Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
4 result(s) for "Katzke, Anna-Lena"
Sort by:
HerediVar and HerediClassify: tools for streamlining genetic variant classification in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
Background Multiple different evidence types as well as gene-specific variant classification guidelines need to be considered during the classification of variants, making the process complex. Therefore, tools that support variant classification by experts are urgently needed. Methods We present HerediVar a web application and HerediClassify a variant classification algorithm. The performance of HerediClassify was validated and compared to other variant classification tools. HerediClassify implements 19/28 variant classification criteria by the American College of Medical Genetics and gene-specific recommendations for ATM , BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CDH1 , PALB2 , PTEN , and TP53 . Results HerediVar offers modular annotation services and allows for collaboration in the classification of variants. On the validation dataset, HerediClassify shows an average F1-Score of 93% across all criteria. HerediClassify outperforms other automated variant classification tools like vaRHC and Cancer SIGVAR. Conclusion In HerediVar and HerediClassify we present a powerful solution to support variant classification in HBOC. Through their modular design, HerediVar and HerediClassify are easily extendable to other use cases and human genetic diagnostics as a whole.
A predictive endocrine resistance index accurately stratifies luminal breast cancer treatment responders and nonresponders
BACKGROUNDEndocrine therapy (ET) with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AI) is highly effective against hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) early breast cancer (BC), but resistance remains a major challenge. The primary objectives of our study were to understand the underlying mechanisms of primary resistance and to identify potential biomarkers.METHODSWe selected more than 800 patients in 3 subcohorts (Discovery, n = 364, matched pairs; Validation 1, n = 270, Validation 2, n = 176) of the West German Study Group (WSG) ADAPT trial who underwent short-term preoperative TAM or AI treatment. Treatment response was assessed by immunohistochemical labeling of proliferating cells with Ki67 before and after ET. We performed comprehensive molecular profiling, including targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation analysis using EPIC arrays, on posttreatment tumor samples.RESULTSTP53 mutations were strongly associated with primary resistance to both TAM and AI. We identified distinct DNA methylation patterns in resistant tumors, suggesting alterations in key signaling pathways and tumor microenvironment composition. Based on these findings and patient age, we developed the Predictive Endocrine ResistanCe Index (PERCI). PERCI accurately stratified responders and nonresponders in both treatment groups in all 3 subcohorts and predicted progression-free survival in an external validation cohort and in the combined subcohorts.CONCLUSIONOur results highlight the potential of PERCI to guide personalized endocrine therapy and improve patient outcomes.TRIAL REGISTRATIONWSG-ADAPT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779206, retrospectively registered 01-25-2013.FUNDINGGerman Cancer Aid (Grant Number 70112954), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number 01ZZ1804C, DIFUTURE).
Limitations in next-generation sequencing-based genotyping of breast cancer polygenic risk score loci
Considering polygenic risk scores (PRSs) in individual risk prediction is increasingly implemented in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer (BC) based on next-generation sequencing (NGS). To calculate individual BC risks, the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) with the inclusion of the BCAC 313 or the BRIDGES 306 BC PRS is commonly used. The PRS calculation depends on accurately reproducing the variant allele frequencies (AFs) and, consequently, the distribution of PRS values anticipated by the algorithm. Here, the 324 loci of the BCAC 313 and the BRIDGES 306 BC PRS were examined in population-specific database gnomAD and in real-world data sets of five centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC), to determine whether these expected AFs can be reproduced by NGS-based genotyping. Four PRS loci were non-existent in gnomAD v3.1.2 non-Finnish Europeans, further 24 loci showed noticeably deviating AFs. In real-world data, between 11 and 23 loci were reported with noticeably deviating AFs, and were shown to have effects on final risk prediction. Deviations depended on the sequencing approach, variant caller and calling mode (forced versus unforced) employed. Therefore, this study demonstrates the necessity to apply quality assurance not only in terms of sequencing coverage but also observed AFs in a sufficiently large cohort, when implementing PRSs in a routine diagnostic setting. Furthermore, future PRS design should be guided by the technical reproducibility of expected AFs across commonly used genotyping methods, especially NGS, in addition to the observed effect sizes.
A predictive endocrine resistance index accurately stratifies luminal breast cancer treatment responders and non-responders
Endocrine therapy (ET) with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AI) is highly effective against hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer (BC), but resistance remains a major challenge. The primary objectives of our study were to understand the underlying mechanisms of primary resistance and to identify potential biomarkers.BACKGROUNDEndocrine therapy (ET) with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AI) is highly effective against hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer (BC), but resistance remains a major challenge. The primary objectives of our study were to understand the underlying mechanisms of primary resistance and to identify potential biomarkers.We selected >800 patients in three sub-cohorts (Discovery, N=364, matched pairs), Validation 1, N=270, Validation 2, N= 176) of the West German Study Group (WSG) Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy (ADAPT) trial who underwent short-term pre-operative TAM or AI treatment. Treatment response was assessed by immunohistochemical labeling of proliferating cells with Ki67 before and after ET. We performed comprehensive molecular profiling, including targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation analysis using EPIC arrays, on post-treatment tumor samples.METHODSWe selected >800 patients in three sub-cohorts (Discovery, N=364, matched pairs), Validation 1, N=270, Validation 2, N= 176) of the West German Study Group (WSG) Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy (ADAPT) trial who underwent short-term pre-operative TAM or AI treatment. Treatment response was assessed by immunohistochemical labeling of proliferating cells with Ki67 before and after ET. We performed comprehensive molecular profiling, including targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation analysis using EPIC arrays, on post-treatment tumor samples.TP53 mutations were strongly associated with primary resistance to both TAM and AI. In addition, we identified distinct DNA methylation patterns in resistant tumors, suggesting alterations in key signaling pathways and tumor microenvironment composition. Based on these findings and patient age, we developed the Predictive Endocrine ResistanCe Index (PERCI). PERCI accurately stratified responders and non-responders in both treatment groups in all three sub-cohorts and predicted progression-free survival in an external validation cohort and in the combined sub-cohorts.RESULTSTP53 mutations were strongly associated with primary resistance to both TAM and AI. In addition, we identified distinct DNA methylation patterns in resistant tumors, suggesting alterations in key signaling pathways and tumor microenvironment composition. Based on these findings and patient age, we developed the Predictive Endocrine ResistanCe Index (PERCI). PERCI accurately stratified responders and non-responders in both treatment groups in all three sub-cohorts and predicted progression-free survival in an external validation cohort and in the combined sub-cohorts.Our results highlight the potential of PERCI to guide personalized endocrine therapy and improve patient outcomes.CONCLUSIONOur results highlight the potential of PERCI to guide personalized endocrine therapy and improve patient outcomes.WSG-ADAPT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779206, Registered 2013-01-25, retrospectively registered.TRIAL REGISTRATIONWSG-ADAPT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779206, Registered 2013-01-25, retrospectively registered.