Explore the vast range of titles available.

Leadership is a valuable skill that can be taught in school, and which may have benefits within and beyond the classroom. Learning to Lead (L2L) is a student-led, primary school-based leadership program whereby older 'peer leaders' deliver a fundamental movement skills (FMS) program to younger 'peers' within their own school. The aims of the study are to determine the efficacy of a peer-led FMS intervention on: (i) peer leaders' (aged 10 to 12 years) leadership effectiveness (primary outcome), leadership self-efficacy, well-being, and time on-task in the classroom; (ii) peers' (aged 8 to 10 years) physical activity levels, actual and perceived FMS competency, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular power, and executive functioning; and (iii) teachers' (referred to as 'school champions') work-related stress and well-being. L2L will be evaluated using a two-arm parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial. Twenty schools located within a two-hour drive of the University of Newcastle, Australia will be recruited. We will recruit 80 students (40 peer leaders and 40 peers) from each school (N = 1,600). L2L will be implemented in three phases: Phase 1 -school champions' training via a professional learning workshop; Phase 2 -school champions' delivery of leadership lessons to the peer leaders; and Phase 3 -peer leaders' delivery of the FMS program to their younger peers. The FMS program, consisting of 12 x 30-minute lessons, will be delivered over the course of one school term (10 weeks). Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline (between mid-March to June, Terms 1 and 2), intervention end (mid-August to September, Term 3), and follow-up (November to mid-December, Term 4. This trial was prospectively registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR); registration number: ACTRN12621000376842.

Purpose To test the effects of a physical activity intervention program on symptoms of mental disorders among adolescents. Methods This study is a 12-week cluster randomized controlled trial. The sample consisted of 306 adolescents (45,8% male, age: 13,6 [0,72] years; 54.2% female, age: 13.5 [0.69] years), randomized into an intervention group ( N  = 165) and a control group ( N  = 141). The physical activity program involved sessions including muscle strengthening and cardiorespiratory exercises and lifestyle guidance. The mental health indicators analyzed were: anxiety, depression, sleep, and psychological well-being. Intervention effects were analyzed by generalized estimating equations. Results After 12 weeks, no significant improvements were observed in the intervention group for sleep; anxiety; depression, and psychological well-being. In the subgroup analysis, significant group×time interactions were observed for adolescents who were classified with moderate symptoms of depression (mean difference: -0.97, p  = 0.002) and anxiety (mean difference: -3.03, p  = 0.01) with favorable effects for intervention group. Conclusion After the 12-week intervention period, it can be concluded that 12 weeks of school-based physical activity intervention significantly reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression in adolescents with moderate/severe symptoms. Furthermore, the intervention contributed to the maintenance of psychological well-being, since the control group showed a significant reduction in this mental health indicator.

This trial aims to investigate the effects of the ActTeens physical activity program, on adolescents’ physical activity level, health-related fitness, cardiometabolic and mental health. The trial will aim to recruit ~140 adolescents (aged 13–14 years). Participants will be randomized into either intervention or control groups. The intervention will be guided by social cognitive theory and self-determination theory and implemented over one school term (24-weeks). The ActTeens Program will include: (1) structured physical activity sessions delivered within physical education, including movement-based games and dynamic stretching warm-ups; resistance training skill development; high-intensity training workouts; and cool-downs; (2) self-monitoring plus goal setting for physical activity by pedometer-smart wearable; and (3) healthy lifestyle guidance (social support) by WhatsApp® messages about healthy eating and regular physical activity for the intervention and parents groups. Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 24-weeks from baseline, and 12-months from baseline. Physical activity (accelerometer) is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiometabolic profile, and mental health. A process evaluation will be conducted (i.e., recruitment, retention, attendance, and program satisfaction). This project will have the potential to address many questions and debates regarding the implementation of physical activity interventions in low-and- middle-income countries. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070377 . Registered on 7 October 2021.

Background Physical activity guidelines recommend young people engage in regular muscle-strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training [RT]). However, few school-based physical activity interventions have been delivered at-scale or promoted RT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens ( RT for Teens ) program. Methods Data were collected between August 2015 and October 2020. RE-AIM was operationalized as: (i) Reach : number and characteristics of students estimated to be exposed to the program; (ii) Effectiveness: impact of the program on student-level outcomes measured in a subsample of 750 students from 17 schools; (iii) Adoption: number and representativeness of schools with one or more teachers trained to deliver the program; (iv) Implementation: extent to which the program was delivered as intended; and (v) Maintenance: extent to which the program was sustained in schools. Results The estimated program reach was ~ 10,000 students, out of a total student population of ~ 200,000 (~ 5%). Students were from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Improvements in muscular fitness, RT self-efficacy, perceived cardiorespiratory fitness and flexibility, and participation in muscle-strengthening physical activities were documented. A total of 30 workshops were delivered, involving 468 teachers from 249 schools from diverse geographical regions. Implementation varied considerably, with teachers adapting the program to suit the context of their school and student cohorts. However, RT skill development and the promotion of muscular fitness were the session components delivered most during sessions. Teachers’ adherence to the SAAFE (Supportive, Active, Autonomous, Fair and Enjoyable) teaching principles was high. Approximately 30% of teachers (144/476) registered to use the RT for Teens app. At the school-level, 37% (93/249) of schools had at least one registered user (teacher and/or student). A total of 2,336 workouts and 3,116 fitness tests were completed by registered users. Of the 249 schools represented, 51 (20.5%) sent an additional (previously untrained) teacher to a second workshop. Conclusions The RT for Teens program had broad reach and adoption. However, intervention delivery varied considerably across schools and additional support strategies are required to optimize intervention implementation and maintain program delivery over time. Future studies will benefit from the utilization of accepted frameworks, recommendations and guidelines for implementation research. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000352808), retrospectively registered 1 st February 2021.

Background Youth with disability are less physically active and more likely to have chronic health conditions than their peers without disability. The aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of a scalable school-based physical activity intervention for youth with disability on functional capacity and a range of secondary outcomes. Methods We conducted a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial involving adolescents aged 15–19 years with diagnosed disabilities ( N  = 255) from 28 secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomized to the Burn 2 Learn adapted (B2La) intervention, or a wait-list control. The B2La intervention included foundational resistance exercises (e.g., push-ups, bodyweight squats), aerobic exercises (e.g., shuttle runs), and sport skills (e.g., catching, kicking), delivered as classroom activity breaks 2–3 times per week by trained special education teachers. The primary outcome was functional capacity assessed using the 6-min walk or push test. Secondary outcomes were muscular fitness, body mass index, physical activity (accelerometers), resistance training motor competence, motivation for physical activity, high-intensity interval training self-efficacy, quality of life, and externalizing behaviors. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 6-months (primary endpoint), and 9-months (follow-up). Results At 6-months, the intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement in functional capacity, with a group-by-time effect of 20.3 m (95% CI, 3.1–37.1). At 9-months, the effect was 17.8 m (95% CI, 0.0–35.6). The intervention had a small effect on muscular fitness, resistance training motor competence, and high-intensity interval training self-efficacy. No effects were observed for the other outcomes and no adverse events were recorded. Conclusions Physical activity breaks delivered by special education teachers during the school day improved functional capacity and a range of secondary outcomes in youth with disability. Activity breaks may need to be longer, more frequent, or more intense to achieve clinically important health effects. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12621000884808; prospectively registered 15th November, 2021.

The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantitatively synthesise the effects of school-based peer-led interventions on leaders’ academic, psychosocial, behavioural, and physical outcomes. Eligible studies were those that: (i) evaluated a school-based peer-led intervention using an experimental or quasi-experimental study design, (ii) included an age-matched control or comparison group, and (iii) evaluated the impact of the intervention on one or more leader outcomes. Medline, Sportdiscus, Psychinfo, Embase, and Scopus online databases were searched on the 24th of October, 2022 which yielded 13,572 results, with 31 included in the narrative synthesis and 12 in the meta-analysis. We found large positive effects for leaders’ attitudes toward bullying (d = 1.02), small-to-medium positive effects for leaders’ literacy (d = 0.39), and small positive effects for leaders’ self-esteem (d = 0.18). There were mixed findings for behavioural outcomes and null effects for physical outcomes. Notable limitations of this research are the inclusion of a relatively small number of studies, and high heterogeneity in those included. Our findings have the potential to inform educational practice, but also highlight the need for further research examining the mechanisms that might account for the observed effects. Our systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273129).

Background The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the ActTeens Program on physical activity and health-related physical fitness among adolescents in Brazil. Methods The “ActTeens Program” was conducted using a cluster-randomized controlled trial during 24-week school term. The sample consisted of 317 adolescents (52.7% girls; 13.61 ± 0.70 years) from four secondary schools that were randomly assigned to intervention group ( N  = 169) or control group ( N  = 148). This school-based physical activity (PA) intervention involved two components: (i) structured physical activity sessions delivered within physical education (PE) and (ii) healthy lifestyle guidance (mHealth). The primary outcome was PA assessed using Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A); secondary outcomes included muscular (MF) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) assessed using 90-push-up, handgrip dynamometer, standing long jump, and 20 m PACER shuttle run test. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12- and 24-week. Intervention effects were assessed using linear mixed models (LMM). Results For the primary outcome (PA), no significant group-by-time effects were observed for physical education based-PA (0.3 score; 95%CI: -0.1; 0.6; and − 0.01 score; 95%CI: -0.03; 0.03, at 12-wk and 24-wk respectively) and total PA (-0.02 score; 95%CI: -0.2; 0.2; and − 0.01score; 95%CI: -0.2; 0.2, at 12 and 24 weeks respectively). After 24 weeks, we observed a significant group by time effects for lower body muscular fitness (12.9 cm; 95%CI, 3.2 to 22.2). Conclusion The implementation of aerobic and muscle-strengthening exercises used in the ActTeens intervention did not lead to improvements in physical activity. The intervention resulted in improved lower body muscular fitness, however, we found no significant differences for upper body muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness.

Background Muscle-strengthening activity (MSA) is beneficial for school-aged children, but most school-based MSA interventions have been delivered by external specialists or research staff, limiting scalability. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a teacher-delivered MSA intervention for children in advance of a future efficacy trial. Methods We conducted a single-group feasibility trial with two Stage 2 (i.e. grade 3–4) classes from one primary school in New South Wales, Australia. The 6-week Muscle Movers intervention included (i) enhanced PE lessons focused on foundational MSA skills (1 × 45 min/week), (ii) classroom energiser breaks (2 × 5 min/week), and (iii) active homework tasks (1 × 10 min/week). We assessed acceptability, implementation, adaptation, and practicality using survey and interview methods. We also assessed pre–post change in children’s perceived strength, upper-body muscular endurance, and lower-body muscular power. Data were analysed in SPSS (V.25) using descriptive statistics and paired-samples t -tests, with Cohen’s d as a measure of effect size. Results Two female teachers (31 and 59 years) and 30 students (mean [SD] = 9.8 [0.6] years; 40% female) were enrolled. Acceptability was high for teachers (mean [SD] = 5.0 [0.0] out of 5) and students (mean [SD] = 4.1 [1.0] out of 5). Teachers implemented all PE lessons and more than double the intended energiser breaks (mean [SD] = 5.5 [2.1] per week). Conversely, homework task assignment (mean [SD] = 5.0 [1.4]) and completion (mean [SD] = 2.5 [0.7]) were lower than intended. Teachers reported high confidence to deliver the program and viewed it as practical and adaptable. We found a moderate increase in children’s push-up performance (mean [95%CI] = 2.2 repetitions [0.7 to 3.8]; d = 0.61), but no meaningful changes in perceived strength (mean [95%CI] = 0.1 units [- 0.1 to 0.4]; d = 0.22) or standing long jump (mean [95%CI] = - 1.4 cm [- 7.4 to 4.7]; d = - 0.09). Conclusions Muscle Movers was feasible for classroom teachers to implement in a primary school setting. The observed improvement in students’ upper-body muscular endurance should be confirmed using an appropriately powered randomised controlled trial. Trial registration Retrospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625000703404).