Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the treatment patterns, medication adherence, concomitant corticosteroid use, factors influencing sequence of therapies (SOTs), healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and associated costs in adults with SLE in the USA.MethodsClaims data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Database between 2011 and 2019 were used to identify patients with incident SLE. The date of first claim with SLE was defined as the index date, with a 24-month pre-index and ≥24-month post-index period. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, adherence, HCRU and cost. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with transition between SOTs.ResultsOverall, 2476 patients received SLE treatment. The mean (SD) age was 46.9 (14.1) years and the mean (SD) follow-up duration was 47.8 (15.7) months. High corticosteroid use was prevalent in all SOTs (≥1 corticosteroid; average dose, 16.8–19.3 mg/day; 50%–60% patients). Antimalarials were most commonly prescribed in SOT 1 (85.7%), and immunosuppressants in SOT 2 and 3 (85.4% and 77.5%, respectively). Transition frequency from SOT 1–2 (38.4%) and SOT 2–3 (16.9%) was influenced by immunosuppressant prescription, concomitant corticosteroid use, sex, severe disease activity, non-persistence and age. Adherence was highest for biologics, followed by antimalarials and immunosuppressants. SLE-related HCRU and associated costs increased with SOT progression (mean (SD) at baseline vs SOT 3, US$19 489 (US$45 336) vs US$23 201 (US$39 628)).ConclusionSLE treatment regimens with greater adherence and reduced corticosteroid use, HCRU and associated costs are needed.

Objective It is unknown how the relationship between disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cardiovascular (CV) events may change over time. We examined the potentially time‐varying association of RA disease activity to CV events. Methods We used the CorEvitas prevalent RA registry. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score category, averaged within each 6‐month window since enrollment, was the exposure, and the outcome was major adverse CV events (MACEs). We used marginal structural models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR), comparing each CDAI score category with remission, allowing for differential association over time. We predicted MACE‐free survival under several CDAI score scenarios. Results We found 44,816 eligible patients (77% female; mean age 58 years) with a crude event rate of 5.3/1000 person‐years (median follow‐up 3.4 years). The strongest association between higher CDAI score and MACEs was observed during the first 6 months of enrollment (HR for CDAI score low 2.29 [95% CI: 1.21‐4.36], moderate 2.81 [95% CI: 1.46‐5.43], and high 2.99 [95% CI: 1.48‐6.02]). These estimates gradually diminished; by year 5, the HRs were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.49‐2.05) for low, 1.18 (95% CI: 0.51‐2.71) for moderate, and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.45‐2.40) for high CDAI score. Predicted MACE‐free survival suggested a potential decrease in MACEs with a hypothetical earlier transition to remission. Conclusion The association of higher disease activity with CV events may be stronger earlier in the disease course of RA. Interventional studies may be warranted to precisely determine the effect of disease activity suppression on CV events in RA.

SLE is a complex autoimmune disease with considerable unmet need. Numerous clinical trials designed to investigate novel therapies are actively enrolling patients straining limited resources and creating inefficiencies that increase enrolment challenges. This has motivated investigators developing novel drugs and treatment strategies to consider innovative trial designs that aim to improve the efficiency of generating evidence; these strategies propose conducting fewer trials, involving smaller numbers of patients, while maintaining scientific rigour in safety and efficacy data collection and analysis. In this review we present the design of two innovative phase IIb studies investigating efavaleukin alfa and rozibafusp alfa for the treatment of SLE which use an adaptive study design. This design was selected as a case study, investigating efavaleukin alfa, in the Food and Drug Administration’s Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Program. The adaptive design approach includes prospectively planned modifications at predefined interim timepoints. Interim assessments of futility allow for a trial to end early when the investigational therapy is unlikely to provide meaningful treatment benefits to patients, which can release eligible patients to participate in other—potentially more promising—trials, or seek alternative treatments. Response-adaptive randomisation allows randomisation ratios to change based on accumulating data, in favour of the more efficacious dose arm(s), while the study is ongoing. Throughout the trial the placebo arm allocation ratio is maintained constant. These design elements can improve the statistical power in the estimation of treatment effect and increase the amount of safety and efficacy data collected for the optimal dose(s). Furthermore, these trials can provide the required evidence to potentially serve as one of two confirmatory trials needed for regulatory approval. This can reduce the need for multiple phase III trials, the total patient requirements, person-exposure risk, and ultimately the time and cost of investigational drug development programmes.

IntroductionEtanercept, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and is administered via subcutaneous injection. Injection site pain (ISP) associated with subcutaneous administration may affect compliance or hinder initiation of prescribed medications. To improve the patient experience, a new phosphate-free formulation of etanercept was evaluated for reduced ISP associated with administration.MethodsThis phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study compared the prior formulation of etanercept to a phosphate-free formulation. Etanercept-naïve adults with RA or PsA indicated for treatment with etanercept were eligible. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive both etanercept formulations (50 mg) in one of two crossover sequences: prior formulation followed by phosphate-free formulation (sequence AB) or phosphate-free formulation followed by prior formulation (sequence BA) at visits 1 week apart. Patients self-reported ISP using a fit-for-purpose 100-mm visual analog scale within 30 s after injection. Safety outcomes included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Mixed-effects analysis of variance model was used to assess ISP, with treatment, study period, sequence, and disease indication as fixed-effect covariates and patient-within-sequence as random effect.ResultsA total of 111 patients enrolled (56 sequence AB; 55 sequence BA). Mean ISP score for prior formulation was 23.1 mm and for phosphate-free formulation was 19.1 mm (mean difference − 4 mm; 95% confidence interval: − 8.0, 0.0; P = 0.048). Patients with the highest ISP scores from the prior formulation (by quartile cut points) had the largest reduction in pain with phosphate-free formulation. Injection site reactions were few in number and similar between formulations; no new safety signals were observed.ConclusionsThe new phosphate-free formulation of etanercept had statistically significantly lower mean pain scores than the prior formulation, with largest pain reductions observed among patients who reported highest pain with the prior formulation.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02986139.FundingAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA USA.

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate maintenance of remission/low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved remission/LDA with etanercept (ETN) plus a conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) and to compare patients who discontinued csDMARD to receive ETN monotherapy (Mono) with those remaining on combination therapy (Combo). Methods Patients from the Corrona RA registry between October 1, 2001, and August 31, 2017, were eligible. The index date for the Mono cohort was the csDMARD discontinuation date; the index visit for the Combo cohort was estimated from time between ETN initiation and csDMARD discontinuation in the Mono cohort. The main outcome calculated was maintenance of remission/LDA. Patients were censored if they switched to or added a biologic DMARD, discontinued ETN, when a csDMARD was reintroduced (Mono), or if methotrexate increased more than 5 mg/d (Combo). Trimming was used to balance demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. Cox regression models were adjusted for the remaining differences across groups. Results We identified 182 Mono and 403 Combo patients; 120 Mono and 207 Combo patients remained after trimming. Most patients (approximately 80%) were biologic medication–naive before initiating ETN. At 24 months postindex, modeled percentages of patients remaining in remission/LDA were 75% for Mono and 86% for Combo (overall adjusted P = 0.057). More patients were censored for therapy change in Mono than in Combo groups (37% versus 5%), largely due to reintroduction of csDMARDs in the Mono group. Conclusion Many patients with RA who achieved remission/LDA on combination therapy maintained remission/LDA with ETN monotherapy for 2 years after csDMARD discontinuation. ETN monotherapy may be a viable option for patients who discontinue csDMARDs after achieving LDA/remission.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease of high unmet therapeutic need. The challenge of accurately measuring clinically meaningful responses to treatment has hindered progress towards positive outcomes in SLE trials, impeding the approval of potential new therapies. Current primary end points used in SLE trials are based on legacy disease activity measures that were neither specifically designed for the clinical trial context, nor developed according to contemporary recommendations for clinical outcome assessments (COAs), such as that substantial patient input should be incorporated into their design. The Treatment Response Measure for SLE (TRM-SLE) Taskforce is a global collaboration of SLE clinician–academics, patients and patient representatives, industry partners and regulatory experts, established to realize the goal of developing a new COA for SLE clinical trials. The aim of this project is a novel COA designed specifically to measure treatment effects that are clinically meaningful to patients and clinicians, and intended for implementation in a trial end point that supports regulatory approval of novel therapeutic agents in SLE. This Consensus Statement reports the first outcomes of the TRM-SLE project, including a structured process for TRM-SLE development.In this Consensus Statement, the Treatment Response Measure for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Consortium presents the initial outcomes of a project to develop a clinical outcome assessment that can contribute to the regulatory approval process for therapeutic agents via its incorporation in end points of clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) monotherapy may enhance adherence and decrease adverse events compared to combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); however, persistence with bDMARD monotherapy has not been extensively studied. We explore persistence of etanercept monotherapy and monotherapy with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) among patients first achieving remission/low disease activity (LDA) while on combination therapy with csDMARDs and a TNFi. Using Corrona registry data, the percentage of patients persistent with the index TNFi (etanercept versus other TNFis) over 6 and 12 months was determined. Factors influencing persistence and treatment patterns at 6 and 12 months were examined. Among 617 eligible patients, 56% of 182 patients on etanercept and 45% of 435 patients on other TNFis persisted with monotherapy at 6 months, 46% and 33%, respectively, at 12 months. Across first-line and subsequent biologic DMARDs, etanercept persistence was greater than other TNFi persistence by 10.8% (95% CI 2.1%, 19.6%) at 6 months and 11.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 21.9%) at 12 months. Patients on other TNFis were more likely to require reintroduction of csDMARD after 6 months (45% versus 35% for etanercept). Remission was the key predictor of persistence for both etanercept and other TNFi monotherapies. This retrospective, cohort study of registry data reflecting real-world practice indicates patients who achieve remission/LDA with combination csDMARD and TNFi therapy may successfully transition to TNFi monotherapy. Patients on etanercept monotherapy experienced greater persistence and less frequent reintroduction of a csDMARD than was observed for patients on other TNFi monotherapies.

Tophaceous gout is painful and impairs quality of life. The optimal modality for assessing tophus resolution in response to urate-lowering treatment remains poorly defined. Using pegloticase as a model system for resolving tophi, we compared multiple imaging and physical diagnostic strategies for assessing tophus resolution. A 32-year-old subject with chronic refractory tophaceous gout was enrolled and received 6 months of pegloticase treatment. Measurements of tophi using vernier calipers (monthly), photographs and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US; every 3 months), and dual-energy CT (DECT) were compared. Pegloticase persistently lowered the patient’s sUA to <0.5 mg/dl. After 6 months, caliper measurements revealed 73, 60, and 61% reductions of three index tophi, while MSK-US revealed 47, 65, and 48% reductions. In contrast, DECT revealed 100% resolution of monosodium urate deposition in all three index tophi, and resolution or improvement of all other tophi identified. On caliper and MSK-US measurement, index tophus size fluctuated, with some lesions enlarging before ultimately contracting. Correlation between assessment modalities during tophus resolution may be poor. DECT identifies urate deposits invisible to physical exam and reveals that some urate deposits completely resolve even as their physically/sonographically measurable lesions persist. Recognition of urate resorption during the urate-lowering process may be confounded by fluctuating lesion volumes during initial tophus breakdown. While DECT was superior for identifying total (including occult) urate deposition, and assessing volume of deposits, other modalities may permit better assessment of non-urate tophus components.

To describe current psoriatic arthritis treatment and costs by provider specialty using real-world claims data. Observational, retrospective cohort study of patients in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and supplemental Medicare databases. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis with 12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and post index date for their initial claim. Patients were assigned to 1 of 5 provider specialty cohorts. During the 1-year follow-up period, we collected psoriatic arthritis treatment agent and regimen type and total annual medical and health care costs. We used multivariate regression models to determine the conditional associations of provider specialty with costs. A total of 2132 patients with incident psoriatic arthritis qualified. Most providers were rheumatologists (n = 1365; 64%). Rheumatologists commonly prescribed oral small molecules (methotrexate, 56.3% of prescriptions; sulfasalazine, 8.6%; apremilast, 7.0%) as the index therapy, whereas 23.8% of prescriptions were for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, 14.2%; etanercept, 7.9%; and infliximab, 1.7%). Compared with other specialists, dermatologists prescribed biologics and other specialty drugs more frequently-adalimumab (32.7%), apremilast (14.3%), etanercept (11.6%), and ustekinumab (8.8%)-and methotrexate less frequently (30.6%). The greatest unadjusted median health care costs were observed among dermatologists ($45,548) compared with rheumatologists ($30,411), primary care physicians ($29,927), rheumatologists/dermatologists ($27,393), and other specialists ($27,774). However, after adjusting for patient-level factors, multivariate regression analyses found that provider specialty was not associated with higher health care costs. In patients with newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis, physician specialty was associated with different medication choices but not costs.

IntroductionThe magnitude and frequency of temporally related methotrexate (MTX)-associated side effects in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients are difficult to quantify using traditional research methods. As proof of concept designed in part to implement digital data collection for remote patient monitoring, we conducted a study implementing self-controlled case series analytic methods to understand MTX-related symptoms in RA or PsA.MethodsIn study phase 1, adults with RA or PsA from the ArthritisPower® Registry (past or current oral MTX users) participated in a cross-sectional survey. In phase 2, current MTX users participated in a longitudinal study and completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) 1-day nausea/vomiting and fatigue measure. Within-person change in PROMIS scores between risk (6–36 h post-dose) and control (96–144 h post-dose) windows were compared using mixed models.ResultsThe baseline survey was completed by 671 participants (mean age: 54 years, 88% female, 92% white, 79% with RA). Among current MTX users (353/671 [53%]), most reported MTX-associated side effects (216/353 [61%]), most frequently fatigue (161/353 [46%]). Among phase 2 participants with (n = 39) and without (n = 84) baseline nausea, mean increase in PROMIS nausea was 5.1 units (P < 0.0001) and 0.7 units (P = 0.135), respectively; among those with (n = 51) and without (n = 72) baseline fatigue, mean increase in PROMIS fatigue was 3.9 units (P = 0.0003) and 0.4 units (P = 0.554), respectively.ConclusionsDigital remote patient monitoring presents an opportunity to detect and address medication tolerability in real time. Using a novel study design to control for between-person confounding, the magnitude of nausea and fatigue experienced by participants with RA and PsA temporally related to weekly MTX use was substantial.