Explore the vast range of titles available.

Carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for clinical stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is used as an advanced medical treatment regimen in Japan. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy reportedly aids in achieving excellent treatment outcomes, despite its high medical cost. We aimed to compare CIRT with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in terms of cost‐effectiveness for treating clinical stage I NSCLC. Data of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with CIRT or SBRT at Gunma University between 2010 and 2015 were analyzed. The CIRT and SBRT groups included 62 and 27 patients, respectively. After propensity‐score matching, both groups comprised 15 patients. Life year (LY) was used as an indicator of outcome. The CIRT technical fee was 3 140 000 JPY. There was no technical fee for the second CIRT carried out on the same organ within 2 years. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental LY for 5 years after treatment. Sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of LY or costs of each group on ICER. The ICERs were 7 491 017 JPY/LY and 3 708 330 JPY/LY for all patients and matched patients, respectively. Hospitalization and examination costs were significantly higher in the CIRT group, and the impact of the CIRT technical costs was smaller than other costs and LY. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy is a cost‐effective treatment approach. However, our findings suggest that reducing excessive costs by considering the validity and necessity of examinations and hospitalizations would make CIRT a more cost‐effective approach. This single‐institutional retrospective study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compared with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for clinical stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the economic standpoint of cost‐effectiveness. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy for clinical stage I NSCLC is used as advanced medical treatment in Japan and entails expensive medical costs, although it achieves excellent treatment outcomes. The actual measurement‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis and sensitivity analysis showed that the impact of the CIRT technical costs was relatively smaller, and CIRT was a cost‐effective treatment.

Background Carbon ion Radiotherapy for prostate cancer is widely used, however reports are limited from single institute or short follow up. We performed a prospective observational study (GUNMA0702) to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. Methods Between June 2010 and August 2013, 304 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated, with a median follow-up duration of 60 months. All patients received carbon ion radiotherapy with 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over 4 weeks. Hormonal therapy was given according to the risk group. Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, Version 4.0 by the National Cancer Institute. Results The overall 5-year biochemical relapse-free rate was 92.7%, with rates of 91.7, 93.4, and 92.0% in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. The 5-year local control and overall survival rates were 98.4 and 96.6%, respectively. Acute grade 3 or greater toxicity was not observed. Late grade 2 and grade 3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity rates were 9 and 0.3%, and 0.3, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions The present protocol of carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer provided low genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity with good biochemical control within 5 years. Trial registration University Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry number: UMIN000003827 .

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon‐ion radiotherapy for non‐squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, 35 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The primary end‐point was the 3‐year local control rate, and the secondary end‐points included the 3‐year overall survival rate and adverse events. Acute and late adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The median follow‐up time for all patients was 39 months. Thirty‐two and three patients received 64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and 57.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions, respectively. Adenoid cystic carcinoma was dominant (60%). Four patients had local recurrence and five patients died. The 3‐year local control and overall survival rates were 93% and 88%, respectively. Acute grade 2–3 radiation mucositis (65%) and dermatitis (31%) was common, which improved immediately with conservative therapy. Late mucositis of grade 2, grade 3, and grade 4 were observed in 11, one, and no patients, respectively. There were no adverse events of grade 5. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy achieved excellent local control and overall survival rates for non‐squamous cell carcinoma. However, the late mucosal adverse events were not rare, and meticulous treatment planning is required. Trial registration no. UMIN000007886. Thirty‐five patients were prospectively enrolled to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon‐ion radiotherapy for non‐squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The present study showed excellent local control and OS for NSCC, with 3‐year local control and OS rates of 93% and 88%, respectively.

This observational study investigates the influence of interfractional motion on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage, planning target volume (PTV) margins, and rectum tissue sparing in carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT). It reports dose coverage to target structures and organs at risk in the presence of interfractional motion, investigates rectal tissue sparing, and provides recommendations for lowering the rate of toxicity. We also propose probabilistic DVH based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) table shifts from photon therapy for consideration in bone-matching CIRT treatment planning to represent probable dose to our CIRT patient population. At Gunma University Hospital intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT, aka IMRT) prostate cancer patients are positioned on a table which is shifted twice based on CBCT to align bones and then align prostate tissue to isocenter. These shifts thereby contain interfractional motion. A total of 1306 such table shifts from 85 patients were collected. Normal probability distributions were fit to the difference between bone-matching and prostate-matching CBCT-to-planning CT table shifts (i.e. interfractional motion). Between 2011 and 2016 CIRT prostate patients were treated with three beams to PTV1 (lateral-opposing and anterior) one per day for 9 fractions and two beams for a boost PTV2 (lateral-opposing) one per day for 7 fractions for a prescribed total of 57.6 Gy(RBE) as follows: PTV1 extends the prostate contour by 10/10, 5/10, 6/6 mm in the right/left, posterior/anterior, and superior/inferior directions, respectively, and the proximal seminal vesicles contour by 5 mm superiorly and inferiorly, 3 mm right and left. PTV2 reduces PTV1 posteriorly along a straight line to exclude the rectum and reduces the superior and inferior margins by 6 mm. Probable interfractional motion for 40 patients was simulated using each patient's own beam data as follows: The previously fit normal probability distributions were randomly sampled 2000 times per patient, and the five beams were shifted and summed with the same relative weighting as in the 16-fraction regimen. The resulting dose distribution was then scaled back down by 16/2000 to match the prescribed number of fractions. We then analyzed the resulting doses to contoured structures. Probable dose to rectum is substantially less than planned: For example, mean+-standard deviation D2% for planned and probable DVH is 51+-1.9 and 45+-2.4, respectively. Cumulative DVH show mean CTV fraction receiving a given probable dose is less than the mean fraction receiving the corresponding planned dose for doses larger than 52 Gy(RBE), up to 19% less at 57.4 Gy(RBE). Our PTV1 margins generally cover 95% of interfractional motion but seminal vesicles and inferior prostate receive less dose than planned due to insufficient PTV2 margins. Assuming rigidly shifting interfractional motion around the prostate region and neglecting minor changes in soft tissue stopping power, interfractional motion resulted in target underdosing but better tissue sparing in all cases. Given our low rates of relapse and recurrence, it appears less curative dose is needed than previously thought or else current planning target margins may be excessive: Planning target volumes should be reconsidered with the adoption of dose verification methods. Our probable dose distributions quantify expected dose for future dose verification studies.

The feasibility and efficacy of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (HS-RT) for prostate cancer (PC) with biochemical recurrence (BR) after prostatectomy, and the usefulness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics as a predictor of BR, were evaluated in 38 patients who received HS-RT without androgen deprivation therapy between May 2009 and January 2017. Their median age, PSA level and PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) at the start of HS-RT were 68 (53–74) years, 0.28 (0.20–0.79) ng/ml and 7.7 (2.3–38.5) months, respectively. A total dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions (three times a week) was three-dimensionally delivered to the prostate bed. After a median follow-up of 62 (30–100) months, 19 (50%) patients developed a second BR after HS-RT, but only 1 patient died before the last follow-up. The 5-year overall survival and BR-free survival rates were 97.1 and 47.4%, respectively. Late grade 2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary morbidities were observed in 0 and 5 (13%) patients, respectively. The PSA level as well as pathological T-stage and surgical margin status were regarded as significant predictive factors for a second BR by multivariate analysis. BR developed within 6 months after HS-RT in 11 (85%) of 13 patients with a PSA-DT < 10 months compared with 1 (17%) of 6 with a PSA-DT ≥ 10 months (median time to BR: 3 vs 14 months, P < 0.05). Despite the small number of patients, our HS-RT protocol seems feasible, and PSA kinetics may be useful for predicting the risk of BR and determining the appropriate follow-up schedule.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the precision of dose delivery to the target in adaptive carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) in cumulative dosimetry. Methods: Forty-six patients who received CIRT were included (64 Gy[relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 16 fractions) with treatment plan computed tomography (CT) and weekly CT scans. Offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) was administered if the dose distribution significantly worsened. Daily doses were calculated from weekly CTs and integrated into plan CT scans using deformable image registration. The dosimetry parameters were compared between the as-scheduled plan and adaptive replan in patients receiving ART. Survival outcomes and toxicity were compared between the ART and non-ART groups. Results: ART was implemented for 27 patients in whom adaptive replans significantly increased the median V98% of the clinical tumor volume from 96.5% to 98.1% and D98% from 60.5 to 62.7 Gy(RBE) compared with the as-scheduled plans (p < 0.001). The conformity and uniformity of the dose distribution improved (p < 0.001), with no significant differences in the doses to normal tissues (lungs, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord) from the as-scheduled plans (p > 0.05). The ART and non-ART groups demonstrated comparable local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (p > 0.05). No grade 3 or higher radiation-related toxicities were observed. Conclusions: ART enhanced target dose coverage while maintaining acceptable normal tissue exposure, supporting weekly CT monitoring integration during CIRT for the timely intervention for anatomical variations, ensuring precise dose delivery in LA-NSCLC.

Background/Aim: Radiotherapy for angiosarcoma of the scalp has not been standardised yet. Hence, we aimed to retrospectively analyse the outcomes of patients treated with electron beam therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for unresectable angiosarcoma of the scalp. Patients and Methods: Data from patients treated with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for unresectable angiosarcoma of the scalp between March 2009 and March 2021 were evaluated. Survival and local control rates were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare groups. Adverse events were analysed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 5.0. Results: Sixteen patients were eligible for the study. Eight patients were treated with electron beam therapy and eight patients with IMRT. The median follow-up period was 18.0 months. The median radiation dose was 57 Gy in 19 fractions in the electron beam therapy group and 70 Gy in 35 fractions in the IMRT group. In the IMRT group, acute non-haematologic toxicity was observed in two patients with grade 3 dermatitis. The one-year overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, and local control rate in the electron beam therapy group were 80.8%, 56.3%, and 77.4%, respectively, and the corresponding values in the IMRT group were 100%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. One-year local control was significantly better in the IMRT group compared to that in the electron beam therapy group (p=0.016). Conclusion: IMRT for angiosarcoma of the scalp may improve local control rates compared to electron beam therapy, but long-term follow-up studies are required to validate this finding.

Health care institutions provide prevention strategies for coronavirus disease 2019 and non-infectious disease care. We investigated the characteristics of patient contamination in a radiotherapy room by examining the trajectory and number of airborne particles in the air when talking and coughing occurred and clarified the actual state of contamination in this closed space. Aerosols were visualized and evaluated in the vertical height and head-to-tail width directions when the participant was lying on the radiotherapy tabletop. Aerosol reach was significantly greater for loud voice and coughing both at vertical height and the head-to-tail width direction. The size and number of particles around the radiotherapy tabletop were also visualized and evaluated in the radiotherapy room. The radiotherapy staff who were in the presence of the participant sometimes had many particles adhering to their facial area; particle adhesion to the staff was dominated by small size particles. Particle adherence to the irradiation device surface near the ceiling had particles larger than 1 mm. Tabletop particles tended to have a wider size range, including bigger sizes and a larger count compared to the surrounding floor. The 0.7-m radius distance from the participant's mouth tended to be highly contaminated, and the smaller the particle size, the farther it reached. The capacity to estimate areas prone to contamination can be used to predict infection of other patients and medical staff in a radiotherapy room.

Background The potential of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) as a curative treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) has garnered attention due to its characteristic dose distribution. We prospectively collected and analyzed over five years to investigate the outcomes of localized PCa treated with CIRT at our institution. Patients and methods The study included patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma. CIRT treatment was administered at a total dose of 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over four weeks. Uroflowmetry (UFM) and residual urine measurements were performed at various time points: before CIRT treatment, one month after starting CIRT, three months after treatment, and annually for five years starting from 1 year after the completion of CIRT. Prostate volume was measured using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Results A total of 304 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. UFM parameters were significantly worsened immediately after the treatment. However, they recovered to pretreatment levels after three months and remained stable until five years post-treatment. Notably, Average flow rate showed significant improvement after three years of treatment compared to before the treatment. Prostate volume decreased to 80% of baseline in patients treated with CIRT alone and to 60–70% of baseline in those receiving combined CIRT and either short- or long-term ADT. The logistic-binomial analysis identified post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR) as a significant factor for predicting adverse events in the acute phase. Conclusions Following CIRT treatment, the voiding parameters in PCa patients significantly deteriorated immediately. However, after three months, they returned to their pre-treatment levels and remained stable for five years.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide despite advances in treatment. In the past few decades, radiotherapy has achieved outstanding technical advances and is being widely used as a definitive, prophylactic, or palliative treatment of patients with lung cancer. The anti-tumor effects of radiotherapy are considered to result in DNA damage in cancer cells. Moreover, recent evidence has demonstrated another advantage of radiotherapy: the induction of anti-tumor immune responses, which play an essential role in cancer control. In contrast, radiotherapy induces an immunosuppressive response. These conflicting reactions after radiotherapy suggest that maximizing immune response to radiotherapy by combining immunotherapy has potential to achieve more effective anti-tumor response than using each alone. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and their inhibitors, have attracted significant attention for overcoming the immunosuppressive conditions in patients with cancer. Therefore, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy is promising. Emerging preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the rationale for these combination strategies. In this review, we outlined evidence suggesting that combination of radiotherapy, including particle therapy using protons and carbon ions, with immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment could be a promising treatment strategy.