Explore the vast range of titles available.

Neuroaxonal damage is the pathological substrate of permanent disability in various neurological disorders. Reliable quantification and longitudinal follow-up of such damage are important for assessing disease activity, monitoring treatment responses, facilitating treatment development and determining prognosis. The neurofilament proteins have promise in this context because their levels rise upon neuroaxonal damage not only in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but also in blood, and they indicate neuroaxonal injury independent of causal pathways. First-generation (immunoblot) and second-generation (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) neurofilament assays had limited sensitivity. Third-generation (electrochemiluminescence) and particularly fourth-generation (single-molecule array) assays enable the reliable measurement of neurofilaments throughout the range of concentrations found in blood samples. This technological advancement has paved the way to investigate neurofilaments in a range of neurological disorders. Here, we review what is known about the structure and function of neurofilaments, discuss analytical aspects and knowledge of age-dependent normal ranges of neurofilaments and provide a comprehensive overview of studies on neurofilament light chain as a marker of axonal injury in different neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, neurodegenerative dementia, stroke, traumatic brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson disease. We also consider work needed to explore the value of this axonal damage marker in managing neurological diseases in daily practice.

Patients with primary progressive MS who received the anti-CD20+ humanized antibody ocrelizumab were less likely to have clinical deterioration that was sustained for 12 weeks than those who received placebo. The drug was associated with decreased lesion activity on MRI. Primary progressive multiple sclerosis accounts for 10 to 15% of the overall population with multiple sclerosis. 1 The course of this disease differs from those of relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis in that progression consists mainly of gradual worsening of neurologic disability from symptom onset, although relapses may occur. 1 Phase 3 trials in primary progressive multiple sclerosis have been unsuccessful, 2 – 4 and no disease-modifying treatments have been approved. B cells contribute to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, including the primary progressive form. 5 Although the mechanisms of tissue injury in multiple sclerosis are uncertain, B cells may influence pathogenesis . . .

In two trials involving patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, the anti-CD20+ monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was associated with lower annualized relapse rates, lower risk of disability progression, and better MRI features than interferon beta-1a. Despite the availability of several disease-modifying treatments for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, patients often continue to have clinical and subclinical disease activity, and neurologic disability continues to accrue. Thus, there is a need for more effective treatments with acceptable safety profiles. 1 – 3 B cells are thought to influence the underlying pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis by means of antigen presentation, 4 autoantibody production, 5 , 6 cytokine regulation, 4 and the formation of ectopic lymphoid aggregates in the meninges, which possibly contribute to cortical demyelination and neurodegeneration. 7 , 8 Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets CD20, a cell-surface antigen that is expressed . . .

In this trial, daclizumab high-yield process (a monoclonal antibody that binds to CD25 and modulates interleukin-2 signaling) was more effective than interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Infection and rash were more common with daclizumab. Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha subunit (CD25) of the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor. 1 , 2 Daclizumab treatment prevents signaling through the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor and increases the availability of interleukin-2 to signal at its intermediate-affinity receptor. 1 , 2 The use of daclizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis was based initially on the hypothesis that it directly antagonizes activated CD25+ effector T cells, which have long been implicated as key mediators of the pathogenic effects of multiple sclerosis. 1 , 3 Notably, effector T-cell numbers and recall responses appear to be largely unaffected by daclizumab in vivo. 3 Other clinically important . . .

In this trial, teriflunomide reduced annualized relapse rates and disability progression over 108 weeks of treatment in patients with relapsing MS, although diarrhea, nausea, hair thinning, and abnormalities in alanine aminotransferase levels were reported. Teriflunomide, the active metabolite of leflunomide, is being investigated as a new oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. 1 Although the two drugs are related in structure, teriflunomide has a distinct profile. 2 It reversibly inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, a key mitochondrial enzyme involved in new pyrimidine synthesis for DNA replication. Consequently, the drug reduces T- and B-cell activation, proliferation, and function in response to autoantigens. However, teriflunomide preserves the replication and function of slowly dividing cells that use exogenous supplies of pyrimidine nucleotides through the so-called salvage pathway. 3 – 5 Teriflunomide has been shown to delay the onset of disease, . . .

In this placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, oral laquinimod administered once daily reduced the number of clinical relapses and slowed disability progression. Laquinimod is an oral quinoline-3-carboxamide small molecule selected for its efficacy and safety from a pool of 60 quinoline-3-carboxamide derivatives of the parent compound, roquinimex, a drug previously evaluated in phase 2 trials of treatment for multiple sclerosis but withdrawn because of safety concerns. 1 Preclinical studies have shown that laquinimod reduces inflammatory cell infiltrates in the central nervous system, decreases demyelination, and prevents axonal loss. 2 It is currently in clinical development for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. 3 – 7 A 36-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial showed a significant reduction in the primary end point, the cumulative number of gadolinium-enhancing . . .

Fatigue symptoms are reported by a majority of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Reliable assessment, however, is a demanding issue as the symptoms are experienced subjectively and as objective assessment strategies are missing. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a new tool, the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), for the assessment of MS-related cognitive and motor fatigue. A total of 309 MS patients and 147 healthy controls were included into the validation study. The FSMC was tested against several external criteria (e.g. cognition, motivation, personality and other fatigue scales). The item-analysis and validation procedure showed that the FSMC is highly sensitive and specific in detecting fatigued MS patients, that both subscales significantly differentiated between patients and controls (p < 0.01), and that internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha α > 0.91) as well as test—retest reliability (r > 0.80) were high. Cut-off values were determined to classify patients as mildly, moderately or severely fatigued. In conclusion, the FSMC is a new scale that has undergone validation based on a large sample of patients and that provides differential quantification and graduation of cognitive and motor fatigue.

Background Neurofilaments (Nf) are major structural proteins that occur exclusively in neurons. In spinal cord injury (SCI), the severity of disease is quantified by clinical measures that have limited sensitivity and reliability, and no blood-based biomarker has been established to further stratify the degree of injury. We aimed to examine a serum-based NfL immunoassay as predictor of the clinical outcome in SCI. Methods Longitudinal measurement of serum NfL was performed in patients with central cord syndrome (CCS, n=4), motor-incomplete SCI (iSCI, n=10), motor-complete SCI (cSCI, n=13) and healthy controls (HC, n=67), and correlated with clinical severity, neurological outcome, and neuroprotective effect of the drug minocycline. Results Baseline NfL levels were higher in iSCI (21 pg/mL) and cSCI (70 pg/mL) than in HC (5 pg/mL, p=0.006 and p<0.001) and CCS (6 pg/mL, p=0.025 and p=0.010). Levels increased over time (p<0.001) and remained higher in cSCI versus iSCI (p=0.011) and than in CCS (p<0.001). NfL levels correlated with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score at baseline (r=−0.53, p=0.004) and after 24 h (r=−0.69, p<0.001) and 3–12-month motor outcome (baseline NfL: r=−0.43, p=0.026 and 24 h NfL: r=−0.72, p<0.001). Minocycline treatment showed decreased NfL levels in the subgroup of cSCI patients. Conclusions Serum NfL concentrations in SCI patients show a close correlation with acute severity and neurological outcome. Our data provide evidence that serum NfL is of prognostic value in SCI patients for the first time. Further, blood NfL levels may qualify as drug response markers in SCI.

Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in patients with a first clinical episode suggestive of multiple sclerosis. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we enrolled patients aged 18–55 years with clinically isolated syndrome (defined as a neurological event consistent with demyelination, starting within 90 days of randomisation, and two or more T2-weighted MRI lesions ≥3 mm in diameter) from 112 centres (mostly hospitals) in 20 countries. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) in a double-blind manner (by an interactive voice response system) to once-daily oral teriflunomide 14 mg, teriflunomide 7 mg, or placebo, for up to 108 weeks. Patients, staff administering the interventions, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was time to relapse (a new neurological abnormality separated by ≥30 days from a preceding clinical event, present for ≥24 h in the absence of fever or known infection), which defined conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. The key secondary endpoint was time to relapse or new gadolinium-enhancing or T2 lesions on MRI, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was analysed for the modified intention-to-treat population; safety analyses included all randomised patients who were exposed to the study drug, as treated. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00622700. Between Feb 13, 2008, and Aug 22, 2012, 618 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to teriflunomide 14 mg (n=216), teriflunomide 7 mg (n=205), or placebo (n=197). Two patients in each of the teriflunomide groups did not receive the study drug, so the modified intention-to-treat population comprised 214 patients in the teriflunomide 14 mg group, 203 in the teriflunomide 7 mg group, and 197 in the placebo group. Compared with placebo, teriflunomide significantly reduced the risk of relapse defining clinically definite multiple sclerosis at the 14 mg dose (hazard ratio [HR] 0·574 [95% CI 0·379–0·869]; p=0·0087) and at the 7 mg dose (0·628 [0·416–0·949]; p=0·0271). Teriflunomide reduced the risk of relapse or a new MRI lesion compared with placebo at the 14 mg dose (HR 0·651 [95% CI 0·515–0·822]; p=0·0003) and at the 7 mg dose (0·686 [0·540–0·871]; p=0·0020). During the study, six patients who were randomly assigned to placebo accidently also received teriflunomide at some point: four received 7 mg and two received 14 mg. Therefore, the safety population comprised 216 patients on teriflunomide 14 mg, 207 on teriflunomide 7 mg, and 191 on placebo. Adverse events that occurred in at least 10% of patients in either teriflunomide group and with an incidence that was at least 2% higher than that with placebo were increased alanine aminotransferase (40 [19%] of 216 patients in the 14 mg group, 36 [17%] of 207 in the 7 mg group vs 27 [14%] of 191 in the placebo group), hair thinning (25 [12%] and 12 [6%] vs 15 [8%]), diarrhoea (23 [11%] and 28 [14%] vs 12 [6%]), paraesthesia (22 [10%] and 11 [5%] vs 10 [5%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (20 [9%] and 23 [11%] vs 14 [7%]). The most common serious adverse event was an increase in alanine aminotransferase (four [2%] and five [2%] vs three [2%]). TOPIC is to our knowledge the first study to report benefits of an available oral disease-modifying therapy in patients with early multiple sclerosis. These results extend the stages of multiple sclerosis in which teriflunomide shows a beneficial effect. Genzyme, a Sanofi company.

Background: Reduction in peripheral blood lymphocytes is an expected pharmacodynamic outcome of fingolimod therapy. Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate lymphocyte dynamics during and after fingolimod therapy and assess the relationship between lymphocyte counts and infections. Methods: Lymphocyte counts and their relationship with infections were evaluated in three multiple sclerosis (MS) populations: (Group A) FREEDOMS phase 3 core study group (n = 1272); (Group B) All Studies group (one phase 2 and two phase 3 studies, plus their extensions; n = 2315); and (Group C) Follow-up group (after fingolimod discontinuation; n = 538). Results: Administration of fingolimod 0.5 mg led to reductions in lymphocyte counts to a steady-state of 24%–30% of baseline values within two weeks, which remained stable while on therapy. Following fingolimod discontinuation, average counts exceeded the lower limit of normal range within six to eight weeks, and were 80% of baseline values by three months. In Group A, infection rates per patient-year were 1.4 with placebo and 1.0 in fingolimod-treated patients who had the lowest lymphocyte counts (< 0.2 × 109/l). No evidence was seen for an increase in serious or opportunistic infections. Conclusions: Fingolimod induces a rapid and reversible reduction in lymphocyte counts without an increase in infections relative to placebo. Because fingolimod reduces blood lymphocyte counts via redistribution in secondary lymphoid organs, peripheral blood lymphocyte counts cannot be utilized to evaluate the lymphocyte subset status of a patient.