Explore the vast range of titles available.

The decision as to whether or not a patient should receive radiation therapy as part of their cancer treatment is based on evidence‐based practice and on recommended international consensus treatment guidelines. However, the merit of involving the patients' individual preferences and values in the treatment decision is frequently overlooked. Here, we review the current literature pertaining to shared decision‐making (SDM) in the field of radiation oncology, including discussion of the patient's perception of radiation therapy as a treatment option and patient involvement in clinical trials. The merit of decision aids during the SDM process in radiation oncology is considered, as are patient preferences for active or passive involvement in decisions about their treatment. Clarity of terminology, a better understanding of effective strategies and increased resources will be needed to ensure SDM in radiation oncology becomes a reality. Radiation therapy is a form of cancer treatment recommended for approximately half of all cancer patients. The patient as a decision‐maker in radiation therapy is frequently overlooked. This review explores the patient perception of radiation therapy as a treatment option and the evidence for using aids in assisting patients to make a decision about their cancer care.

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the biphasic 2-deoxy-2-[18 F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18 F]FDG PET/CT) examinations in terms of distinguishing benign and malignant lesions within the pharynx. 139 patients underwent sequential biphasic [18 F]FDG PET/CT examinations at 60 and 90 minutes (min) post intravenous injection (p.i.) of the [18 F]FDG. We evaluated the metabolic activity of 93 malignant lesions and 59 benign findings within pharynx as well as 70 normal blood vessels. We evaluated the maximal and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean) and the retention index (RI-SUVmax). We used the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to obtain the prognostic metabolic indices cut-off which may differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. The SUVmax value cut-off at 60 and 90 min p.i. differentiating between normal and abnormal metabolic activity in the pharynx was 1.9 and 2.0, respectively. When compared benign and malignant lesions, the SUVmax on initial and delayed scans were 3.1 and 3.6, respectively. In this material, the increase of the SUVmax value over time of 1.7% suggested abnormality, while RI-SUVmax of 5.7% indicated malignant etiology. The biphasic [18 F]FDG PET/CT study protocol is useful in better stratification of normal and abnormal glucose metabolism activity in the pharynx.

No clear criteria have yet been established to guide decision-making for patient selection and the optimal timing of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) based on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We have developed a novel protocol—the Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy (B-ART) protocol—to guide patient selection for ART. The aim of the present study is to describe this protocol, to evaluate its validity in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, and to identify the anatomical and clinical predictors of the need for replanning. We retrospectively evaluated 82 patients with HN cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy (HT) and subsequently required replanning due to soft tissue changes upon daily MVCT. Under the proposed criteria, patients with anatomical changes >3 mm on three to four consecutive scans are candidates for ART. We compared the volumes on the initial CT scan (iCT) and the replanning CT (rCT) scan for the clinical target volumes (CTV1, referring to primary tumor or tumor bed and CTV2, metastatic lymph nodes) and for the parotid glands (PG) and body contour (B-body). The patients were stratified by primary tumor localization, clinical stage, and treatment scheme. The main reasons for replanning were: (1) a planning target volume (PTV) outside the body contour (n = 70; 85.4%), (2) PG shrinkage (n = 69; 84.1%), (3) B-body deviations (n = 69; 84.1%), and (4) setup deviations (n = 40; 48.8%). The replanning decision was made, on average, during the fourth week of treatment (n = 47; 57.3%). The mean reductions in the size of the right and left PG volumes were 6.31 cc (20.9%) and 5.98 cc (20.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). The reduction in PG volume was ≥30% in 30 patients (36.6%). The volume reduction in all of the anatomical structures was statistically significant. Four variables—advanced stage disease (T3–T4), chemoradiation, increased weight loss, and oropharyngeal localization—were significantly associated with the need for ART. The B-ART protocol provides clear criteria to eliminate random errors, and to allow for an early response to relevant changes in target volumes.

Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) contributes to oropharyngeal cancers through mechanisms involving the deregulation of host cell functions by oncoproteins E6 and E7. Changes in the epigenome, particularly involving long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are crucial for understanding HPV-related carcinogenesis. Methods: This study aimed to analyze the expression levels of lncRNAs in HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to determine their biological and clinical significance, addressing the current gap in clinically validated biomarkers for early screening and therapeutic interventions. Results: The study highlights the significant overexpression of the EGOT gene in HPV-positive HNSCC samples, suggesting its potential as a marker to distinguish between HPV-negative and HPV-positive cases. Furthermore, high EGOT expression correlates with better overall survival (OS) and indicates possible resistance to therapy, making it a valuable prognostic factor. Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential of incorporating EGOT expression analysis in clinical practice for improved patient stratification and treatment outcomes in HNSCC.

Long-non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as important regulators in the epigenetic control of cellular phenotypes. Among them, the eosinophil granule ontogeny transcript ( ) has attracted attention, as changes in its expression levels are correlated with pathological conditions, including tumorigenesis and viral infections. Despite many studies, the biological role and diagnostic utility of remain unclear. was analyzed based on the TCGA, including pathological and clinical features, cellular pathways, and genomic and cellular changes. We observed an association of higher expression with better survival in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), as well as worse patient survival for liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC). Expression levels of differ in the case of HNSC, KIRC, and LIHC. Critical cellular pathways and processes vary depending on the . Moreover, immune profile, cancer subtypes, and differences in the proliferation, wound healing ability, stromal fraction, and intratumor heterogeneity were observed in relation to these lncRNA levels, with the most pronounced differences seen mostly for BRCA and KIRC. seems to be a potential prognostic biomarker in clinical use. Possible factors that connect all of the analyzed types of cancers and changes in expression are viral activity and immunological response to viral infection.

Background Oropharyngeal carcinomas are characterized by an increasing incidence and a relatively good prognosis. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients develops metachronous distant metastases; identification of these patients is an urgent medical need. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter evaluation of 431 patients. All patients underwent [ 18 F]-FDG positron emission tomography (PET). The cohort was split into an explorative group ( n  = 366) and a validation group ( n  = 65). Lesions were manually delineated in the explorative group and automatically delineated by a convolutional neuronal network (CNN) in the validation group. Quantitative PET parameters standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated for primary tumors ( prim ) and tumor plus lymphnodes ( all ). Association of parameters with freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) and overall survival (OS) was tested by cox regression analyses. Results In the explorative group, univariate analyses revealed an association of metric MTV prim ( p  = 0.022), MTV all ( p  < 0.001) and TLG all ( p  < 0.001) with FFDM, binarized parameters were also associated with FFDM ( p  < 0.001 and p  = 0.002). Bootstrap analyses revealed a significantly better association of TLG all compared to TLG prim with FFDM ( p  = 0.02). MTV all and TLG all remained significantly associated with FFDM upon multivariate testing ( p  = 0.002, p  = 0.031, respectively). In the validation group, the cutoff value for TLG all but not for TLG prim was significantly associated with FFDM (HR = 3.1, p  = 0.045). Additional analyses with manually delineated contours of the validation cohort revealed a similar effect (HR = 3.47, p  = 0.026). No considerable differences between HPV positive and negative disease were observed. Conclusions TLG all is a promising biomarker to select OPC patients with high risk for metachronous distant metastases.

Background The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in γ-H2AX expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) according to severity of radiation-induced mucositis. Patients and method Fifty patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation were included in the study. Blood samples were collected before treatment to measure baseline γ-H2AX levels. Second sample was taken 45 minutes after the first RT fraction and then once a week, 45 min after irradiation. In patients treated with chemoradiation the blood sample was taken the day after chemotherapy. Mucositis was evaluated once a week and reported according to CTCAE v4 and RTOG/EORTC scales. PBL were analyzed with flow cytometry and level of H2AX phosphorylation at every time point was evaluated. Results In 35 patients mild to moderate (grade 1-2) mucositis was observed and 15 patients developed severe (grade 3) mucositis. No cases of grade 4 mucositis were observed. The difference in baseline levels of γ-H2AX between groups with mild and severe mucositis was statistically insignificant (p = 0.25). The statistically significant difference in γ-H2AX level was observed in week 7 of treatment (p = 0.01). No significant differences in γ-H2AX level were found neither between group treated with concomitant chemoradiation or RT alone neither between groups with and without common comorbidities. In the analysis of the kinetics of γ-H2AX during treatment, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0088) between groups with mild and severe mucositis was observed. After fourth week of treatment levels of γ-H2AX decreased significantly in the group with severe mucositis and increased in patients with mild side effects. The observed difference was not caused by the decrease in peripheral lymphocyte count, which was similar in both groups. Conclusions Presented results indicate that severity of radiation-induced mucositis does not correlate directly with γ-H2AX levels measured in vivo in PBL. Prediction of mucositis grade based on γ-H2AX level is not yet possible, either before treatment or early during treatment, but preliminary results, indicating significant differences in γ-H2AX kinetics between groups, encourage further studies.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a treatment method commonly used in oncology. A vast majority of patients undergoing RT suffer from radiation-induced skin injury (RISI), which results from complex biochemical reactions in the irradiated skin. Current strategies for preventing and managing RISI are insufficient for achieving full skin regeneration. Multiple studies have shown that alterations in the skin microbiome correlate with the development and severity of RISI. These studies suggest that dysbiosis is a crucial factor in promoting radiation-associated dermatitis. Targeting the skin microbiota presents a potential therapeutic approach that could significantly improve the quality of life for patients undergoing RT. This review aims to present current findings on the interplay between the skin microbiome and radiation-induced skin damage as well as to discuss potential therapeutic strategies for preventing and mitigating this condition.

Acute radiation-induced skin injury (aRISI) is one of the most frequent adverse effects of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and may compromise treatment delivery and quality of life. Topical glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are commonly used in clinical practice for aRISI management; however, evidence supporting their proactive use remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proactive topical GCS therapy during RT for HNC. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception to July 2025 in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing topical GCS with placebo or standard skin care in adult patients undergoing curative RT or RChT for HNC were included. The primary outcomes were incidence of clinically significant aRISI (grade ≥ 2) and severe aRISI (grade ≥ 3), assessed using validated grading systems (RTOG or CTCAE). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Three randomized controlled trials comprising 459 patients were included. Proactive topical GCS did not significantly reduce the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 2 aRISI compared with placebo or standard skin care (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.60-1.27). Similarly, no statistically significant reduction in grade ≥ 3 aRISI was observed in pooled analysis (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.22-3.06). Qualitative synthesis of secondary outcomes reported in individual trials suggested potential benefits of topical GCS, including delayed onset or slower progression of aRISI, and, in one large double-blind study, a reduced risk of severe reactions. No increase in treatment-related adverse events was observed in any included trial. Proactive topical GCS do not significantly reduce the overall incidence of aRISI in pooled analysis. Individual studies showed trend towards delayed onset, slower progression, and reduced severe aRISI without compromising safety. These findings support the judicious use of topical GCS as part of proactive supportive care in HNC RT, while highlighting the need for larger, standardized trials to define optimal regimens and patient selection.