencing. For the reiteration regions, we used PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. Our analysis and comparison of the VZV genomes from the first and second episodes of HZ in each of the five participants indicate that both episodes were caused by the same VZV strain. This is consistent with the extraordinary stability of VZV during the replication phase of varicella and the subsequent establishment of latency in sensory ganglia throughout the body. Our observations also indicate that VZV is stable during the persistence of latency and the subsequent reactivation and replication that results in HZ.

BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the association between varicella-zoster virus (VZV)–specific humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to herpes zoster (HZ) and protection against HZ morbidity and to compare immune responses to HZ and zoster vaccine MethodsIn 981 elderly persons who developed HZ during a zoster vaccine efficacy trial (321 vaccinees and 660 placebo recipients) and 1362 without HZ (682 vaccinees and 680 placebo recipients), CMI was measured by VZV responder cell frequency and interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot, and antibodies were measured by VZV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay against affinity-purified VZV glycoproteins (gpELISA) ResultsRobust VZV CMI at HZ onset correlated with reduced HZ morbidity, whereas VZV gpELISA titers did not. Three weeks after HZ onset, gpELISA titers were highest in those with more severe HZ and were slightly increased in placebo recipients (compared with zoster vaccine recipients) and in older individuals. VZV CMI responses to HZ were similar in zoster vaccine and placebo recipients and were not affected by demographic characteristics or antiviral therapy, except for responder cell frequency at HZ onset, which decreased with age. When responses to zoster vaccine and HZ could be compared, VZV CMI values were similar, but antibody titers were lower ConclusionsHigher VZV CMI at HZ onset was associated with reduced HZ severity and less postherpetic neuralgia. Higher antibody titers were associated with increased HZ severity and occurrence of postherpetic neuralgia. HZ and zoster vaccine generated comparable VZV CMI

•Limited clinical data are available to evaluate ZOSTAVAX® duration of protection.•Four regression models estimated years-since-vaccination and age on vaccine efficacy.•Vaccine-group/chronological-age interaction was statistically significant.•Vaccine-group/time-since-vaccination interaction was not statistically significant.•Vaccine efficacy decreases with the expected effects of advancing age. Since 2006, the vaccine, ZOSTAVAX®, has been licensed to prevent herpes zoster. Only limited clinical follow-up data are available to evaluate duration of protection, an important consideration when developing HZ vaccination policy recommendations. Four Poisson regression models were developed based on an integrated analysis of data from the Shingles Prevention Study and its Short Term Persistence extension to estimate the effects of years-since-vaccination and chronological-age on vaccine efficacy among people ≥60 years old. The models included number of HZ cases parsed into categories by chronological-age and time-since-vaccination as the dependent variable with different explanatory variables in each model. In all models, the interaction between vaccine-group and chronological-age was statistically significant indicating that vaccine efficacy decreases with the expected effects of advancing age but the interaction between vaccine-group and time-since-vaccination was not statistically significant indicating that much of the reduction in vaccine efficacy over time-since-vaccination can be explained by increasing age.

This analysis of the VAST-D data aimed to explore the utility of using early improvement at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of antidepressant medication treatment (i.e., a drop from baseline depression severity as measured by the QIDS-C) to predict remission, response, or greater than minimal improvement by week 12. Objective:In this secondary analysis of data from the Veterans Affairs Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST-D) study, the authors sought to determine the effectiveness of early improvement (or lack thereof) for predicting remission from depression with antidepressant therapy.Methods:This study used data from the VAST-D study, a multisite, randomized, single-blind trial with parallel assignment to one of three medication interventions for 1,522 veterans whose major depressive disorder was unresponsive to at least one course of antidepressant treatment meeting minimal standards for dosage and duration. The authors calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of early improvement on remission, response, or greater than minimal improvement from depression for various degrees of improvement (10%–50%) on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Clinician Rated (QIDS-C) at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks.Results:The end of week 2 of treatment was identified as the best time to evaluate early improvement. The presence of a ≥20% drop from the baseline QIDS-C score by the end of week 2 resulted in a PPV for remission of 38% and an NPV of 93% by week 12. Extending the observational window to week 6 minimally improved NPV (97%). This association did not differ across treatment groups.Conclusions:A lack of early improvement at the end of week 2 of antidepressant therapy can be used to inform clinical decisions on the likelihood of nonremission of depression during the subsequent 10 weeks, even when dosage optimization is incomplete.