Explore the vast range of titles available.

Six patients in the COVID-19 group were admitted to the ICU (defined as “severe COVID-19”), four of them required mechanical ventilation during hospital stay and three of them died due to COVID-19 or related complications. SEE PDF] ADM expression was significantly elevated in patients with COVID-19 than other respiratory infections (Fig. 1a) despite similar clinical features at admission. According to ROC-analysis, ADM was able to differentiate severe from non-severe COVID-19 cases with an AUC of 0.82 (p = 0.024, 95% CI 0.64–1.0). Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are related to acute kidney injury (AKI) and severe illness in COVID-19 patients. Methods 153 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the emergency department (ED) were included. Blood samples were collected from each patient at admission. Bio-ADM and IL-6, as well as DPP3 and routinely measured markers were evaluated regarding the endpoints AKI (22/128 hospitalized patients) and a composite endpoint of admission to intensive care unit and/or in-hospital death ( n  = 26/153 patients). Results Bio-ADM and IL-6 were significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients with AKI compared to COVID-19 patients without AKI (each p  < 0.001). According to ROC analyses IL-6 and bio-ADM had the largest AUC (0.84 and 0.81) regarding the detection of AKI. Furthermore, bio-ADM and IL-6 were significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients reaching the composite endpoint (each p  < 0.001). Regarding the composite endpoint ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.89 for IL-6 and 0.83 for bio-ADM in COVID-19 patients. In the multivariable logistic model bio-ADM and IL-6 presented as independent significant predictors regarding both endpoints AKI and the composite endpoint in COVID-19 patients (as well as creatinine regarding the composite endpoint; each p  < 0.05), opposite to leukocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP) and dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3; each p  = n.s.). Conclusion Elevated levels of bio-ADM and IL-6 are associated with AKI and critical illness in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, both biomarkers may be potential tools in risk stratification in COVID-19 patients at presentation in the ED.

Abstract Introduction: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is placing an extraordinary burden on our health care system with its limited resources. Accurate triage of patients is necessary to ensure medical care for those most severely affected. In this regard, biomarkers could contribute to risk evaluation. The aim of this prospective observational clinical study was to assess the relationship between urinary N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and acute kidney injury (AKI) as well as severe disease in patients with COVID-19. Methods: 125 patients treated with an acute respiratory infection in the emergency department of the University Hospital Regensburg were analyzed. These patients were divided into a COVID-19 cohort (n = 91) and a cohort with infections not caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (n = 34). NT-proBNP was determined from serum and fresh urine samples collected in the emergency department. Clinical endpoints were the development of AKI and a composite one consisting of AKI, intensive care unit admission, and in-hospital death. Results: 11 (12.1%) COVID-19 patients developed AKI during hospitalization, whereas 15 (16.5%) reached the composite endpoint. Urinary NT-proBNP was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients who suffered AKI or reached the composite endpoint (each p < 0.005). In a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, and arterial hypertension, urinary NT-proBNP was identified as independent predictor of AKI (p = 0.017, OR = 3.91 [CI: 1.28–11.97] per standard deviation [SD]), as well as of the composite endpoint (p = 0.026, OR 2.66 [CI: 1.13–6.28] per SD). Conclusion: Urinary NT-proBNP might help identify patients at risk for AKI and severe disease progression in COVID-19.

Background: Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is the major cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The probability of reconnection is higher if the primary lesion is not sufficiently effective, which can be unmasked with an adenosine provocation test (APT). High-power short-duration radiofrequency energy (HPSD) guided with ablation index (AI) and the third generation of the visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) are new methods for PVI. Methods: A total of 70 participants (35 in each group) who underwent a PVI with either AI-guided HPSD (50 W; AI 500 for the anterior and 400 for the posterior wall, respectively) or VGLB ablation were included in this observational pilot trial. Twenty minutes after each PVI, an APT was performed. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival from AF after three years. Results: A total of 137 (100%) PVs in the HPSD arm and 131 PVs (98.5%) in the VGLB arm were initially successfully isolated (p = 0.24). The overall procedure duration was similar in both arms (155 ± 39 in HPSD vs. 175 ± 58 min in VGLB, p = 0.191). Fluoroscopy time, left atrial dwelling time and duration from the first to the last ablation were longer in the VGLB arm (23 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 3 min, p < 0.001; 157 (111–185) vs. 134 (104–154) min, p = 0.049; 92(59–108) vs. 72 (43–85) min, p = 0.010). A total of 127 (93%) in the HPSD arm and 126 (95%) PVs in the VGLB arm remained isolated after APT (p = 0.34). The primary endpoint was met 1107 ± 68 days after ablation in 71% vs. 66% in the VGLB and HPSD arms, respectively (p = 0.65). Conclusions: HPSD and VGLB did not differ with respect to long-term outcome of PVI. A large, randomized study should be conducted to compare clinical outcomes with respect to these new ablation techniques.

Aims The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of urinary N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) compared with plasma NT‐proBNP in patients presenting with acute chest pain in the emergency department. Methods and results We measured simultaneously plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP at admission in 301 patients with acute chest pain. In our cohort, 174 patients suffered from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A follow‐up (median of 55 months) was performed regarding the endpoints all‐cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (mortality, congestive heart failure, ACS with the necessity of a coronary intervention, and stroke). Fifty‐four patients died during follow‐up; 98 suffered from the combined endpoint. A significant and positive correlation of urinary and plasma NT‐proBNP was found (r = 0.87, P < 0.05). Patients with troponin positive ACS had significantly elevated levels of plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP compared with those with unstable angina pectoris or chest wall syndrome (each P < 0.05). The highest levels of both biomarkers were found in patients with congestive heart failure (each P < 0.05). According to Kaplan–Meier analysis, plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP were significant predictors for mortality and the combined endpoint in the whole study cohort and in the subgroup of patients with ACS (each P < 0.05). Regarding Cox regression analysis, plasma and urinary NT‐proBNP were independent predictors for mortality and the combined endpoint (each P < 0.05). Conclusions Urinary NT‐proBNP seems to provide a significant predictive value regarding the endpoints all‐cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain and those with ACS.

Aims The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether tubular markers kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase (NAG) are related to acute kidney injury (AKI) and severe disease in patients with COVID-19. Methods and results In this prospective observational clinical trial we examined a cohort of 80 patients with proof of acute respiratory infection and divided them into a COVID-19 cohort (n = 54) and a control cohort (n = 26). KIM-1 and NAG were measured from urine samples collected in the emergency department. We assessed the development of AKI, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intrahospital death as clinical endpoints. Urinary KIM-1 and NAG were not significantly different between patients with SARS-CoV-2 and those with other respiratory infections (each p = n.s.). Eight patients from the COVID-19 cohort and five of the non-COVID-19-patients suffered from acute kidney injury during their stay. Nine COVID-19 patients and two non-COVID-19 patients were admitted to the ICU. KIM-1 was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients with, compared to those without AKI (p = 0.005), as opposed to NAG and creatinine (each p = n.s.). Furthermore, KIM-1 was significantly elevated in the patients with COVID-19 that had to be transferred to the ICU (p = 0.015), in contrast to NAG and creatinine (each p = n.s.). Conclusion Assessing KIM-1 in patients with COVID-19 might provide additional value in recognizing AKI at an early stage of disease. Further, KIM-1 might indicate higher risk for clinical deterioration as displayed by admission to the ICU. Graphical abstract

Guidelines for the treatment of heart failure (HF) recommend the titration of β blockers (BB) to a target dosage shown to be effective in clinical trials. The benefit of BBs is associated with heart rate (HR) control, with a target resting HR <70 bpm which in clinical trials have been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The primary purpose of this study was to gauge the ability to achieve guideline-directed medical therapy HR control in the early posthospitalization period for HF patients with the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD), assessing whether the WCD could be used to evaluate HR both at rest and during activity to determine if targets were being met and to adequately direct clinical decision making. The WCD platform allows continuous recording of HR. To assess the guideline-directed therapy goals for reduction of resting HR, HR was evaluated both at rest (nighttime: midnight-7 a.m.; daytime: 7 a.m. midnight), and during activity of daily living. HR data during activity of daily living (ADL) and rest were collected from patients with HF that wore the WCD for ≥5 weeks (n = 1,353) between 2015 and 2017. First, 643,891 activity episodes from 1,353 patients were analyzed. Daytime and nighttime resting HRs significantly dropped from beginning to end of WCD use (day: 72.5 bpm vs 69.0 bpm, p <0.0001; night: 68.1 vs 64.3, p <0.0001). However, 43% of patients still had an average daytime resting HR ≥70 bpm during the last week of WCD use. When comparing a patient’s peak activity HR during the first week of WCD use to the last week, there was no difference (93.6 bpm vs 94.1 bpm, p = 0.23). During ADL, 31% of patients had a HR ≥100 bpm, 14% of patients had a HR ≥110 bpm, and 6% had a HR ≥120 bpm. In conclusion, months after hospital discharge, 43% of patients did not meet guideline-directed resting target HR control, indicating they may not have been effectively managed with BB. HR during ADL may have also been higher than preferred. Remote HR monitoring may help physicians to adequately titrate guideline-directed medical therapy, thus improving clinical outcomes in HF patients.

BackgroundThe prospective WEARIT-II-EUROPE registry aimed to assess the value of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) prior to potential ICD implantation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction considered at risk of sudden arrhythmic death.Methods and results781 patients (77% men; mean age 59.3 ± 13.4 years) with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were consecutively enrolled. All patients received a WCD. Follow-up time for all patients was 12 months. Mean baseline LVEF was 26.9%. Mean WCD wearing time was 75 ± 47.7 days, mean daily WCD use 20.3 ± 4.6 h. WCD shocks terminated 13 VT/VF events in ten patients (1.3%). Two patients died during WCD prescription of non-arrhythmic cause. Mean LVEF increased from 26.9 to 36.3% at the end of WCD prescription (p < 0.01). After WCD use, ICDs were implanted in only 289 patients (37%). Forty patients (5.1%) died during follow-up. Five patients (1.7%) died with ICDs implanted, 33 patients (7%) had no ICD (no information on ICD in two patients). The majority of patients (75%) with the follow-up of 12 months after WCD prescription died from heart failure (15 patients) and non-cardiac death (15 patients). Only three patients (7%) died suddenly. In seven patients, the cause of death remained unknown.ConclusionsMortality after WCD prescription was mainly driven by heart failure and non-cardiovascular death. In patients with HFrEF and a potential risk of sudden arrhythmic death, WCD protected observation of LVEF progression and appraisal of competing risks of potential non-arrhythmic death may enable improved selection for beneficial ICD implantation.Graphic abstract

Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 spread worldwide, causing a respiratory disease known as COVID-19. The aim of the present study was to examine whether Dipeptidyl-peptidase 3 (DPP3) and the inflammatory biomarkers IL-6, CRP, and leucocytes are associated with COVID-19 and able to predict the severity of pulmonary infiltrates in COVID-19 patients versus non-COVID-19 patients. 114 COVID-19 patients and 35 patients with respiratory infections other than SARS-CoV-2 were included in our prospective observational study. Blood samples were collected at presentation to the emergency department. 102 COVID-19 patients and 28 non-COVID-19 patients received CT imaging (19 outpatients did not receive CT imaging). If CT imaging was available, artificial intelligence software (CT Pneumonia Analysis) was used to quantify pulmonary infiltrates. According to the median of infiltrate (14.45%), patients who obtained quantitative CT analysis were divided into two groups (> median: 55 COVID-19 and nine non-COVID-19, ≤ median: 47 COVID-19 and 19 non-COVID-19). DPP3 was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients (median 20.85 ng/ml, 95% CI 18.34–24.40 ng/ml), as opposed to those without SARS-CoV-2 (median 13.80 ng/ml, 95% CI 11.30–17.65 ng/ml; p  < 0.001, AUC = 0.72), opposite to IL-6, CRP (each p  = n.s.) and leucocytes ( p  < 0.05, but lower levels in COVID-19 patients). Regarding binary logistic regression analysis, higher DPP3 concentrations (OR = 1.12, p  < 0.001) and lower leucocytes counts (OR = 0.76, p  < 0.001) were identified as significant and independent predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as opposed to IL-6 and CRP (each p  = n.s.). IL-6 was significantly increased in patients with infiltrate above the median compared to infiltrate below the median both in COVID-19 ( p  < 0.001, AUC = 0.78) and in non-COVID-19 ( p  < 0.05, AUC = 0.81). CRP, DPP3, and leucocytes were increased in COVID-19 patients with infiltrate above median (each p  < 0.05, AUC: CRP 0.82, DPP3 0.70, leucocytes 0.67) compared to infiltrate below median, opposite to non-COVID-19 (each p  = n.s.). Regarding multiple linear regression analysis in COVID-19, CRP, IL-6, and leucocytes (each p  < 0.05) were associated with the degree of pulmonary infiltrates, as opposed to DPP3 ( p  = n.s.). DPP3 showed the potential to be a COVID-19-specific biomarker. IL-6 might serve as a prognostic marker to assess the extent of pulmonary infiltrates in respiratory patients.

As complex disease, heart failure is associated with various pathophysiological and biochemical disorders. No single biomarker is able to display all these characteristics. Therefore, we evaluated a multimarker panel together with the biochemical gold-standard NT-proBNP. Part of the panel are markers for angiogenesis (Endostatin, IBP-4, IBP-7, sFlt-1 as antiangiogenetic factors and PLGF as angiogenectic factor), myocyte stress (GDF-15), extracellular matrix remodelling (galectin-3, mimecan and TIMP-1), inflammation (galectin-3) and myocyte injury (hs-TnT). All markers (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) were assessed in a cohort of 149 patients with chronic heart failure and 84 healthy controls. All markers were positively correlated with ln NT-proBNP (each p < 0.05). Furthermore, they were significantly elevated in patients with chronic heart failure (each p < 0.05). All markers increased significantly with severity of LV dysfunction and severity of New York Heart Association class (each p < 0.05), except for PLGF and Mimecan (each p = NS). With the exception of endostatin, mimecan and PLGF, all other markers were further significant predictors for all-cause mortality in a 3-year follow-up. In a multimarker approach of the five biomarkers with the best performance (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, TIMP-1, GDF-15 and IBP-4), the event rate was superior to NT-proBNP alone and increased significantly and progressively with the number of elevated biomarkers. All emerging markers increased stepwise with the severity of symptoms and LV dysfunction and offer important prognostic information in chronic heart failure, except for PLGF and mimecan. Five biomarkers with different pathophysiological background incorporated additive prognostic value in heart failure. Prognostication in heart failure may be further improved through a multimarker approach.