Explore the vast range of titles available.

Animal heterotrimeric G proteins are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF), typically seven transmembrane receptors that trigger GDP release and subsequent GTP binding. In contrast, the Arabidopsis thaliana G protein (AtGPA1) rapidly activates itself without a GEF and is instead regulated by a seven transmembrane Regulator of G protein Signaling (7TM-RGS) protein that promotes GTP hydrolysis to reset the inactive (GDP-bound) state. It is not known if this unusual activation is a major and constraining part of the evolutionary history of G signaling in eukaryotes. In particular, it is not known if this is an ancestral form or if this mechanism is maintained, and therefore constrained, within the plant kingdom. To determine if this mode of signal regulation is conserved throughout the plant kingdom, we analyzed available plant genomes for G protein signaling components, and we purified individually the plant components encoded in an informative set of plant genomes in order to determine their activation properties in vitro. While the subunits of the heterotrimeric G protein complex are encoded in vascular plant genomes, the 7TM-RGS genes were lost in all investigated grasses. Despite the absence of a Gα-inactivating protein in grasses, all vascular plant Gα proteins examined rapidly released GDP without a receptor and slowly hydrolyzed GTP, indicating that these Gα are self-activating. We showed further that a single amino acid substitution found naturally in grass Gα proteins reduced the Gα-RGS interaction, and this amino acid substitution occurred before the loss of the RGS gene in the grass lineage. Like grasses, non-vascular plants also appear to lack RGS proteins. However, unlike grasses, one representative non-vascular plant Gα showed rapid GTP hydrolysis, likely compensating for the loss of the RGS gene. Our findings, the loss of a regulatory gene and the retention of the \"self-activating\" trait, indicate the existence of divergent Gα regulatory mechanisms in the plant kingdom. In the grasses, purifying selection on the regulatory gene was lost after the physical decoupling of the RGS protein and its cognate Gα partner. More broadly these findings show extreme divergence in Gα activation and regulation that played a critical role in the evolution of G protein signaling pathways.

Heterotrimeric G proteins were originally discovered through efforts to understand the effects of hormones, such as glucagon and epinephrine, on glucose metabolism. On the other hand, many cellular metabolites, including glucose, serve as ligands for G protein-coupled receptors. Here we investigate the consequences of glucose-mediated receptor signaling, and in particular the role of a Gα subunit Gpa2 and a non-canonical Gβ subunit, known as Asc1 in yeast and RACK1 in animals. Asc1/RACK1 is of particular interest because it has multiple, seemingly unrelated, functions in the cell. The existence of such “moonlighting” operations has complicated the determination of phenotype from genotype. Through a comparative analysis of individual gene deletion mutants, and by integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics measurements, we have determined the relative contributions of the Gα and Gβ protein subunits to glucose-initiated processes in yeast. We determined that Gpa2 is primarily involved in regulating carbohydrate metabolism while Asc1 is primarily involved in amino acid metabolism. Both proteins are involved in regulating purine metabolism. Of the two subunits, Gpa2 regulates a greater number of gene transcripts and was particularly important in determining the amplitude of response to glucose addition. We conclude that the two G protein subunits regulate distinct but complementary processes downstream of the glucose-sensing receptor, as well as processes that lead ultimately to changes in cell growth and metabolism.

Proteins with similar crystal structures can have dissimilar rates of substrate binding and catalysis. Here we used molecular dynamics simulations and biochemical analysis to determine the role of intradomain and interdomain motions in conferring distinct activation rates to two Gα proteins, Gαi1 and GPA1. Despite high structural similarity, GPA1 can activate itself without a receptor, whereas Gαi1 cannot. We found that motions in these proteins vary greatly in type and frequency. Whereas motion is greatest in the Ras domain of Gαi1, it is greatest in helices αA and αB from the helical domain of GPA1. Using protein chimeras, we show that helix αA from GPA1 is sufficient to confer rapid activation to Gαi1. Gαi1 has less intradomain motion than GPA1 and instead displays interdomain displacement resembling that observed in a receptor–heterotrimer crystal complex. Thus, structurally similar proteins can have distinct atomic motions that confer distinct activation mechanisms.

Signal transduction typically begins by ligand-dependent activation of a concomitant partner that is otherwise in its resting state. However, in cases where signal activation is constitutive by default, the mechanism of regulation is unknown. The Arabidopsis thaliana heterotrimeric Gα protein self-activates without accessory proteins, and is kept in its resting state by the negative regulator, AtRGS1 (regulator of G-protein signalling 1), which is the prototype of a seven-transmembrane receptor fused with an RGS domain. Endocytosis of AtRGS1 by ligand-dependent endocytosis physically uncouples the GTPase-accelerating activity of AtRGS1 from the Gα protein, permitting sustained activation. Phosphorylation of AtRGS1 by AtWNK8 kinase causes AtRGS1 endocytosis, required for both G-protein-mediated sugar signalling and cell proliferation. In animals, receptor endocytosis results in signal desensitization, whereas in plants, endocytosis results in signal activation. These findings reveal how different organisms rearrange a regulatory system to result in opposite outcomes using similar phosphorylation-dependent endocytosis mechanisms. In plants, the heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit is kept inactive by binding to the regulator of G protein signalling 1 (RGS1) protein. Jones and colleagues show that G-protein β and γ subunits recruit the WNK8 kinase to the plasma membrane, where WNK8 phosphorylates RGS1 and facilitates its internalization. This effect de-represses Gα signalling and is required for sugar signalling and cell proliferation.

Heterotrimeric G proteins were originally discovered through efforts to understand the effects of hormones, such as glucagon and epinephrine, on glucose metabolism. On the other hand, many cellular metabolites, including glucose, serve as ligands for G protein-coupled receptors. Here we investigate the consequences of glucose-mediated receptor signaling, and in particular the role of a G[alpha] subunit Gpa2 and a non-canonical G[beta] subunit, known as Asc1 in yeast and RACK1 in animals. Asc1/RACK1 is of particular interest because it has multiple, seemingly unrelated, functions in the cell. The existence of such \"moonlighting\" operations has complicated the determination of phenotype from genotype. Through a comparative analysis of individual gene deletion mutants, and by integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics measurements, we have determined the relative contributions of the G[alpha] and G[beta] protein subunits to glucose-initiated processes in yeast. We determined that Gpa2 is primarily involved in regulating carbohydrate metabolism while Asc1 is primarily involved in amino acid metabolism. Both proteins are involved in regulating purine metabolism. Of the two subunits, Gpa2 regulates a greater number of gene transcripts and was particularly important in determining the amplitude of response to glucose addition. We conclude that the two G protein subunits regulate distinct but complementary processes downstream of the glucose-sensing receptor, as well as processes that lead ultimately to changes in cell growth and metabolism.

Metabolomics assays have recently been used in humans for the identification of biomarkers for dietary assessment and diseases. The application of metabolomics to feline nutrition, however, has been very limited. The objective of this study was to identify how the feline blood metabolome changed in response to dietary macronutrient composition. Twelve adult domestic cats were fed four nutritionally complete diets [control, high-fat (HF), high-protein (HP), high-carbohydrate (HC)] at amounts to maintain ideal body weight and body condition score for 16 days. Overnight fasted plasma samples were collected on day 16 and subjected to liquid/gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis showed that metabolite profiles of cats fed HP, HF, and HC dietary regimes formed distinct clusters. Cats fed the HP diet had a metabolite profile associated with decreased nucleotide catabolism, but increased amino acid metabolism and ketone bodies, indicating a greater use of protein and fat for energy. Cats fed the HP diet had a significant increase in metabolites associated with gut microbial metabolism. Cats fed the HF diet had metabolites indicative of increased lipid metabolism, including free fatty acids, monoacylglycerols, glycerol-3-phosphate, cholesterol, ketone bodies, and markers of oxidative stress. γ-glutamylleucine, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate, and 3-indoxyl sulfate were identified by random forest analysis to distinguish cats fed the three macronutrient-rich diets. In conclusion, macronutrient-rich diets primarily altered markers of amino acid and lipid metabolism, with little changes in markers of carbohydrate and energy metabolism. Moreover, the HP diet influenced several metabolites originating from gut microbial metabolism.

Proteins with similar crystal structures can have dissimilar rates of substrate binding and catalysis. Here we used molecular dynamics simulations and biochemical analysis to determine the role of intradomain and interdomain motions in conferring distinct activation rates to two Gα proteins, Gα^sub i1^ and GPA1. Despite high structural similarity, GPA1 can activate itself without a receptor, whereas Gα^sub i1^ cannot. We found that motions in these proteins vary greatly in type and frequency. Whereas motion is greatest in the Ras domain of Gα^sub i1^, it is greatest in helices αA and αB from the helical domain of GPA1. Using protein chimeras, we show that helix αA from GPA1 is sufficient to confer rapid activation to Gα^sub i1^. Gα^sub i1^ has less intradomain motion than GPA1 and instead displays interdomain displacement resembling that observed in a receptor-heterotrimer crystal complex. Thus, structurally similar proteins can have distinct atomic motions that confer distinct activation mechanisms. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Signal transduction typically begins by ligand-dependent activation of a concomitant partner which is otherwise in its resting state. However, in cases where signal activation is constitutive by default, the mechanism of regulation is unknown. The Arabidopsis thaliana heterotrimeric Gα protein self-activates without accessory proteins, and is kept in its resting state by the negative regulator, AtRGS1 (Regulator of G protein Signaling 1), which is the prototype of a seven transmembrane receptor fused with an RGS domain. Endocytosis of AtRGS1 by ligand-dependent endocytosis physically uncouples the GTPase accelerating activity of AtRGS1 from the Gα protein, permitting sustained activation. Phosphorylation of AtRGS1 by AtWNK8 kinase causes AtRGS1 endocytosis, required both for G protein-mediated sugar signaling and cell proliferation. In animals, receptor endocytosis results in signal desensitization, whereas in plants, endocytosis results in signal activation. These findings reveal how different organisms rearrange a regulatory system to result in opposite outcomes using similar phosphorylation-dependent endocytosis.

ABSTRACT G proteins were originally discovered through efforts to understand the effects of hormones, such as glucagon and epinephrine, on glucose metabolism. On the other hand, many cellular metabolites, including glucose, serve as ligands for G protein-coupled receptors. Here we investigate the consequences of glucose-mediated receptor signaling, and in particular the role of a Gα subunit Gpa2 and a non-canonical Gβ subunit, known as Asc1 in yeast and RACK1 in animals. Asc1/RACK1 is of particular interest because it has multiple, seemingly unrelated, functions in the cell. The existence of such “moonlighting” operations has complicated the determination of phenotype from genotype. Through a comparative analysis of individual gene deletion mutants, and by integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics measurements, we have determined the relative contributions of the Gα and Gβ protein subunits to glucose-initiated processes in yeast. We determined that Gpa2 is primarily involved in regulating sugar metabolism while Asc1 is primarily involved in amino acid metabolism. Both proteins are involved in regulating purine metabolism. Of the two subunits, Gpa2 regulates a greater number of gene transcripts and was particularly important in determining the amplitude of response to glucose addition. We conclude that the two G protein subunits regulate distinct but complementary processes downstream of the glucose-sensing receptor, as well as processes that lead ultimately to changes in cell growth and metabolism. AUTHOR Despite the societal importance of glucose fermentation in yeast, the mechanisms by which these cells detect and respond to glucose have remained obscure. Glucose detection requires a cell surface receptor coupled to a G protein that is comprised of two subunits, rather than the more typical heterotrimer: an α subunit Gpa2 and the β subunit Asc1 (or RACK1 in humans). Asc1/RACK1 also serves as a subunit of the ribosome, where it regulates the synthesis of proteins involved in glucose fermentation. This manuscript uses global metabolomics and transcriptomics to demonstrate the distinct roles of each G protein subunit in transmitting the glucose signal. Whereas Gpa2 is primarily involved in the metabolism of sugars, Asc1/RACK1 contributes to production of amino acids necessary for protein synthesis and cell division. These findings reveal the initial steps of glucose signaling and several unique and complementary functions of the G protein subunits. More broadly, the integrated approach used here is likely to guide efforts to determine the topology of complex G protein and metabolic signaling networks in humans. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

The C-terminal repeat domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II is composed of tandem repeats of heptapeptides with the consensus sequence Tyr1-Ser2-Pro3-Thr4-Ser5 -Pro6-Ser7. The CTD is unique to RNA polymerase II, and it is essential for viability in all eukaryotes that have this domain. Phosphorylation of this domain correlates with polymerase activity. Specifically, phosphorylation of serines at position 5 is required for the transition from initiation to elongation, while Ser2 phosphorylation is detected on polymerases transcribing coding regions of genes. Differentially phosphorylated forms of the CTD bind different sets of proteins that are involved in a spectrum of nuclear events including capping, splicing, 3' end formation and chromatin remodeling. A network of kinases and phosphatases combine to determine the phosphorylation pattern of the CTD throughout the transcription cycle. Our lab has focused on budding yeast CTD kinase I (CTDK-I). Genetics and biochemistry implicate this kinase in elongation, chromatin remodeling and 3' end formation. CTDK-I has been exploited as a tool in our lab to generate hyperphosphorylated CTD to use as a probe for interactants in the yeast proteome, but little was known about how this kinase phosphorylates the CTD. We examined the specificity of CTDK-I and found that it phosphorylates CTD heptads that are already phosphorylated at Ser2 or Ser5 more efficiently than unphosphorylated heptads. CTDK-I phosphorylates Ser5 of substrates that are either unphosphorylated or phosphorylated at Ser2, but it phosphorylates Ser2 if Ser5 is already phosphorylated. We have identified an arginine residue in the T-loop of the catalytic subunit of CTDK-I that is an important determinant of substrate specificity and enzyme processivity. Finally, we compared the specificity of CTDK-I to P-TEFb, the proposed metazoan counterpart to CTDK-I. We found that although CTDK-I and P-TEFb have some differences, they share more similarities with each other than either shares with other CTD kinases. We propose a model wherein CTDK-I acts after the TFIIH-associated CTD kinase to generate CTD heptads that are phosphorylated at both Ser2 and Ser5, and we suggest that doubly-phosphorylated CTD repeats contribute importantly to elongation and associated functional properties of RNAPII.