Explore the vast range of titles available.

Aurora kinase A (AURKA) has emerged as a drug target for glioblastoma (GBM). However, resistance to therapy remains a critical issue. By integration of transcriptome, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (CHIP-seq), Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq), proteomic and metabolite screening followed by carbon tracing and extracellular flux analyses we show that genetic and pharmacological AURKA inhibition elicits metabolic reprogramming mediated by inhibition of MYC targets and concomitant activation of Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha (PPARA) signaling. While glycolysis is suppressed by AURKA inhibition, we note an increase in the oxygen consumption rate fueled by enhanced fatty acid oxidation (FAO), which was accompanied by an increase of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1α). Combining AURKA inhibitors with inhibitors of FAO extends overall survival in orthotopic GBM PDX models. Taken together, these data suggest that simultaneous targeting of oxidative metabolism and AURKAi might be a potential novel therapy against recalcitrant malignancies. Glioblastoma patients are treated with Aurora kinase A (AURKA) inhibitors but resistance can occur. Here, the authors show that AURKA inhibition induces metabolic reprogramming, which leads to increased mitochondrial activity and inhibition of oxidative metabolism sensitizes glioblastoma cells to AURKA inhibition.

In recent years, the discovery of functional and communicative cellular tumour networks has led to a new understanding of malignant primary brain tumours. In this review, the authors shed light on the diverse nature of cell‐to‐cell connections in brain tumours and propose an innovative treatment approach to address the detrimental connectivity of these networks. The proposed therapeutic outlook revolves around three main strategies: (a) supramarginal resection removing a substantial portion of the communicating tumour cell front far beyond the gadolinium‐enhancing tumour mass, (b) morphological isolation at the single cell level disrupting structural cell‐to‐cell contacts facilitated by elongated cellular membrane protrusions known as tumour microtubes (TMs), and (c) functional isolation at the single cell level blocking TM‐mediated intercellular cytosolic exchange and inhibiting neuronal excitatory input into the malignant network. We draw an analogy between the proposed therapeutic outlook and the Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary, where inmates faced an impassable sea barrier and experienced both spatial and functional isolation within individual cells. Based on current translational efforts and ongoing clinical trials, we propose the Alcatraz‐Strategy as a promising framework to tackle the harmful effects of cellular brain tumour networks. This review introduces the ‘Alcatraz‐Strategy’ for malignant brain tumours, drawing parallels to Alcatraz's isolating barriers. By disrupting cellular tumour networks through supramarginal resection and targeted pharmacological therapy, it aims to decouple tumour cells, akin to the prison's spatial and functional inmate isolation. This approach offers a promising framework to counteract the malignant connectivity of brain tumour networks.

Liver‐X‐receptor (LXR) agonists are known to bear anti‐tumor activity. However, their efficacy is limited and additional insights regarding the underlying mechanism are necessary. By performing transcriptome analysis coupled with global polar metabolite screening, we show that LXR agonists, LXR623 and GW3965, enhance synergistically the anti‐proliferative effect of BH3 mimetics in solid tumor malignancies, which is predominantly mediated by cell death with features of apoptosis and is rescued by exogenous cholesterol. Extracellular flux analysis and carbon tracing experiments (U‐ 13 C‐glucose and U‐ 13 C‐glutamine) reveal that within 5 h, activation of LXRβ results in reprogramming of tumor cell metabolism, leading to suppression of mitochondrial respiration, a phenomenon not observed in normal human astrocytes. LXR activation elicits a suppression of respiratory complexes at the protein level by reducing their stability. In turn, energy starvation drives an integrated stress response (ISR) that up‐regulates pro‐apoptotic Noxa in an ATF4‐dependent manner. Cholesterol and nucleotides rescue from the ISR elicited by LXR agonists and from cell death induced by LXR agonists and BH3 mimetics. In conventional and patient‐derived xenograft models of colon carcinoma, melanoma, and glioblastoma, the combination treatment of ABT263 and LXR agonists reduces tumor sizes significantly stronger than single treatments. Therefore, the combination treatment of LXR agonists and BH3 mimetics might be a viable efficacious treatment approach for solid malignancies. Synopsis Liver‐X‐receptor agonists display limited anti‐tumor activity. The present study uncovers the synthetic lethality triggered by combining activation of liver‐X‐receptor and Bcl‐xL inhibition. Activation of LXR‐receptors resulted in suppression of gene‐sets related to mitochondrial translation, metabolism, transcription and regulators of intrinsic apoptosis associated, with an increase in cholesterol efflux signature. In the TCGA datasets, high levels of the LXR target ABCA1 correlated with low levels of group of genes related to mitochondrial transcription, translation and metabolism. Liver‐X‐receptors activation led to early reprogramming of oxidative energy metabolism, resulting in energy deprivation and solid tumor cells sensitization to glucose withdrawal. Suppression of the electron transport chain by LXRβ activation lowered the apoptotic threshold and sensitized solid tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of BH3‐mimetics. The combination treatment of ABT263 and LXR623 reduced tumor growth in patient‐derived xenograft model systems. Graphical Abstract Liver‐X‐receptor agonists display limited anti‐tumor activity. The present study uncovers the synthetic lethality triggered by combining activation of liver‐X‐receptor and Bcl‐xL inhibition.

Recurrence of glioblastoma (GBM) mostly occurs in close vicinity to the resection cavity. Therefore, our group has previously designed an implant to locally apply repetitive photodynamic therapy to mitigate tumor recurrence. The penetration depths of different wavelengths in brain tissue were exhaustively studied before. However, the PDT-induced biological effects of 5-ALA-based PDT against GBM cells at different depths have not been evaluated yet. Therefore, a synthetic brain substitute material of 1-10 mm thickness and with optical properties comparable to the white or gray matter of pig brain was developed. Tumor cell viability was assessed in spheroids from six GBM cell lines using disks of varying thickness prepared from pig brain substitute material to mimic in vivo radiation attenuation. Using an artificial brain tissue optical model based on material science, we have established a relationship between the PDT-induced effect of our PDT implant and the distance of migrating GBM cells from the resection cavity wall. This model may be helpful to aid optimization of the irradiation doses and fractionation required to attain the maximal therapeutic effect by long-term PDT applications.

The Warburg effect is a tumor-related phenomenon that could potentially be targeted therapeutically. Here, we showed that glioblastoma (GBM) cultures and patients' tumors harbored super-enhancers in several genes related to the Warburg effect. By conducting a transcriptome analysis followed by ChIP-Seq coupled with a comprehensive metabolite analysis in GBM models, we found that FDA-approved global (panobinostat, vorinostat) and selective (romidepsin) histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors elicited metabolic reprogramming in concert with disruption of several Warburg effect-related super-enhancers. Extracellular flux and carbon-tracing analyses revealed that HDAC inhibitors blunted glycolysis in a c-Myc-dependent manner and lowered ATP levels. This resulted in the engagement of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) driven by elevated fatty acid oxidation (FAO), rendering GBM cells dependent on these pathways. Mechanistically, interference with HDAC1/-2 elicited a suppression of c-Myc protein levels and a concomitant increase in 2 transcriptional drivers of oxidative metabolism, PGC1α and PPARD, suggesting an inverse relationship. Rescue and ChIP experiments indicated that c-Myc bound to the promoter regions of PGC1α and PPARD to counteract their upregulation driven by HDAC1/-2 inhibition. Finally, we demonstrated that combination treatment with HDAC and FAO inhibitors extended animal survival in patient-derived xenograft model systems in vivo more potently than single treatments in the absence of toxicity.

Cancer is a leading cause of death in both adults and children, but in terms of absolute numbers, pediatric cancer is a relatively rare disease. The rarity of pediatric cancer is consistent with our current understanding of how adult malignancies form, emphasizing the view of cancer as a genetic disease caused by the accumulation and selection of unrepaired mutations over time. However, considering those children who develop cancer merely as stochastically “unlucky” does not fully explain the underlying aetiology, which is distinct from that observed in adults. Here, we discuss the differences in cancer genetics, distribution, and microenvironment between adult and pediatric cancers and argue that pediatric tumours need to be seen as a distinct subset with their own distinct therapeutic challenges. While in adults, the benefit of any treatment should outweigh mostly short-term complications, potential long-term effects have a much stronger impact in children. In addition, clinical trials must cope with low participant numbers when evaluating novel treatment strategies, which need to address the specific requirements of children.

The alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) together with maximal safe bulk resection and focal radiotherapy comprises the standard treatment for glioblastoma (GB), a particularly aggressive and lethal primary brain tumor. GB affects 3.2 in 100,000 people who have an average survival time of around 14 months after presentation. Several key aspects make GB a difficult to treat disease, primarily including the high resistance of tumor cells to cell death-inducing substances or radiation and the combination of the highly invasive nature of the malignancy, i.e., treatment must affect the whole brain, and the protection from drugs of the tumor bulk—or at least of the invading cells—by the blood brain barrier (BBB). TMZ crosses the BBB, but—unlike classic chemotherapeutics—does not induce DNA damage or misalignment of segregating chromosomes directly. It has been described as a DNA alkylating agent, which leads to base mismatches that initiate futile DNA repair cycles; eventually, DNA strand breaks, which in turn induces cell death. However, while much is assumed about the function of TMZ and its mode of action, primary data are actually scarce and often contradictory. To improve GB treatment further, we need to fully understand what TMZ does to the tumor cells and their microenvironment. This is of particular importance, as novel therapeutic approaches are almost always clinically assessed in the presence of standard treatment, i.e., in the presence of TMZ. Therefore, potential pharmacological interactions between TMZ and novel drugs might occur with unforeseeable consequences.

Certain gliomas often harbor a mutation in the activity center of IDH1 (R132H), which leads to the production of the oncometabolite 2-R-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). In six model systems, including patient-derived stem cell-like glioblastoma cultures, inhibition of Bcl-xL induces significantly more apoptosis in IDH1-mutated cells than in wild-type IDH1 cells. Anaplastic astrocytoma samples with mutated IDH1 display lower levels of Mcl-1 than IDH1 wild-type tumors and specific knockdown of Mcl-1 broadly sensitizes glioblastoma cells to Bcl-xL inhibition-mediated apoptosis. Addition of 2-HG to glioblastoma cultures recapitulates the effects of the IDH mutation on intrinsic apoptosis, shuts down oxidative phosphorylation and reduces ATP levels in glioblastoma cells. 2-HG-mediated energy depletion activates AMPK (Threonine 172), blunting protein synthesis and mTOR signaling, culminating in a decline of Mcl-1. In an orthotopic glioblastoma xenograft model expressing mutated IDH1, Bcl-xL inhibition leads to long-term survival. These results demonstrate that IDH1-mutated gliomas are particularly vulnerable to Bcl-xL inhibition. Glioblastoma (GBM) cells are often characterized by the presence of the IDH1 R132H mutation and high expression of anti-apoptotic proteins. Here, the authors show that the inhibition of Bcl-xL is synthetically lethal in IDH1-mutated GBM models and that this effect is mediated by the oncometabolite, 2-HG, which reduces Mcl-1 protein levels.

Background Dysregulation of the metabolome is a hallmark of primary brain malignancies. In this work we examined whether metabolic reprogramming through a multi-targeting approach causes enhanced anti-cancer activity in glioblastoma. Methods Preclinical testing of a combined treatment with ONC201/TIC10 and 2-Deoxyglucose was performed in established and primary-cultured glioblastoma cells. Extracellular flux analysis was used to determine real-time effects on OXPHOS and glycolysis. Respiratory chain complexes were analysed by western blotting. Biological effects on tumour formation were tested on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). Results ONC201/TIC10 impairs mitochondrial respiration accompanied by an increase of glycolysis. When combined with 2-Deoxyglucose, ONC201/TIC10 induces a state of energy depletion as outlined by a significant decrease in ATP levels and a hypo-phosphorylative state. As a result, synergistic anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects were observed among a broad panel of different glioblastoma cells. In addition, this combinatorial approach significantly impaired tumour formation on the CAM. Conclusion Treatment with ONC201/TIC10 and 2-Deoxyglucose results in a dual metabolic reprogramming of glioblastoma cells resulting in a synergistic anti-neoplastic activity. Given, that both agents penetrate the blood–brain barrier and have been used in clinical trials with a good safety profile warrants further clinical evaluation of this therapeutic strategy.

Glioblastoma (GB) is a highly aggressive, difficult to treat brain tumour. Successful treatment, consisting of maximal safe tumour de-bulking, followed by radiotherapy and treatment with the alkylating agent Temozolomide (TMZ), can extend patient survival to approximately 15 months. Combination treatments based on the inhibition of the PI3K pathway, which is the most frequently activated signalling cascade in GB, have so far only shown limited therapeutic success. Here, we use the clinically approved MEK inhibitor Trametinib to investigate its potential use in managing GB. Trametinib has a strong anti-proliferative effect on established GB cell lines, stem cell-like cells and their differentiated progeny and while it does not enhance anti-proliferative and cell death-inducing properties of the standard treatment, i.e. exposure to radiation or TMZ, neither does MEK inhibition block their effectiveness. However, upon MEK inhibition some cell populations appear to favour cell-substrate interactions in a sprouting assay and become more invasive in the Chorioallantoic Membrane assay, which assesses cell penetration into an organic membrane. While this increased invasion can be modulated by additional inhibition of the PI3K signalling cascade, there is no apparent benefit of blocking MEK compared to targeting PI3K.