Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgoundEarly-stage breast cancer is increasingly detected by screening mammography, and we aim to establish radiofrequency ablation therapy (RFA) as a minimally invasive, cost-efficient, and cosmetically acceptable local treatment. Although there were many studies on resection after RFA, none of them provided sufficient evidence to support RFA as a standard therapy for breast cancer.ResultsIn our Phase I study, localized tumors with a maximum diameter of 2 cm, preoperatively diagnosed by imaging and histopathology, were treated with RFA. A 90% complete ablation rate was confirmed histopathologically. Our phase II multicenter study of RFA without resection for early breast cancer will evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of RFA as well as its cosmetic results, which are a perceived advantage of this technique. We started a phase III multicenter study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of RFA compared with standard treatment (breast-conserving surgery) in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate, which is the best index of local control.ConclucionTo standardize RFA for breast cancer, the results of our multicenter study, Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer as Local Therapy (the RAFAELO study) that began in 2013, are eagerly awaited.

MicroRNA (miRNA), which are stably present in serum, have been reported to be potentially useful for detecting cancer. In the present study, we examined the expression profiles of serum miRNA in several large cohorts to identify novel miRNA that can be used to detect early stage breast cancer. We comprehensively evaluated the serum miRNA expression profiles using highly sensitive microarray analysis. A total of 1280 serum samples of breast cancer patients stored in the National Cancer Center Biobank were used. In addition, 2836 serum samples were obtained from non‐cancer controls, 451 from patients with other types of cancers, and 63 from patients with non‐breast benign diseases. The samples were divided into a training cohort including non‐cancer controls, other cancers and breast cancer, and a test cohort including non‐cancer controls and breast cancer. The training cohort was used to identify a combination of miRNA that could detect breast cancer, and the test cohort was used to validate that combination. miRNA expressions were compared between patients with breast cancer and non‐breast cancer, and a combination of five miRNA (miR‐1246, miR‐1307‐3p, miR‐4634, miR‐6861‐5p and miR‐6875‐5p) was found to be able to detect breast cancer. This combination had a sensitivity of 97.3%, specificity of 82.9% and accuracy of 89.7% for breast cancer in the test cohort. In addition, this combination could detect early stage breast cancer (sensitivity of 98.0% for Tis). Cancer specificity of the diagnostic index using the combination of miR‐1246, miR‐1307‐3p, miR‐4634, miR‐6861‐5p, and miR‐6875‐5p in the test cohort.

Non-surgical ablation is emerging as an alternative local therapy option for patients with early-stage breast cancer and encompasses two main types of percutaneous therapeutic procedures: radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Both techniques involve obliteration of a spherical lesion and feasibility studies have shown that complete tumour ablation is achievable with good or excellent cosmetic results. Although few clinical studies have directly compared non-surgical ablation with conventional surgical resection, observational studies indicate that clinical outcomes are favourable with acceptable rates of local control and no detriment to long-term survival. There remain outstanding issues with these percutaneous ablative techniques that require resolution before they could be incorporated into routine clinical practice. Hence, a consensus meeting was convened to discuss the challenges of non-surgical ablation and clarify indications for its use alongside clinical management pathways. In this Policy Review we will address some of the broader biological aspects of non-surgical ablation, including immune-modulatory effects and potential novel applications for the future.

Background The long-term outcomes and risk factors of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN) have not yet been fully elucidated. Methods We identified 219 breast cancer patients who received paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy between 2002 and 2009. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence, time to onset, duration, and risk factors for PIPN by chart review. Results Of the 219 patients, 212 developed PIPN (97%) during a median follow-up time of 57 months (range 5.3–95.5). Median time to PIPN onset was 21 days (range 11–101) for the entire patient population: 35 days (range 14–77) for weekly administration and 21 days (range 11–101) for tri-weekly administration. PIPN caused termination of paclitaxel treatment in 7 patients (4%). Median duration of PIPN was 727 days (range 14–2621 days). PIPN persisted in 64 and 41% of patients at 1 and 3 years after initiating paclitaxel, respectively. Age ≥60 years and severity of PIPN were significantly associated with PIPN duration. Conclusions PIPN persists longer in older patients and in those who experience severe neuropathy. Further studies to identify the risk factors for PIPN are warranted.

Background Most patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer can be cured by surgery and endocrine therapy, but a significant proportion suffer recurrences. Actinin-4 is associated with cancer invasion and metastasis, and its genetic alteration may be used for breast cancer prognostication. Methods The copy number of the actinin-4 ( ACTN4 ) gene was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in two independent cohorts totalling 597 patients (336 from Japan and 261 from the USA) with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Results In the Japanese cohort, multivariate analysis revealed that a copy number increase (CNI) of ACTN4 was an independent factor associated with high risks of recurrence ( P  = 0.01; hazard ratio (HR), 2.95) and breast cancer death ( P  = 0.014; HR, 4.27). The prognostic significance of ACTN4 CNI was validated in the US cohort, where it was the sole prognostic factor significantly associated with high risks of recurrence ( P  = 0.04; HR, 2.73) and death ( P  = 0.016; HR, 4.01). Conclusions Copy number analysis of a single gene, ACTN4 , can identify early-stage luminal breast cancer patients with a distinct outcome. Such high-risk patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate whether young age at onset of breast cancer is an independent prognostic factor in patients from the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry, after adjustment of known clinicopathological prognostic factors. Methods Of the 53,670 patients registered between 2004 and 2006 and surveyed after a 5-year follow-up prognosis, 25,898 breast cancer patients (48.3 %), who were obtained prognostic data, were examined. Clinicopathological factors were compared between young adult (YA; <35 years), middle-aged adult (MA; 35–50 years), and older adult (OA; >50 years) patients. Five-year disease- free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were studied. Results YA patients were associated with an advanced TNM stage and aggressive characteristics (e.g. human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers) compared to MA and OA patients ( P  < 0.001). The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 79.4 % and 90.8, 88.5 and 95.0 %, and 87.8 % and 91.6 % for YA, MA, and OA patients, respectively. From the multivariable regression analysis, young age at onset was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for both DFS (hazard ratio 1.73, 95 % confidence interval 1.42–2.10; P  < 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio 1.58, 95 % confidence interval 1.16–2.15; P  = 0.004). Conclusions Young age at onset is an independent negative prognostic factor in breast cancer. Further studies are required to develop new therapeutic strategies for YA breast cancer patients.

Background Breast cancer survival outcomes vary across different ethnic groups. We clarified the differences in clinicopathological and survival characteristics of breast cancer among Japanese, US residents with Japanese origin (USJ), and US residents with other origins (USO). Method Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 dataset and Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) registry, we included patients first diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 and 2015. We categorized the patients into three groups based on the database and the recorded ethnicity: Japanese (all those from the JBCS registry), USJ (those from SEER with ethnicity: Japanese), and USO (those from SEER with ethnicity other than Japanese). Excluding patients diagnosed after 2012, stage 0, and 4 patients, we examined the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, cancer stage, and hormone receptor (HR) status. Results We identified 7362 USJ, 701,751 USO, and 503,013 Japanese breast cancer patients. The proportion of HR-positive breast cancer was the highest among USJ (71%). OS was significantly longer among Japanese and USJ than USO (Hazard ratio 0.46; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.45–0.47 for Japanese and 0.66 [95% CI 0.59–0.74] for USJ) after adjusting for baseline covariates. BCSS was also significantly higher in the two groups (HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.51–0.55] for Japanese and 0.53 [95% CI 0.52–0.74] for USJ). Conclusions In stage I–III breast cancer, Japanese and US residents with Japanese origin experienced significantly longer survival than US residents with non-Japanese origins.

SummaryBackgroundOral fluoropyrimidines, such as S-1, have been shown to have a role in controlling disease progression in metastatic breast cancer. We examined adjuvant treatment with S-1 in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-negative primary breast cancer. MethodsWe did a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial in 139 sites (137 hospitals and two clinics). Eligible patients were women aged 20–75 years with histologically diagnosed stage I to IIIB invasive breast cancer (intermediate to high risk of recurrence). Patients were temporarily registered at participating institutions and biopsy or surgical samples were collected and sent for central pathological assessment. Patients received 5 years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (selective oestrogen receptor modulators with or without ovarian suppression and aromatase inhibitors) with or without 1 year of S-1. Oral S-1 80–120 mg/day was administered twice a day for 14 days with 7 days off. Randomisation (1:1) using the minimisation method was done with six stratification factors (age, axillary lymph node metastasis at surgery or sentinel lymph node biopsy, preoperative or postoperative (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) chemotherapy, preoperative endocrine therapy, proportion of ER-positive cells, and study site). The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival, in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned patients, excluding those with significant protocol deviations). The safety analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, we report the results from the interim analysis at the data cutoff date Jan 31, 2019. This trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051180057, and the University hospital Medical Information Network, UMIN000003969. FindingsBetween Feb 1, 2012, and Feb 1, 2016, 1930 patients were enrolled in the full analysis set, 957 (50%) received endocrine therapy plus S-1 and 973 (50%) received endocrine therapy alone. Median follow-up was 52·2 months (IQR 42·1–58·9). 155 (16%) patients in the endocrine therapy alone group and in 101 (11%) patients in the endocrine therapy plus S-1 group had invasive disease-free survival events (hazard ratio 0·63, 95% CI 0·49–0·81, p=0·0003). As the primary endpoint was met at interim analysis, the trial was terminated early. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (72 [8%] of 954 patients in the endocrine therapy plus S-1 group vs seven [<1%] of 970 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group), diarrhoea (18 [2%] vs none), decreased white blood cells (15 [2%] vs two [<1%]), and fatigue (six [<1%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported in nine (<1%) of 970 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group and 23 (2%) of 954 patients in the endocrine therapy plus S-1 group. There was one (<1%) possible treatment-related death in the endocrine therapy plus S-1 group due to suspected pulmonary artery thrombosis. InterpretationThese data suggest that this combination of S-1 with endocrine therapy could be a potential treatment option for this intermediate and high-risk group of patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative primary breast cancer. FundingPublic Health Research Foundation (Japan), Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy using the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence method compared with that using the blue dye method, a prospective multicenter study was performed. Methods Patients with T1–3 primary breast cancer without clinical lymph node involvement were included in this study. ICG as a fluorescence-emitting source and indigo carmine as blue dye were injected into the subareolar area. Extracted lymph nodes were examined to identify the first, second, and other SLNs. The identified nodes were classified according to the ICG fluorescence signal and blue dye uptake. Results Ninety-nine eligible patients were included in this study. The ICG fluorescence method identified an average of 3.4 SLNs (range, 1–8) in 98 of 99 patients (detection rate, 99 %). The number of lymph nodes identified by the fluorescence method was significantly higher than that identified by the blue dye method ( p  < 0.001). SLN involvement was identified in 20 % (20 of 99) of patients, all of whom tested positive for the first SLN. In 16 patients, complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed. In 25 % (4 of 16) of these patients, axillary metastases were identified; however, no axillary involvement was found in 8 patients with only one involved node, which was isolated as the first SLN. Conclusions High rate of SLN detection was achieved using the ICG fluorescence method. The first SLN identified by fluorescence imaging provides an exact indication of the axillary status. Therefore, the ICG fluorescence method provides precise information required to avoid unnecessary ALND.

Background The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy in patients treated with NAC and mastectomy in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry. Methods We enrolled patients who received NAC and mastectomy for cT1–4 cN0–2 M0 breast cancer. We evaluated the association between radiotherapy and outcomes, locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) based on ypN status by multivariable analysis. Results Of the 145,530 patients, we identified 3226 who met the inclusion criteria. Among ypN1 patients, no differences were found in LRR, DDFS, or OS between groups with and without radiotherapy ( p  = 0.72, p  = 0.29, and p  = 0.36, respectively). Radiotherapy was associated with improved LRR-free survival ( p  < 0.001), DDFS ( p  = 0.01), and OS ( p  < 0.001) in patients with ypN2–3. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that use of radiotherapy was independently associated with improved LRR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.82, p  = 0.001] and OS [HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.89, p  = 0.004) for ypN2–3 patients only. The association between radiotherapy and OS was not statistically significant among ypN0 ( p  = 0.22) and ypN1 patients ( p  = 0.51). Conclusions The results from this nationwide database study did not show significant associations between PMRT and improved survival among ypN0 and ypN1 patients. Radiotherapy may be beneficial only for ypN2–3 breast cancer patients who receive NAC and mastectomy in the modern era.