Explore the vast range of titles available.

Nearly a decade ago, The Lancet published the Neonatal Survival Series, with an ambitious call for integration of newborn care across the continuum of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health and nutrition (RMNCH). In this first of five papers in the Every Newborn Series, we consider what has changed during this decade, assessing progress on the basis of a systematic policy heuristic including agenda-setting, policy formulation and adoption, leadership and partnership, implementation, and evaluation of effect. Substantial progress has been made in agenda setting and policy formulation for newborn health, as witnessed by the shift from maternal and child health to maternal, newborn, and child health as a standard. However, investment and large-scale implementation have been disappointingly small, especially in view of the size of the burden and potential for rapid change and synergies throughout the RMNCH continuum. Moreover, stillbirths remain invisible on the global health agenda. Hence that progress in improvement of newborn survival and reduction of stillbirths lags behind that of maternal mortality and deaths for children aged 1–59 months is not surprising. Faster progress is possible, but with several requirements: clear communication of the interventions with the greatest effect and how to overcome bottlenecks for scale-up; national leadership, and technical capacity to integrate and implement these interventions; global coordination of partners, especially within countries, in provision of technical assistance and increased funding; increased domestic investment in newborn health, and access to specific commodities and equipment where needed; better data to monitor progress, with local data used for programme improvement; and accountability for results at all levels, including demand from communities and mortality targets in the post-2015 framework. Who will step up during the next decade to ensure decision making in countries leads to implementation of stillbirth and newborn health interventions within RMNCH programmes?

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to prioritise a set of indicators to measure World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-care standards for small and/or sick newborns (SSNB) in health facilities. The hypothesis is that monitoring prioritised indicators can support accountability mechanisms, assess and drive progress, and compare performance in quality-of-care (QoC) at subnational levels.DesignProspective, iterative, deductive, stepwise process to prioritise a list of QoC indicators organised around the WHO Standards for improving the QoC for small and sick newborns in health facilities. A technical working group (TWG) used an iterative four-step deductive process: (1) articulation of conceptual framework and method for indicator development; (2) comprehensive review of existing global SSNB-relevant indicators; (3) development of indicator selection criteria; and (4) selection of indicators through consultations with a wide range of stakeholders at country, regional and global levels.SettingThe indicators are prioritised for inpatient newborn care (typically called level 2 and 3 care) in high mortality/morbidity settings, where most preventable poor neonatal outcomes occur.ParticipantsThe TWG included 24 technical experts and leaders in SSNB QoC programming selected by WHO. Global perspectives were synthesised from an online survey of 172 respondents who represented different countries and levels of the health system, and a wide range of perspectives, including ministries of health, research institutions, technical and implementing partners, health workers and independent experts.ResultsThe 30 prioritised SSNB QoC indicators include 27 with metadata and 3 requiring further development; together, they cover all eight standard domains of the WHO quality framework. Among the established indicators, 10 were adopted from existing indicators and 17 adapted. The list contains a balance of indicators measuring inputs (n=6), processes (n=12) and outcome/impact (n=9).ConclusionsThe prioritised SSNB QoC indicators can be used at health facility, subnational and national levels, depending on the maturity of a country’s health information system. Their use in implementation, research and evaluation across diverse contexts has the potential to help drive action to improve quality of SSNB care. WHO and others could use this list for further prioritisation of a core set.

Progress This paper is a narrative review that takes stock of the progress in addressing preterm birth over the past decade – notably on policies, national plans, innovation, evidence, social mobilisation, and community engagement – to inform future progress on preterm birth. At the global policy level, many countries have strongly supported collective initiatives and resolutions on maternal and newborn health relevant to preterm birth in multilateral fora, most recently through a World Health Assembly resolution calling for a revival amongst the global community on stalled progress for maternal, newborn and child health. Following the adoption of other global plans, like the Every Newborn Action Plan and Strategies for Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality, most countries set corresponding national mortality and coverage targets, and many have national and subnational policies and plans for integrated maternal and newborn health. Adequate financing remains a challenge, and sexual and reproductive health and rights of women and girls are being challenged globally. There have been significant advances in evidence-based interventions for preterm birth prevention and care, reflected in updated World Health Organization guidelines on antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care, and care for small and sick newborns. The past decade has also seen progress in social mobilisation and community engagement, particularly parent groups and healthcare professional organisations advocating on issues surrounding preterm birth. Polycrisis and vulnerability There are, however, significant challenges that continue to hamper progress on preterm birth. Polycrisis – the interplay of overlapping economic, geopolitical, and environmental crises – compounds existing inequities, especially in places where health systems are already weak. Distinct and overlapping threats from conflict, climate change and the cost-of-living crisis present life-or-death challenges to those already facing extreme vulnerability, particularly women and girls, and small and sick newborns. Preterm birth: a marker of maternal and neonatal health progress in the coming decade The detrimental impacts of preterm birth are felt along the life course and across generations. The success of countries and the global community in preventing preterm births and ensuring high-quality care for mothers and preterm babies serves as a critical measure of progress – or failure – in advancing global efforts to improve maternal and newborn health. Plain language summary Countries have agreed on global plans and resolutions to improve maternal and newborn health. The World Health Assembly recently emphasized the need for renewed efforts in this area. Many countries have set national goals, but implementation remains a challenge as does funding. There have been advances in evidence-based interventions for preterm birth prevention and care, reflected in updated World Health Organization guidelines. Progress has also been made in community engagement, with parent groups and healthcare organisations as leading advocates. However, overlapping crises hinder progress, including conflicts, climate change, pandemics, and the cost-of-living crisis. These crises increase inequities and pose serious risks to women and newborns, especially where health systems are weak. Preterm birth is an important indicator of progress on maternal and neonatal health. How well countries and the global community address preterm birth and provide care for mothers and babies will show their overall success or failure in improving maternal and newborn health more broadly. Key findings • Over the past decade, global and national policy frameworks, targets and plans relevant to preterm birth have been adopted, though significant funding gaps remain. •  Knowledge of ‘what works’ to prevent and delay preterm birth and to care for babies who are born preterm has improved and is reflected in updated World Health Organization technical guidelines. •  The world has flatlined on preterm birth prevention resulting in renewed urgency to learn from and fully leverage knowledge gained over the past decade to accelerate progress in the next decade. •  Overlapping and compounding challenges of climate change, conflict, pandemics and the cost-of-living crisis pose significant direct and indirect risks for pregnant women and preterm babies and must be mitigated. •  Addressing preterm birth is a key component of integrated maternal and newborn health across the continuum of care and along the life course, and a key marker of progress.

Each year an estimated 2.6 million newborns die, mainly from complications of prematurity, neonatal infections, and intrapartum events. Reducing these deaths requires high coverage of good quality care at birth, and inpatient care for small and sick newborns. In low- and middle-income countries, standardised measurement of the readiness of facilities to provide emergency obstetric care has improved tracking of readiness to provide care at birth in recent years. However, the focus has been mainly on obstetric care; service readiness for providing inpatient care of small and sick newborns is still not consistently measured or tracked. We reviewed existing international guidelines and resources to create a matrix of the structural characteristics (infrastructure, equipment, drugs, providers and guidelines) for service readiness to deliver a package of inpatient care interventions for small and sick newborns. To identify gaps in existing measurement systems, we reviewed three multi-country health facility survey tools (the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment, the Service Provision Assessment and the Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Assessment) against our service readiness matrix. For service readiness to provide inpatient care for small and sick newborns, our matrix detailed over 600 structural characteristics. Our review of the SPA, the SARA and the EmONC assessment tools identified several measurement omissions to capture information on key intervention areas, such as thermoregulation, feeding and respiratory support, treatment of specific complications (seizures, jaundice), and screening and follow up services, as well as specialised staff and service infrastructure. Our review delineates the required inputs to ensure readiness to provide inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Based on these findings, we detail where questions need to be added to existing tools and describe how measurement systems can be adapted to reflect small and sick newborns interventions. Such work can inform investments in health systems to end preventable newborn death and disability as part of the Action Plan.

The Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) are committed to achieve quality, equity and dignity for women, newborns and children as reflected in the four World Health Assembly Resolutions.1-4 These resolutions provide the foundation to reach the targets for maternal, newborn and child health and survival5 of the sustainable development goal on health, and universal health coverage. Although coverage of health services has increased, many women, newborns and children continue to die from poor care practices, even after reaching a health facility.6,7 Poor care practices are not limited to the medical aspects of care or resources needed to provide this care; research has demonstrated a disrespectful or neglectful treatment in the facilities that negatively impacts the care outcomes for women and newborns.8 Implementing an approach to improve quality of care at scale that is effective and sustainable is critical to further reduce mortality and improve health outcomes.9Recognizing the need for action, the national governments of Bangladesh, Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda and United Republic of Tanzania, together with WHO, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), implementation partners and other stakeholders, have established the Network for Improving Quality of Care for Maternal Newborn and Child Health care.10 The network has agreed to pursue the ambitious goals of halving maternal and newborn deaths and stillbirths and improving experience of care in participating health facilities within five years of implementation. Under the leadership of the participating countries' health ministries, the network will support the implementation of national frameworks for quality improvement by pursuing four strategic objectives: (i) leadership by building and strengthening national institutions and processes for improving quality of care; (ii) action by accelerating and sustaining implementation of quality-of-care improvement packages through operationalizing a standards-based approach to quality improvement; (iii) learning by promoting joint learning and generating evidence on quality planning, improvement and control of health services; and (iv) accountability by developing, strengthening and sustaining institutions and mechanisms for accountability of quality maternal, neonatal and child health services that are equitable and dignified.